Create a file with the directory entry VMIRMAINT shows you called
VMBACKUP DIRECT. Then use DIRM ADD VMBACKUP to add it. DIRMAINT does the
rest.
Once DIRMAINT is active, you should NEVER update USER DIRECT. All that
is behind you - use the DIRMAINT tools to do directory management.
VMRMAINT
Jim
David Boyes wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--_=_NextPart_001_01C92F97.DA79C3B0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Create a file with the directory entry VMIRMAINT shows you called
VMBACKUP
I am out of the office until 10/27/2008.
I will be unable to check for email/voicemail during my absence. I will
respond to your message when I return.
Note: This is an automated response to your message IBMVM Digest - 14 Oct
2008 to 15 Oct 2008 (#2008-201) sent on 10/15/08 23:12:26.
This
Thanks Mike. I added the VMBACKUP DIRECT file and then used the AMDISK
statements manually to create the MDISK statements from the allocation
group. Worked great. Thanks very much for the help.
Regards,
Dave
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 16:20 -0700, Mike Harding wrote:
Better still, create a
Jim, Yes, you can always use the SERVP2P PPF. As a matter of fact, we
recommend that you use it. And if you need to create an override PPF for
your site, we recommend that you override the SERVP2P PPF, rather than a
base PPF.
But the SERVP2P name is hardcoded in the SERVICE and PUT2PROD EXECs, so
isn't overriding SERVP2P ineffective when using those commands?
Bob Bolch
CA
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Carol Everitt
Sent: Thursday, October 16,
In an attempt to process a file that arrived in the reader of a class B
machine and send the results to a third party's reader with the original
file's Origiid, the DIAG D4 subcode 0 was greeted with RC=12. The
description of this RC is:
ESM authorization denied or subcode X'00' issued
Do you need a grant surrogate perhaps?
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information
That's the problem with these newbie z/VM sysprogs -- they don't want to
look at the CP source code!;-)
Richard,
Every reference I've ever seen to SECLABEL is for printed output. On
systems set for B1 security levels, one can set a security label to
print at the bottom (or top -- don't
Richard,
Are you using VM:Secure? If you are, you need an ACCEPT server DIAGD4
record in your system rules file. If you're not running G0808, you also
need GRANT SURROGAT TO server in AUTHORIZ CONFIG. The rule was
supposed to supersede the GRANT in G0706, but it doesn't.
Thanks, Dennis. That looks like the ticket.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:57 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
I'm trying to use Charlotte to go to a secure web page (HTTPS). RXSSL
abends when I try this.
Does anyone have a working version of RXSSL MODULE? An up-to-date version
of Charlotte? A version of WW2GET that works with SSL?
I find I have 3 versions of RXSSL:
RXSSLMODULE I1 V 31664
And it is not accepted in the release we are currently running. One more
thing to remember to include in the cutover script. :-(
Regards,
Richard Schuh
The rule was supposed to supersede the GRANT in G0706, but it
doesn't.
In case of hardware modifications, I'm looking for a way to 'dynamically'
map our drive tape models with the ones found on our DR site.
To know if the drives come from a 3494 I use the cp cmd q ta details whic
h
gives the libid and the libport. The cms devtype cmd gives the model (349
0
or 3590,
I am experiencing a problem getting to the Boulder Pubs web site today.
I was just wondering if anyone else is having the same problem..
Or have those adorable network nerds here started blocking stuff again.
From the CICS-L list
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:29:49 -0400
From: Steve Ware [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: CICS List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CICS Infocenter not working?
From a note from an IBMer:
I've just been informed that the
Cannot get there from here, either.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huegel, Thomas
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:45 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
The Boulder site is currently down. This includes everything starting with
publib.boulder.ibm.com , publibz.boulder.ibm., and probably others.
This impacts access to most documentation. I do not know an ETA for
restoration. I have been able to confirm the outage only.
Michael J. Forte
z/VM ID
Greetings,
The problems in Boulder also seem to be affecting ptf.boulder.ibm.com
as I have not been able to connect to that ftp site all afternoon.
Guess I didn't need that TCPIP fix after all! :)
Larry Scollard
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Carol-Thanks. My question first arose when I started customizing RACF
for z/VM 5.4 yesterday. SERVP2P and 5VMRAC40 are used pretty much
interchangeably in the Program Directory for RACF. There was really no
explanation in it, that I found, as to the two different names altho I
saw that
The 5VMRAC40 is used during tha installation of maintenance. It will
never touch minidisks used in production.
For example, it will never touch RACFVM 490 nor RACFVM 305. But the
alternate build disks
The SERVP2P, stands fro Service Put To Production, it will copy the
files from the alternate
Richard -
There is a DIAGD4 VMARC on my VM download site:
http://zvm.sru.edu/~download
It contains an assembler program to invoke DIAGD4 and a SAMPLE EXEC
that uses it.
There are two versions. I use the later version in z/VM 3.1
/Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania
Not a problem, it was easy to write one (especially since someone else
did it). The problem was that there needed to be a secret rule
established in VMSECURE. That and priv class B, which is documented.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
All:
I believe I had this problem before, but I was probably
distracted and never pursued it.
When I issue a CMS LPR command on a plain-text CMS file (using
the following in an EXEC), it works fine. But if I attempt to print a
file with an LRECL of 132, or 133 if using the CC
David -
I would reecommend that you quit using the LPR command and set up you
printers using the free LPR feature in RSCS.
It's a little work to set it up but it is sweet to use.
/Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania USA for 45 years
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is the problem, Fran:
We are an outsourcer; the RSCS network belongs to us; the TCP-attached
network does NOT belong to us - it belongs to the client. And various
auditing and security requirements must keep those separate.
I guess it is possible to set up a separate RSCS server for the
Alan: My version is:
RXSSLMODULE A1 V 39080 4 11 2000-12-08 13:00:28
and it used to work pretty well but I am finding that fewer and fewer
sites that work. I suspect that it is a root certificate problem.
See the SSL.README that came with the SSL updates for
I just tried Charlotte/RXSSL from my IFL system to the web server on the
VM system on the other side of the system. I do not get an abend but I
do get this message:
SSL Alert: HANDSHAKE_FAILURE
My copy of RXSSL is:
RXSSLMODULE T1 V 39080 4 11 4/21/00 16:15:46
Our web server is
Hi, listers,
How do I add page pack dynamically to the running system ?
Thanks in advance,
Ann
29 matches
Mail list logo
