I inherited a z10 system and tonight I'd need to update the IOCP. The the
guy that maintained the system can no longer be reached.
The z10 was recently migrated from a z800.
On Maint 191, I do find 2 IOCP files with fname Z10-2098 but the filetype is
IOCPPREP, and still mentions two LPAR and
Hi
we unload the vm 5.4 ddr successfully and finding the problem with spool
file with the message
hcpwrs250e spoll file control date error ccpv 00465f91
hcpwrs2510e spool file unknown file will be deleted..
When enter q limit allto run the sevice tape it give the following
message:
The spool can be queried with CP Q ALLOC SPOOL (gives how full the spool
extents are)
and with CP Q SDF/CP Q FILES to find how many files exist of each spool type
and with CP Q RDR/PUN/PRT/NSS/TRF to find the individual files
Q LIMITS at the other hand is a CMS command to query about the logical
As Kris already mentioned, the root cause is not the Shared File System.
The first message you describe does not exist. It appears that you
actually meant message: HCPWRS2509E
z/VM is great with keeping message help online. From any VM userid,
enter: Help msg HCPwrs2509E
(where you only need
VM, PR/SM. What's the difference? ;-)
Actually, the question was meant to be facetious.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Alan Ackerman
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 9:58 PM
To:
Hi,
I set up events to change my PTK settings of USRLIMITS according to shifts.
The main batch machines are not supposed to be gobbling resources during
prime time,
but at night they can run wild. So, while the usual USRLIMIT for %CPU is 30,
at 17:00 I want to do FC USRLIMIT batchuser %CPU 75
I was asked to find out how many linux guests are running on our z/VM?
the cp commands:Q N is not very suitable for this question.
What is the better way?
This message is intended only for the addressee. It may contain privileged or
confidential information. Any unauthorized disclosure is
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:49 PM, sunny...@wcb.ab.ca wrote:
I was asked to find out how many linux guests are running on our z/VM?
the cp commands:Q N is not very suitable for this question.
What is the better way?
Your network connections might help. If you're using vswitch you could
count
If all the linux guests are configured to shutdown with the signal from CP
SHUTDOWN, then count the number of userids listed in the response from CP Q
SIGNALS SHUTDOWN, minus the number of SFS servers.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of
Hi, Sunny.
Some sites have guest naming standards (Linux guests are named LIN
or LS., etc.) that would allow you to very simply see which guests
were running Linux, as opposed to CMS or GCS. If your site doesn't have
such a standard, then I'm afraid you're going to have to do this
If IPL device is sufficient, then it is not necessary to install TRACK.
The IPL device or system is in the CP IND USER userid response, so a
PIPE can be used to count all the userids IPL'ed by device, excluding
the IPL 190 userids.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
That's true, Robert; I had forgotten that the IND command does show the
last IPL statementof course, if some knuckle head had installed
Linux on a virtual DASD at address 190, then that could pose a
problem:-)
Hodge, Robert L wrote:
If IPL device is sufficient, then it is not
On 8/12/2009 at 5:49 PM, sunny...@wcb.ab.ca wrote:
I was asked to find out how many linux guests are running on our z/VM?
the cp commands:Q N is not very suitable for this question.
Why is q n not suitable?
for guest in $(vmcp q n | sed -f qnames.sed)
do grep -q $guest excluded.names ||
Hi Sunny,
Are you Linux guests autologed?
If so then just check out the profile exec (or associated exec) for the Linux
names there...should be unidentifiable by their IPL device numbers.
--- On Wed, 8/12/09, sunny...@wcb.ab.ca sunny...@wcb.ab.ca wrote:
From: sunny...@wcb.ab.ca
Strong incentive to make sure that either all of the linux guests IPL from the
same virtual address or, at the very least, that none of them has a virtual 190.
As long as you are using something fuzzy to make the determination, you can
also see the virtual storage in the response to IND USER.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Schuh, Richardrsc...@visa.com wrote:
Strong incentive to make sure that either all of the linux guests IPL from
the same virtual address or, at the very least, that none of them has a
virtual 190.
As long as you are using something fuzzy to make the
I agree with Mark, why is the Q N command not suitable, maybe I am missing
something or don't understand what Sunny is asking. I would just write a simple
PIPE grabbing count them and write them to a file or to the console along with
the count.
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin -
And perhaps a set of clarifying questions:
1- do you mean those Linux guests logged on at a particular moment?
2- do you mean Linux guests defined in the directory?
3- do you care which are production, development, test, QA, or sandbox machines?
Perhaps if you described the reason for the
A naming convention is probably the simplest way to ensure you get
everything.. LNXx or what have you. Anything else is just guessing
when it comes down to it, when talking about checking dynamically. You can
use PIPE CP Q N | SPLIT AT /,/ | STRIP | FIND LNX| count lines|consif
you
I am out of the office until 08/19/2009.
I will be unable to check for email/voicemail during my absence. I will
respond to your message when I return.
Note: This is an automated response to your message IBMVM Digest - 11 Aug
2009 to 12 Aug 2009 (#2009-217) sent on 8/12/09 23:00:17.
This
20 matches
Mail list logo
