> On 09-May-07, at 10:38 AM, PJ wrote:
>
> > BSD style licencing is better than most, but such licences have had a
> > role in helping MS Windows to its current position (which is why Bill
> > Gates favours them).
Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> and which is why apache is running
On 09-May-07, at 1:49 PM, PJ wrote:
> Other less-established but important projects under any BSD style
> licence are
> still at risk.
name some. or name at least one or two (stick to those without lucky
and talented developers because we have already established that bsd
+luck+talent != da
On 09-May-07, at 1:49 PM, PJ wrote:
> > Other less-established but important projects under any BSD style
> > licence are
> > still at risk.
Kenneth Gonsalves writes:
> name some. or name at least one or two (stick to those without lucky
> and talented developers because we have already estab
PJ wrote:
> Kenneth Gonsalves writes:
>
>> name some. or name at least one or two (stick to those without lucky
>> and talented developers because we have already established that bsd
>> +luck+talent != danger)
>
>
> 2. Use your clairvoyance to figure out which project is going to be unlucky
On 09-May-07, at 5:34 PM, PJ wrote:
>> name some. or name at least one or two (stick to those without lucky
>> and talented developers because we have already established that bsd
>> +luck+talent != danger)
>
> Sure.
>
> I just need a list of names of projects that are important && that
> will be
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 18:15, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
> [snip]
> I have a feeling that Kenneth is just asking for some facts behind
> your theory of how BSD code is being abused by M$ and its ilk. Too
> many people throw the "BSD networking stack" as an example whenever
> this discussion comes
On 09-May-07, at 7:15 PM, Raj Mathur wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 May 2007 18:15, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
>> [snip]
>> I have a feeling that Kenneth is just asking for some facts behind
>> your theory of how BSD code is being abused by M$ and its ilk. Too
>> many people throw the "BSD networking s
Hi Hemant,
This may be too late a reply, (you might have already found out the
solution) but still here it is
man page for mount says "Normally, only the superuser can mount file
systems. However, when *fstab* contains the *user* option on a line, anybody
can mount the corresponding system.
Lokesh Bhog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> How does this pact affect Linux?
>
Bad for Microsoft's FUD campaign against Gnu/linux.
According to groklaw, Dell purchased licenses for Suse enterprise
Linux from Microsoft, NOT from Novell.
That means, well, M$ is licensing the gnu/linux OS; which M$
Mahesh T. Pai wrote:
> That means, well, M$ is licensing the gnu/linux OS; which M$ cannot do
> unless it conforms to the GNU GPL, which means the viral clause in GPL
> applies to M$ patents!!!
Microsoft cannot change the license of GPL software. I am sure there
lawyers understand this more than a
Raj Mathur wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 May 2007 18:15, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
>> [snip]
>> I have a feeling that Kenneth is just asking for some facts behind
>> your theory of how BSD code is being abused by M$ and its ilk. Too
>> many people throw the "BSD networking stack" as an example whenever
Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> so, in short, your statement that many important BSD projects are in
> danger is not based on any factual knowledge or research.
I've told you a principle that has been shown to hold true (viz. danger of BSD
projects being usurped for all projects
Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Wednesday 09 May 2007 18:15, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
> > [snip]
> > I have a feeling that Kenneth is just asking for some facts behind
> > your theory of how BSD code is being abused by M$ and its ilk. Too
> > many people throw the "BSD networking
OT but fwd to anyone interested.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Guntupalli Karunakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 10, 2007 7:40 AM
Subject: [Reader-list] researcher req. for survey of educational software in
market.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Sarai is doing a survey of educational
Quoting "Mahesh T. Pai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> unless it conforms to the GNU GPL, which means the viral clause in GPL
since when did GPL become viral?
kg
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/il
Quoting Sandip Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Raj Mathur wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 May 2007 18:15, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >> I have a feeling that Kenneth is just asking for some facts behind
> >> your theory of how BSD code is being abused by M$ and its ilk. Too
> >> many
Quoting PJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > so, in short, your statement that many important BSD projects are in
> > danger is not based on any factual knowledge or research.
>
> I've told you a principle that has been shown to hold true (viz. danger o
Quoting PJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > On Wednesday 09 May 2007 18:15, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > I have a feeling that Kenneth is just asking for some facts behind
> > > your theory of how BSD code is being abused by M$ and its ilk.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting "Mahesh T. Pai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > unless it conforms to the GNU GPL, which means the
> viral clause in GPL
>
> since when did GPL become viral?
>
Since its inception.
regrds
VK
Engineers normally have problem with every solution. If not they hav
> > On Wednesday 09 May 2007 18:15, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
> >> I have a feeling that Kenneth is just asking for some facts behind
> >> your theory of how BSD code is being abused by M$ and its ilk. Too
> >> many people throw the "BSD networking stack" as an example whenever
> >> this discussi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FTP is software? I always thought it was a protocol
>
Sigh. Frederick, I know you're smarter than this.
You are being deliberately dense here, which makes rational discussion hard.
For:
FTP
read:
The implementation of the FTP protocol in the software named ft
I am experimenting with SCIM to type a document in Hindi. I have
ubuntu 7.04 on my machine. SCIM is installed and working. I can type
the alphabet without any problem. Could somebody tell me
how to type half-letters. Also, I don't know where to find the
documentation if there is any.
Vikas
_
> You are being deliberately dense here, which makes rational discussion hard.
>
> For:
>
> FTP
>
> read:
>
> The implementation of the FTP protocol in the software named ftp.exe on win98
> for
> example.
>
>> and how did that affect the FTP protocol?
>
> It did not (AFAIK) and I did not cl
On 10-May-07, at 9:57 AM, vivek khurana wrote:
>> Quoting "Mahesh T. Pai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> unless it conforms to the GNU GPL, which means the
>> viral clause in GPL
>>
>> since when did GPL become viral?
>>
>
> Since its inception.
does RMS know?
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Associat
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:17:21AM +0530, Vikas Rawal wrote:
|I am experimenting with SCIM to type a document in Hindi. I have
|ubuntu 7.04 on my machine. SCIM is installed and working. I can type
|the alphabet without any problem. Could somebody tell me
|how to type half-letters. Also, I don't kn
On 5/10/07, आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:17:21AM +0530, Vikas Rawal wrote:
> |I am experimenting with SCIM to type a document in Hindi. I have
> |ubuntu 7.04 on my machine. SCIM is installed and working. I can type
> |the alphabet without any prob
26 matches
Mail list logo
