I mean, if you don't get a connection, then RC -5 on PUT would be correct.
Could this be the case?
Ivica
Are you using active or passive FTP? If you are using passive FTP to get
around the problem of foreign server establishing data connection to your
unprivileged port (>1023), which would probably be blocked by your firewall,
then server side might have a problem.
In active mode, foreign server alway
Darren,
I would think that you will have to change your IOCDS for the hardware
configuration. You need one set of CHPIDs for the z/OS LPAR and its 8XXX device
numbers and a separate set of CHPIDs for the z/VM LPAR and its 8XXX device
numbers. Don't forget to exclude the CHPIDs from the access a
Hi guys,
We have a machine with two LPARs; one z/OS and one z/VM. The hardware config is
done via z/OS and z/VM picks up devices automatically via sensing. We've
recently added a number of new DASD devices at 8000-8FFF for the z/OS side.
Unfortunately, z/VM uses an EDEVICE at 8000 to access som
SCIDS is the (good) old name for SHARE's currently (and boringly) named
"evening receptions". IIRC, it stood for Social Conversations Informal
Discussion Session, but more than one member "hit the SCIDS" after
imbibing too much of the then-free alcoholic beverages.
The folklore expansion of th
>On Tuesday, 09/02/2008 at 09:21 EDT, Nick Laflamme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w rote:
>
>> I'll put $5 on "Fran's talking to two different kinds of FTP servers,"
>please.
>>
>> {snip}
>
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 11:23:15 -0400 Alan Altmark said:
>Pay up. :-) The Internet only works (most of the time) because w
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:51:54 -0500 Mike Walter said:
>Is there any chance that when you get the rc-5, the target network drive
>is momentarily "full", but then before the re-try something cleaned out a
>large file? Did you know how large the files were that failed, and from
>the other perspective,
On Tuesday, 09/02/2008 at 09:21 EDT, Nick Laflamme
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll put $5 on "Fran's talking to two different kinds of FTP servers,"
please.
>
> FTP clients have to parse responses from FTP servers. Even though the
> return codes are standardized, I don't have enough faith to
>At 09:45 AM 9/2/2008 -0400, Fran Hensler wrote:
>>All of the FTPs are going to the same network drive.
>
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:52:29 -0500 Nick Laflamme said:
>When you say "the same network drive," is that the same as saying,
>"the exact same server"? Or are you using more than one Windows
>serve
Fran,
SCIDS is the (good) old name for SHARE's currently (and boringly) named
"evening receptions". IIRC, it stood for Social Conversations Informal
Discussion Session, but more than one member "hit the SCIDS" after
imbibing too much of the then-free alcoholic beverages.
Is there any chance t
At 09:45 AM 9/2/2008 -0400, Fran Hensler wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 08:20:58 -0500 Nick Laflamme said:
>I'll put $5 on "Fran's talking to two different kinds of FTP
servers," please.
>
>If I'm wrong, I'll pay the $5 the next time I'm at SCIDS.
Well if I knew what SCIDS is I would attend so I co
I do remember something about a socket not being available a while back.
Once the socket was bound to a port, it could not used for about 2 or 4
minutes(dependent on some ip value). The port/socket would have a
"time-wait" status and could not be reused until this time had expired.
This was direct
I don't remember the details but about 10 years ago, I found that FTP
would fail after "x" number of files during the same FTP PUT. If I
remember correctly, it had to do with a max number of sessions or
something like that. The number kept on incrementing with each
successive file until the
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 08:20:58 -0500 Nick Laflamme said:
>I'll put $5 on "Fran's talking to two different kinds of FTP servers," please.
>
>If I'm wrong, I'll pay the $5 the next time I'm at SCIDS.
Well if I knew what SCIDS is I would attend so I could collect :-).
All of the FTPs are going to the s
At 08:13 AM 9/2/2008 -0400, Fran Hensler wrote:
The return code -5 is does NOT always happen on a disk full condition.
I have an exec FTP2HOME that does 450+ FTPs to users' homes drives.
It creates a VMFTP macro on a VDISK and then invokes VMFTP
to exec it. The FTP2HOME EXEC creates and runs
The return code -5 is does NOT always happen on a disk full
condition.
I have an exec FTP2HOME that does 450+ FTPs to users' homes drives.
It creates a VMFTP macro on a VDISK and then invokes VMFTP to
exec it. The FTP2HOME EXEC creates and runs 384 macros before it
gets a -5 RC. There were num
16 matches
Mail list logo
