Hi, Florian.
Yes, there is a VM version of the TERSE/DETERSE utilities. On z/VM 5.4, the DETERSE module
is found on MAINT's 5E5 disk. I think you can download the TERSE module for VM from an IBM
web site.
Florian Bilek wrote:
Dear all,
Under z/OS there exists a Terse Program to make
Is it possible that 172.27.28.2 is the gw not 172.27.24.2?
David Kreuter
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Ray Waters
Sent: Tue 12/16/2008 8:47 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Unable to PING the LINUX server
David,
You
David,
You were correct; I had to enter the NETSTAT command twice:
NETSTAT ARP ALL TCP DTCVSW1
VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 540 TCP/IP Server Name: DTCVSW1
DTCNET338E * MAC address is not in the ARP table.
Ready(4); T=0.01/0.01 08:43:29
NETSTAT ARP ALL TCP DTCVSW1
VM TCP/IP Netstat Level
IBM release at least one version of TERSE. When we used Publication Maste
r,
we found DZATERSE MODULE and HELPCMS. It worked rather nicely to compress
some large files for online archive. The normal DETERSE program worked fi
ne
to uncompress these files later.
/Tom Kern
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008
I speak EDEVs, but for various reasons EDEV is not a choice for this
customer. They only have SAN disks - raw LUNs. (The VM system itself
is installed on the few ECKD volumes -- all the Linuxen are on SAN only.)
Lee
Richard Troth wrote:
You want EDEV.
EDEV lets FCP disks look like
On 12/15/2008 at 3:22 PM, Ray Waters ray.wat...@opensolutions.com wrote:
Mark,
I can PING the GATEWAY from NOVSTART but not my pc. My pc is not running a
FTP server so it should not respond, right?
Wrong. If your PC is running a TCP/IP stack, and isn't firewalling off ICMP
packets, it
But, using simulated FBA minidisks incur higher CP overheads that
letting Linux use the FCP channels.
2008/12/16 Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
On Tuesday, 12/16/2008 at 11:07 EST, Lee Stewart
lstewart.dsgr...@attglobal.net wrote:
I speak EDEVs, but for various reasons EDEV is not a
Can anyone point me to documents that cover the more complex vswitch and
multi-VLAN configurations?
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 10:05 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
I did the same today. Worked perfectly.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:32 AM, O'Brien, Dennis L
Dennis.L.O'br...@bankofamerica.com dennis.l.o%27br...@bankofamerica.comwrote:
Florian,
I use SERVICE and PUT2PROD for TCP/IP service, just like I do for the
other z/VM components:
SERVICE ALL
On Tuesday, 12/16/2008 at 11:07 EST, Lee Stewart
lstewart.dsgr...@attglobal.net wrote:
I speak EDEVs, but for various reasons EDEV is not a choice for this
customer. They only have SAN disks - raw LUNs. (The VM system itself
is installed on the few ECKD volumes -- all the Linuxen are on SAN
Will get our network people involved.
Thanks to all who responded.
Ray
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Mark Post
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 10:30 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Unable to PING the
I've answered 1 question. I can not define a layer2 switch 2nd level and
attach it to a 1st level layer3.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
If I update one VM to 5.4 before another running 5.2, can one be layer 2
while the other is layer 3? Each is sharing
On Tuesday, 12/16/2008 at 10:24 EST, David Kreuter
dkreu...@vm-resources.com wrote:
Is it possible that 172.27.28.2 is the gw not 172.27.24.2?
Can't be. With netmask 255.255.252.0, .24 and .28 are in separate
subnets. Your gw must be in your subnet. (And the assigned IP addresses
were
Yes, you can have an OSA triplet attached to a z/VM tcpip in layer3 mode and
another triplet from the same OSA attached to a z/VM tcpip in layer2 mode.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
If I update one VM to 5.4 before another running 5.2, can one be layer 2
On Tuesday, 12/16/2008 at 10:02 EST, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
If I update one VM to 5.4 before another running 5.2, can one be layer 2
while
the other is layer 3? Each is sharing the same physical OSA, but
different
addresses.
I don't recall the machine on which it first
On Monday, 12/15/2008 at 07:36 EST, Lee Stewart
lstewart.dsgr...@attglobal.net wrote:
Hi allDoes the new RACF (VM Security Server) handle protecting
FCP disks? If so, how? By FCP device/CHPID? By target WWPN? By
target LUN?
I browsed the books but didn't find any FCP
If I update one VM to 5.4 before another running 5.2, can one be layer 2
while the other is layer 3? Each is sharing the same physical OSA, but
different addresses.
While I am installing the new VM 2nd level I have it connected to my 1st
level vswitch. Can the 2nd level vswitch be layer 2 while
The overhead is real, but its cost is not clear.
The difference between the performance of direct FCP -vs- EDEV has not
been fully measured (or at least not widely reported.)
I'm still looking for numbers.
Which is faster? For a guest to perform QDIO or for CP to handle it?
Traditionally, we
On Tuesday, 12/16/2008 at 11:44 EST, Kris Buelens kris.buel...@gmail.com
wrote:
But, using simulated FBA minidisks incur higher CP overheads that
letting Linux use the FCP channels.
The question was how does RACF protect FCP. If you want RACF to protect
access to LUNs there is no choice but
The OSA I was using was on our 28 network. I changed to an OSA on our 24
network and now all is connecting. Problem is solved.
ping 172.16.24.129
Ping Level 540: Pinging host 172.16.24.129.
Enter #CP EXT to interrupt.
PING: Ping #1 response took 0.001 seconds. Successes so
is attached to this note...enjoy.
--
DJ
V/Soft
z/VM and mainframe Linux expertise, training,
consulting, and software development
www.vsoft-software.com
?
nothing attached
we will try it soon as we just regained access to the tape drive
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Dave Jones
Sent: Tue 12/16/2008 3:47 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] DCSS and NSS backup code
is attached to
On Tuesday, 12/16/2008 at 03:48 EST, Dave Jones d...@vsoft-software.com
wrote:
is attached to this note...enjoy.
Attachments not allowed.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
is attached to this note...enjoy.
--
DJ
No it isn't, at least not to the one I received..
Regards,
Richard Schuh
oopssorry about thatmeant to sent it to the address right below IBMVM in my
address book
Alan Altmark wrote:
On Tuesday, 12/16/2008 at 03:48 EST, Dave Jones d...@vsoft-software.com
wrote:
is attached to this note...enjoy.
Attachments not allowed.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
Is layer 2 only available to z/VM TCPIP and linux? I'm getting errors on my
z/VSE guest and I don't even want to bother starting my z/OS 1.9 guest if
it's not going to work on the layer 2 vswitch. I'll just go ahead and
change the vswitch and TCPIP back to layer 3.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:31
Sir Dave the Generous,
Pray tell thee great Sir, wherefore might one find such a treasure as TER
SE
for VM? I have searched futilely over many years through deep blue caves
,
with torches and swords held high and low. This prize has always eluded
mere mortals without close ties to IBM. Be
On Tuesday, 12/16/2008 at 04:33 EST, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
Is layer 2 only available to z/VM TCPIP and linux? I'm getting errors
on my
z/VSE guest and I don't even want to bother starting my z/OS 1.9 guest
if it's
not going to work on the layer 2 vswitch. I'll just go ahead
Now that you have our interest .
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu]on
Behalf Of Dave Jones
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 3:21 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: DCSS and NSS backup code
oopssorry about
Thanks, Alan. Guess I'll be changing that z/VM back to a layer 3 vswitch.
Guess I'll get to try it when I get to my Linux only z/VM system.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.comwrote:
On Tuesday, 12/16/2008 at 04:33 EST, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
Is
Thanks, that's what I thought, but wanted to be sure...
Lee
Alan Altmark wrote:
On Tuesday, 12/16/2008 at 11:07 EST, Lee Stewart
lstewart.dsgr...@attglobal.net wrote:
I speak EDEVs, but for various reasons EDEV is not a choice for this
customer. They only have SAN disks - raw LUNs. (The VM
31 matches
Mail list logo
