Hi All,
We have some GDG data sets that are stacked on a tape. Each month a new
generation is added to the tape and data are appended to it
periodically. One of the data sets have gone to a second volume.
Subsequent generations were added with
DSN=GDG(+1),LABEL=(n,SL),VOL=SER=(VOL1,VOL2).
Bruce
That's it. Thanks for your help.
Howi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Multifile multivolume tape data set problem
One of the
This may involve the implementation of VSAM RLS, DFSMStvs, and perhaps
another product that we are testing right now, called Power Exchange
from Informatica.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday,
ACIF
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 13:49, Kok, Howi wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to put together our order for z/OS 1.7 before time runs
out.
One thing that confuses me is the Enhanced ACIF pgm no 5655-M32. Does
anyone know if I don't put this in the order list will I still get
ACIF?
The IBM partner
Hi All,
I'm trying to put together our order for z/OS 1.7 before time runs out.
One thing that confuses me is the Enhanced ACIF pgm no 5655-M32. Does
anyone know if I don't put this in the order list will I still get ACIF?
The IBM partner that I'm working with could not get an answer from IBM.
Hi All,
Is there a utility that I can use to monitor some VSAM data sets to tell
me how full they are?
Thanks,
Howi Kok
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the
If you are right about not picking up track 0, then something has caused
this. I haven't changed my cloning process for a long-long time. I'll
try the ALLEXCP parm and report back after I migrate the current
maintenance to production. Many thanks to all.
-Original Message-
From: IBM
the correct
NUCLEUS/SAMPLIB prior to IPL ?
i vaguely remember this APAR having an impact on
EMC devices (or is it?) ...
only bugbear i have is waiting on APAR OA15115
- ravi.
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:46:05 -0500, Kok, Howi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I don't know since which maintenance, could
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kok, Howi
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Have to reformat IPL volume with IPLTEXT
I don't really know which APAR that might have caused my problem. For
sure I init the volume
Hi All,
I don't know since which maintenance, could be OA09050, I have been
unable to IPL until I reformat the IPL volume even though I initialized
it with IPL TEXT. Does anyone has the same problem and how you solve
it? We are at z/OS 1.4.
Thanks,
Howi Kok
I got wait code 075 but can't remember what reason code.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 9:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Have to reformat IPL volume with IPLTEXT
I
Hi All,
I'm experiencing abend 002-04 when reading SMF data on a tape with
IFASMFDP. I searched the list archive and found some records of the
same problem in 1999. One suggestion offered was to use DFSORT with
SPANINC=RC0. I tried this and did not work. We are on z/OS and DFSORT
1.4. The
Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Abend 002-04 extracting SMF records
Kok, Howi wrote:
Hi All,
I'm experiencing abend 002-04 when reading SMF data on a tape with
IFASMFDP. I searched the list
I agree too. That was why I threw out some questions to try to clarify
his situation. Jerry did reply and clarify eventually, except that he
used two other threads ('Mount a tape in flexes', 'IBMLINK vs
techsupport.service.ibm.com') instead of this one.
Howi Kok
-Original Message-
Jerry
Try vary path offline and online, then vary device online after path is
online as follow:
V path(b81,fc),offline
V path(b81,fc),online
V b81,online
Howi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerry Ragland
Sent: Wednesday,
Steve Comstock's company website
http://www.trainersfriend.com/General_content/Book_site.htm has an
introduction to this topic. Steve is a regular contributor to a few
listservs.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Finnell
These are in the message manual:
RPLY:CURR=
The number of write to operator with reply (WTOR) message buffers in
use by the system at this time.
RPLY:LIM=
The limit of the number of WTOR message buffers allowed outstanding.
The maximum value of is specified by the
Instead of accepting command via console you can try using TCPIP. The
IP API rexx exec sample members RSCLIENT and RSSERVER in TCPIP.SEZAINST
or whatever TCPIP data set name your shop uses can be modified to do
what you want. You can code your rexx stc to accept connection from a
rexx client and
: Thursday, November 03, 2005 11:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: F against a REXX STC
On 11/3/2005 11:24 AM, Kok, Howi wrote:
Instead of accepting command via console you can try using TCPIP. The
IP API rexx exec sample members RSCLIENT and RSSERVER in
TCPIP.SEZAINST
or whatever TCPIP data
PFS - Physical File System
Check the BPXPRMxx member in your PARMLIB to see if you have FILESYSTYPE
TYPE(INET) and NETWORK DOMAINNAME(AF_INET) statement coded for the
socket file system activation.
You may find exactly what PFS is missing from the SYSLOG, and then code
the appropriate
As far as I remember no change to IODF/IOCDS. From the HMC you need to
re-customize the LPAR activation profiles to specify the number of
initial processors for each LPAR. We are running a 2064-003 and the
last time we turned on an additional engine we had to deactivate and
reactivate the LPARs
21 matches
Mail list logo