Hi,
Someone has running this environment or similar to this:
HW: z196 or z10
SW: z/VM V6 and under this running a OS/390 2.10 with CICS 2.2 + DB2 V7.
If yes, os/390 is running in 31 or 64 bits?
--
*Regards
Jose Munoz
Senior IT Consultant*
*GBM - Kuwait**
skype: jmunoz61*
Well, I've been through the instructions in the link that Jim provided,
but I still haven't been able to get SSL to start up. I'm trying to set
things up with a single-server, as opposed to the new SSL Pool option.
I'm going provide my configuration in the hope that a mistake might
stand out to
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Mark Post
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 2:30 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: The old VM/ESA CMS GUI - Does it still live?
On 11/23/2010 at 10:19 AM, George Henke/NYLIC
This being a pseudo Friday in the USA due to Thanksgiving holidays
Does anyone have any experience with the AS/400 support in the z/196 box?
Yep, I know it is a separate processor/memory and connected somehow, in some
sort of internal networkbut..
Can we share devices, like we do
The most difficult problems to diagnose are often those that just look
*SO* correct, but contain a wee typo.
I don't run the SSL server (yet), so I can't say for sure if this is the
cause or not, but *could* it be:
:Mixedcasparms.YES
should be
:Mixedcaseparms.YES
_
Potentially, that
That's a good catch, Mike! I did fat-finger that entry... g.
Alas, after fixing it, the problem remains...
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 11:01 -0600, Mike Walter wrote:
The most difficult problems to diagnose are often those that just look
*SO* correct, but contain a wee typo.
I don't run the
The question came up today as to whether z/VM 5.1 will run on a z196. I know
there are no 5.1 PTF's available for z196 support.
How about z/VM 5.4, will it run WITHOUT the z196 PTF's?...
Any guesses? or experiences?
Thanks
Dave,
Take out the following form :nick.SSLSERV because you are not using
the pool concept you don¹t need it and it is creating the problem.
:vmlink. .DIR VMSYS:TCPMAINT.SSLPOOL_SSL . A FORCERW
Jim P.
On 11/24/10 12:08 PM, Dave Keeton dave.kee...@state.or.us wrote:
That's a good
Dave,
You stated you are receiving the following:
--
The issue continues to be the following error when TCPIP starts:
DMSACR1184E Directory VMSYS:TCPMAINT.SSLPOOL_SSL not found or you are not
authorized for it
DTCRUN1001E VMLINK .DIR
That is an assumption or opinion, not necessarily a fact. For example, my wife
may not know the operating system line mode commands, but she certainly knows
the accounting systems that she uses via a GUI interface. In fact, the GUI
represents an increase in productivity.
I would suggest that
Dave,
I also noticed that in your PROFILE TCPIP you need to comment out the
autolog entry for SSLSERV as this
function will be done by SSLDCSSM.
Jim P.
On 11/24/10 12:35 PM, James Poirier james.poir...@doit.nh.gov wrote:
Dave,
Take out the following form :nick.SSLSERV because
Are there any classes for zLinux administration under zVM ? If so, who/where
are they ?
Daniel,
you can find LINUX education here:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/education/
both IBM and non IBM
Bill Munson
Sr. z/VM Systems Programmer
Brown Brothers Harriman CO.
525 Washington Blvd.
Jersey City, NJ 07310
201-418-7588
From: Daniel Allen dal...@serena.com
To:
I think we can safely assume that since this discussion was about VM CMS that
we're talking operating systems and interfaces to those OS's not applications
as is your wife's case
GUI's have their place, I personally do not believe that place is in an OS to
manage it or it's subsystems where
I have multiple installations running Linux under z/VM where the z/VM
sysprogs are very overcommitted. Allowing them to offload work that CAN
be done by someone else makes them much more productive - as long as the
work assigned is controlled by an authorization mechanism.
Most of the work,
Mike, thanks for the assistance.
In going through your instructions, I see that in my initial attempts at
this I *DID* attempt to set things up using an SSL Pool. Here's what the
output from the command you had me run says:
Directory = VMSYS:TCPMAINT.SSLPOOL_SSL
Grantee R W NR NW
TCPMAINT X
Dave,
This parm :DCSS_Parms.DEFAULTgoes on :nick.tcpip not on
:nick.ssldcssm
Jim P.
On 11/24/10 2:07 PM, Dave Keeton dave.kee...@state.or.us wrote:
:DCSS_Parms.DEFAULT
Hi, Daniel.
VM Resources (http://www.vm-resources.com/) offers a set of zLinux
courses that I think are very good. They are usually 3 to 5 days in
length and include hands-on lab exercises. You can even arrange to
have the courses taught on site at your location.
Happy Thanksgiving.
On
Jim,
That is present also. Is it possible that having
multiple :DCSS_Parms. entries is a bad thing?
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 14:10 -0500, James Poirier wrote:
Dave,
This parm :DCSS_Parms.DEFAULTgoes on :nick.tcpip not
on :nick.ssldcssm
Jim P.
On 11/24/10 2:07 PM, Dave
If you look at zpro (live system running many linux servers), at
vm2.velocitysoftware.com/zpro,
sign in with the userid and password provided, go to System status
then dasd, gets you our live dasd report. This user is of course
restricted, otherwise y'all would be seeing how bad you could hurt
Dave,
In this case I believe it is. The setup doc for using non pool show it on
the nick.tcpip ONLY.
Jim P.
On 11/24/10 2:20 PM, Dave Keeton dave.kee...@state.or.us wrote:
Jim,
That is present also. Is it possible that having multiple :DCSS_Parms.
entries is a bad thing?
On
Now it seems to have heartburn with the :For. tag... which is present
under the :nick.SSLDCSSM section.
DTCRUN1005E Required tag :For. was not found in file(s): SYSTEM DTCPARMS
D1, IBM DTCPARMS E1
This log is sent to TCPMAINT immediately after TCPIP's PROFILE EXEC is
run.
Dave
On Wed,
Dave,
:nick.sslserventry needs to be in either SYSTEM DTCPARMS or a SSLSERV
DTCPARMS
Jim P.
On 11/24/10 2:34 PM, Dave Keeton dave.kee...@state.or.us wrote:
Now it seems to have heartburn with the :For. tag... which is present under
the :nick.SSLDCSSM section.
DTCRUN1005E Required
Jim,
Here's what I have:
:nick.TCPIP:type.server
:class.stack
:attach.2D18-2D1A
:DCSS_Parms.DEFAULT
:nick.TCPIP:type.server
:class.stack
:attach.06EC-06EE
:DCSS_Parms.DEFAULT
:nick.FTP
Dave,
Are you 100% certain that the DTCPARMS files that the server is accessing
as its D-disk and E-disk is the one that you are actually updating?
See The DCTPARMS File section in z/VM TCP/IP Planning and
Customization for details. I'm using SC24-6125-04, it's on page 39.
I prefer to use the
Mike,
Yes, I'm positive 198 is the same for SSLSERV. Here's the output
from Q LINKS on SSLSERV:
q links 198
TCPMAINT 0198 R/W, DTCVSW1 0198 R/O, DTCVSW2 0198 R/O, SSLDCSSM 0198
R/O
TCPIP0198 R/O, SSLSERV 0198 R/O
One interesting note; there's actual progress being made here. I can
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Tom Duerbusch
duerbus...@stlouiscity.com wrote:
This being a pseudo Friday in the USA due to Thanksgiving holidays
Does anyone have any experience with the AS/400 support in the z/196 box?
Yep, I know it is a separate processor/memory and connected
The question came up today as to whether z/VM 5.1 will run on a z196. I know
there are no 5.1 PTF's available for z196 support.
How about z/VM 5.4, will it run WITHOUT the z196 PTF's?...
Any guesses? or experiences?
As z/VM 5.1 was never tested on a z196 we cannot provide an outlook of
how it
And then you have someone like me who finds typing to be burdensome due to a
physical condition. If I had a GUI to manage the operating system, I would
welcome it. One point I was making is that saying or implying that because
someone prefers a GUI, they do not know what they are doing is a
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:05 PM, McBride, Catherine cmcbr...@kable.com wrote:
Power Blades support IOS
But do they on a zBX? I don't see that in the docs I'm looking at (of
course, it may have changed, too).
--
zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it
The message TCPIPNOT IN USE OR AN INVALID NSS/DCSS NAME seems to
be related to a console message SSLSERV that TCPIP send out when TCPRUN
is started:
DTCRUN1022I Console log will be sent to default owner ID: TCPMAINT
DTCRUN1040I SSL server cache segment query / definition results:
HCPCFC003E
IOS runs fine on the PS701 Express Blade server which is the Blade
shipped with zBX. However, the integrated management modules (Zmanager)
may not yet support IOS.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of zMan
Sent:
Thanks Les, that is pretty much what I suspected. The problem is the upgrade
path. We currently have a z9 so 6.1 is not an option on this machine.
So when the time comes to swap CPU.s what OS can I IPL on the z196 that I
have tested on the z9?
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Les Geer
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:32 PM, McBride, Catherine cmcbr...@kable.com wrote:
IOS runs fine on the PS701 Express Blade server which is the Blade
shipped with zBX. However, the integrated management modules (Zmanager)
may not yet support IOS.
Right, that was my point. Without real support,
Dave,
The SSLSERV userid needs to have CP Class E privileges so it can define and
save the DCSS and own the shared queue SSL will be using.
Mike
From: Dave Keeton dave.kee...@state.or.us
I think your reading more into my comments that I put there.
I pointed one specific case of DNS, it was not a generality or implied that you
or anyone doesn't not know what they are doing. I that case they clearly did
not. We had to hire a contractor to help because the GUI was not available
Been there, done that, bought the T-shirt, wore it, and put it in a draw
never to wear it again..
The path of choice given the hardware, software, expiration dates, and
upward and downward compatibility issue is:
z/VM 5.4 on z9
to z196 with the 14 APARs for 5.4 that support it
and then move
George, are you saying that even AFTER the 14 PTF's for z196 support z/VM
5.4 still runs on a z9?
If so that clears up a misconception I had, and also makes life much easier.
Thakns
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:00 PM, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
Been there, done that,
Ok, I've reread the announcement letter.
I see my confusion...
The z/196 supports Power Blades.
And Power Blades support i5 (the operating system formerly known as i5.OS or
OS/400).
It doesn't mean that z/196 has the support for the i5 OS.
Which is kind of strange.
Is this a licensing
Not George here, but that is correct. 5.4 will get you from there to here and
the ptfs will run on the z9 as well.
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not
use,
Running z/VM 5.4 with the 14 APARs now on z9.
Thanks to Marcy
PK97799
VM64656
VM64672
VM64747
VM64774
VM64793
VM64798
VM64799
VM64807
VM64818
VM64820
VM64879
VM64881
VM64891
They can be found at:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=1209dc=DB540q1=z196uid=isg1_2817DEVICE_2817-ZVM
On 11/24/2010 at 04:50 PM, William D Carroll
william.d.carr...@jpmchase.com
wrote:
My Original Comment on this whole thing was the a 3270 Emulator really is not
a GUI. It is a text based implementation on a GUI desktop, that does not
make it a GUI, your still typing commands.
Of course
Mark,
It is documented as such. See the SSL DCSS Management Agent Notes
section at http://www.vm.ibm.com/related/tcpip/tcspeins.html
Thanks!
Mike
From: Mark Post mp...@novell.com
You are totally missing my point
Maybe your definition of a GUI is different than what I know to be a GUI.
William 'Doug' Carroll
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Mark Post
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 6:33 PM
Excellent!!
Thanks, and have a happy Thanksgiving.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com
wrote:
Not George here, but that is correct. 5.4 will get you from there to here
and the ptfs will run on the z9 as well.
Marcy
This message may contain
A goal of the zBX is that the virtual servers on it are all managed by the
HCM. That is: virtual machine can be defined, started, etc. This requires
hooks in the hypervisor.
And, that's the reason why not everything that might run on these blades
natively isn't supported on the zBX. If the
46 matches
Mail list logo
