On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:52:35 -0500, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
The standard defines alphabetic as A-Z (actually, A, B, C, D, etc. to
avoid confusion) and numeric as 0-9.
So, our existing labeling programs that allow blanks in the middle of
labels (very annoying) and characters
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Automated DDR funny - has anyone got any ideas
On Thursday, 03/11/2010 at 03:19 EST, Daniel P. Martin
dmar...@gizmoworks.com wrote:
Well, yes, the semicolon does work... but if you're going
to have to
do new work to hack the way DDR parses statements
On Thursday, 03/11/2010 at 05:39 EST, Brian Nielsen
bniel...@sco.idaho.gov wrote:
The main problem to solve is still the same as the original posters'
problem: The DASD label might contain the special characters or
character
DASD labels of @@, ¢¢, and /* */ are all valid
Sorry if
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Automated DDR funny - has anyone got any ideas
On Thursday, 03/11/2010 at 05:39 EST, Brian Nielsen
bniel...@sco.idaho.gov wrote:
The main problem to solve is still the same as the original posters'
problem: The DASD label might contain the special
I like to use the line delete symbol as a way to add comments to my DDR
control files.
So, we will all now suffer a brand new control statement because of you.
;-)
On Thursday, 03/11/2010 at 06:44 EST, Ivica Brodaric
ivica.broda...@gmail.com wrote:
So, we will all now suffer a brand new control statement because of you.
;-)
I don't mind leaving the cent sign as a comment prefix delimiter (not as a
line delete) for compatibility, but we'll want another
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:49:46 -0500, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
On Thursday, 03/11/2010 at 06:44 EST, Ivica Brodaric
ivica.broda...@gmail.com wrote:
So, we will all now suffer a brand new control statement because of yo
u.
;-)
I don't mind leaving the cent sign as a comment
On Thursday, 03/11/2010 at 12:16 EST, Brian Nielsen
bniel...@sco.idaho.gov wrote:
If you were inclined to add an official comment syntax to DDR control
files I would suggest using REXX style comments as are also used in
SYSTEM
CONFIG. I suppose another choice could be the semi-colon as used
Well, yes, the semicolon does work... but if you're going to have to
do new work to hack the way DDR parses statements anyhow, REXX-ish
syntax would certainly be a desirable approach. Not that I have any
delusions about the development process being at all democratic, but if
you're
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:21:07 -0500, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
Semicolon works ok as it allows
INPUT 181 TAPE ( LEAVE ; Comment on the same line
and
; Full line comment
Today you have to code
Comment on same line ¢INPUT 181 TAPE ( LEAVE
and
Full line comment ¢
On Thursday, 03/11/2010 at 03:23 EST, Brian Nielsen
bniel...@sco.idaho.gov wrote:
The version with the cent sign in the middle of the line does not work
as
you are expecting. A cent sign anywhere in the line discards the entire
line, not just what is before it.
So, contrary to the doc, it
Boy, is that old.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
Most often, the default values for these two symbols are
defined for each
virtual machine at system generation. When you use the CP
TERMINAL command to redefine the CHARDEL and LINEDEL
characters, the redefinitions have no effect on
On Thursday, 03/11/2010 at 03:19 EST, Daniel P. Martin
dmar...@gizmoworks.com wrote:
Well, yes, the semicolon does work... but if you're going to have to
do new work to hack the way DDR parses statements anyhow, REXX-ish
syntax would certainly be a desirable approach. Not that I have any
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:43:14 -0500, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
If I ran the zoo, I would propose that DDR
- no longer check for @
- continue to obey Ý as it does today.
- add an actual comment capability
The main problem to solve is still the same as the original posters'
Oh. I'm sorry. I didn't realize you had wandered down the primrose
path of thinking I was trying to suggest what some might call the easy
solution... :-p
Yeah. I know. Somewhere next week, in Seattle, when I least expect it,
I will pay.
*sigh*
-dan.
On 3/11/2010 3:58 PM, Alan Altmark
On 3/11/2010 at 05:47 PM, Daniel P. Martin dmar...@gizmoworks.com
wrote:
Yeah. I know. Somewhere next week, in Seattle, when I least expect it,
I will pay.
Just being in Seattle isn't punishment enough? I vote for clemency.
Mark Post
I have a series of automated slaves that read a control file and perform
DDR copies. These slaves do not have their own RW minidisks so they queue
the commands for DDR.
In this case the target volume has a label of d...@d5f3 but DDR is winging at
a label mismatch. I have traced my exec and can
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Automated DDR funny - has anyone got any ideas
I have a series of automated slaves that read a control file and perform
DDR copies. These slaves do not have their own RW minidisks so they
queue the commands for DDR.
In this case the target volume has a label of d
Imler, Steven J steven.im...@ca.com wrote:-
To be sure try ... d...@d5f3
OK - tried that but it showed that it was trying to match to VD5F3. This
suggests that @ is still operating as CHARDEL even though it is set OFF.
Just to clarify - all TERM characters (except LINEND) are OFF
L
I should read the DDR help more carefully next time !!
When you use the CP TERMINAL command to redefine the CHARDEL and LINEDEL
characters, the redefinitions have no effect on DDR line editing. DDR
continues to recognize the at sign (@) and the cent sign (¢) as valid
CHARDEL and LINEDEL
C°
Tel.: + 32 3 217 50 16
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Colin Allinson
Sent: woensdag 10 maart 2010 12:45
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Automated DDR funny - has anyone got any ideas
I have
, not my employer's.
Colin Allinson cgallin...@amadeus.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
03/10/2010 05:44 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Automated DDR funny - has anyone got any
On Wednesday, 03/10/2010 at 09:25 EST, Nick Laflamme
dplafla...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd be very tempted to open a PMR and request they also respect an
ESCAPE
character. It's only fair.
But that's a long-term solution, not a short-term solution. :-(
Go ahead and open a PMR. While it is
Mike Walter mike.wal...@hewitt.com wrote :-
What happens if your control statement volser matches the volser
reported by DDR, e.g.
OUT D5F3 DASD v...@d5f3
Is the actual DASD volser being written to really d...@d543, or actually
v...@d5f3 as reported by DDR?
Sorry, that was a typo. I
I like to use the line delete symbol as a way to add comments to my DDR
control files.
Brian Nielsen
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:07:36 +0100, Colin Allinson
cgallin...@amadeus.com wrote:
I should read the DDR help more carefully next time !!
When you use the CP TERMINAL command to redefine the
25 matches
Mail list logo
