Ball park
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 7, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Ed Gould wrote:
>
> On Aug 6, 2014, at 11:11 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
>>> -SNIP--
>>> Gil,
>>>
>>> No blurred lines. We asked for a Personal Use license (some called it
>>>
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 21:45:12 -0400, Thomas Conley wrote:
>On 8/6/2014 9:45 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www-03.ibm.com/software/products/en/ratideveandtestenviforsystz
>>>
>> Where I read:
>>
>> Note: Rational Development and Test Environment for System z can only
>> be used for
>
On Aug 6, 2014, at 11:11 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
-SNIP--
Gil,
No blurred lines. We asked for a Personal Use license (some
called it Hobbyist, a pejorative term that I think held us back)
for z/OS, and IBM delivered. You can't use
How much does this cost
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 6, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Thomas Conley wrote:
>
>> On 8/6/2014 9:45 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>>> On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 09:26:01 -0400, Pinnacle wrote:
>>>
>>> I've been remiss in not posting this sooner on IBM-Main. I recently
>>> purchased Ratio
On Aug 6, 2014, at 8:55 PM, Thomas Conley wrote:
-SNIP_
Mike,
A number of folks here have completely missed the point. RD&T is a
completely new and completely unique offering. The zPad and PC
Server 500 offerings were only ava
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Thomas Conley wrote:
>
> No blurred lines. We asked for a Personal Use license (some called it
> Hobbyist, a pejorative term that I think held us back) for z/OS, and IBM
> delivered. You can't use it for commercial development or production. You
> can use it for
On 8/6/2014 11:07 AM, Mike Myers wrote:
Gil:
This doesn't surprise me. I thank you for finding it, as I was going to
look for something like that in the announcement.
This is very much the same as prior offerings, going back as far as the
zPad and even back to the PC Server 500. I had both of t
On 8/6/2014 9:45 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 09:26:01 -0400, Pinnacle wrote:
I've been remiss in not posting this sooner on IBM-Main. I recently
purchased Rational Development & Test (RD&T) from IBM, a product which
allows anyone to run z/OS on Intel hardware. That's right, a
On 8/6/2014 12:29 PM, Barry Merrill wrote:
What is the advantage of this RD&T system over using the IBM Remote Developer
Program?
Unless you need to thrash the CPU time to really jack up your RDP costs,
it seems a great deal less expensive and far easier to use, since there
is no install nor ma
On 8/6/2014 12:22 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
I stand corrected. I was not aware that such systems were available. One site
I saw after a brief search will even sell you a 12-core Xeon with Win7 Pro or
Win 8.1 Pro for less than $4,200.
I also stand corrected that there are only 4-core i7
Hi Mate,
It has been escalated to our System Programmer. But I'm really eager to
know the solution.
Kindly help me to know the solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajesh Janakiraman
Mainframe System Analyst
From: retired mainframer
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 08/07/2014 03:06 AM
Su
Yes.
On 6 Aug 2014 22:01, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)"
wrote:
> In
> ,
> on 08/06/2014
>at 10:25 AM, Jim McAlpine said:
>
> >We currently have an assembler routine which is called from CICS to
> >check whether a particular job is running in the same z/OS system as
> >the CICS system. This rout
Do you want to fix the problem or just clear the message from your operator
console? David's response shows the former and "K E,1" should handle the
latter.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Rajesh Janakiraman
> Sen
If you specify FIX on the AUDIT command, doesn't HSM correct the problems
without you having to generate the FIXCDS commands manually.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of willie bunter
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 201
In
,
on 08/06/2014
at 10:25 AM, Jim McAlpine said:
>We currently have an assembler routine which is called from CICS to
>check whether a particular job is running in the same z/OS system as
>the CICS system. This routine was written back in the dark ages and
>accomplishes this by chasing the A
I added
-D "racfid=IBMUSER,profiletype=user,sysplex=sysplex1"
And it created output in STDOUT
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Donald J.
Sent: Wednesday, 06 August, 2014 4:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
Try typing the ldapsearch directly from an omvs command line.
I usually use openldap on my pc for commands.
An OMVS segment for your userid is probably a requirement.
--
Donald J.
dona...@4email.net
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Tim Brown wrote:
> Thanks, I ran this, it got rc=0 but the
Thanks David. Google Access was temporarily not available here, due to
services. sorry for inconvenience. And Thanks a lot
Thanks & Regards,
Rajesh Janakiraman
Mainframe System Analyst
From: "Jousma, David"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 08/07/2014 01:28 AM
Subject:[Ma
Thanks, I ran this, it got rc=0 but there is no output?
//LDAPSPRCH JOB 0,CLASS=A,PRTY=6,MSGLEVEL=(1,1),MSGCLASS=X,
//STEP01 EXEC PGM=BPXBATCH
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*,LRECL=1024,RECFM=V
//STDOUT DD SYSOUT=*,LRECL=1024,RECFM=V
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Farley, Peter x23353
wrote:
> Tom, are you sure about that i7 processor spec? I believe the i7 is a 4-core
> processor, not a 6-core processor. And if you turn off hiperthreading it
> really is only 4 cores, not the 8 cores you seem to have with hiperthreading
Thanks, Neil, for the detailed explanation - as well as the clarification about
CDS-based versus active-based displays. My thinking had been that possibly the
CDS display might display the defined-but-not-found volumes and the active
display only the 'found' volumes, but you clarified that for
Caveat:
In particular, column 22 Physical Status will have Convert, Initial or NonSMS
for actual volumes with, as Mike mentioned, dashes (empty) for the un-assigned
volumes. [3] Columns 25+ will show the SMS status (Quiesce, Enable, etc.)
assigned to the volume whether it exists or not. Thu
My first hit on google on this, and BTW, google can be your friend:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21186162
Unable to load user security exit CUA Startup error: KLVIN406 Module KLVINNAM
R15(4)
Technote (troubleshooting)
Problem(Abstract)
Unable to load user security exit CUA
Dear Mates,
In our Production box we got the following console message,
STC07556 *KLVIN406 STARTUP ERROR: MODULE(KLVINNAM) R15(4)
Which is operator response message. It is still there for nearly 12hrs
without proper response from our team.
Kindly help me in this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajes
Garth,
Thanks for your explanation. It was very helpful.
Allan,
I originally checked the manual before I posted my question. For some reason I
didn't find the display command as
Garth had recommended. Perhaps I missed it.
Thanks again to all of you. Now on to DFHSMing !!
Too ba
Certainly one--perhaps all--functions using DVD must be performed on a
'local' HMC: IPL from disc. When we installed z/VM, we had to use a real
HMC. Note however that some functions require inserting the DVD into an
HMC, not into the SE itself. I believe that some actions like rebooting
the SE
I stand corrected. I was not aware that such systems were available. One site
I saw after a brief search will even sell you a 12-core Xeon with Win7 Pro or
Win 8.1 Pro for less than $4,200.
I also stand corrected that there are only 4-core i7 CPU's. I see now that
there are 6-core versions,
What is the advantage of this RD&T system over using the IBM Remote Developer
Program?
Unless you need to thrash the CPU time to really jack up your RDP costs,
it seems a great deal less expensive and far easier to use, since there
is no install nor maintenance on your part. Doesn't look like a
A dual Xeon box with 12 cores and 64GB can be had for less than half the price
of that Mac. If you have the $$$ for the licence, the hardware cost is a
non-issue.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent:
Typical legalese for "If you try to replace any part of your production z
hardware and software with this PC-based, capacity-limited software-only
offering we will sue your behind off!"
Possibly also aimed at countries who don't (or whose "rogue" citizens or
military organizations don't) really
On 2014-08-06, at 08:53, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
>
> For Sysplex installations, IBM recommends an 11-Core system with 3 cores
> devoted to linux and 8 cores devoted to z/VM and its guests.
>
> AFAIK ordinary people don't have access to an 11-core system. That would
> require a "PC" with fo
Gil:
This doesn't surprise me. I thank you for finding it, as I was going to
look for something like that in the announcement.
This is very much the same as prior offerings, going back as far as the
zPad and even back to the PC Server 500. I had both of these and similar
restrictions applied
See GC52-1387-00z/OS DFSMShsm Diagnosis
HTH,
I am having a problem to find the record type of some dsns which do not exist
in the ICFCAT however they are in uncataloged status in HSM. I stumbled upon
25 dsns while running AUDIT against the MCDS & BCDS.
Here is an example.
ERR 03 HESD
I wonder if CICS REXX interface would support "CONSOLE SYSCMD(D A,CICSPROD)
CART('CMDTEST')" statement?
This came from IBM-MAIN archives.
Something interesting to try.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Miklos Sz
For the ERR03, I've used the following;
HSEND DELETE 'AOSYS.OPS.GLBLVAR.BKUPS.NWKC.G0068V00'
This is some documentation I picked up along the way for the ERR20:
THE ERR 20 MESSAGES INDICATE THERE IS A MCD RECORD BUT THE
CORRESPONDING MCV RECORD IS NOT FOUND. TO CLEAN THIS UP, YOU
Tom, are you sure about that i7 processor spec? I believe the i7 is a 4-core
processor, not a 6-core processor. And if you turn off hiperthreading it
really is only 4 cores, not the 8 cores you seem to have with hiperthreading
turned on.
Plus, I read this in the specs for the hardware support
Try this:
> //STEPNAME EXEC PGM=BPXBATCH
> //STDOUT DD SYSOUT=*,LRECL=1024,RECFM=V
> //STDERR DD SYSOUT=*,LRECL=1024,RECFM=V
> //STDPARM DD *
> sh /bin/ldapsearch -h m
Good Day Readers,
I am having a problem to find the record type of some dsns which do not exist
in the ICFCAT however they are in uncataloged status in HSM. I stumbled upon
25 dsns while running AUDIT against the MCDS & BCDS.
Here is an example.
ERR 03 HESD.MAILRETN.WRKLIST.G0041V00 NOT CATALO
This calls GLDSRCH and I get a return code of 1
LDAPREX2 'IBMUSER'
3 *-* call LDAPSRCH '-h 127.0.0.1 ' '-p 389 ' '-s base '
>L> "-h 127.0.0.1 "
>L> "-p 389 "
I would also suggest to use the shared SPOOL, but maybe a "ROUTE
*ALL,D A,jobname " would do this.
With EXEC CICS SPOOLOPEN, EXEC CICS SPOOLWRITE you can submit a job and
you can get back the result via
EXEC CICS SPOOLREAD.
Another option would be via RMF II API interface, (ERB2XDGS) quer
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 09:26:01 -0400, Pinnacle wrote:
>I've been remiss in not posting this sooner on IBM-Main. I recently
>purchased Rational Development & Test (RD&T) from IBM, a product which
>allows anyone to run z/OS on Intel hardware. That's right, anyone. You
>do not have to own any big iro
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 09:26:01 -0400, Pinnacle wrote:
>II recently
>purchased Rational Development & Test (RD&T) from IBM, a product which
>allows anyone to run z/OS on Intel hardware. That's right, anyone.
You crazy son of a bitch ;0)
This just might work - especially it it's now seen to be
hello Tim,
maybe something like this helps:
//TSO EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,DYNAMNBR=50
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSLST DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSPROC DD DISP=SHR,DSN=GLD.SGLDEXEC
//LDAPOUT DD SYSOUT=V,HOLD=YES
//LDAPER
Yes I quoted the part with ANY SOLUTION. That meant - to me - CICS but
anything else would also work.
Next part of the questions.
What version of CICS?
What version of z/OS?
Do you want any language or a specific language?
Do you want a vendor tool or a home grown one (roll your own)?
How do y
Tom, that is fantastic news!
I am surprised this has not been more publicized.
Your offer to help other folks is characteristically generous. Careful
there - you'll spoil your rep.
Cheers,,,Steve
Steven F. Conway, CISSP
AO-DTS- CTHO-HSD INFRASTRUCTURE (INFR)
z/OS Systems Support
Phone: 703
Perhaps if you provide some more detail on why you need to do this. Systems
have changed over the decades and perhaps there is a better solution than
querying JES2. Of course that may be the correct solution, but without the
details on why this is being done, it is hard to judge.
Are you tryin
Lizette,
You've quoted only part of the post. If you read the whole thing it is
obvious (to me at least) that it is a CICS program solution that is
required.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
> Jim,
>
> You inferred a CICS solution, you did not state it.
> We now have
Yes it does.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:23 PM, DASDBILL2 wrote:
> I forgot to add "running in the same system (image, LPAR, instance of
> z/OS)."
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Fairchild, Bill"
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 8:21:46 AM
> Subject: Re
I've been remiss in not posting this sooner on IBM-Main. I recently
purchased Rational Development & Test (RD&T) from IBM, a product which
allows anyone to run z/OS on Intel hardware. That's right, anyone. You
do not have to own any big iron. Any high-schooler, college kid, z/OS
professiona
I forgot to add "running in the same system (image, LPAR, instance of z/OS)."
- Original Message -
From: "Fairchild, Bill"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 8:21:46 AM
Subject: Re: How to check if a job is running in a SYSPLEX
It is possible to have two o
It is possible to have two or more address spaces with the same "jobname."
Does your code handle that possibility?
Bill Fairchild
- Original Message -
From: "CP Vernooij (SPLXM) - KLM"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 6:30:47 AM
Subject: Re: How to c
Jim,
You inferred a CICS solution, you did not state it.
We now have the need to check to see if the job in question is running in
any z/OS instance of a SYSPLEX. Any suggestions as to what is the best way to
accomplish this.
So you need a CICS solution. If you have not done so, you might
Use the JES SSI interface
See "z/OS MVS Using the Functional Subsystem Interface" SA38-0678-00
>We currently have an assembler routine which is called from CICS to check
>whether a particular job is running in the same z/OS system as the CICS
>system. This routine was written back in the
W dniu 2014-08-06 14:27, Williams, Jeff (MGS) pisze:
Depends on what HMC functions you want to use. Some HMC functions cannot be
peformed with the remote web interface. I would have a local HMC console rather
than use it remotely if that's an option. For example, you can't POR remotely,
you ha
On 6 Aug 2014 12:56, "Elardus Engelbrecht"
wrote:
>
> Vernooij, CP (SPLXM) wrote:
>
> >Your JES2 MAS will probably cover your Sysplex, so you could ask JES2 if
the job is running (I don't know JES3).
>
> Good suggestion. With SDSF you can use SYSNAME * and then using ST
screen, sorting/filtering a
How do you want this implemented. As others have pointed out - lots of
solutions.
Do you want:
Automation (OPS/MVS Tivoli?)
REXX in Batch
A new program (COBOL, PL/I, Assembler, PERL, etc)
Do you have a scheduling product (CA Workload manager, BMC Control)
Do you want to use SDSF interactively?
Has an internet search for ldapsearch examples provided any guidance?
Or do you have a more specific issue? For example, you coded the ldapsearch
but x occurs?
What happens when you try running it with JCL?
Can you post what you have? And any messages that occur when you run it?
Lizette
>
Depends on what HMC functions you want to use. Some HMC functions cannot be
peformed with the remote web interface. I would have a local HMC console rather
than use it remotely if that's an option. For example, you can't POR remotely,
you have to be at the HMC.
-Original Message-
From:
Does anyone have an example of running ldapsearch via jcl
If this not the right listserv for this request let me know
Thanks,
Tim Brown
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...
John Gilmore wrote:
>... as it is the clots who cannot be bothered to learn to do so.
LOL! I had to look up 'clot' as I only know about clot as in 'blood clot'.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/clot said it is (noun) 'Brit - a stupid
person; fool'
;-D
>In my experience the use of a sort to po
Vernooij, CP (SPLXM) wrote:
>Your JES2 MAS will probably cover your Sysplex, so you could ask JES2 if the
>job is running (I don't know JES3).
Good suggestion. With SDSF you can use SYSNAME * and then using ST screen,
sorting/filtering according to SAff, Queue, ASYS, etc, (or in DA screen you
It's not so much DB2, which can be used efficiently, as it is the
clots who cannot be bothered to learn to do so.
The practical effects are of course the same, but the distinction is
worth making because the remedies are not the same.
In my experience the use of a sort to post process DB2 outputs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 11:25
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: How to check if a job is running in a SYSPLEX
We currently have an assembler routine which is c
Jim McAlpine wrote:
>We currently have an assembler routine which is called from CICS to check
>whether a particular job is running in the same z/OS system as the CICS
>system. This routine was written back in the dark ages and accomplishes this
>by chasing the ASCB chain and comparing the jobn
Thank you, the information cleared things up for me
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 6, 2014, at 2:06 AM, "Vernooij, CP (SPLXM) - KLM"
> wrote:
>
> I think I already smelled a misconception: the CDS is not a signaling path,
> it is the administration. The signaling paths are CF structures and
We currently have an assembler routine which is called from CICS to check
whether a particular job is running in the same z/OS system as the CICS
system. This routine was written back in the dark ages and accomplishes
this by chasing the ASCB chain and comparing the jobname of each address
space. W
66 matches
Mail list logo
