I think it is better to use the jars from the module output directory,
cause the exact location under build/output will change from version
to
version.
What build/output will change from version to version?
The directory name under build/output changes when the version
number/tag changes.
Is th
Feature Requests item #694187, was opened at 2003-02-27 05:38
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=694187&group_id=22866
Category: Other
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: SunADM (sunadm)
Assigned to: Nobody/Ano
I tested JSR-77 support in 3.2 and noticed the following issues:
* EntityBeanStatsImpl: PooledCount shows up always as zero
* JTAStatsImpl: results are always zero because the
TranactionManagerService doesn't register itself as an MBean
* JCAConnectionPoolStatsImpl: WaitingThreadCount probably no
Bugs item #694148, was opened at 2003-02-27 14:44
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=694148&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 6
Submitted By: John Cleary (insert_id)
Assigned
Bugs item #694148, was opened at 2003-02-27 14:44
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=694148&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Cleary (insert_id)
Assigned
onsdagen den 26 februari 2003 kl 22.32 skrev Bill Burke:
This is one of the very reasons I avoid IDEs. If you don't live in
them,
you die by them.
True ! ... not only of IDEs ... but systems in general !!! ... (ours
come to mind) ... motivation is "key" when in a entropy volatile
environment
I've been looking into both since January. I've never been a big IDE
fan (10+ years with Emacs with forays into SlickEdit), but at my
current gig I started using JBuilder at first then XDE when we upgraded
from Rose. I've been using XDE for the last 3 months for modeling and
editing, and it is
(Reopening a very old thread, I know...
I posted a message on the forums on this today and started to seach
the lists...)
The call to remove makes NDC's more or less unusable for usercode,
since any call to an EJB (or other stuff where a remove() is done)
clears the NDC and the info is lost.
Would
Ignore it, it is a DEBUG message.
The class is only required on jre1.4 to workaround a
bug in that version's RMI caching.
I'll change it to a TRACE, to avoid this
question in future.
Regards,
Adrian
From: Patrick Mau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: JBoss Development <[EMAIL PROT
> I think it is better to use the jars from the module output directory,
> cause the exact location under build/output will change from version to
> version.
What build/output will change from version to version?
> Is there any way to make Eclipse create jars?
Go under the file menu to export.
If you're doing any kind of systems work, you need stable basepoints.
For a while, my Sun One Studio was crashing because of driver problem.
The problem was known to Sun and scheduled to be fixed in the next release
of the JVM.
For reasons like that, my favorite development IDE is vi(m).
Bil
This is one of the very reasons I avoid IDEs. If you don't live in them,
you die by them.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hiram
> Chirino
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Ec
Starting with M5 (I can't remember if it was in M4) you can do a check out
into... which will allow you to choose a source folder to check out into.
If you right click on your project, choose properties and then Java Build
Path there is a source tab where you can add new source directories. Next
--- Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it is better to use the jars from the module
> output directory,
> cause the exact location under build/output will
> change from version to
> version.
>
true.. but it's easier to do a multiple selection in 2
or 3 directories rather than go
>
> Is there any way to make Eclipse create jars? Or any way to make it
Export feature
> conditionally compile stuff for 1.3 and others for 1.4? Or a way to
> force it to use ant to do all compiles? Seems like that would be best
> to solve most problems.
You can switch between the 1.3 and
I think it is better to use the jars from the module output directory,
cause the exact location under build/output will change from version to
version.
Is there any way to make Eclipse create jars? Or any way to make it
conditionally compile stuff for 1.3 and others for 1.4? Or a way to
force
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1049
Successful tests: 1045
Errors:1
Failures: 3
[time of test: 2003-02-26.12-05 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
Are you using the internal extssh client? I can certainly check out the
source on the command line then connect the checked out source project
by project. However, I was sort of hoping to be able to checkout a
whole branch from within Eclipse AS a project. In other words, I was
really hoping to
I have been using both and I like IntelliJ much more. Although eclipse
is catching up with the RC1.
Eclipse 2.1 might compete with IntelliJ 2.5 ( I see lots of eclipse
features if not all are copied from IntelliJ)
But eclipse debugging is cool and I hope IntelliJ guys will improve in
the coming
Ya, for like 5 minutes. All I really want out of an ide is an editor,
syntax highlighting and ant. I can get that from vim, bash and ant.
Am I missing some amazing feature.
-dain
On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 02:24 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Ahh, but have you tried Eclipse?
--jason
On T
I've tried it various ways.. lately I've been doing
the following:
- compile source code manualy.
- adjust eclipse build path by: adding the source
folders of sub projects that I will be working with as
source folders. (the default is no good)
- adjust eclipse build path by: adding all the jar
Ahh, but have you tried Eclipse?
--jason
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:02 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
vim
-dain
On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 12:43 PM, Jeff Haynie wrote:
If you like Eclipse, IntelliJ blows it away. It's not free, but cheap
and much more mature than Eclipse. I
> j2ee.src.main.org.jboss.j2ee, messaging.src.main.org.jboss.mq, etc. I
> guess it wants individual projects for each directory?
You can checkout the jboss source to work with and create new
java project with the link to the directory to which you cvs'd
the jboss modules. It will be pretty slow
Any reason not to set it up as multiple projects? I have had nothing
but success when connecting Eclipse projects to a checked out
jboss-head.
--jason
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:42 AM, Nathan Phelps wrote:
While we're on the subject of Eclipse...
Can anyone give me some tips for
Is there any particular reason you have to use builtin extssh? I use ext/ssh and am
pretty happy with it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nathan Phelps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amaz
Bugs item #693861, was opened at 2003-02-26 14:43
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=693861&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bob Cotton (bcotton969)
Assigned to: Nobody/A
While we're on the subject of Eclipse...
Can anyone give me some tips for working with the JBoss source in
Eclipse via the built-in extssh client? I can get it all checked out,
but then it gets very confused about the package names. It tries to do
j2ee.src.main.org.jboss.j2ee, messaging.src.main
Bugs item #693861, was opened at 2003-02-26 19:43
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=693861&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bob Cotton (bcotton969)
Assigned to: Nobody/A
Hallo everyone,
I have a problem running JBoss 4 (CVS HEAD) under jdk1.3.1.
If I build JBoss using above jdk, the JBossRMIClassLoader
is excluded in jboss/system/build.xml
This leads to a CNFE during startup. Maybe JBoss4 is actually JDK1.4
only ? It would be great if someone could clarify th
Title: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...
The
guys around my office (who have never been without some sort of integrated IDE
like Delphi or JBuilder) call me the "old UNIX guy" even though I'm only
23. They were roaring in the aisles the day I told them that Eclipse was
the only IDE to ev
vim
-dain
On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 12:43 PM, Jeff Haynie wrote:
If you like Eclipse, IntelliJ blows it away. It's not free, but cheap
and much more mature than Eclipse. I used Eclipse, but enjoy IntelliJ
much more. (Not trying to start a holy war, just giving you another
option to l
If you like Eclipse, IntelliJ blows it away. It's not free, but cheap
and much more mature than Eclipse. I used Eclipse, but enjoy IntelliJ
much more. (Not trying to start a holy war, just giving you another
option to look at it you enjoy Eclipse...)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTE
Jason,
I'm in the same boat.. Been using Emacs + JDE for years, but Eclipse is
starting to supercede.. I actually posted a message to the JDE user list
regarding this. But, alas, eclipse is so stupid, it can't open a file
outside of a project and can't talk SSH2 natively, so it has to shell
out s
+1 I use it all them time. The Refactoring support
and the Quick Assist features rock.
Regards,
Hiram
--- Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can not believe how fast, intelligent and
> functional this little IDE.
> I have tears in my eyes I am so pleased. Okay
> perhaps I need to g
I can not believe how fast, intelligent and functional this little IDE.
I have tears in my eyes I am so pleased. Okay perhaps I need to get
out more... but still. I think I am going to have to say goodbye to
XEmacs. Perhaps I am just getting old and lazy...
--jason
--
Bugs item #693311, was opened at 2003-02-26 00:34
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=693311&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mike Youngstrom (youngm)
Assigned to: Nobody/
I couldn't agree more.
-dain
On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 04:03 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
IMO interceptors are much simpilar than hard coded invokers.
--jason
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Bill Burke wrote:
What I'm saying is, why add this complication? Do we really need it?
KISS.
-Orig
Bugs item #629145, was opened at 2002-10-26 17:14
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=629145&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Wachter (stefanwachter)
Assigned to: C
IMO interceptors are much simpilar than hard coded invokers.
--jason
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Bill Burke wrote:
> What I'm saying is, why add this complication? Do we really need it? KISS.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hiram
> Chi
Bugs item #669112, was opened at 2003-01-16 15:49
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=669112&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Andrew Everitt (andieveritt)
Assigned to: Nob
Oh, I could not agree more. This is a serious problem. It is whover not
solvable by just disabling optimizations since it also plagues MBean. My
sugestion of a delegating repostirory the other week was another way of
trying to solve this dilemma. If we at least could change JBoss so that
it is poss
First of all, upgrade to 3.0.6, 3.0.0 is older than me. Many classloading
problems have been solved in subsequent releases.
Cheers,
Sacha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of ramakrishnan srinivasan
> Sent: m
42 matches
Mail list logo
