Thank you all for your suggestions.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-m
I agree with Gil that by far the most important effect of a usermod based
on an IBM-supplied element to force a 'modid error' in case the original
element is ever hit by a PTF. There may be multiple ways to get the user
element installed as desired in a single step. Whatever. Here's an example
of h
At 18:20 -0500 on 07/02/2009, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re:
ERASEDATA - DASD disposal:
The cited article and its followups point out that it's
a greater concern to erase all temporary copies of the
file (how often do you S(ave) during an E(dit) session?)
This issue is handled by doing an "Er
2009/7/2 Adams, Tracy :
>
> While I am cleaning out my DR room... I also have an IBM 7060 H30, $1
> plus shipping and packaging. Please respond to me directly.
One in Florida sold on eBay just recently for US $515, with 4 serious
bidders (it started at $99). Item 220436063530, and from the pictur
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 20:47:47 -0400, Jeffery Swagger wrote:
>Yes, but this strikes me as incomplete.
>
>I did try an APPLY CHECK of the proposed USERMOD (minus the JCLIN) and
>it appeared to produce the desired result.
>In that a ++EXEC element would be created (target library SISPEXEC) with
>an ALI
Hi all,
Since we defined following statement to protect our LU on mainframe,
APPC cannot access the PRDLU01 becuase without owner information, is
there anyone have same problem?
RDEFINE VTAMAPPL PRDLU01 UACC(NONE) OWNER(SYS1)
PERMIT PRDLU01 CLASS(VTAMAPPL) ID(P428501)
Thanks and regards
On Sun
Yes, but this strikes me as incomplete.
I did try an APPLY CHECK of the proposed USERMOD (minus the JCLIN) and
it appeared to produce the desired result.
In that a ++EXEC element would be created (target library SISPEXEC) with
an ALIAS of ONLY copied from SISPSAMP.
However, here's the problem. T
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:49:24 -0500, Tom Harper wrote:
>Gerhard,
>
>According to this source, that theory [track edge residue]
>is in question:
>
>http://www.h-online.com/security/Secure-deletion-a-single-overwrite-will-do-it--/news/112432
>
>(watch the wrap).
>
Thanks. I long wondered, given that d
Gerhard,
According to this source, that theory is in question:
http://www.h-online.com/security/Secure-deletion-a-single-overwrite-will
-do-it--/news/112432
(watch the wrap).
Tom Harper
IMS Utilities Development Team
Neon Enterprise Software
Sugar Land, TX
-Original Message-
From: IBM
APAR OA28473 had a PTF for z/OS 1.10 (UA47631) as well as the PTFs for
z/OS 1.9 and 1.8.
UA47631 is not marked PE.
This may be valid because the z/OS 1.10 code would have to have additional
processing for EAV - but what if it should have been marked PE as well?
Has anyone asked IBM to confirm t
Eric Bielefeld wrote:
I always wondered if it was possible to read data if binary zeros or
some other pattern were written to the disk. I thought that it would be
very hard, which the article quoted seemed to agree with. But then, I
noticed that the writer of the article didn't sign his name.
Good point...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>We are working in a management context so it's best to use words the same way
>they do.
I disagree with that.
Are you telling me that 'management context' is allowed to be technically
inaccurate?
It's one thing to 'dumb it down'; it's another to be wrong.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Gibney, Dave wrote:
View an ETR record
Record 03197,550,000
I've been updating ETRs all day! 8-)
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
-
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:30:37 -0500, Michael R. Mayne wrote:
>
>HSM may expire and delete VSAM data sets because of an invalid creation
>date caused by a DSS RESTORE or HSM RECALL/RECOVER of a VSAM data sets.
>This occurs after the application of PTF's UA46732/UA47067 for z/OS 1.8
>or PTF's UA46733/U
Thanks, Matthew! I'll have a look at the REVAL
Linda
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Stitt"
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2009 3:33:02 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: ERASEDATA - DASD disposal
The last time I needed to perform this functio
Hal Merritt wrote:
Is there a JES parameter that will abend a job that exceeds some output
threshold?
I looked at ESTBYTE, but I want to positively, absolutely *NOT* affect started
tasks. Only ordinary batch jobs. The doc was not clear on this point.
Thanks.
NOTICE: This electronic mail mes
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:26:03 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>>one MIP
>
>It's one MIPS.
>The "s" is not pluralising the word it stands for "second".
>
>The plural is imbedded in the "i": "instructionS".
>
Ah, but do the medias report that the datas affirm that usage?
-- gil
---
MIP = 'meaningless indication of power'. Singular, plural, or rate is just as
meaningless. :-)
You will hear management and sales folks drop the 's' inappropriately: "This a
100 MIP box".
We are working in a management context so it's best to use words the same way
they do. Besides, I was try
o identify data
sets that may have been affected.
Recommended Actions:
Please apply fix for OA29102 to prevent the problem.
---
Link:
http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/set2/sas/f/redAlerts/20090702.html
Could get ugly...
-Mike
This was called NALC (New Application License Charge) which was meant to
ease the pain of adding a lot of MIPS for a specific application
(generally a hog) like SAP, PeopleSoft, and the like. Only certain
applications/work was acceptable and you were not allowed to run a
'classic' workload (e.g.
Have some one installed already this product?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Ed Finnell
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 2:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Offload work to ziip
In a message dated 7/2/2009 9:36:
View an ETR record
Record 03197,550,000
Click on an action button to revise, complete, or assign this record.
Abstract Web ibmlink error/VM ibmlink gone
User keyword None
Status Open
Responsible IBM
Type Software problem
Severity 3
CPU device type No
>But it's newer; therefore "by definition" it's "better".
The two worst fallacies:
1. This is old, therefore bad.
2. This is new, therefore better.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Similar advice as for the 'S222' thread. Consider that the user-supplied
authorization routine could well be issuing an 'S913' abend.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.ro
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
>
>
>And the Web is slower than the proverbial molasses in January :(
But it's newer; therefore "by definition" it's "better".
-jc-
-
Plus:
An error has occurred:
An error occurred accessing the database: -911 40001
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
sen
And the Web is slower than the proverbial molasses in January :(
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:49:57 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
>
>Ask them if their Assembler source code contains this ABEND macro coded
>more or less like this example:
>
>ABEND 222,REASON=,,,
For an S222, that would be
ABEND X'222',REASON=,,,SYSTEM
or
ABEND 546,REASON=,,,SYSTEM
--
In a message dated 7/2/2009 12:14:14 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
sipu...@georgetown.edu writes:
Why is Step 3, the ICKDSF init necessary? What would happen if you tried to
skip it?
>>
Fails on UNINIT'd volume
**Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the
gri
In a message dated 7/2/2009 10:26:46 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
oldti...@wanadoo.fr writes:
They lost the key of the computer room where it was hosted
>>
Probably not on minidisk they shutdown. We had VM image up for several
months(over 14)
and a bad squirrel strike and UPS failure caus
Just so we're clear: it is quite possible (you can decide whether
'legitimate') to code an S222 on an abend macro in any program. Just
because an application takes a deliberate dive, that doesn't make the abend
'user'. The code gets reported according to how the macro is coded, not on
circumstances
Check Appendix B of your ICKDSF manual.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Sipusic
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 10:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Install z/OS from scratch
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:26:36 EDT, Ed Finnell wrote:
[snip]
>>>
>This is a good exercise for Cold Site
I have always thought that software pricing on z/OS is ridiculous. There
are way too many options. I suspect that if IBM had drastically cut
software costs on the MVS platform, there would be hundreds of thousands of
mainframes out there, instead of maybe 10 to 20,000 mainframes. I just
talk
In a message dated 7/2/2009 9:36:56 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
david.jou...@53.com writes:
I'm not saying it is right. But this is the Pandora's box that Neon
seems to be opening. In reality, a large company would most likely be
>>
Idle speculation 'til the suits sort it out.
*
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:17:55 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>Anyone try to display XEQCOUNT on z/OS 1.9 or z/OS 1.10? I know on z/OS 1.8
>$DJOBCLASS(n) showed it... or at least $DJOBCLASS(n),LONG.
>
>XEQCOUNT doesn't display unless you specifically ask for it, for example:
>
>$DJOBCLASS(A),XEQCOUNT
>
I always wondered if it was possible to read data if binary zeros or some
other pattern were written to the disk. I thought that it would be very
hard, which the article quoted seemed to agree with. But then, I noticed
that the writer of the article didn't sign his name.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. S
Pretty funny, but if that analogy doesn't work, then tell them that CPUs are
like spigots, and applications are like guys standing around with one or
more buckets.If they start to get that, then quickly switch analogies -
maybe we can compile a list? :-)
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Tom M
Lizette Koehler They are researching an internal S222 abend. It came with a reason code.
>Now, I have seen S222 due to OPER Cancel commands, but I am not familiar
with S222 abends that are issued internally and with a reason code.
>Would I be correct in assuming that I need the person that wrot
>one MIP
It's one MIPS.
The "s" is not pluralising the word it stands for "second".
The plural is imbedded in the "i": "instructionS".
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access ins
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:30:48 -0500, Hal Merritt
wrote:
>They don't really want to know MIPS. They want to know money. That is,
how much does it cost to run transaction x.
>
>Perhaps expressing the CPU consumption as a percentage of the box's
capacity would answer the question. Each engine has a
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:40:12 -0600, Roach, Dennis (N-GHG)
wrote:
>This is not an S222, it is a U222. Major difference.
Of course I knew that. I've worked on this platform for a little
while. :-)Read what I wrote again:
> "I have also seen user 222 abends (poor choice of a number IMHO)."
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:26:36 EDT, Ed Finnell wrote:
[snip]
>>>
>This is a good exercise for Cold Site planning as well.
>
>1)From SE use stand-alone IOCP to import text and make IOCDS
> that defines basic system of tapes, dasd and consoles to run
> the driver system.
>
>2)Have to configure
I was going to use a "Another one bites the dust" subject for a note
on this subject. I was logged on yesterday, lost the session and now the
"nice" message.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion Li
This is not an S222, it is a U222. Major difference. If this is a vendor
application the check the vender documentation and then call the vendor.
If it is an in-house application, turn it over to the application
programming team.
Dennis Roach
GHG Corporation
Lockheed Martin Mission Services
Facili
They don't really want to know MIPS. They want to know money. That is, how much
does it cost to run transaction x.
Perhaps expressing the CPU consumption as a percentage of the box's capacity
would answer the question. Each engine has a fixed capacity of one CPU second
per clock second, but th
Chase, John wrote:
Perhaps it's just ServiceLink that has stopped. I just logged in
successfully, but got this when I tried to browse my ETRs:
=== Begin paste
ATTENTION! - ServiceLink access stopped on July 2, 2009.
My SIS is still working. Everything is still workin
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:09:34 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
>> CLC RACROUTE+4(4),=F'0' TEST THE REASON CODE
>> BEEXTRACT ZERO, AUTHORIZED
>> NOTAUTH WTO 'CMD913E UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THE COMMAND PROGRAM - JOB
>AX
>>BORTED',ROUTCDE=(2,11)
>>
Yes, I was way off base chasing the RACF problem. Turns out, somebody
coded up a little program that goes out and checks a hard coded list of
user names to see who should get to run the program.
Ken Klein
Sr. Systems Programmer
Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance - Louisville
kenneth.kl...@kyfb.com
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:57:27 -0500, McKown, John
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
>> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 10:54 AM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
>> Subject: S222 abends and Reason Codes
I agree that this is meaningless. However, there are two times available to you
in a CICS transaction. The CPU used and the elapsed time. Now, if you divide
the CPU used by the elapsed, you will get a measure of "how hard" this
particular transaction can drive the machine. IMO, any transaction t
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
>
> Today is the day the IBMLink 3270 interface is supposed to no longer
> work. But, I've been logged on since Monday and it's still up. Am I on
> borrowed time?
Perhaps it's just ServiceLink that has st
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:25:31 -0500, Ramiro Camposagrado wrote:
>Management is trying to cut and save CPU cost. So they came up with
>this "Cost Avoidance Committee". (Primarily consisting of uper management).
>Now they want us to somehow equate the CPU Time consumed (primarily by a
>CICS transactio
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
>
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:15:28 -0400, Klein, Kenneth
> wrote:
>
> > No, that's why the RACF guy tells me it's not his problem. No RACF
> >messages. Just the cmd913e error message from the command program
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:36:08 +, Linda Mooney wrote:
> Do you consider the 4 passes with TRKFMT enough to be sure that the  data
is really gone?
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/112432
Norbert Friemel
--
For IBM-MAI
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 10:54 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: S222 abends and Reason Codes
>
> Someone asked this and I did not know where to look.
>
>
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:37:43 -0500, Jeffrey Deaver
wrote:
>> "Cost Avoidance Committee"
>
>What is the ultimate goal of the committee? Are you attempting to stave
>off a CPU upgrade? Are you looking to actually decrease the size of your
>current configuration? You're most likely locked into a
Someone asked this and I did not know where to look.
They are researching an internal S222 abend. It came with a reason code.
Now, I have seen S222 due to OPER Cancel commands, but I am not familiar with
S222 abends that are issued internally and with a reason code.
Would I be correct in assum
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 08:07:07 -0700, Edward Jaffe
wrote:
>Today is the day the IBMLink 3270 interface is supposed to no longer
>work. But, I've been logged on since Monday and it's still up. Am I on
>borrowed time?
>
My ID has said "revoked" for a while when I select IBMLINK from the
menu. I jus
Look at the OPT parameter of ESTLINE/ESTBYTE/ESTPAGE. In conjunction
w/J2EXIT9 you should be able to do what you want.
HTH,
Is there a JES parameter that will abend a job that exceeds some output
threshold?
I looked at ESTBYTE, but I want to positively, absolutely *NOT* affect
started tasks. O
> "Cost Avoidance Committee"
What is the ultimate goal of the committee? Are you attempting to stave
off a CPU upgrade? Are you looking to actually decrease the size of your
current configuration? You're most likely locked into a lease or own your
mainframe, so you've already "sunk" the money
Is there a JES parameter that will abend a job that exceeds some output
threshold?
I looked at ESTBYTE, but I want to positively, absolutely *NOT* affect started
tasks. Only ordinary batch jobs. The doc was not clear on this point.
Thanks.
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files tra
Are you sure?
If it try SIS, SRD I get this:
ATTENTION! - ServiceLink access stopped on July 2, 2009.
Access to ServiceLink v
Management is trying to cut and save CPU cost. So they came up with
this "Cost Avoidance Committee". (Primarily consisting of uper management).
Now they want us to somehow equate the CPU Time consumed (primarily by a
CICS transaction) and equate that into MIPS. I know that folks have come up
wi
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 08:07:07 -0700, Edward Jaffe
wrote:
>Today is the day the IBMLink 3270 interface is supposed to no longer
>work. But, I've been logged on since Monday and it's still up. Am I on
>borrowed time?
>
>--
Nah
They lost the key of the computer room where it was hosted
:-))
Bruno S
Today is the day the IBMLink 3270 interface is supposed to no longer
work. But, I've been logged on since Monday and it's still up. Am I on
borrowed time?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
edja...@phoenix
>I'm not saying it is right. But this is the Pandora's box that Neon
>seems to be opening. In reality, a large company would most likely be
>much more subtle, and add additional capacity as ZxxP engines instead of
>GP's, and stay under the radar so to speak.
Interesting discussion. A few bit-wis
Ken,
Because the IDFIND routine is invoked via a CALL macro which generates a
V(CON) for IDFIND, that routine must be linkedited into the load module.
If the module source isn't in the same program, I would look in the LKED
JCL for the list of objects pulled in, and find the source. My guess is
thanks to all who are offering up the good clues!!
The source here may have been modified by a previous systems guy. This
part of the code is where I'm getting booted I think. I know I'm getting
the cmd107i message and then the message from the NOTAUTH routine. What
is this IDFIND routine??
FI
I'm not saying it is right. But this is the Pandora's box that Neon
seems to be opening. In reality, a large company would most likely be
much more subtle, and add additional capacity as ZxxP engines instead of
GP's, and stay under the radar so to speak.
_
I will be out of the office starting 07/01/2009 and will not return until
07/07/2009.
I will respond to your communication when I return.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@
In a message dated 7/2/2009 9:22:23 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
david.jou...@53.com writes:
you cut that in half to 5 GP's, and buy 5 ZxxP's. You probably more
than cut your software bill in half.
>>
Unless IBM decides that if you have this configuration you're charged at
full rate for S
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:15:28 -0400, Klein, Kenneth
wrote:
> No, that's why the RACF guy tells me it's not his problem. No RACF
>messages. Just the cmd913e error message from the command program. I can
>see in the code that he does a rackroute and the BH command sends
>control straight to the error
- Original Message -
From: "Klein, Kenneth"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: Command program from the cbt
No, that's why the RACF guy tells me it's not his problem. No RACF
messages. Just the cmd913e error message from the command p
Also, a failing RACHECK should have issued a SMF type 80 record. That
might tell you what resource is complaining.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of John Kelly
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 10:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
S
CMD107I SAFRC04: USING SECONDARY CHECK
CMD913E UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THE COMMAND PROGRAM - JOB ABORTED
Check the 'command' program, it's issuing the message. Sounds like it has
multiple SAF calls and you're in neither.
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
--
Could be, but lets say you are a 10-way GP processor now. If true, if
you cut that in half to 5 GP's, and buy 5 ZxxP's. You probably more
than cut your software bill in half.
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Service
Leider nicht der Fall.
these are the only messages from the job. How do I set up UAUDIT?
- 01 JUL 2009 JOB EXECUTION DATE
-9 CARDS READ
- 42 SYSOUT PRINT RECORDS
-0 SYSOUT PUNCH RECORDS
-3 SYSOUT SPOOL KBYTES
- 0.00 MINUTES EXECUTION TIM
No, that's why the RACF guy tells me it's not his problem. No RACF
messages. Just the cmd913e error message from the command program. I can
see in the code that he does a rackroute and the BH command sends
control straight to the error message and abends.
Ken Klein
Sr. Systems Programmer
Kentuc
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 06:38:17 -0500, Barbara Nitz wrote:
>... Not having the command ready to make it JES-managed again
The easiest way to change most job class attributes in JES2 is to use the JC
panel in SDSF.
--
Tom Marchant
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:22:16 -0400, Klein, Kenneth
wrote:
>Thanks, good advice. It's working now. What is this "automount
>management" all about?
I picked off some good info from this thread, too. Lots of smart people here.
As for automount, take a look at z/OS Unix System Servies Planning (wa
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 08:34:17 -0500, McKown, John
wrote:
>
>True: sum(zIIPS)+sum(zAAPs) <= sum(CPs).
>
>I am wondering if I could have, say, 4 CPs, 2 zIIPS, and 2 zAAPs and then
make an LPAR which only has 1 CP, but all four of the speciality engines.
How about an LPAR with all 4 CPs, 2 zIIPS, and 2
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld
>
> Isn't there a requirement that you have at least as many regular CPs
as the
> total of ziip and zaap engines? I don't think you can buy just one
regular
> engine, and then have say 4 ziips zaaps or
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 8:25 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Offload work to ziip
>
> Isn't there a requirement that you have at least as many
> reg
Tracy,
I was going to email you and find out where your 7060 was located, but then
I looked for your web site and found out you are in Vermont. I would be
interested in an H30, and it would fit in my car, but Vermont is a long way
from Milwaukee. Also, there is the minor problem of z/OS soft
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 06:38:17 -0500, Barbara Nitz wrote:
>WLM- Initiators:
>Someone here had changed the 'sysprog class' (the only one open right after
>IPL) to WLM-managed (and didn't care about the serviceclass).
>
>IPL'd of one system in order to upgrade a database to a new release. Used the
>cl
Isn't there a requirement that you have at least as many regular CPs as the
total of ziip and zaap engines? I don't think you can buy just one regular
engine, and then have say 4 ziips zaaps or whatever.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. Systems Programmer
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
414-475-7434
- Original M
> Isn't there something in the licensing that preclude reverse
> engineering?
Strictly speaking you don't need to reverse engineer anything - the
Linux crowd proved that with SMB and the TiVo. I sat in on a talk by the
folks that did both - smart bastards then Aussies ...
Treat it like a black box
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shane
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:06 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Offload work to ziip
>
> I can't be the only (non-ISV) customer sysprog that has thought "I
>
Of course, now that the cat is out of the bag, since this is not a GUPI,
expect Big Blue to change something so it will no longer work!
Isn't there something in the licensing that preclude reverse
engineering?
>From zPrime press release
>
> NEON zPrime is 100 percent compliant with IBM specific
Sounds to me to be more of an installation configuration issue, not a
problem w/WLM inits. I am not going to second guess the way you
operate, but in order to handle this you can use SYSAFF or WLM
Scheduling Environments.
... It took me quite a while to figure out that the job had been routed
We also have on available for sale - finally retired a 9672-RA5
Regards,
Listen. Think. Solve.
Steve Wolf
Rockwell Automation
414-382-4308
Victor Presher
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
07/01/2009 10:30 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
> While I am cleaning out my DR room... I also have an IBM 7060 H30,
> $1 plus shipping and packaging.
And I have a H50 that's probably not even worth that much.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access ins
While I am cleaning out my DR room... I also have an IBM 7060 H30, $1
plus shipping and packaging. Please respond to me directly.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@ba
On Thu, Jul 2nd, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Jim Marshall wrote:
> It really depends on your definition of "Wiped Clean". No amount of
> passes will get rid of the data where it could not be recovered.
> Have to measure the worth of the data if someone "really, really"
> wanted to recover it.
My attitude
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 05:27:53 -0500, Bjarni Hauksson wrote:
>I am using IBM Hardware Configuration Manager to day. Mainly to have
>graphical presentation of the physical IO configuration and labeling
>management.
I believe NewEra Software has a tool they have been trying to get me to look
at thei
Agreed. This has lawsuit written all over it.
Simply my opinion and not necessarily that of my employer.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Jousma, David wrote:
> I simply cannot see how IBM or any other ISV's will not challenge this.
> It clearly is not what IBM intended, and other ISV's could l
I simply cannot see how IBM or any other ISV's will not challenge this.
It clearly is not what IBM intended, and other ISV's could lose revenue
if customers buy specialty engines, and reduce GP's. Or worse yet,
ISV's will just start charging you for capacity based on ZxxP's along
with GP's, thereb
>I am in the process of retiring 3 RAMAC 2 racks, each with a 3990 mod 6
controller, and 1 RAMAC 3 rack, with a 9293 controller. All data has been
moved to new DASD. The RAMAC DASD will be surplused so I have to be
sure that the data has been wiped clean and nothing is recoverable - w ithou
Hi Kenneth,
abend 913 is from OPEN macro, not from RACF. Its explanation reads to
check message IEC150I. Insufficient authorization is one of several
possible reasons. The reason code will give detailed explanation. Let's
assume, it is a SAF authorization problem and not I/O, JCL, APF etc.
rel
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
