Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

2008-08-06 Thread Marcy Cortes
ation." From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Vincent Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 2:49 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008) I understa

Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread James Vincent
I understand Richard. Your need to add -and- remove the memory for your environment is as important as just the adding is for a lot of others. It sounds like you have compelling reasons to ask for the 'next step' to be done - to remove real memory dynamically. I have not heard anything formal fr

Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
esday, August 05, 2008 12:55 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008) To add to Mark's comment, as well as others: your need (certainly a valid one) is more encompassing than most sites. Alan al

Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
esday, August 05, 2008 12:28 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE > (Aug 5, 2008) > > >>> On 8/5/2008 at 2:53 PM, in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> , "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008) Richard, there are good number of folks that -will- find this useful to an unbelievable level. Imagine having LPARs loaded with Linux guests - hundreds of them that cross all lines of business at a company. Any outage on any of those LPARs

Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Quay, Jonathan (IHG)
elsewhere has a long time to fester. From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Walter Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 3:55 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008

Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Mike Walter
pinions or policies of Hewitt Associates. "Mark Post" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" 08/05/2008 02:28 PM Please respond to "The IBM z/VM Operating System" To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Some IBM Announcements for

Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Mark Post
>>> On 8/5/2008 at 2:53 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -snip- > Thus the ferrous solution > because there is no way to borrow memory and give it back without > disruption. Which is the whole point. This capability isn't about borrowing memory an

Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
K.EDU > Subject: Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE > (Aug 5, 2008) > > On Tuesday, 08/05/2008 at 12:39 EDT, "Schuh, Richard" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I was interested in the ability to add memory to an LPAR because we > > hav

Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread James Vincent
Richard, there are good number of folks that -will- find this useful to an unbelievable level. Imagine having LPARs loaded with Linux guests - hundreds of them that cross all lines of business at a company. Any outage on any of those LPARs takes over six to eight hours and will only be allowed o

Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 08/05/2008 at 12:39 EDT, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was interested in the ability to add memory to an LPAR because we have > 2 LPARs that are used infrequently and it would be nice to add their > storage to VM. The new capability is > absolutely useless to us.

Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
gards, Richard Schuh > -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Post > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 10:12 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE > (Au

Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Mark Post
>>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:38 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -snip- > The new capability is > absolutely useless to us. Nice boilerplate to show in sales pitches to > management, perhaps, but no practical value here. Our VM is as close to > 24 X

Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
rm & sunny Endicott NY > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 8:59 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008) > > For the participants of IBMVM, LINUX-390, and IBMMAIN who are > interested in z/OS, z/VM, and z/VSE... >

Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Pamela Christina in warm & sunny Endicott NY
For the participants of IBMVM, LINUX-390, and IBMMAIN who are interested in z/OS, z/VM, and z/VSE... The following announcements were made today IBM z/VM V5.4 - Extending virtualization technology for System z IBM z/OS V1.10 offers new scalability, performance, availability, economics, and solut