On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Thomas Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe the :TLR record could optionally include a checksum of the entire
file. I might not want to do that for every transaction I do to build a
VMARC file, but when I am finished and it is ready to transfer to
someplace
(Mike Walter wrote about VMARCs not having a timestamp on a VMARC.)
Seems to me that the real problem here is with the originating site. If the
site says that the VMARC is from 9/1/2007 and you have a downloaded copy
created 1/1/08, you don't need to worry (much) about whether you have the
Friends,
The next meeting of the Metropolitan VM Users Association will be Tuesday
October 21, 2008 in New York City at Information Builders.
Please see the agenda on our web site and you will also find directions
and security requirements
http://www2.marist.edu/~mvmua/2008oct.html
thanx
On my VM Download Site ( http://zvm.sru.edu/~download ) I always use
DMSPLU to make the date of the VMARC file be the same as the latest
file it contains.
For those unfamiliar with DMSPLU the syntax is:
DMSPLU fn ft fm mm/dd/yy hh:mm:ss
/Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania
Yes, DMSPLU is nice for that (I sometimes do the same), but, as mentioned,
once you download it, that date gets wiped out, and if you then upload to a
VM system, using FTP or PCOMM, that date gets wiped ot in its turn...
Only ALMCOPY preserves file dates when exchanging files between VM and PCs,
I will be out of the office starting 2008-09-29 and will not return until
2008-10-06.
I will check notes every other day.
Disk accounting records...what to do with them.
Is there anything in VM that will allow you to process these records and if so
where and what is it.
I've been asked to do something like offload these records and clean up
accounting's A/191 disk.
Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
hello VM listeners,
For the past week i am looking for an exec called GONE which i used long
time ago but lost since then.
Perhaps one of the VM oldtimers still have a copy of it somewhere.
It was very handy as an engine to respond to all kinds of interferences
while the cms userid was in
Hi Ben,
If you're really part of IBM, then you should be able to find GONE
EXEC on the internal VMTOOLS disk. I don't think it has ever been put
on an external site of VM tools. It is pretty old - the level out
there dates to 1991.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Ben Gentenaar
[EMAIL
Sending to the mailing list... g -- not sure why I reply to some users
and it goes to them instead of the list..
Scott
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Scott Rohling [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Here's my code to do a quick report on one or more ACCOUNT files:
(you can pass it the individual
I've added an annotated console log for both the starter system install
and a client system install as appendices in the document, assuming that
Novell does another release.
-- db
When I installed z/VM 5.2 and 5.3, they both required one (1) 3390-9
(xxxRES) and two (2) 3390-3 (xxxPAG and xxxSPL).
Can I use the same configuration with z/VM 5.4 (one 3390-9 540RES and
two 3390-3 (540PAG and 540SPL) ?
The z/VM Summary for Automated Installation and Service says that five
Yes, that will work fine. It is best that all paging volumes are the
same type (i.e. mod 3) and actually using mod 3s for paging gives VM
more devices to use and lets it do more paging in parallel. Just make
sure your page space usage is 50% or less - if it grows above that,
add more paging
I am currently running z/VM 4.4 on a 2066-003 with the following OS/390 guests:
4 @ 2.5
1 @ 2.8
2 @ 2.9
5 @ 2.10
Does anybody see a compatibility problem in upgrading to either z/VM 5.3 or 5.4
and running those versions of OS/390?
Thank you,
Scott R Wandschneider
Senior Systems Programmer
Colleen M Brown
IBM z/VM and Related Products Development and Service
- Forwarded by Colleen Brown/Endicott/IBM on 09/30/2008 12:52 PM -
Colleen Brown/Endicott/IBM
09/30/2008 11:29 AM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: Disk Accounting Records
If you are referring to the account
I see ACCOUNT HELPCMS and it sounds great -- but no ACCOUNT MODULE.. Is
this provided as part of the base z/VM product?
Thanks -
Scott Rohling
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Colleen Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Colleen M Brown
IBM z/VM and Related Products Development and Service
Look on MAINT 193.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 10:06 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Fw:
The ACCOUNT MODULE is on MAINT 193.
/Tom Kern
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:05:36 -0600, Scott Rohling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m
wrote:
I see ACCOUNT HELPCMS and it sounds great -- but no ACCOUNT MODULE.. Is
this provided as part of the base z/VM product?
Thanks -
Scott Rohling
It is on MAINT 193.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Scott Rohling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see ACCOUNT HELPCMS and it sounds great -- but no ACCOUNT MODULE.. Is
this provided as part of the base z/VM product?
Thanks -
Scott Rohling
--
Bruce Hayden
Linux on System z Advanced Technical
According to Romney White of z/VM Design:
z/VM will support OS//390 V2R8 if and only if OS/390 V2R8 is supported on
the underlying hardware (regardless of whether z/OS V2R8 is still in
support).
Romney
I would take this to mean that as long as you can run OS/390 2.5 natively on
the z800, you
Is the following statement true? (I don't know)
If insert OS and release and insert VM relase is supported on insert
machine, then insert OS and release is supported under insert VM
relese on insert machine.
I.e. is there ever a case where an OS will run on some machine, but will
not run
As a matter of fact that is one of the commonalties of these hosts.
There is Oracle Clustering going on in these hosts. Can you explain more
about this?
Thanks,
Terry
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adam
Hi
The volumes are defined as mini disks in the directory entry for the
quest. They are not being shared with z/OS.
Thanks,
Terry
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Monday, September 29,
On Sep 30, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
As a matter of fact that is one of the commonalties of these hosts.
There is Oracle Clustering going on in these hosts. Can you explain
more about this?
Well, I don't know exactly how Oracle does it.
But I do know,
So I guess it's on MAINT 193 :-) Thanks to everybody for the replies..
I wonder how long ACCOUNT MODULE has been out there -- I coded up an EXEC to
do the tallying some time ago -- definitely not the first time I found
myself having reinvented a wheel :-)
Thanks again!
Scott Rohling
Hi Everyone,
Well, I made it to:
*** login using 'ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED]' ***
*** run 'yast' to start the installation ***
Am I suppose to disconnect from client and then ssh to it and enter
YAST; or, do I enter YAST from here?
Thanks,
Alyce
-Original
*** login using 'ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED]' ***
*** run 'yast' to start the installation ***
Am I suppose to disconnect from client and then ssh to it and enter
YAST;
Yes.
On 9/30/2008 at 4:20 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Austin, Alyce
(CIV) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Well, I made it to:
*** login using 'ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED]' ***
*** run 'yast' to start the installation ***
Am I suppose to disconnect from
OK, here's a summary of the replies so far and my thoughts...
phsiii replied (in part)
---
If the site says that the VMARC is from 9/1/2007 and you have a
downloaded copy created 1/1/08, you don't need to worry (much) about
whether you have the current version.
and...
OOPs...I already disonnected from Client Do I need to start the
process again before SSH'g?
Thanks,
Alyce
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:33 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
As long as you left it RUNNING in the bottom right hand corner of the
screen, having issued at some point since logon, (perhaps in the PROFILE
EXEC), you should be good to SSH in right away.
Also, see SHARE session Installing a Novell SLES 10 Starter System
without a Net(work)
at:
OK...i was able to ssh to my new client. Is the default root password
the same as it was for the starter system?
Thanks,
Alyce
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:20 PM
To:
Why not just try the default NOVSTART root password and find out for
yourself?
If it works (which it should) you have your answer.
But if you followed the instructions, you changed your NOVSTART root
password immediately.
So try that one, if the default fails.
Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
I don't believe you'll be asked for a password -- just enter root for the
userid and you should go right in...
Scott
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Austin, Alyce (CIV) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK...i was able to ssh to my new client. Is the default root password
the same as it was for the
I was afraid I might get locked out
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:54 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES10 Client
Why not just try the default NOVSTART root
Don't be afraid -- you're not going to break anything... And besides -
we're here if you do :-)
Best of luck - Scott
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Austin, Alyce (CIV) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was afraid I might get locked out
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM
Hi Ben,
You can find GONE on the old VM Workshop tools here...
http://ukcc.uky.edu/%7Etools/1996/
Cheers,
Dave
Ben Gentenaar wrote:
hello VM listeners,
For the past week i am looking for an exec called GONE which i used
long time ago but lost since then.
Perhaps one of the VM oldtimers
No offense to Rick Troth, but that isn't the real GONE. Wayne Preism of
the IBM WSC wrote GONE in the early 80's and it's different than Rick's.
Jim
Dave Tibbetts wrote:
Hi Ben,
You can find GONE on the old VM Workshop tools here...
http://ukcc.uky.edu/%7Etools/1996/
Cheers,
Dave
Ben
On 9/30/2008 at 10:53 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Rohling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sending to the mailing list... g -- not sure why I reply to some users
and it goes to them instead of the list..
Usually this happens because the person you're replying to has a reply to
mail
39 matches
Mail list logo
