Hello List,
We are running here :
z/VM Version 5 Release 4.0, service level 0903 (64-bit)
Generated at 11/12/09 13:16:27 BRT
IPL at 04/09/11 23:01:08 BRT
We alter a LOGO, and when try see this in screen nothing happen.
We use this way ...
CPREL A
CP LINK * CF1 CF1 W
ACC CF1 G
flist * * g
You have to use the CP REFRESH command to pick up the new logo.
*Jonathan Quay*
**Systems Engineer - Enterprise Servers and Virtualization
Global Technology
Direct Line: 770-442-7026
Fax: 770-442-7191
*http://www.ihg.com
*
2011/7/21 Sérgio Lima Costa sergio.co...@cetip.com.br
Hello
Hello, Mr. Jonathan.
First, thanks for your help.
When tried use the CP REFRESH command here, We have the error below :
q cpdisk
Label Userid Vdev Mode Stat Vol-ID Rdev Type StartLoc EndLoc
MNTCF1 MAINT0CF1 A R/O 540RES 0100 CKD 39158
MNTCF2 MAINT0CF2 B
That is excellent news, and IBM should be shouting it from the rooftops.
Large enterprise CIO's should perceive virtualized linux on Z as the new
cool thing to do.
There is a very nice sample program called DRAWLOGO that adds the correct
3270 data stream commands to your logo. Look here:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zvm/v5r4/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zvm.v54.hcpa5/drlgcmd.htm
and also in the chapter in that book on the logo configuration file.
Sérgio Lima Costa writes:
When tried use the CP REFRESH command here, We have the error below :
[...]
cp refresh logo local logo
HCPZPM6700E File LOCAL LOGO, record 1:
HCPZPM6701E Invalid logo configuration file statement - /
The file you give to the CP REFRESH command should be
Hello Malcom,
Sorry about my mistake, even though the problem persist.
Lookl please :
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 10:08:55
CP REFRESH LOGO logo config
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 10:09:02
Any Idea?
Thanks,
Sergio
-Mensagem original-
De: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]
Terry, Table 10 on Page 74 of the Ensemble Performance Management Guide
lists the GPMP software requirements. RedHat 5.3 and up are listed.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg2401230a207bb542c852576c600738869aid=1
Thanks,
Sergio,
If the logo is used by VTAM, you might need an additional command to refresh it.
Examine the comments at the top of this partial file(and consider adding them
to your LOGO CONFIG, too - I added them to ours as soon as I realized that this
is not a task that I perform often, and would
Hello Mr. Mike.
I tried executed what you said here, but still don't work.
Look please :
Ready; T=0.02/0.03 11:23:35
CP REFRESH LOGOinfo LOGO CONFIG
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 11:23:41
CP REFRESH LOGOVSM VSCS
HCPZLC6784E VSM VSCS not logged on.
Ready(06784); T=0.01/0.01 11:23:56
cp q cpdisk
Label
On Thursday, 07/21/2011 at 10:30 EDT, Sérgio Lima Costa
sergio.co...@cetip.com.br wrote:
CP REFRESH LOGOVSM VSCS
HCPZLC6784E VSM VSCS not logged on.
Ready(06784); T=0.01/0.01 11:23:56
:
q n
:
VSM - TCPIP
VSM - VTAM
You have VSCS running in the VTAM virtual machine, not in VSCS
On Wednesday, 07/20/2011 at 03:18 EDT, Ewald Roller
e.rol...@rolf-benz.de wrote:
Hello,
I tried so setup a new SMTP-Server on z/VM 5.4.
I want to remove the seperate TCPIP DATA on SMTPs 191
(w/o DNS) and use the Parameter IPMAILERADDRESS instead
to forward all mails to our exchange-server:
Yes,
You can use only the two chpids to connect all the partitions. Use the
Shimon doc to design all the conections.
With FICON, no need to define Chpids as CNC/CTC, all must be FC. And the
Control Units and IODEVICE can be FCTC.
Shimon Lebowitz wrote a very nice paper on how to do this with
Sergio, you don't have VSCS broken into a separate virtual machine. That's OK,
we only have it separated because many years ago we had so many CMS users that
it was more efficient to run it separate from VTAM.
Try the command: CP REFRESH LOGOVSM VTAM
If that works, presuming that you added
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Crispin Hugo crispin.h...@macro4.com wrote:
Am I right to assume, if I am clever(?) with the configuration, I could
connect all 15 LPARS to each other with CTC’s ?
If you also plan to run ISLINK connections between them, you need to
be careful. We had lots of
Hello List,
Now is ok.
I must say thanks very much from all for the help.
You are the Best.
Regards, and Greetings from São Paulo - Brazil.
Sergio Lima Costa
-Mensagem original-
De: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] Em nome de
Mike Walter
Enviada em:
Alan,
I got no startup errors in the SMTP Log.
I tried the statement as you have advised:
IPMAILERADDRESS ALL 1.2.3.4
same result. See part of the log below.
I only restarted the SMTP-Server.
Should I also restart the associated TCP/IP stack ?
Kind regards
Ewald Roller
DTCRUN1022I Console
Problem is partially solved (but I'm not satisfied):
Although I have defined in SYSTEM DTCPARMS for my
SMTP-Server SMTP02 the :parms Operand with
:parms.SMTP02 CONFIG *
the server never used it...
Is it possible, to force it to use the defined CONFIG file?
I want to have SMTP-Userid name and
The problem with SET SECUSER is that it changes to who messages are
delivered:
If you issue SET SECUSER REXECD MAINT messages sent to REXECD are directly
delivered to MAINT.
REXECD runs a program that intercept messages, but when they are delivered
to MAINT
When using SET OBSERVER such message
On Thursday, 07/21/2011 at 11:33 EDT, Rob van der Heij rvdh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Crispin Hugo crispin.h...@macro4.com
wrote:
Am I right to assume, if I am clever(?) with the configuration, I
could
connect all 15 LPARS to each other with CTCs ?
If you
We are working on a project to provide Internet access to select Linux guests
on z/VM. The network team plans to use separate OSA's and virtual switches for
this. For the initial testing, there will be one OSA and virtual switch for
the presentation zone and a separate OSA and virtual switch
No One Controller can handle all the VSWITCHES you may want to create. I would
create at least to Controller and code all your VSwitch definitions with a
CONTROLLER * and two RDEV devices. Also you can use VLAN's to reduce the number
of Ports and isolate the traffic through a switch.
Larry
Hello Everyone,
I am interested in knowing how to configure a spare ESCON channel to ou
r
DASD so that if one of the existing eight shared channels goes belly-up
(like it did last week) we can just move the cable over and not have to
POR.
I'm currently looking in the System z Input/Output
On Thursday, 07/21/2011 at 03:16 EDT, O'Brien, Dennis L
dennis.l.o'br...@bankofamerica.com wrote:
I believe there was a statement from IBM that the two
default controllers, DTCVSW1 and DTCVSW2, are sufficient for any number
of
virtual switches. Is there any security risk if the same
The HMC or SE has the ability to do this, or used to so a ESCON port could be
sparred over to another port.
That way you did not have to code it in the IOCP.
Larry Davis
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Sherry
you can do a channel reassign at the HMC level also
Sherry Everhart
severhart@MACCNE
I know we could use VLAN's. The network people would rather spend money on
additional OSA's. I'm sure IBM won't object.
Dennis O'Brien
I want to express my gratitude to
We have the same situation here.
Larry Davis
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 4:14 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Separate virtual switch controllers
I know we could use VLAN's. The
Reassigning the selected channel path identifier (CHPID) to another
partition could not be completed. The selected CHPID is not
reconfigurable. Select a reconfigurable CHPID and try the operation
again.
On Thursday, 07/21/2011 at 03:32 EDT, Sherry Everhart
severh...@maccnet.com wrote:
I am interested in knowing how to configure a spare ESCON channel to
our
DASD so that if one of the existing eight shared channels goes belly-up
(like it did last week) we can just move the cable over and not
We just went through all this with a government contract - we had to have a
presentation zone separated totally from a Data zone separated from an app
zone, it was a nightmare. Technical (logic) has nothing to do with it, it is
another chance for the dreaded Loch Ness Security Department to
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Mark Post mp...@novell.com wrote:
Cross-posted to Linux-390, IBMVM, and IBM-Main
All,
As part of Attachmate's promoting SUSE to a separate brand,
http://www.suse.com/ is online once again. For those interested, it's worth
a look.
Mark
Hello!
And Mark
On Thursday, 07/21/2011 at 04:15 EDT, O'Brien, Dennis L
dennis.l.o'br...@bankofamerica.com wrote:
I know we could use VLAN?s. The network people would rather spend money
on
additional OSA?s.
It is a common (possibly best) practice to keep Internet and intranet
traffic segregated onto
Cross-posted to Linux-390, IBMVM, and IBM-Main
All,
As part of Attachmate's promoting SUSE to a separate brand,
http://www.suse.com/ is online once again. For those interested, it's worth a
look.
Mark
On Thursday, 07/21/2011 at 12:11 EDT, Ewald Roller e.rol...@rolf-benz.de
wrote:
Problem is partially solved (but I'm not satisfied):
Although I have defined in SYSTEM DTCPARMS for my
SMTP-Server SMTP02 the :parms Operand with
:parms.SMTP02 CONFIG *
the server never used it...
Is it
Puuh, now I got it!
The SYSTEM DTCPARMS file puzzled me a lot.
After carefully reading the TCP/IP Planning guide once more,
I found the mismatch in the DTCPARMS file.
After a few tests now all works well!
Thank you and sorry for wasting your time :-)
Kind regards
Ewald Roller
Greetings from the SHARE LVM Program group!
We would like to invite anyone who may be interested in meeting with us
and learning more about the Linux and VM Program at SHARE to join us for
dinner during the next SHARE conference, which is being held in Orlando,
Florida. The dinner is
I will be out of the office starting 22/07/2011 and will return on
25/07/2011.
I will respond to your email when I return. For any urgent responses,
please contact Brett Skellon - Mainframe Services Team Leader.
CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information
You can use only the two chpids to connect all the partitions. Use the Shimon
doc to design all the conections.
With FICON, no need to define Chpids as CNC/CTC, all must be FC. And the
Control Units and IODEVICE can be FCTC.
If someone will give me the updates, I’ll reformat the paper and
39 matches
Mail list logo
