[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-02 Thread Peter Becker
What I'm saying is that I never found the user experience on the Nokia phone convincing -- independent of the question what the application was programmed in. To some extent the JavaME ones might have been better -- you get the longer startup time, but at least they don't crash your phone by

[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-02 Thread Jess Holle
Joshua Marinacci wrote: So I think you are saying that JavaME has been useful, but fallen behind the times. It is now far from cutting edge and you wouldn't target it for new products. I agree. Sun is aware of this and we have been are taking steps to address it. The partnerships and

[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-02 Thread Casper Bang
You say you're seeing a lot: what does joe the average do with them? Email, browsing, yellow-pages, stocks, currencies, TV-guide etc., much the same as I see for the iPhone (but don't see for Nokia's). You raise an interesting aspect though, of the few J2ME applications I have run into in the

[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-01 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Casper Bang wrote: On 1 Jul., 14:30, Fabrizio Giudici fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it wrote: Can you define popular? Possibly in terms of number of installations? Thanks. :-) I can try, although I won't jump on the number bandwagon as I think that's utterly pointless. Most people

[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-01 Thread Jess Holle
Casper Bang wrote: - Android is a superset of J2ME and supports generics etc. making J2ME looking more stale than ever. J2ME *is* stale. It's stuck with the Java language as it was prior to Java-5 -- and neither Sun nor any J2ME partner (at least none I asked at JavaOne) has any plans to

[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-01 Thread Casper Bang
Yes then you are right, if you only wish to focus on something quantifiable as potential installation numbers in the wild, then the discussion is pointless and starts to look like you're just bull- baiting me into coming up with a number. However I would still love to know what then you think of

[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-01 Thread Casper Bang
On 1 Jul., 17:14, Joshua Marinacci jos...@gmail.com wrote: This is incorrect. There are over a billion installations of Java on cellphones. Google has made J2ME based clients before Android and continues to do so. If you want to hit more than 5% of the market you have to use Java. Whether

[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-01 Thread Joshua Marinacci
Pointing out that Google also targets J2SE doesn't prove much, given that they are also more than willing to make Obj-C clients for the iPhone and other non-J2ME devices. Google is just like that, they go after the marked and tries to win the hart of users regardless of underlying

[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-01 Thread Casper Bang
I give up, seems like everyone equates popularity with potential marked share regardless of how many actually USES their Symbian phone for anything but calls and messages (I have yet to meet one). I think it's naïve to care only for such a marketing metric, but if that's your definition of

[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-01 Thread Joshua Marinacci
You were talking about why developers, and Google in particular, might or might not target JavaME. I'm telling you why. Google is practical and targets large markets, so they build JavaME clients. A much better question is why does Google target the iPhone which has such a small

[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-01 Thread Alexey Zinger
I think the average user profile for a Symbian phone user is very different from that of an average iPhone (and now Android) user. Most people using J2ME-capable mobile devices aren't nearly as likely to want to spend money on 3rd party apps as their iPhone and Android counterparts. So it's

[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-01 Thread Viktor Klang
From what I've heared from sources in the industry whom I unfortunately cannot name, developing for J2ME is less pleasant than stabbing yourself in the face with a sharp and rusty object repeatedly. So basically: It doesn't matter how many installations there are, very few people like to stab

[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-01 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Viktor Klang wrote: From what I've heared from sources in the industry whom I unfortunately cannot name, developing for J2ME is less pleasant than stabbing yourself in the face with a sharp and rusty object repeatedly. So basically: It doesn't matter how many installations there are, very

[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-01 Thread Casper Bang
The point, as Joshua said, is that TODAY Android is only a very small fraction of the market. Since it's pushed by Google, it can do very well, but - again - I'm not talking of trends and predictions; it's an argument that I'm not interested of. I posted in this discussion only to argue

[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-01 Thread Peter Becker
I actually have a few things installed on my E65, although the only J2ME app I currently use is 5ud0ku :-) And to support your point: - I would not consider myself an average user - my next phone is certainly not going to be Nokia or Symbian-based I have used a few things on the phone over the

[The Java Posse] Re: In defense of Google thread branch: J2ME and Android

2009-07-01 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Casper Bang wrote: See that's because you equate popularity with runtime distribution count, which is a red herring. Casper, please don't assert I'm saying things that I'm not saying :-) Let's talk about USE, but explain how it's possible that people feel most popular a thing that most