RE: [JBoss-dev] Jboss java.lang.VerifyError:

2003-02-26 Thread Sacha Labourey
First of all, upgrade to 3.0.6, 3.0.0 is older than me. Many classloading problems have been solved in subsequent releases. Cheers, Sacha -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ramakrishnan srinivasan Sent:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-669112 ] Server.log not created when using xerces

2003-02-26 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #669112, was opened at 2003-01-16 15:49 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=669112group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Andrew Everitt (andieveritt) Assigned to:

RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing sincesliced bread

2003-02-26 Thread Jason Dillon
IMO interceptors are much simpilar than hard coded invokers. --jason On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Bill Burke wrote: What I'm saying is, why add this complication? Do we really need it? KISS. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hiram Chirino

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-629145 ] ejb-link bug

2003-02-26 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #629145, was opened at 2002-10-26 17:14 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=629145group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Wachter (stefanwachter) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-693311 ] getEJBLocalHome throws UnsupportedOperationException

2003-02-26 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #693311, was opened at 2003-02-26 00:34 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=693311group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mike Youngstrom (youngm) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Hiram Chirino
+1 I use it all them time. The Refactoring support and the Quick Assist features rock. Regards, Hiram --- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can not believe how fast, intelligent and functional this little IDE. I have tears in my eyes I am so pleased. Okay perhaps I need to get

RE: [JBoss-dev] [OT] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread James Higginbotham
Jason, I'm in the same boat.. Been using Emacs + JDE for years, but Eclipse is starting to supercede.. I actually posted a message to the JDE user list regarding this. But, alas, eclipse is so stupid, it can't open a file outside of a project and can't talk SSH2 natively, so it has to shell out

RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Jeff Haynie
If you like Eclipse, IntelliJ blows it away. It's not free, but cheap and much more mature than Eclipse. I used Eclipse, but enjoy IntelliJ much more. (Not trying to start a holy war, just giving you another option to look at it you enjoy Eclipse...) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Rhett Aultman
Title: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing... The guys around my office (who have never been without some sort of integrated IDE like Delphi or JBuilder) call me the "old UNIX guy" even though I'm only 23. They were roaring in the aisles the day I told them that Eclipse was the only IDE to

[JBoss-dev] JBoss4 (CVS HEAD): Missing JBossRMIClassLoader.class

2003-02-26 Thread Patrick Mau
Hallo everyone, I have a problem running JBoss 4 (CVS HEAD) under jdk1.3.1. If I build JBoss using above jdk, the JBossRMIClassLoader is excluded in jboss/system/build.xml exclude name=org/jboss/system/JBossRMIClassLoader.java unless=HAVE_JDK_1.4/ This leads to a CNFE during startup.

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-693861 ] PooledInvoker has a memory leak

2003-02-26 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #693861, was opened at 2003-02-26 19:43 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=693861group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Cotton (bcotton969) Assigned to:

RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Nathan Phelps
While we're on the subject of Eclipse... Can anyone give me some tips for working with the JBoss source in Eclipse via the built-in extssh client? I can get it all checked out, but then it gets very confused about the package names. It tries to do j2ee.src.main.org.jboss.j2ee,

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-693861 ] PooledInvoker has a memory leak

2003-02-26 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #693861, was opened at 2003-02-26 14:43 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=693861group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Cotton (bcotton969) Assigned to:

RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Is there any particular reason you have to use builtin extssh? I use ext/ssh and am pretty happy with it. -Original Message- From: Nathan Phelps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so

Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Jason Dillon
Any reason not to set it up as multiple projects? I have had nothing but success when connecting Eclipse projects to a checked out jboss-head. --jason On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:42 AM, Nathan Phelps wrote: While we're on the subject of Eclipse... Can anyone give me some tips for

RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Aleksandr Shneyderman
j2ee.src.main.org.jboss.j2ee, messaging.src.main.org.jboss.mq, etc. I guess it wants individual projects for each directory? You can checkout the jboss source to work with and create new java project with the link to the directory to which you cvs'd the jboss modules. It will be pretty slow

Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Jason Dillon
Ahh, but have you tried Eclipse? --jason On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:02 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: vim -dain On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 12:43 PM, Jeff Haynie wrote: If you like Eclipse, IntelliJ blows it away. It's not free, but cheap and much more mature than Eclipse. I

RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Hiram Chirino
I've tried it various ways.. lately I've been doing the following: - compile source code manualy. - adjust eclipse build path by: adding the source folders of sub projects that I will be working with as source folders. (the default is no good) - adjust eclipse build path by: adding all the

Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Ya, for like 5 minutes. All I really want out of an ide is an editor, syntax highlighting and ant. I can get that from vim, bash and ant. Am I missing some amazing feature. -dain On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 02:24 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Ahh, but have you tried Eclipse? --jason On

RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Tieying Liu
I have been using both and I like IntelliJ much more. Although eclipse is catching up with the RC1. Eclipse 2.1 might compete with IntelliJ 2.5 ( I see lots of eclipse features if not all are copied from IntelliJ) But eclipse debugging is cool and I hope IntelliJ guys will improve in the coming

RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Nathan Phelps
Are you using the internal extssh client? I can certainly check out the source on the command line then connect the checked out source project by project. However, I was sort of hoping to be able to checkout a whole branch from within Eclipse AS a project. In other words, I was really hoping to

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 26-February-2003

2003-02-26 Thread scott . stark
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 1049 Successful tests: 1045 Errors:1 Failures: 3 [time of test: 2003-02-26.12-05 GMT] [java.version:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Jason Dillon
I think it is better to use the jars from the module output directory, cause the exact location under build/output will change from version to version. Is there any way to make Eclipse create jars? Or any way to make it conditionally compile stuff for 1.3 and others for 1.4? Or a way to

RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Aleksandr Shneyderman
Is there any way to make Eclipse create jars? Or any way to make it Export feature conditionally compile stuff for 1.3 and others for 1.4? Or a way to force it to use ant to do all compiles? Seems like that would be best to solve most problems. You can switch between the 1.3 and 1.4

Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Hiram Chirino
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it is better to use the jars from the module output directory, cause the exact location under build/output will change from version to version. true.. but it's easier to do a multiple selection in 2 or 3 directories rather than going

RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread philipborlin
Starting with M5 (I can't remember if it was in M4) you can do a check out into... which will allow you to choose a source folder to check out into. If you right click on your project, choose properties and then Java Build Path there is a source tab where you can add new source directories. Next

RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Bill Burke
This is one of the very reasons I avoid IDEs. If you don't live in them, you die by them. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hiram Chirino Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse

Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread philipborlin
I think it is better to use the jars from the module output directory, cause the exact location under build/output will change from version to version. What build/output will change from version to version? Is there any way to make Eclipse create jars? Go under the file menu to export.

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss4 (CVS HEAD): Missing JBossRMIClassLoader.class

2003-02-26 Thread Adrian Brock
Ignore it, it is a DEBUG message. The class is only required on jre1.4 to workaround a bug in that version's RMI caching. I'll change it to a TRACE, to avoid this question in future. Regards, Adrian From: Patrick Mau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: JBoss Development [EMAIL

Re: [JBoss-dev] Possible leak in JBoss due to org.apache.log4j.NDC usage mistake?

2003-02-26 Thread Mikael Eriksson
(Reopening a very old thread, I know... I posted a message on the forums on this today and started to seach the lists...) The call to remove makes NDC's more or less unusable for usercode, since any call to an EJB (or other stuff where a remove() is done) clears the NDC and the info is lost.

Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Robert HALL
I've been looking into both since January. I've never been a big IDE fan (10+ years with Emacs with forays into SlickEdit), but at my current gig I started using JBuilder at first then XDE when we upgraded from Rose. I've been using XDE for the last 3 months for modeling and editing, and it

Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Peter Fagerlund
onsdagen den 26 februari 2003 kl 22.32 skrev Bill Burke: This is one of the very reasons I avoid IDEs. If you don't live in them, you die by them. True ! ... not only of IDEs ... but systems in general !!! ... (ours come to mind) ... motivation is key when in a entropy volatile environment

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-694148 ] 3.0.x uses developer release of Xalan, upgrade available

2003-02-26 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #694148, was opened at 2003-02-27 14:44 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=694148group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Cleary (insert_id) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-694148 ] 3.0.x uses developer release of Xalan, upgrade available

2003-02-26 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #694148, was opened at 2003-02-27 14:44 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=694148group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Submitted By: John Cleary (insert_id) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] JSR-77 in 3.2

2003-02-26 Thread Stefan Reich
I tested JSR-77 support in 3.2 and noticed the following issues: * EntityBeanStatsImpl: PooledCount shows up always as zero * JTAStatsImpl: results are always zero because the TranactionManagerService doesn't register itself as an MBean * JCAConnectionPoolStatsImpl: WaitingThreadCount probably

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Feature Requests-694187 ] JBossIDE Compatibility

2003-02-26 Thread SourceForge.net
Feature Requests item #694187, was opened at 2003-02-27 05:38 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=694187group_id=22866 Category: Other Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: SunADM (sunadm) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Jason Dillon
I think it is better to use the jars from the module output directory, cause the exact location under build/output will change from version to version. What build/output will change from version to version? The directory name under build/output changes when the version number/tag changes. Is