>Its interesting, because I don’t have any products that give me extra extents
>except what SMS does for me space wise, and I have never increased my dataset
>size allocations.
Just as a preparation for increasing allocations, here is what failed x37 in
the past 8 refreshes (all on the *install
Except for C:\Windows and the Program files directory, I don't think I keep
anything where Microsoft wants me to. I like to keep everything that isn't the
vanilla MS system on other drives and I create links to them so that I can
reinstall when I want and just redo the links.
But then I also
production was a non-event. Which is
as it should be.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Tom Brennan
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 7:38 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Re
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests
External Email
Hi Terri,
When adding an Software Instance that you already have (say, z/OS V2.4), you
are telling z/OSMF the CSI and zones to use. Those DDDEFs, presumably, will be
correct with the data set names, volumes, and
ah YUP!
I was going to add, when I did a short jaunt with IGS, most of the IBM
sysprog's never heard of ServerPac and most never provided or worked
with a custompac install.
The clients systems are built based on what the client needs, sometime
just the base system, sometimes the base+OEM pr
"seems everyone has a better way"
I think you hit on the root of the problem. With Windows and Linux
installs, everyone (generally) does things the same exact way, including
filenames and directory locations. They don't have the problems we have
with mainframe installs.
On 7/22/2021 7:19 A
I think I IPL'd the CPAC system that was built from the ServerPac once
in my career, it was the company/dept's standard and we had a small LPAR
built just for that reason. Documentation was provided, IPLing the CPAC
system was only done to proceed with the ServerPac install.
moving on from th
I'm almost completely the opposite, I use it as an opportunity to replace the
datasets and make corrections to their allocations. Although in my case I am
normally coming in after someone messed up or 5 to 10 years (or more) after the
previous upgrade so the sizes and allocations in many cases
Some of the problem here is that you are telling me what "will" be there, but I
don't have anything that actually shows that or even implies it for z/OSMF for
z/OS. I don't even have the workflows to verify anything.
I'm really hoping that I'm being Chicken Little here, but it's looking less
We always seemed to be at the limit of our res pack, so after a new
install I would run a job that to compress and trim (to zero) most PDS's
with the idea that they would just go into extents as needed if updates
were made. We rarely updated a res pack in place, so there was usually
no problem
Same with me when I ran ServerPac installs - I never IPL'd using the
datasets provided by the installer such as catalogs, RACF, spool, SMF,
page, etc. I never understood IBM's reason for doing that, and also
never understood the reason for running the system validation jobs on
the vanilla syst
Bruce,
Thank you! This is very helpful for us to have!
-Marna WALLE
z/OS System Install and Upgrade
IBM Poughkeepsie
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
Brian,
Let's make a clear distinction. Inside the z/OS z/OSMF ServerPac package that
is shipped to you, and I'm talking about the archived datasets for you to
restore, these are the data sets you'll receive (which is somewhat based on
what the product mix you ordered from Shopz):
--SMP/E targ
Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Ed
Jaffe [edja...@phoenixsoftware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 12:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests
On 7/20/2021 10:47 AM, Marna WALLE wrote:
> ... even with
Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Brian Westerman [brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 1:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022
Hi Marna,
>Making everything bigger is not a good option. Not everything "needs" to be
>bigger, but there are those that even 40% won't be enough.I think
>creating z/OSMF product delivery without the ability to change the size and
>location of the datasets (easily) is a bad idea.
I am wi
>Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
>
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
>Marna WALLE [mwa...@us.ibm.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 1:47 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.ED
Making everything bigger is not a good option. Not everything "needs" to be
bigger, but there are those that even 40% won't be enough. The Serverpac used
to ship with SMF and JES spool/checkpoint and SMF on the catalog volume, and
I'm sure no one probably leaves it there, but the size of the d
Hello Marna,
I use:-
Rules for re-sizing datasets:-
Target volume datasets to be allocated in CYLINDERS
Distribution volume datasets to be allocated in TRACK
nce into a
running system
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Ed Jaffe
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:50 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests
>
> On 7/2
On 7/20/2021 10:47 AM, Marna WALLE wrote:
... even with enlarging the data sets with some predictive percentage (50%,
100%, 200%?) - still doesn't completely help with running out of space in some
data sets or even volumes continually, and could result in some data sets being
overly and unnece
It'd be great if IBM disappeared the problem by buying one of the stop x37
companies :)
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, July 20th, 2021 at 11:17 PM, Marna WALLE wrote:
> Hi Barbara (and others),
>
> Nice to see so many users of PDSEs! We do not today have the capability to
: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests
External Email
Hi Terri,
When adding an Software Instance that you already have (say, z/OS V2.4), you
are telling z/OSMF the CSI and zones to use. Those DDDEFs, presumably, will be
correct with the data set names, volumes, and paths
Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Marna WALLE [mwa...@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 1:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests
Hi Barbara (and others),
Nice to see so many users of PDSEs! We do not
Hello KB,
As a little reference table, here's what's available today (and in the future)
from Shopz as a ServerPac, along with the installation method. You can see
that z/OSMF ServerPac has been available for many products, for quite a while
now.
CICS (and program products):
z/OSMF ServerP
Hi Barbara (and others),
Nice to see so many users of PDSEs! We do not today have the capability to
switch from PDS to PDSE in z/OSMF, but we've got it in our backlog from
requests to have it. If PDSEs users would like to help us prioritize that,
with their business impacts without this capabi
thank you for the sanity check. I see that I can inquire missing /
critical maint, I was hoping that I could take the info and perform a
receive from that missing maint. using a defined protocol (ftps or
https) and have z/osmf submit the job to receive from network.
I do have a weekly job setu
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:05 PM Marna WALLE wrote:
>
> Q: I wonder since my company does not allow access from my mainframe systems
> to the internet, what protocol will be used to query my CSI's,
> maint level? get service
> A: Same methods as before. Nothing has changed. You can acquire a
Hi Carmen,
Sorry to hear that z/OS V2.4 will be your least release! Good luck in
retirement!
Once you have laid down a z/OSMF ServerPac, it will have the same
considerations as if you had done it with the ISPF ServerPac dialogs, so I'm
guessing the comments weren't about z/OSMF specifically?
This may be off topic...
I used SMP(/e) about 35+ years ago, I used to build CICS.
I now get my z/OS from ADCD. I download some volumes and have an IPLable
system. I could download the DLIBs if I wanted them.
Is this the sort of direction we should be going in? If IBM was to provide
the volumes
ion List On Behalf Of
> kekronbekron
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:35 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests
>
> Hmm.. is 2.4 is available as a zOSMF Software Instance via ShopZ?
>
> - KB
>
> ‐‐
Hi Terri,
When adding an Software Instance that you already have (say, z/OS V2.4), you
are telling z/OSMF the CSI and zones to use. Those DDDEFs, presumably, will be
correct with the data set names, volumes, and paths. Those DDDEFs will be used
as a model on the incoming z/OS CSI DDDEFs. That
January 2022 and beyond - Requests
Robert,
It's been done, and is the proceedings:
https://www.share.org/Events/Past-Events/Proceedings/Proceeding-Details/installing-ibms-serverpac-using-zosmf-software-management
Look for Kurt Quackenbush's "Installing IBM's ServerPac U
Robert,
It's been done, and is the proceedings:
https://www.share.org/Events/Past-Events/Proceedings/Proceeding-Details/installing-ibms-serverpac-using-zosmf-software-management
Look for Kurt Quackenbush's "Installing IBM's ServerPac Using z/OSMF Software
Management", from Ft Worth 2020. Kurt
.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed
Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 10:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests
External Email
On 7/20/2021 4:41 AM, Richards, Robert B
On 7/20/2021 7:27 AM, Shaffer, Terri wrote:
How would this even work? Or be complete.. SMPE doesn’t know about my
SERVERPAC customizations. Or how about the CPAC. ** datasets or other
operational names I setup.
When you create a Software Instance, you select a CSI and as many target
zo
AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests
External Email
On 7/20/2021 4:41 AM, Richards, Robert B. (CTR) wrote:
> "If I may suggest to all that will install z/OS V2.5 with z/OSMF, it really
> behooves you to define your prior z
t;
> H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592)
>
> terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
>
> -Original Message-
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of
> kekronbekron
>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:24 AM
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sounds like great SHARE session material (if it isn't already there for the
next one).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed
Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 10:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and b
On 7/20/2021 6:34 AM, kekronbekron wrote:
Hmm.. is 2.4 is available as a zOSMF Software Instance via ShopZ?
No products are available as Software Instances from ShopZ, they come as
PORTABLE Software Instances.
You can create a Software Instance for any collection of software you
have -- SMP
On 7/20/2021 4:41 AM, Richards, Robert B. (CTR) wrote:
"If I may suggest to all that will install z/OS V2.5 with z/OSMF, it really behooves
you to define your prior z/OS release right now as a Software Instance."
I do not want to assume that I completely understand your suggestion.
She means
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
kekronbekron
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests
Hmm.. is 2.4 is available as a zOSMF Software Instance via ShopZ?
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
O
Discussion List On Behalf Of
kekronbekron
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests
External Email
Hi Bob,
I believe she means that when you import your prior/current zOS CSI and set
some parms (if
pz except change the
> delivery mechanism.
>
> Bob
>
> -Original Message-
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of
> kekronbekron
>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:24 AM
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Subj
I thought that maybe a new order of 2.4 through Shopz except change the
delivery mechanism.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
kekronbekron
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January
Hi Bob,
I believe she means that when you import your prior/current zOS CSI and set
some parms (if required) for it, then you can base your target environment
(CSI, files, etc.) off of it.
This way, you don't start at zero, i.e., defining all datasets manually, anew.
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Mess
Marna,
Can you expand on what you mean below?
"If I may suggest to all that will install z/OS V2.5 with z/OSMF, it really
behooves you to define your prior z/OS release right now as a Software
Instance."
I do not want to assume that I completely understand your suggestion.
Bob
Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Marna WALLE
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2021 1:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests
External Email
Hi Terri,
You are correct that within the z/OSMF interface, there is no way to edit a
produced job for
You are 100% correct, there are about 50 datasets that I ALWAYS enlarge during
the installation for just the reason you specified, IBM sizes them for
delivery, not for applying maintenance later. Then there are the ones that
ALWAYS need to be updated like HASPSPACE and the checkpoints, as well
>You can't change the size of a dataset and you can't change PDS to PDSE. It's
>easy in ServerPac to mass change to PDSE. It skips ones that aren't eligible.
You can't? As far as I am concerned that is a definite roadblock. IBM never
sizes the data sets in such a way that they won't go x37 at th
ssage-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Marna WALLE
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2021 1:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests
External Email
Hi Terri,
You are correct that within the z/OSMF interface, there is no way to edit
ent: Monday, July 19, 2021 1:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests
Hi Terri,
You are correct that within the z/OSMF interface, there is no way to edit a
produced job for Deployment. It is intended that no editing is necessary, in
that i
Hi Terri,
You are correct that within the z/OSMF interface, there is no way to edit a
produced job for Deployment. It is intended that no editing is necessary, in
that if you need to "tweak" the job, we should be providing that capability
within the interface itself. The JCL produced should re
So, I am going to ease up on IBM a little, except for the resources needed for
z/OSMF, But have a few usability requests just as in the serverpac.
I am not 100% convinced yet, but I see no way of editing a job that was
generated, BEFORE submit!!
I also see fields on the screen but no context
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Colin Paice
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2021 2:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond (+hungry ZOWE concerns)
Caution! This message was sent from outside your
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2021 4:32 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond (+hungry ZOWE
> concerns)
>
> Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization.
>
> If z/OSMF uses a lot of CPU when idle. You should in
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Colin Paice
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2021 4:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond (+hungry ZOWE concerns)
Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization.
If z/OSMF uses a lot of CPU when
STSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Ed Jaffe
> Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2021 7:24 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond
>
> Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization.
>
> On 7/17/2021 3:46 AM, Brian Westerman
On 17/07/2021 8:46 pm, Brian Westerman wrote:
once they figured out that the two "sample" sites I was dealing with were z13s (80mip)
and a z15t02 (88mip), they decided that they needed to republish the "minimum"
requirements. If you look at the guide now, they use a 400+mip box to do the setup
Hi,
zIIP is not free, and isn't even an available upgrade for the client running a
z13s. It's an option for the one running the z15, but the cost is prohibitive.
My point is that IBM is providing an entry level for customers, but that entry
level cannot execute z/OSMF. These two sites are
July 17, 2021 4:24 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond
>
> On 7/17/2021 3:46 AM, Brian Westerman wrote:
> > Asking a site that is able to function within their requirements and
> > existing
> SLA's to upgrade
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 7:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond
So I have to politely disagree with that comment.
z/OSMF software install has always had its limitations as with big installation
we installed once and replicated 127 times to
ehalf
Of Ed Jaffe
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2021 7:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond
Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization.
On 7/17/2021 3:46 AM, Brian Westerman wrote:
> Asking a site that is able to function with
it again.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Cheryl
> >
> >==
> >Cheryl Watson Walker, CEO
> >Watson & Walker, Inc.
> >Sarasota, FL USA
> >www.watsonwalker.com
> >==
> >
> >
> >
> >
On 7/17/2021 3:46 AM, Brian Westerman wrote:
Asking a site that is able to function within their requirements and existing
SLA's to upgrade their box to more than 4x the existing size just to run z/OSMF
is just never going to be economically feasible. Even on sites with larger
machines, they
from trying it again.
>
>Best regards,
>Cheryl
>
>==
>Cheryl Watson Walker, CEO
>Watson & Walker, Inc.
>Sarasota, FL USA
>www.watsonwalker.com
>======
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
>Shaf
s Terri E Shaffer
Senior Systems Engineer,
z/OS Support:
ACIWorldwide - Telecommuter
H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592)
terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Richards, Robert B. (CTR)
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 12:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LI
Worldwide - Telecommuter
H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592)
terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Richards, Robert B. (CTR)
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 12:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2
ainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf
> Of Shaffer, Terri
>
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 11:01 AM
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond
>
> ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
>
> So not to beat u
On Behalf Of Ron
Wells
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 12:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond
Total joke--setup and developed by people that THINK they know what they are
doing and THINK they know what you need.
-Original Message-
From
.EDU On Behalf Of
> Shaffer, Terri
>
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 11:01 AM
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond
>
> ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
>
> So not to beat up on this new installation process, but
: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond
** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
So not to beat up on this new installation process, but if I have the option on
installing z/OS 2.5 with serverpac in Oct, I will never touch z/OSMF again for
2 years.
It took me 2 days and working with security just to
ources.
Ms Terri E Shaffer
Senior Systems Engineer,
z/OS Support:
ACIWorldwide – Telecommuter
H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592)
terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Marna WALLE
Sent: Sunday, March 7, 2021 10:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSE
Hi,
:) Driving a yugo is an "example of" driving a 18 wheel truck, but it's not an
18-wheel truck, and the exercise is almost useless if you need to drive an
18-wheel truck. :)
If you don't have DB2, CICS or IMS, (which a good number of sites don't have),
what would they use to "practice" wi
Brian,
I see that Timothy jumped in to mention that you do not need to have an IMS,
Db2, or CICS license to try out a z/OSMF Portable Software Instance today. Any
IBM customer can have a sample Portable Software Instance. And that other
major software vendors are already delivering z/OSMF Port
Brian Westerman wrote:
>Next, using CICS, DBV2 or IMS serverpac as a sample/example.
>There are a great many sites who do not have CICS or DB2 or
>IMS, I can name 30 just off the top of my head. How will
>they "practice"? How will they "learn the process now?"
>Are you penalizing them because the
Hi Marna, I will respond in a different order.
As for staying "current", yes, that would be a good idea, unfortunately, it's
unrealistic to decide it has to be that way. I would imagine a very large
number of sites are still running 2.1 and 2.2, in fact, I know that to be true.
Next, usin
Brian,
I would like to assure you that this decision was not taken lightly, and was
taken with all those considerations (and others) to extend both ordering types
for as long as was feasible.
Some points I would like to make:
- the z/OS ServerPac for z/OSMF is extremely similar to the CICS, D
The problem I see is that (currently), you can't use it to get a copy of z/OS
to test how it will work, until 2.5 is released later in the year. Then, after
it is released, just a few months later, the ability to download the "old"
serverpac way will be completely removed.
That's very short-si
Thanks, Dana, for mentioning the test Portable Software Instance you can use
now.
I wanted to add, for those "advanced" z/OSMF users (who are really those that
want a simplified GUI for an SMP/E APPLY of PTFs), this test Portable Software
Instance *also* includes some sample test PTFs in the GL
On 3/5/2021 12:19 AM, Brian Westerman wrote:
When you click on the link below to get the announcement and then from there click on the
link to go the software update page at
(https://www.ibm.com/support/z-content-solutions/software-update-zosmf/), and then click
on the link to "configure your
When you click on the link below to get the announcement and then from there
click on the link to go the software update page at
(https://www.ibm.com/support/z-content-solutions/software-update-zosmf/), and
then click on the link to "configure your software management service", you get
a dead l
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:16:37 -0500, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
>On 3/3/2021 10:53 PM, Jake Anderson wrote:
>
>> If I understand zosmf is going to connect to IBM site over the internet to
>> download it's software.What if a mainframe data centre which doesn't
>> connect to internet or have restriction
9:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond
[External Email. Exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments.]
On 3/3/2021 10:53 PM, Jake Anderson wrote:
> If I understand zosmf is going to connect to IBM site over the
> inte
On 3/3/2021 10:53 PM, Jake Anderson wrote:
If I understand zosmf is going to connect to IBM site over the internet to
download it's software.What if a mainframe data centre which doesn't
connect to internet or have restrictions ?
Downloading your ServerPac using z/OSMF is mostly the same as
dow
If I understand zosmf is going to connect to IBM site over the internet to
download it's software.What if a mainframe data centre which doesn't
connect to internet or have restrictions ?
On Thu, 4 Mar, 2021, 6:48 am Ed Jaffe, wrote:
> On 3/3/2021 2:54 PM, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
> > I hate it!
On 3/3/2021 2:54 PM, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
I hate it!
IMHO there should be "vacation legis" - a period of coexistence of two
methods. Yes, there is some period, but it should be definitely longer.
When I first heard about this, there was no overlap period at all. There
must have been signi
I hate it!
IMHO there should be "vacation legis" - a period of coexistence of two
methods. Yes, there is some period, but it should be definitely longer.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
(looking for new job)
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 03.03.2021 o 20:33, Dave Jousma pisze:
Well, it was foreshadowed here on
Well, it was foreshadowed here on IBM-Main not too long ago, probably by Marna.
Now its in writing…. Get your z/OSMF instances functional now! After January
2022 orders using the custompac dialogs will be gone!
https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/7/897/E
101 - 189 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
