A check of Q RECORDING Looks OK, we're only doing ACCOUNT, no COUNT.
I'm pretty much going to pass this whole thread over to the owner of
the query machines; It is to my knowledge a recent development and
from my vantage, there have been recent changes in the
performance/resource usage of them.
Alan, Thanks. Probably after the 1st but I'll discuss opening a PMR
sooner with our VM guys and the machine(s) owner. I don';t think
we'll see a FRF002 as the machines have been stopped/forced. I'm not
planning on them setting STREXEMPT for the machines or STRLIMIT off
either! Happy Holidays
We've an application that gets HCPLIM6007I, and eventually 6008E or 6009E
Short of logging off/on, is there a way for the logon to advise CP
they nolonger need it?
It seems to survive a CP IPL or CP SYSTEM CLEAR...
The disconnected machines, don't appear to be doing any of the items
mentioned
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: System Free Storage
We've an application that gets HCPLIM6007I, and eventually
6008E or 6009E Short of logging off/on, is there a way for
the logon to advise CP they nolonger need it?
It seems to survive a CP IPL or CP SYSTEM CLEAR...
The disconnected machines, don't
Richard, they are sending performance queries to TPF images;
ACTIVE(ACTION? can't recall for sure), VISTA like but called TASTE on
this system over ESCON CTCs; We've an IP flavor that we're moving to
that doesn't have this issue or hasn't shown any in other systems.
Many years ago, our VISTACTL
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Gregg
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:25 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: System Free Storage
We've an application that gets HCPLIM6007I, and eventually
6008E
Hadn't but just tried; 16M machine, CP DEF STOR 16M and STOR 32M;
still have, 142 double words if I'm looking at the right place in the
VMDBK... and I think I am...
Just out of curiousity, have you tried doing a CP DEFINE STORAGE?
--
John McKown
Gregg Reed
No Plan, survives execution
...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Gregg
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 9:40 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: System Free Storage
Richard, they are sending performance queries to TPF images;
ACTIVE(ACTION? can't recall for sure), VISTA like but called
TASTE on this system over ESCON CTCs
On Wednesday, 12/16/2009 at 12:25 EST, Gregg reed.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
We've an application that gets HCPLIM6007I, and eventually 6008E or
6009E
Short of logging off/on, is there a way for the logon to advise CP
they nolonger need it?
It seems to survive a CP IPL or CP SYSTEM CLEAR...
The
: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 9:51 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: System Free Storage
Hadn't but just tried; 16M machine, CP DEF STOR 16M and STOR
32M; still have, 142 double words if I'm looking at the right
place in the VMDBK... and I think I am...
Just out of curiousity
Correct, though redefining virtual machine storage to a different size
performs a reset clear function on the virtual machine, which could well
help clear up the problem.
But as Alan says, this isn't typically something a customer can unravel
looking at the system from the outside.
- Bill
Ok, I should have read the whole thread more carefully - both re-IPL and
SYSTEM CLEAR had already been tried with no effect, redefining virtual
storage would be a similar no-op. I think Richard's probably on the righ
t
track with the theory about SMSG backlogs building up, resetting the virt
ual
Subject: Re: System Free Storage
Correct, though redefining virtual machine storage to a
different size performs a reset clear function on the virtual
machine, which could well help clear up the problem.
But as Alan says, this isn't typically something a customer
can unravel looking
Bill Holder wrote:
Ok, I should have read the whole thread more carefully - both re-IPL and
SYSTEM CLEAR had already been tried with no effect, redefining virtual
storage would be a similar no-op. I think Richard's probably on the right
track with the theory about SMSG backlogs building up,
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Bill Holder hold...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Correct, though redefining virtual machine storage to a different size
performs a reset clear function on the virtual machine, which could well
help clear up the problem.
Just wagging, but the fair share before CP gets
15 matches
Mail list logo
