Greg,
In your opinion, would it be okay to specify a reserve value to all partition
profiles that equals the highest number of CPs that my CBU records allow?
This would allow for total flexibility of CP assignment to any or all lpars. In
my case, it would also apply to a second set of backup p
On 5/11/2016 8:59 AM, Bigendian Smalls wrote:
However, you will be able to use HTTPS.
Kurt - that hasn’t been my experience on z/OS 2.1. Without Sec Lvl
3 (JCPT411) the test SMP/E download job fails - captures show that it
cannot negotiate a common cipher suite with the server - and fails
rig
Thanks to all... It turns out the ACFMFWHY and ACFMFTXT fields are what I
needed to understand. The ACFMFWHY field refers to a message.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@lis
On 5/13/2016 4:07 AM, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
... would it be okay to specify a reserve value to all partition profiles that
equals the highest number of CPs that my CBU records allow?
This would allow for total flexibility of CP assignment to any or all lpars. In
my case, it would also app
On Thu, 12 May 2016 23:16:43 -0500, Edward Gould wrote:
>When I do JCL I have 1 PROC (total) for Receive, Apply and Accept.
>The symbolics in JCL allow for overrides for APPLY & Accept volumes.
So when you APPLY or ACCEPT you have to update the symbol(s) for the volume(s)
AND specify the matching
I know this has been kicked around before but I don't have a good answer off
the top of my head and I don't know exactly how to Google for the answer.
Does anyone have suggestions for conditioning a jobstep on &symbol1 !=
&symbol2? I know that COND= and IF are only on return codes and similar
thin
Totally agree with Tom here - JCL leads to everyone specifying their own values
instead of one consistent standard for the relevant zone. Our shop mandates the
use of DDDEFs for each zone.
Jerry Whitteridge
Manager Mainframe Systems & Storage
Albertsons - Safeway Inc.
925 738 9443
Corporate Tiel
On Fri, 13 May 2016 09:39:43 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>I know this has been kicked around before but I don't have a good answer off
>the top of my head and I don't know exactly how to Google for the answer.
>
>Does anyone have suggestions for conditioning a jobstep on &symbol1 !=
>&symbol2? I k
I don't have a solution for the string comparison issue, but the DISP=NEW issue
I can tell you with confidence "just works" under JES2. For either a COND= or
an IF bypass of a step, all of the DD's are bypassed and no allocation error
occurs. I use this feature all the time in my testing.
For
Charles Mills wrote:
>I know this has been kicked around before but I don't have a good answer off
>the top of my head and I don't know exactly how to Google for the answer.
Can you search IBM-MAIN archives itself? Of course, you may try out different
search arguments...
>Does anyone have sug
Thanks. I do NOT need JES3. This is for internal use, not a product, and our
datacenter is all JES2.
Thanks for your experiment below. That's the right idea even if it did not
work. I always forget about the UNIX tools from batch.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
If you remember I had a situation where the CPU was hitting its four hour avg
and soft capping itself. When this happens CICS and DB2 aren't allowed to flex
above and I get max socket errors within the busiest CICS. At the advice of
the group I set up a resource group and associated to a servi
Furthermore, even in 2.1, if the parameter is not specified (we do not), the
default is 16 for . That's plenty for us.
.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
robin...@sce.co
If there is room, the cpu will be used. When things get tight, the RG cap will
be enforced.
HTH,
If you remember I had a situation where the CPU was hitting its four hour avg
and soft capping itself. When this happens CICS and DB2 aren't allowed to flex
above and I get max socket errors wit
You may want to set:
AOP_MVS_RETURN_CODES
Specifies whether the afpxpcl, afpxpdf, and afpxps commands return MVS
return codes or UNIX exit values:
Value
Meaning
YES
MVS return codes:
0
Successful.
4
A warning occurred during t
So at what point with the service class get restricted based on the resource
group settings?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 1:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
I think you have it right, the RG cap should be enforced, based on the goal &
importance for the service class and system scope -- From the Knowledge Base:
If work in a resource group is consuming more resources than the specified
maximum capacity, the system caps the associated work accordingl
> On May 13, 2016, at 10:15 AM, Tom Marchant
> <000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 May 2016 23:16:43 -0500, Edward Gould wrote:
>
>> When I do JCL I have 1 PROC (total) for Receive, Apply and Accept.
>> The symbolics in JCL allow for overrides for APPLY & Accep
> Just because I specify deliverycb-bld.dhe.ibm.com doesn't mean that when
> it resolves that it is the same:
>
> Connecting to: dispby-117.boulder.ibm.com 170.225.15.117 port: 21
>
> I ran into this with our Firewall weenies and it took a bit of work for them
> to get it right.
>
> This
We asked IBM support about implementing SHA2 for the SMP/E FTP download process
and was told to open an RFE. That seems kinda insane given that SHA-1 seems to
be heading to the heap of obsolete technologies.
Can anyone shed any light on this? Opening an RFE seems absurd given that this
is an i
On Fri, 13 May 2016 09:39:43 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>I know this has been kicked around before but I don't have a good answer off
>the top of my head and I don't know exactly how to Google for the answer.
>
>Does anyone have suggestions for conditioning a jobstep on &symbol1 !=
>&symbol2? I k
Now you're talking! Great! Simple, and real obvious what is going on there.
Thanks. That's the kind of hack I was hoping for. Yes, I would be running on
JES2/V2R1.
Darn! I was looking forward to writing a Rexx script that would do an INTERPRET
on PARM=
Charles
-Original Message-
From
I would think that the RFE would provide IBM with documentation on the number of
customers interested in this. And to show IBM MGT it is worth the investment in
time and coding.
>From what I have seen working with vendors, just because it makes sense does
>not
mean it would be a priority for wor
On Fri, 13 May 2016 14:07:22 -0700, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
>I would think that the RFE would provide IBM with documentation on the number
>of
>customers interested in this. And to show IBM MGT it is worth the investment
>in
>time and coding.
>
>From what I have seen working with vendors, just
>>> On 5/13/2016 at 03:21 PM, "Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)"
>>> wrote:
> We asked IBM support about implementing SHA2 for the SMP/E FTP download
> process and was told to open an RFE. That seems kinda insane given that SHA-1
> seems to be heading to the heap of obsolete technologies.
>
> Can anyone
On 5/13/2016 5:31 PM, Mark Post wrote:
On 5/13/2016 at 03:21 PM, "Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)" wrote:
We asked IBM support about implementing SHA2 for the SMP/E FTP download
process and was told to open an RFE. That seems kinda insane given that SHA-1
seems to be heading to the heap of obsolete techn
I have seen specific customer pushback against SHA-1. Serious "you need to
change this" pushback, not "we were just wondering."
"SHA-1 is no longer considered secure against well-funded opponents. In
2005, cryptanalysts found attacks on SHA-1 suggesting that the algorithm
might not be secure enou
DFSORT using JPn symbols:
// SET PARM1=XY
// SET PARM2=AB
//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=SORT,PARM='JP1"&PARM1",JP2"&PARM2"'
//SYMNOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SORTOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSINDD *
OPTION COPY,STOPAFT=1
INREC OVE
W dniu 2016-05-07 o 22:11, Clark Morris pisze:
[Default] On 29 Apr 2016 08:58:52 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
r.skoru...@sninp-it.com.pl (R.S.) wrote:
It's Friday...
1. I would like to have whole z/OS installation material (read tape
content) on pendrive. I could accept multiple volumes (pen
On 13 May 2016 at 19:19, R.S. wrote:
> It's absurd. Completely ridiculous.
> Pendrive from IBM is not likely to have a virus.
True. But it's related to the argument that airline pilots should not
be security screened at airports. Of course it's not about screening
pilots, but rather those who *lo
On 2016-05-13 17:47, Tony Harminc wrote:
> On 13 May 2016 at 19:19, R.S. wrote:
>> It's absurd. Completely ridiculous.
>> Pendrive from IBM is not likely to have a virus.
>
> True. But it's related to the argument that airline pilots should not
> be security screened at airports. Of course it's no
It worked, once I un-fat-fingered it. Thanks again,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bill Godfrey
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 1:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Suggestion for conditioning step on
32 matches
Mail list logo
