Re: Spam from my account

2011-09-28 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
? it is common for spammers to send using bogus addresses in the reverse path and in the header. If your have a sample of the spam in question, look at the Received header fields to see whether it was actually sent by yahoo. Note: I'm not denying that yahoo has security and spam issues, just noting

Spam from my account

2011-09-27 Thread Ed Gould
I have been told my email account has been hacked and email was sent using it. I apologize and will once again change my password. Ed -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Spam from my account

2011-09-27 Thread Ed Gould
All, I have been advised my email account has been hacked. I apologize. Ed -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the

Re: Spam from my account

2011-09-27 Thread Ivan Warren
On 9/28/2011 1:52 AM, Ed Gould wrote: All, I have been advised my email account has been hacked. I apologize. Unfortunately, this won't change a thing. The originator of an e-mail address is no more valid as a method of authentication than the return address at the back of a snail-mail

Re: Spam

2011-08-08 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: What are you using to do tracing, if I may ask, please? I'm using a modified version of BWwhois[1] to do lookups. I've also got a RYO utility[2] that scans the entire e-mail and looks up all of the relevant names and addresses for use in reporting the spam. [1

Re: Spam

2011-08-08 Thread Rick Fochtman
snip--- Q: How many personal injury attorneys does it take to change a light bulb? A: Three–one to turn the bulb, one to shake him off the ladder, and the third to sue the ladder company.

Spam

2011-08-05 Thread Shane Ginnane
My ISP just harvested some junk (supposedly) from John G - a vacation reply. Never had similar (from John). Let's hope he hasn't been using Internet Cafe(s) in B#283;ij#299;ng. Shane ... -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: Spam

2011-08-05 Thread Shane Ginnane
Sorry - that would be Beijing in plain text. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: Spam

2011-08-05 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Shane Ginnane wrote: Sorry - that would be Beijing in plain text. For three and half nanoseconds I was thinking you're trying mixing English and Mandarin languages... :-) Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht -- For IBM-MAIN

Re: Spam

2011-08-05 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Shane Ginnane wrote: My ISP just harvested some junk (supposedly) from John G - a vacation reply. I also got that one too. That one came from 'snt0-omc4-s4.snt0.hotmail.com' located in USA despite trying to fake a msn address. Hmm, I need a vacation from all those spam, spam and more spam

Re: Spam

2011-08-05 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search

Re: Spam

2011-08-05 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: The legitimate messages also went through hotmail. However, compare the originating IP addresses; [108.20.159.218] is verizon while [65.55.90.239] is microsoft. Before I posted, I have traced only that domain name ending with hotmail. I initially did not bother

Re: Spam

2011-08-05 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
] that scans the entire e-mail and looks up all of the relevant names and addresses for use in reporting the spam. [1] The unmodified version is at http://whois.bw.org/ [2] The stable version is at http://www.medwayhosting.com/spam-l/deobfuscation-by-Shmuel/index.html -- Shmuel (Seymour J

Re: List spam

2011-01-20 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
to the group there is a high probability those with an email address of @comcast.net will reject the email. Verio has spam issues; I don't see blocking NTT as being overambitious. You should be able to send from a different network. I wonder how many valid emails are not getting through because of false

Re: List spam

2011-01-20 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In aanlktinpdwgfgumjbvlpseb5uovjghuv9irrx_suu...@mail.gmail.com, on 01/18/2011 at 10:48 AM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said: Yep. I signed up for a topica.com email group. They have issues. I bet the people marking it as spame has signed up for the list then marked an email as spam

Re: List spam

2011-01-19 Thread Ed Gould
was not getting email from their site.  They said they were sending 92% spam messages and were blacklisted.  I bet the people marking it as spame has signed up for the list then marked an email as spam.  I know I see about 1% of non-spam messages in the spam folder, yet I have to keep telling people

Re: List spam

2011-01-18 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
community. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003

Re: List spam

2011-01-18 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In b282be35b5a4494894d4ecfba2bf7847180c7f0...@xch-nw-17v.nw.nos.boeing.com, on 01/15/2011 at 05:45 PM, Schwarz, Barry A barry.a.schw...@boeing.com said: What happened to the common and effective advice - If you receive spam, hit delete and move on. To every complex question

Re: List spam

2011-01-18 Thread Steve Comstock
On 1/17/2011 8:49 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: In b282be35b5a4494894d4ecfba2bf7847180c7f0...@xch-nw-17v.nw.nos.boeing.com, on 01/15/2011 at 05:45 PM, Schwarz, Barry Abarry.a.schw...@boeing.com said: What happened to the common and effective advice - If you receive spam, hit delete

Re: List spam

2011-01-18 Thread Ted MacNEIL
I wonder how many valid emails are not getting through because of false-positive results in some spam sensing algorithm. I have always wondered the same thing since a time when our service provider started using a metric of percentage of messages filtered by the spam filter(s) as an indication

Re: List spam

2011-01-18 Thread Mike Schwab
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote: I wonder how many valid emails are not getting through because of false-positive results in some spam sensing algorithm. I have always wondered the same thing since a time when our service provider started using a metric

Re: List spam

2011-01-16 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Vernooij, CP - SPLXM Shane Ginnane ibm-m...@tpg.com.au wrote in message news:1294994009.4d300a5943...@postoffice.tpg.com.au... Any/every-one else getting spammed by recoveryknowledge ?. Must have been done as a

Re: List spam

2011-01-15 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
this spam-mail for good. Now just let things straight. I'm NOT into buying or hiring software and hardware. I'm just a lowly programmer. Nothing more. And hyper allergic to spammers too... ;-D But actually, because I'm the only one active on IBM-MAIN - I'm actually luring spammers away from my

Re: List spam

2011-01-15 Thread Gerhard Postpischil
On 1/15/2011 1:28 PM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: Persons here in IBM-MAIN post regurlarly about training, upcoming events and products. I tolerate them because they are honest and offering ideas and advices here. Not to mention that they first ask permission to post blatant ads! Gerhard

Re: List spam

2011-01-15 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Not to mention that they first ask permission to post blatant ads! Not all! - Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:

Re: List spam

2011-01-15 Thread Schwarz, Barry A
But there are a lot less ads than this apparently interminable discussion about an email that many of us never saw but get to relive vicariously through many people's need to vent on this list. What happened to the common and effective advice - If you receive spam, hit delete and move

List spam

2011-01-14 Thread Shane Ginnane
Any/every-one else getting spammed by recoveryknowledge ?. Must have been done as a harvesting of the list as both addresses I use to post have been hit. No way I would have signed up (twice) for DB2 paraphernalia. Probably seen it before and just trashed it.

Re: List spam

2011-01-14 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Shane Ginnane ibm-m...@tpg.com.au wrote in message news:1294994009.4d300a5943...@postoffice.tpg.com.au... Any/every-one else getting spammed by recoveryknowledge ?. Must have been done as a harvesting of the list as both addresses I use to post have been hit. No way I would have signed up

Re: List spam

2011-01-14 Thread Stephen Mednick
@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shane Ginnane Sent: Friday, 14 January 2011 7:33 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: List spam Any/every-one else getting spammed by recoveryknowledge ?. Must have been done as a harvesting of the list as both addresses I use to post have been hit. No way I would have signed

Re: List spam

2011-01-14 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Shane Ginnane wrote: Any/every-one else getting spammed by recoveryknowledge ?. Yes. And I wasted precious seconds to review that thing in my Junk folder and delete it. Only 5 and half seconds of my life were wasted to get rid of this bored spammer! ;-D It took me a half minute to write

Re: List spam

2011-01-14 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Vernooij, CP wrote: I hope they respect my unsubscribe. Perhaps not. Your address are now probably marked as 'live' and you will be spammed properly... Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff

Re: List spam

2011-01-14 Thread Steve Comstock
On 1/14/2011 1:33 AM, Shane Ginnane wrote: Any/every-one else getting spammed by recoveryknowledge ?. Must have been done as a harvesting of the list as both addresses I use to post have been hit. No way I would have signed up (twice) for DB2 paraphernalia. Probably seen it before and just

Re: List spam

2011-01-14 Thread Avram Friedman
I would not consider a rare work related email as a spam attack. Most firms that seek new clients engage in some form of targeted advertising. There are a few things that seperate the email from Recovery Knowelage from spam. 1. Appears to to a rare event. 2. It is targeted and directed

Re: List spam

2011-01-14 Thread Stan Weyman
lives It is wise to keep in mind that neither success nor failure is ever final... -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Avram Friedman Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 9:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: List spam I

Re: List spam

2011-01-14 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Avram Friedman Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 9:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: List spam I would not consider a rare work related email as a spam attack. Most firms that seek new clients engage in some form of targeted

Re: List spam

2011-01-14 Thread Rick Fochtman
---snip-- Any/every-one else getting spammed by recoveryknowledge ?. Must have been done as a harvesting of the list as both addresses I use to post have been hit. No way I would have signed up (twice) for DB2 paraphernalia.

Re: List spam

2011-01-14 Thread Stan Weyman
: Friday, January 14, 2011 10:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: List spam Stan, I agree. There are always some grey areas (or grey persons, who besides plugging their training company also provide useful contributions ;-)). However this is indiscriminate spanning to z/OS customers

Re: List spam

2011-01-14 Thread Bob Rutledge
Shane Ginnane wrote: Any/every-one else getting spammed by recoveryknowledge ?. Yes, but I found it mildly amusing... Hello Deer Recovery Knowledge an IBM Business Partner is offering an unbelievable (No License Charge) discount on all our DB2 Automated Tools to IX Netcom. Bob

Re: List spam

2011-01-14 Thread Linda Mooney
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 11:05:24 AM Subject: Re: List spam   I would go so far as to say I wouldn't rule a company like this out but I still take some exception to the back door method used to send out their message, after getting their email list (I'm sure

Re: List spam

2011-01-14 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In listserv%201101140850499626.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 01/14/2011 at 08:50 AM, Avram Friedman ibmsysp...@geek-sites.com said: Most firms that seek new clients engage in some form of targeted advertising. Spam is a good way to lose potential business. There are a few things that seperate

Re: List spam

2011-01-14 Thread Tony Harminc
On 14 January 2011 15:15, Linda Mooney linda.lst...@comcast.net wrote: Well, I would rule them out, not because they obviously harvested this list - but because they  lied by  claiming that I had subscribed.  T he email address I use for this list is ONLY used for that purpose, never

Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: CA-OPS/MVS to IBM's System Automation?

2010-10-22 Thread Marc Heimlich
SFI (www.streamfoundry.com) has done 3 TSA migrations in the last six months. We can help. Marc heiml...@streamfoundry.com --Original Message-- From: Andreas Steinberg Sender: IBM-MAIN To: IBM-MAIN ReplyTo: IBM-MAIN Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: CA-OPS/MVS to IBM's System Automation? Sent

Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: CA-OPS/MVS to IBM's System Automation?

2010-10-22 Thread John McKown
in the last six months. We can help. Marc heiml...@streamfoundry.com --Original Message-- From: Andreas Steinberg Sender: IBM-MAIN To: IBM-MAIN ReplyTo: IBM-MAIN Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: CA-OPS/MVS to IBM's System Automation? Sent: Oct 22, 2010 3:46 AM John, we did it 5 years ago with a lot

Re: [**SPAM**] Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread J. D. Cassidy
Serious topic yaw here. Koyma was / is more famous.. = better yet, to Vorkuta (or did they dismantle that place after 1989?) = = /s/ tuco bonno; = Graduate, College of Conflict Management; = University of SouthEast Asia; = I partied on the Ho Chi Minh Trail - tiến lên !! = = = =Too

Sorry for the spam!

2010-07-29 Thread Daz
Apologies for the spam, folks, my Gmail got compromised, its back to business now, but I cannot promise your addresses did not get harvested as well. I'm pretty disturbed about it, and quite upset as well.. mainly because it spammed email addresses from family members who are no longer with us

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: easy access to the current cpu-peak-time status or cpu load

2010-07-29 Thread Paul Gillis
Mugzach Sent: Thursday, 29 July 2010 9:49 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: ***SPAM*** Re: easy access to the current cpu-peak-time status or cpu load This invoice factor is a number that is caluleted reading milions of SMF recods. Why don't you just keep this number in your product DB ad let

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: easy access to the current cpu-peak-time status or cpu load

2010-07-29 Thread Itschak Mugzach
. Cheers, Paul Gillis -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Itschak Mugzach Sent: Thursday, 29 July 2010 9:49 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: ***SPAM*** Re: easy access to the current cpu-peak-time status

OT: Was spam sender

2010-01-22 Thread Jon Brock
Making an OT thread even more OT, that reminds me of something I read just yesterday -- the case of the 500-mile email: http://www.ibiblio.org/harris/500milemail.html It's an interesting tale if you're into problem-solving. Jon snip Faking an email address is fairly simple. Well, at least

spam

2009-06-30 Thread Shane
Anyone else get spam from ittrader ?. Just wondering if my address was harvested from here. Shane ... -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET

Re: spam

2009-06-30 Thread Steve Comstock
Shane wrote: Anyone else get spam from ittrader ?. Just wondering if my address was harvested from here. Shane ... I got one, but I'm on several lists, so it's hard to tell where it came from. Anyway, 'Delete' works fast. Kind regards, -Steve Comstock The Trainer's Friend, Inc. 303-393

Re: spam

2009-06-30 Thread A L Hughes
-Original Message- From: Shane ibm-m...@tpg.com.au To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 2:20 pm Subject: spam Anyone else get spam from ittrader ?. Just wondering if my address was harvested from here. Shane

Re: spam

2009-06-30 Thread Rick Fochtman
Shane wrote: Anyone else get spam from ittrader ?. Just wondering if my address was harvested from here. Shane ... -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu

Re: spam

2009-06-30 Thread Mary Anne Matyaz
I didn't get it. MA On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote: Shane wrote: Anyone else get spam from ittrader ?. Just wondering if my address was harvested from here. Shane ... -- For IBM

Re: [From Vwall: Suspected SPAM]: Your conversion to Enterprise COBOL

2009-05-05 Thread Wagner, Leslie
to retire to. Hopefully, I'll get back there one day. Les Leslie Wagner 718-403-4207 wagn...@finance.nyc.gov -Original Message- From: Clark Morris [mailto:cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca] Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 8:47 PM To: Wagner, Leslie Subject: [From Vwall: Suspected SPAM]: Your

Re: ****SPAM**** Re: Is Xrc a reasonable solution between two databases created separately(in DB2)?

2009-04-17 Thread Ron Hawkins
yazdi Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 10:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] SPAM Re: Is Xrc a reasonable solution between two databases created separately(in DB2)? Ron I don't know about PRDF but Progagator does put a load on the source CPU which isn't desirable

Re: ****SPAM**** Re: Is Xrc a reasonable solution between two databases created separately(in DB2)?

2009-04-16 Thread farzad yazdi
@bama.ua.edu Subject: SPAM Re: Is Xrc a reasonable solution between two databases created separately(in DB2)? Sanaz, From what I read of your intent you may be better of using DB2 Data Propagator from IBM, or RRDF from ENET Corp. These products are working with the Database rather than

Re: [spam] Re: IBM buys PSI

2008-07-03 Thread R.S.
Pinnacle wrote: [...] Bastids. This is bad news for PWD/FLEX suckers. IBM's next red herring for developers will be a PSI box which we will all stumble over ourselves buying, only to have it obsoleted three years later (see R390, P390, Integrated Server, MP3000, FLEX, etc.). They'll be sure

Re: [spam] Re: IBM buys PSI

2008-07-03 Thread Jim McAlpine
On 7/3/08, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I disagree. Real competition is second hand market. You can buy small z/800 almost for peanuts (few k$, less than FLEX). It's definitely not obsoleted. You can run any version of supported OSes, including future z/OS 1.10. There are HW features

Re: [spam] Re: IBM buys PSI

2008-07-03 Thread R.S.
Jim McAlpine wrote: On 7/3/08, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I disagree. Real competition is second hand market. You can buy small z/800 almost for peanuts (few k$, less than FLEX). It's definitely not obsoleted. You can run any version of supported OSes, including future z/OS 1.10. There are

spam: Re: Video of mainframe being shaken

2008-03-14 Thread Gregory Pinkowski
Skip this if off-subject stuff irritates you...just some Friday war stories. Speaking of vibration testing...I remember back sometime in the 1970's we had an intermittent storage director. After a few SEV1 failures IBM would auto-escalate the support issue to page somebody and another guy in

Re: SPAM: Re: clock, daylight savings time

2008-03-13 Thread Rick Fochtman
snip--- But Rick, do your users all reside in different time zones like mine do??? Isn't amazing how much railroad schedules and saving daylight make our lives so difficult at times. Decisions, decisions!

Re: SPAM: RACF Tool PWDCOPY (ichwpin/ichpwout)

2008-03-09 Thread Rick Fochtman
--snip--- I tried to run the ´sample´ IBM password copy utility (PWDCOPY on the IBM RACF website) on z/OS 1.7 and z/OS 1.8. The tool runs without errors, but the copied password could not be used. Has anyone recently used this tool? Or has someone used an

Re: SPAM: Re: Tapeless backup

2008-03-08 Thread Rick Fochtman
-snip--- We have a similar issue in our shop. The midrange area wants tapeless. the Mainframe side TAPE. We have a VTS and ATL. We use the product DRVI to stack the VTS Tape backups to an real tape and ship it offsite for DR purposes. Tape is cheap.

Re: SPAM: Re: Transfer reports from lpar to lpar

2008-03-08 Thread Rick Fochtman
-snip I haven't been following this but has anyone suggested setting up a CTC between the LPAR's. The connection is setup over Escon channels. ---unsnip That will make a very reasonable physical connection; the next step is

Re: SPAM: Re: Transfer reports from lpar to lpar

2008-03-08 Thread Edward Jaffe
Rick Fochtman wrote: That will make a very reasonable physical connection; the next step is to configure software to actually use it. :-) I vote for a NJE connection, with routing JECL where appropriate. It's a LOT less prone to error than trying to do spool OFFLOAD and LOAD. The OP

Re: SPAM: Re: Transfer reports from lpar to lpar

2008-03-08 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 3/8/2008 11:03:41 A.M. Central Standard Time, r [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: vote for a NJE connection, with routing JECL where appropriate. It's a LOT less prone to error than trying to do spool OFFLOAD and LOAD. Shared spool may be out for valid reasons. Guess if all

Re: SPAM: Re: Transfer reports from lpar to lpar

2008-03-08 Thread Gilbert Cardenas
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 09:21:53 -0800, Edward Jaffe The OP indicates that he already has TCP/IP connectivity between all LPARs and FTP servers running on each. Therefore, the JES FTP interface should be available without any additional configuration. (Though I would highly recommend specifying

Re: SPAM: Re: Transfer reports from lpar to lpar

2008-03-08 Thread Gilbert Cardenas
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:45:28 EST, Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guess if all you got is PFCSKs DEST='IP:ipaddr' might suffice w/o NJE quote JCL Reference DEST=destination The destination subparameter for JES2 is one of the following: LOCAL|ANYLOCAL 'IP:ipaddr' name | Nn |

Re: SPAM: Re: Transfer reports from lpar to lpar

2008-03-08 Thread John S. Giltner, Jr.
Gilbert Cardenas wrote: On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:45:28 EST, Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guess if all you got is PFCSKs DEST='IP:ipaddr' might suffice w/o NJE quote JCL Reference DEST=destination The destination subparameter for JES2 is one of the following: LOCAL|ANYLOCAL 'IP:ipaddr'

Re: SPAM: Re: Transfer reports from lpar to lpar

2008-03-08 Thread Brian Westerman
Setting up NJE really isn't that difficult. I can send you a short set of directions for how to set it up if you want. If your systems are both on the same physical processor (2 LPARs), and if it's a z-series box with an OSA/e or similar, it's even easier. I would bet that your systems people

Re: SPAM: Migration/Coexistence with z/OS 1.10

2008-03-05 Thread Rick Fochtman
snip-- Why am I seeing APARs for coexistence or toleration with z/OS 1.10 that go back to z/OS 1.6 (which is already past EOS)? I am seeing them via ASAP notification. I saw one for WLM today and I know I saw one for sysplex join as soon as z/OS 1.10

Re: SPAM: Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-03 Thread Rick Fochtman
-snip- Handout hogs still roam from room to room grabbing handouts, making it hard to have enough for the people who actually stay and listen. Why? Either they are too lazy to download a pdf (or thee won't be one). ... ... ... I

Re: SPAM: Re: Large Page Datasets APAR OA20749

2008-03-03 Thread Rick Fochtman
---snip I am curious about the unintended affect of OA20749. Do you know if it in general remove the restriction of non-SMS VSAM being limited to 4GB? --unsnip-- I would tend to doubt that. A PAGE file more closely resembles a

Re: SPAM: Re: new Feb2008 zPOP: Execute Relative Long

2008-03-03 Thread Rick Fochtman
-snip-- Why not also allow the EXreg instruction to execute UP TO 8 bytes worth of the register contents? In other words, if you have less than 6 byte instructions to execute (say a 2-byte plus a 6-byte instruction) why not allow BOTH of them to

Re: SPAM: Abend S013 using ICHDSM00 procedure

2008-03-03 Thread Rick Fochtman
snip- Please, somebody can help me with this: i tried to use the ICHDSM00 program using SYS1.BRODCAST library, then using a DSMON sentences to get RACF report. so, i get an abend S013 when jcl fails; what are the main reason for this abend?

Re: SPAM: Re: new Feb2008 zPOP: Execute Relative Long

2008-03-03 Thread Edward Jaffe
Rick Fochtman wrote: Let's all quit trying to second-guess IBM and instead just wait a while. I'm certain that there will be additional upgrades as the z/10 goes through evolution. Let's see what time brings us. Customer dialog helps influence IBM's design and direction. If customers always

Re: SPAM: Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread Rick Fochtman
-snip-- What I would love to see happen is that the handouts are on flash drives or they could load the handouts on my flash drive so I can take notes directly on my computer. unsnip- Or on CD-ROM or DVD. Then there would be two

Re: SPAM: Re: 256 bytes again

2008-02-26 Thread Rick Fochtman
-sniip he guy who precipitated all this extra discussion was trying to get the thread oriented to remembering that the key length must be considered when determining how many blocks will fit on the track. That's part of it. There's also code

Re: SPAM: Re: LZW Compression/Expansion

2008-02-25 Thread Rick Fochtman
Edward Jaffe wrote: Rick Fochtman wrote: I can't say for sure what compression algorithm I'll use in the updated ARCHIVER; overall performance and some of the technical details will still need exploration but I've got some starting points now. Remember that there are high-performance,

Re: SPAM: ACBUSER

2008-02-25 Thread Rick Fochtman
--snip-- Has anyone ever encountered use of (or indeed had cause to use) the ACBUSER field in a VSAM ACB? Just curious. --unsnip- I've used it, in the distant past, to point to a VTAM terminal message queue.

Re: SPAM: Re: RACF callable service to check (new) password

2008-02-25 Thread Rick Fochtman
-snip-- RACF itself has practically all the functionality built-in that you are looking for. If I remember correctly, - RACF Configuration options allow the retention of (x) previous passwords within the RACF database. - password syntax options (length,

Re: SPAM: Re: LZW Compression/Expansion

2008-02-24 Thread Edward Jaffe
Rick Fochtman wrote: I can't say for sure what compression algorithm I'll use in the updated ARCHIVER; overall performance and some of the technical details will still need exploration but I've got some starting points now. Remember that there are high-performance, hardware-assisted

Re: SPAM: Re: Newbie RACROUTE question: how to *test* authorization?

2008-02-23 Thread Rick Fochtman
---snip- My advice in another message about letting the system do the checking still stands. ---unsnip I strongly agree. Consider that a potential customer may WANT all the logging he can get, possibly weeding out

Re: SPAM: Re: Questions Regarding Disk Cache

2008-02-22 Thread Rick Fochtman
---snip-- Virtual Storage Access Method - The Complete Source Book for VSAM File Structures by Ronald K Ferguson. Now out of box number 2. Mine hasn't got a signature, but it has a coffee stain :-) --unsnip-- You mean coffee was

Re: SPAM from data21.com

2008-02-21 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:06 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: SPAM from data21.com It appears as a reward for posting regarding CA-TPX, I received SPAM

SPAM from data21.com

2008-02-21 Thread Binyamin Dissen
It appears as a reward for posting regarding CA-TPX, I received SPAM from data21.com trying to sell their product. Gentlemen from data21.com - not a good idea to SPAM based on posts to this list. -- Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar

Re: SPAM from data21.com

2008-02-21 Thread Rick Fochtman
snip-- It appears as a reward for posting regarding CA-TPX, I received SPAM from data21.com trying to sell their product. Gentlemen from data21.com - not a good idea to SPAM based on posts to this list. --unsnip

Re: SPAM: Re: LZW Compression/Expansion

2008-02-20 Thread Rick Fochtman
Many thanks to all who responded to my LZW query. I now have a plethora of references available, thanks to many helpful responses both onlist and offlist. I can't say for sure what compression algorithm I'll use in the updated ARCHIVER; overall performance and some of the technical details

Re: SPAM: Re: COMPRESS QUESTION

2008-02-19 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search

Re: SPAM: Re: COMPRESS QUESTION

2008-02-19 Thread Rick Fochtman
---snip- It's always best to consider the audience; I got into the habit of referring to the 256-byte data portion of the actual record as the directory block, ignoring the key and count portions, when talking to application folks. Doesn't that confuse

Re: SPAM: Re: COMPRESS QUESTION

2008-02-19 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
on the options used. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003

Re: SPAM: Re: COMPRESS QUESTION

2008-02-19 Thread Tom Marchant
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:06:13 -0600, Rick Fochtman wrote: In the last shop I was in, all but one member of the application staff considered it was beneath them to define their own PDS datasets. They'd just send a request to systems staff, and management said we had to do it, period. I'd guess

Re: SPAM: Re: COMPRESS QUESTION

2008-02-19 Thread Ted MacNEIL
In this case, an auditor would be your friend. No. A compliance officer. SME: Sets standards with help from compliance. Auditor: Reports on how much/little is complied with. Compliance: Enforces standards and ensures deviations are rectified. Auditors should have no enforcement authority. -

Re: SPAM: Re: COMPRESS QUESTION

2008-02-19 Thread Rick Fochtman
snip-- In the last shop I was in, all but one member of the application staff considered it was beneath them to define their own PDS datasets. They'd just send a request to systems staff, and management said we had to do it, period. I'd guess

Re: SPAM: Re: COMPRESS QUESTION

2008-02-18 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Re: SPAM: Re: COMPRESS QUESTION

2008-02-18 Thread (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
In a message dated 2/18/2008 10:09:09 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, I'll bite. A PDS directory block has an 8-byte count area, an 8-byte key area, and a 256-byte data area. Aha! When is a directory block not 256 bytes long? When 8 is not equal to 0.

Re: SPAM: Re: Linux zSeries questions

2008-02-18 Thread Rick Fochtman
--snip- From what I've seen in looking at various bits and pieces of source code, PL/S or its replacement(s) have been most heavily used in the MVS code; not so much in OS/360, except SMP. Do you count BSL as being PL/S? It was heavily used in OS/360,

Re: SPAM: Re: OT: D/R situation in an Airliner

2008-02-18 Thread Rick Fochtman
---snip--- D/R is just not an option at 10K (or more) meters up. The closest time I ever got to fly a plane was in the Caribbean between islands. My knuckles were wrapped around a steering wheel so tightly that my hands were white. The pilot was right

Re: SPAM: Re: COMPRESS QUESTION

2008-02-18 Thread Rick Fochtman
-snip--- OK, I'll bite. A PDS directory block has an 8-byte count area, an 8-byte key area, and a 256-byte data area. Aha! When is a directory block not 256 bytes long? When 8 is not equal to 0. Which is why the number of directory blocks

Re: SPAM: Re: COMPRESS QUESTION

2008-02-18 Thread (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
In a message dated 2/18/2008 11:18:35 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I THINK the difference arises because of the key. While many of us tend to ignore the key when referring to directory block, Seymour chooses NOT to ignore this value. I now see the source of the

  1   2   3   4   >