Bill Bitner wrote:
1. What applications are you using with the z/VM SSL server?
PigIron <-> SMAPI .. at least, we plan to.
2. What is the maximum number of concurrent sessions you currently use?
2 :)
3. What is the maximum number you expect to be using in 2 years?
Not sure.
--
Jack
Hi, listers,
How do I add page pack dynamically to the running system ?
Thanks in advance,
Ann
The z/VM Development Lab is looking for some information regarding
z/VM SSL server usage (this is the SSL for use with the VM TCP/IP
stack). If you currently use the z/VM SSL server or plan to use it
in the next few years, we'd like to hear from you to help guide some
design decisions.
Answers her
On 10/16/08 10:46 AM, "Jim Bohnsack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> VMRMAINT
Yeah. Typo.
-- db
I just tried Charlotte/RXSSL from my IFL system to the web server on the
VM system on the other side of the system. I do not get an abend but I
do get this message:
SSL Alert: HANDSHAKE_FAILURE
My copy of RXSSL is:
RXSSLMODULE T1 V 39080 4 11 4/21/00 16:15:46
Our web server is V
Alan: My version is:
RXSSLMODULE A1 V 39080 4 11 2000-12-08 13:00:28
and it used to work pretty well but I am finding that fewer and fewer
sites that work. I suspect that it is a root certificate problem.
See the SSL.README that came with the SSL updates for CHARLOTTe.
Here is the problem, Fran:
We are an outsourcer; the RSCS network "belongs" to us; the TCP-attached
network does NOT belong to us - it belongs to the client. And various
auditing and security requirements must keep those separate.
I guess it is possible to set up a "separate" RSCS server for the
David -
I would reecommend that you quit using the LPR command and set up you
printers using the free LPR feature in RSCS.
It's a little work to set it up but it is sweet to use.
/Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania USA for 45 years
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://zv
All:
I believe I had this problem before, but I was probably
distracted and never pursued it.
When I issue a CMS LPR command on a plain-text CMS file (using
the following in an EXEC), it works fine. But if I attempt to print a
file with an LRECL of 132, or 133 if using the CC opti
Not a problem, it was easy to write one (especially since someone else
did it). The problem was that there needed to be a secret rule
established in VMSECURE. That and priv class B, which is documented.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
Richard -
There is a DIAGD4 VMARC on my VM download site:
http://zvm.sru.edu/~download
It contains an assembler program to invoke DIAGD4 and a SAMPLE EXEC
that uses it.
There are two versions. I use the later version in z/VM 3.1
/Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania USA
The 5VMRAC40 is used during tha installation of maintenance. It will
never touch minidisks used in production.
For example, it will never touch RACFVM 490 nor RACFVM 305. But the
"alternate build disks"
The SERVP2P, stands fro Service Put To Production, it will copy the
files from the alternate b
Carol-Thanks. My question first arose when I started customizing RACF
for z/VM 5.4 yesterday. SERVP2P and 5VMRAC40 are used pretty much
interchangeably in the Program Directory for RACF. There was really no
explanation in it, that I found, as to the two different names altho I
saw that 5VMRA
Greetings,
The problems in Boulder also seem to be affecting ptf.boulder.ibm.com
as I have not been able to connect to that ftp site all afternoon.
Guess I didn't need that TCPIP fix after all! :)
Larry Scollard
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
The Boulder site is currently down. This includes everything starting with
"publib.boulder.ibm.com" , "publibz.boulder.ibm.", and probably others.
This impacts access to most documentation. I do not know an ETA for
restoration. I have been able to confirm the outage only.
Michael J. Forte
z/VM
Cannot get there from here, either.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huegel, Thomas
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:45 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
S
>From the CICS-L list
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:29:49 -0400
From: Steve Ware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: CICS List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CICS Infocenter not working?
>From a note from an IBMer:
I've just been informed tha
I am experiencing a problem getting to the Boulder Pubs web site today.
I was just wondering if anyone else is having the same problem..
Or have those adorable network nerds here started blocking stuff again.
In case of hardware modifications, I'm looking for a way to 'dynamically'
map our drive tape models with the ones found on our DR site.
To know if the drives come from a 3494 I use the cp cmd q ta details whic
h
gives the libid and the libport. The cms devtype cmd gives the model (349
0
or 3590,
And it is not accepted in the release we are currently running. One more
thing to remember to include in the cutover script. :-(
Regards,
Richard Schuh
The rule was supposed to supersede the GRANT in G0706, but it
doesn't.
I'm trying to use Charlotte to go to a secure web page (HTTPS). RXSSL
abends when I try this.
Does anyone have a working version of RXSSL MODULE? An up-to-date version
of Charlotte? A version of WW2GET that works with SSL?
I find I have 3 versions of RXSSL:
RXSSLMODULE I1 V 31664
Thanks, Dennis. That looks like the ticket.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:57 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Richard,
Are you using VM:Secure? If you are, you need an "ACCEPT server DIAGD4"
record in your system rules file. If you're not running G0808, you also
need "GRANT SURROGAT TO server" in AUTHORIZ CONFIG. The rule was
supposed to supersede the GRANT in G0706, but it doesn't.
That's the problem with these newbie z/VM sysprogs -- they don't want to
look at the CP source code!;-)
Richard,
Every reference I've ever seen to SECLABEL is for printed output. On
systems set for B1 security levels, one can set a "security label" to
print at the bottom (or top -- don't
Do you need a "grant surrogate" perhaps?
Marcy
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information her
In an attempt to process a file that arrived in the reader of a class B
machine and send the results to a third party's reader with the original
file's Origiid, the DIAG D4 subcode 0 was greeted with RC=12. The
description of this RC is:
"ESM authorization denied or subcode X'00' issued wh
But the SERVP2P name is hardcoded in the SERVICE and PUT2PROD EXECs, so
isn't overriding SERVP2P ineffective when using those commands?
Bob Bolch
CA
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Carol Everitt
> Sent: Thursday, October
Jim, Yes, you can always use the SERVP2P PPF. As a matter of fact, we
recommend that you use it. And if you need to create an override PPF for
your site, we recommend that you override the SERVP2P PPF, rather than a
base PPF.
Thanks Mike. I added the VMBACKUP DIRECT file and then used the AMDISK
statements manually to create the MDISK statements from the allocation
group. Worked great. Thanks very much for the help.
Regards,
Dave
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 16:20 -0700, Mike Harding wrote:
> Better still, create a VMBACKU
VMRMAINT
Jim
David Boyes wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--_=_NextPart_001_01C92F97.DA79C3B0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Create a file with the directory entry VMIRMAINT shows you called
VMBACKUP DIRE
Create a file with the directory entry VMIRMAINT shows you called
VMBACKUP DIRECT. Then use DIRM ADD VMBACKUP to add it. DIRMAINT does the
rest.
Once DIRMAINT is active, you should NEVER update USER DIRECT. All that
is behind you - use the DIRMAINT tools to do directory management.
__
I am out of the office until 10/27/2008.
I will be unable to check for email/voicemail during my absence. I will
respond to your message when I return.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "IBMVM Digest - 14 Oct
2008 to 15 Oct 2008 (#2008-201)" sent on 10/15/08 23:12:26.
This
32 matches
Mail list logo
