A major aspect of Programming is mastering complexity. The human mind
can deal only with something like seven entities at once. An important
means to approach a set of entities that is much larger is
abstraction. A good IDE reduces the amount of swapping between levels
of abstraction tremendously
] Eclipse is so amazing...
A major aspect of Programming is mastering complexity. The human mind
can deal only with something like seven entities at once. An important
means to approach a set of entities that is much larger is
abstraction. A good IDE reduces the amount of swapping between levels
Hello Nick,
NB Hate to say this but netbeans (www.netbeans.org) beats eclipse hands down.
NB Does all of the below and lots more. Go take a look at the module selection
NB at www.netbeans.org/devhome and
NB http://www.netbeans.org/devhome/modules/by-module.html
NB There is the full ide and a
Hate to say this but netbeans (www.netbeans.org) beats eclipse hands down.
Hate to tell you but that thing is just damn slow.
What amazes me is that no matter how much RAM your
machine has NetBeans is just always hungry for it.
Does all of the below and lots more. Go take a look at the
Well, if you are willing to shell out some cash, then
you might consider trying webshpere studio. Since
it's built on eclipse, it has all the eclipse goodies
plus a ton of other stuff like a jsp editor.
Regards,
Hiram
--- Aleksandr Shneyderman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hate to say this but
force it to use ant to do all compiles? Seems like
that would be best
to solve most problems.
I've been able to get it to run our ant build files
directly. You might have to go into the eclipse
properties and add all the tools/lib/*.jar files to
the ANT runtime classpath.
Do you know if there is
hmmm ... allow me to namedrop and spread unverified grapewine info here
then ... ThogetherSoft is toying with Eclice as it's runtime framework
in upcoming versions ... or was that before Borland ? ...
PS: Any right made void as this message is transmitted in a reporting
capacity : DS
+1 I use it all them time. The Refactoring support
and the Quick Assist features rock.
Regards,
Hiram
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can not believe how fast, intelligent and
functional this little IDE.
I have tears in my eyes I am so pleased. Okay
perhaps I need to get
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hiram Chirino
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...
+1 I use it all them time. The Refactoring support
and the Quick Assist features rock.
Regards,
Hiram
--- Jason Dillon
Title: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...
The
guys around my office (who have never been without some sort of integrated IDE
like Delphi or JBuilder) call me the "old UNIX guy" even though I'm only
23. They were roaring in the aisles the day I told them that Eclipse was
th
While we're on the subject of Eclipse...
Can anyone give me some tips for working with the JBoss source in
Eclipse via the built-in extssh client? I can get it all checked out,
but then it gets very confused about the package names. It tries to do
j2ee.src.main.org.jboss.j2ee,
Is there any particular reason you have to use builtin extssh? I use ext/ssh and am
pretty happy with it.
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Phelps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing
Any reason not to set it up as multiple projects? I have had nothing
but success when connecting Eclipse projects to a checked out
jboss-head.
--jason
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:42 AM, Nathan Phelps wrote:
While we're on the subject of Eclipse...
Can anyone give me some tips for
j2ee.src.main.org.jboss.j2ee, messaging.src.main.org.jboss.mq, etc. I
guess it wants individual projects for each directory?
You can checkout the jboss source to work with and create new
java project with the link to the directory to which you cvs'd
the jboss modules. It will be pretty slow
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...
+1 I use it all them time. The Refactoring support
and the Quick Assist features rock.
Regards,
Hiram
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can not believe how fast, intelligent and
functional this little IDE.
I have tears
I've tried it various ways.. lately I've been doing
the following:
- compile source code manualy.
- adjust eclipse build path by: adding the source
folders of sub projects that I will be working with as
source folders. (the default is no good)
- adjust eclipse build path by: adding all the
Ya, for like 5 minutes. All I really want out of an ide is an editor,
syntax highlighting and ant. I can get that from vim, bash and ant.
Am I missing some amazing feature.
-dain
On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 02:24 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Ahh, but have you tried Eclipse?
--jason
On
release.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...
Any reason not to set it up as multiple projects? I have had nothing
but success when
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...
Any reason not to set it up as multiple projects? I have had nothing
I think it is better to use the jars from the module output directory,
cause the exact location under build/output will change from version to
version.
Is there any way to make Eclipse create jars? Or any way to make it
conditionally compile stuff for 1.3 and others for 1.4? Or a way to
Is there any way to make Eclipse create jars? Or any way to make it
Export feature
conditionally compile stuff for 1.3 and others for 1.4? Or a way to
force it to use ant to do all compiles? Seems like that would be best
to solve most problems.
You can switch between the 1.3 and 1.4
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is better to use the jars from the module
output directory,
cause the exact location under build/output will
change from version to
version.
true.. but it's easier to do a multiple selection in 2
or 3 directories rather than going
]
Sent by: To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:
ceforge.netSubject: RE:
[JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing
This is one of the very reasons I avoid IDEs. If you don't live in them,
you die by them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hiram
Chirino
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse
I think it is better to use the jars from the module output directory,
cause the exact location under build/output will change from version to
version.
What build/output will change from version to version?
Is there any way to make Eclipse create jars?
Go under the file menu to export.
, February 26, 2003 1:58 pm
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...
I have been using both and I like IntelliJ much more. Although eclipse
is catching up with the RC1.
Eclipse 2.1 might compete with IntelliJ 2.5 ( I see lots of eclipse
features if not all are copied from IntelliJ
onsdagen den 26 februari 2003 kl 22.32 skrev Bill Burke:
This is one of the very reasons I avoid IDEs. If you don't live in
them,
you die by them.
True ! ... not only of IDEs ... but systems in general !!! ... (ours
come to mind) ... motivation is key when in a entropy volatile
environment
I think it is better to use the jars from the module output directory,
cause the exact location under build/output will change from version
to
version.
What build/output will change from version to version?
The directory name under build/output changes when the version
number/tag changes.
Is
28 matches
Mail list logo