Friends.
Let us stop this discussion here.
Hope baskar will continue sending mails on this list on all his FOSS
related activities.
If the event is organized via ILUGC, he can put the word on bahalf of ILUGC.
else, he can omit the string.
Please stop here.
--
Regards,
T.Shrinivasan
My
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Mohan Sundaram mohan@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:55 PM, A. Mani a.mani@gmail.com wrote:
Further the member(s) in question should inform the list well in advance
and obtain an implicit no objection certificate on the mailing list.
Such
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Baskar Selvaraj bas...@linuxpert.inwrote:
Not necessary. I wish to stay away from all these noices because of my
regular posts in this list.
Si, no disturbance due to any of your post.
As I was really worried about our education system going behind
Hi,
--- On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Sundaram KR
sundaram.ramachand...@kggroup.com wrote:
| 2. The Linux kernel is jointly developed by entities such as RedHat,
IBM etc. all of which are
| commercial public companies, that exist to provide gains to
shareholders. The employees from
| the
The objectives are different for a user group mailing list and a
project list. They are not the same.
---
Is it the objective of ilugc mailing list to prevent members from talking about
Commercial activities on the list? Nobody is answering this simple question;
Free Software
Iff the company has given permission to the employee to use his/her
official e-mail address, can he/she use the same. Otherwise, a
different account needs to be used. Whether the individual is authorized to
speak for the organization or
not doesn't matter. Any e-mail sent through the official
Hi,
--- On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Sundaram KR
sundaram.ramachand...@kggroup.com wrote:
| Likewise on this list, many members are working on
| FOSS products and services; sometimes gratis, sometimes charging money.
\--
This is a volunteer-driven list, and people try to help each other out
There have been cases where groups, and conferences (in India) have been
hijacked for personal or commercial interests.
I have not seen anybody hijacking this list for personal interests which are
not based around Free Software. If anybody tries to do that on this list, we
can simply ban
Hi,
--- On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Sundaram KR
sundaram.ramachand...@kggroup.com wrote:
| I have not seen anybody hijacking this list for personal interests
| which are not based around Free Software.
\--
True. I am only trying to make people aware of what has happened in
other
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Raman Pandarinathan raam...@gmail.com wrote:
1.Let us use 'on behalf of ILUGC' only if any ONE of the following is
satisfied
a.If the offer for the event came to ILUGC either on the list or to
the co-ordinator/members and someone attends the event.
Further
I am new to the list but personally I feel that there using the On behalf
of ILUGC name for conducting free events and workshops should be allowed
or rather encouraged. Imparting knowledge for free resonates with the core
principles of the FOSS community.
The contentious part seems to be when the
Raman Pandarinathan raam...@gmail.com writes:
Dear all
Probably I would have posted maximum 'on behalf of ILUGC' in the list
for the last 10 years. My humble opinion
1.Let us use 'on behalf of ILUGC' only if any ONE of the following is
satisfied
a.If the offer for the event came to
Hi
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:55 PM, A. Mani a.mani@gmail.com wrote:
Further the member(s) in question should inform the list well in advance
and obtain an implicit no objection certificate on the mailing list.
Why do you think this is needed ? What does an implicit no
objection
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:55 PM, A. Mani a.mani@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Raman Pandarinathan raam...@gmail.com
wrote:
1.Let us use 'on behalf of ILUGC' only if any ONE of the following is
satisfied
a.If the offer for the event came to ILUGC either on the
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:55 PM, A. Mani a.mani@gmail.com wrote:
Further the member(s) in question should inform the list well in advance
and obtain an implicit no objection certificate on the mailing list.
Such thoughts in the context of what Baskar is doing boil down to
being regimental
Mohan Sundaram mohan@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:55 PM, A. Mani a.mani@gmail.com wrote:
Further the member(s) in question should inform the list well in advance
and obtain an implicit no objection certificate on the mailing list.
Such thoughts in the context of
Hi
I think we have lost complete sight of the spirit and the symbiotic
relationship ILUGC can have with companies like Baskar's in furthering
the cause of FOSS.
The following information was told to me by Railway Baskar (The railway
Baskar, not the linuxpert baskar)
Railway Baskar and Linux
Do we need a clearance to conduct an event, I think the co-ordinator should
take a call, My opinion is , it is better to have one.
My opinion is; On Behalf Of is a meaningless term. There is no need for any
clearance since this meaningless term On Behalf Of can be removed.
The following information was told to me by Railway Baskar (The railway
Baskar, not the linuxpert baskar)
Railway Baskar and Linux expert company did a workshop at Eswari Engg
College.
Sorry for your misunderstanding. But that was not a workshop, but a
complete three months commercial
Hi,
Baskar, not the linuxpert baskar)
Railway Baskar and Linux expert company did a workshop at Eswari Engg
College.
Sorry for your misunderstanding. But that was not a workshop, but a
complete three months commercial training program conducted for the
students of MCA requested by the
I dont mean that people dont like your posts.
They just wanted the posts to come without the string on bahalf of
ilugc as none of the ilugc members know how you contact the colleges
and organize the events.
You can directly say as on bahalf of linuxpert.in too. No harm in this.
Please keep
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Shrinivasan T tshriniva...@gmail.comwrote:
I dont mean that people dont like your posts.
They just wanted the posts to come without the string on bahalf of
ilugc as none of the ilugc members know how you contact the colleges
and organize the events.
You can
They just wanted the posts to come without the string on bahalf of
ilugc as none of the ilugc members know how you contact the colleges
and organize the events.
Earlier, this list received few requests for conducting guest lecture /
workshop on FOSS in their respective colleges. As no one
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:02 PM, balachandar muruganantham
mbchan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Shrinivasan T tshriniva...@gmail.com
wrote:
If some members dont want to hear, shouldnt it be decided by the community?
may be take a vote. lets not define rules and
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Shrinivasan T tshriniva...@gmail.comwrote:
I dont mean that people dont like your posts.
They just wanted the posts to come without the string on bahalf of
ilugc as none of the ilugc members know how you contact the colleges
and organize the events.
who are
Hi
If some members dont want to hear, shouldnt it be decided by the
community?
may be take a vote. lets not define rules and regulations just to do
define
it.
how about taking this action item in the next meet?.
regards,
Thyagarajan Shanmugham
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Mohan L
Hi,
Apologies for top posting.
regards,
Thyagarajan Shanmugham
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
ILUGC Mailing List Guidelines:
http://ilugc.in/mailinglist-guidelines
I want to make several points on this topic:
1. The Free in FOSS stands for Freedom or Sudhandhiram; not Free as in Gratis
or Ilavasam. As long as any of the 3000 members of this list post their
thoughts, and those postings are related to Freedom providing software; I or
nobody should
Dear members,
how about taking this action item in the next meet?.
Not necessary. I wish to stay away from all these noices because of my
regular posts in this list.
As I was really worried about our education system going behind proprietary
software, I took my very own initiative of
Dear all,
My sincere apologies for posting the FDP/Workshop Event Report mails in
ILUG-C in the recent times.
As I came to know through Mr.Shrinivasan, the members of the ILUG-C
community were against the term 'on behalf of ILUG-C' used in my posts.
As you all are aware that I have been a
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Baskar Selvaraj bas...@linuxpert.inwrote:
Dear all,
My sincere apologies for posting the FDP/Workshop Event Report mails in
ILUG-C in the recent times.
Do not understand the apology why ?
As I came to know through Mr.Shrinivasan, the members of the ILUG-C
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:41 AM, satyaakam goswami satyaa...@gmail.comwrote:
My sincere apologies for posting the FDP/Workshop Event Report mails in
ILUG-C in the recent times.
Do not understand the apology why ?
I agree. No need for apology. Posting such events will
a) coax more members
On 16 September 2013 09:41, satyaakam goswami satyaa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Baskar Selvaraj bas...@linuxpert.in
wrote:
Dear all,
My sincere apologies for posting the FDP/Workshop Event Report mails in
ILUG-C in the recent times.
Dear Baskar
I am sad to
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Asokan Pichai paso...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sad to see this. But then, your contribution is independent of any
acknowledgement it receives from ilugc.
Whether on behalf of or in spite of, please continue the good work.
Probably it is a good idea for ilugc
Hi ,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Baskar Selvaraj bas...@linuxpert.in wrote:
Dear all,
My sincere apologies for posting the FDP/Workshop Event Report mails in
ILUG-C in the recent times.
As I came to know through Mr.Shrinivasan, the members of the ILUG-C
community were against the term
35 matches
Mail list logo
