We are fixing them ASAP.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam
> Heath
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:14 PM
> To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
> Subject: Broken links - Re: [JBoss-dev] PHP probl
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, marc fleury wrote:
> [snip]
Hmm. There broken links on the site. Some stale .jsp(team.jsp(from the front
page) is a 404).
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Someth
Title: RE: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
+1. Very Nice.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, marc fleury wrote
In the early days of Java, I read that a large retailer had about 70 Java
programmers because it was "a business decision". It was the only tool
available that they could use to integrate their systems.
Most likely, Marc's decision to use PHP on the website is a business decision
as well. The
ECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Holger Baxmann
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
mmmmmm, i am not talking about porting xor integration. i
am talking about php beeing a _frontend_ in the depest
meaning. un
uary 09, 2003 8:34 PM
> To: marc fleury
> Subject: Re[6]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
>
> To my mind creating an PHP compiler/interpreter/whatever on a java VM
> is feasible but would require lot of resources.
>
> I did a pascal compiler in my early courses, but the context was
> very
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, marc fleury wrote:
> Nukes on JBoss is going to be SUCH A GREAT PROJECT. Finally ENTERPRISE
> CMS for the MASSES.
Well, we have been playing with OFBiz(www.ofbiz.org) lately. It uses it's own
entity engine(which I know you guys don't like), but their GenericValue
objects are
What about just writing a shell script to walk the tree of jboss.org via
the PHP every x min or hours, spit out static HTML, and only offer paths
to the PHP-based pages for POSTing of new forum stuff? Would that be a
bit faster and reduce your server load at the PHP end for read-only
stuff, before
mann
>> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:28 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>>
>>
>> mmmmmm, i am not talking about porting xor integration. i
>> am talking about php beeing a _frontend_ in the depest
>> meaning.
January 09, 2003 8:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
>
> > I've been looking into this as you speak. Seems from reading
> doco that you
> > can't go Java->PHP->Java which is what we need. Not sure what
> would happen
; fleury
>> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:35 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>>
>>
>> holger,
>>
>> we totally agree and we are talking about the same thing. I already
>> proposed it to Julien back when
sage-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
>
> holger,
>
> we totally agree and we are talking about the same thing. I
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
>>> Behalf Of julien viet
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:27 PM
>>> To: Holger Baxmann
>>> Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought about it, but that wouldn't solve the case. Direct
>&
the php 'vm'
bax
> Von: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 19:31:26 -0500
> An: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: RE: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
> what is the zend engine?
>
> marcf
-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
>> Behalf Of julien viet
>> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:27 PM
>> To: Holger Baxmann
>> Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>>
>>
>> I thought about it, but that wouldn't solve t
speed by ten.
marcf
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Holger Baxmann
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
>
> mmmmmm,
what is the zend engine?
marcf
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of julien viet
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:27 PM
> To: Holger Baxmann
> Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
>
> I thought abo
lem for me.
let's do both
bax
> Von: julien viet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 01:14:23 +0100
> An: Holger Baxmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
> we already tried to investigate that
; extension.
HB> at: http://php.benscom.com/manual/kr/ref.java.php
HB> bax
>> Von: Holger Baxmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Datum: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:57:31 +0100
>> An: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Betreff: Re: Re[2]: [J
er Baxmann
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
>
> anybody thought about integrating php (and this way the
> cms-whatever-this-is
> thingy) into the the containers? maybe by calling the zend
> engine nati
Servlet server, the latter by the Java
extension.
at: http://php.benscom.com/manual/kr/ref.java.php
bax
> Von: Holger Baxmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:57:31 +0100
> An: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: Re[2]: [JBo
0100
> An: Bill Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
>
> Problem Bill, such a thing does not exists yet and that would be
> time consuming to start that from scratch.
>
> julien
>
> BB> Actually your idea does have merit. Julien.
? maybe by calling the zend engine
> natively?
>
> HB> layer rules ...
>
> HB> just an idea ..
>
> HB> bax
>
>>> Von: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Datum: Thu, 9 Jan 2003
riginal Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>> Holger Baxmann
>> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:20 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>>
>>
>> anybody thought about integrat
9, 2003 6:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
>
> anybody thought about integrating php (and this way the
> cms-whatever-this-is
> thingy) into the the containers? maybe by calling the zend engine
> natively?
>
> layer rules ...
>
> just
um: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 15:34:10 -0500
> An: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
> IWE. Go Go Julien Viet!
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt
>> Munz
>> Sent
OTECTED]>
>> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Datum: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 15:34:10 -0500
>> An: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>>
>> IWE. Go Go Julien Viet!
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMA
> Matt Munz wrote:
> > Marc,
> >
> > If you're writing tissue-paper code (write once, never
> modify, throw
> > away when broken), "script kiddie" languages are great.
> > If not, be prepared to eat it in the long run on man
> > hours / maintennance.
>
> And remember that eating used tissue
what's a pronoun? :)
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: danch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] PHP problems
Matt Munz wrote:
> Marc,
>
> If you're writing tissue-paper code (write
03 3:50 PM
> To: Jboss-Dev
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: FW: PostNuke / JNuke (Fw: [JBoss-dev] PHP)
>
>
> Screw em. We have the development community and development
> process. They don't.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andreas Kuck
> What's good in PN is that the underlying model is proven to
> work. Also reusing all HTML, CSS and icons is very good.
yes all the functionality is KICK ASS. Just take it and solidify it
with a refactor port to JBoss as you are moving forward with it.
> I am a java coder not a web designer. W
The first one seems to be dead while the second one only a few weeks old.
>
> Andreas
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:54 PM
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] P
Matt Munz wrote:
Marc,
If you're writing tissue-paper code (write once, never modify, throw
> away when broken), "script kiddie" languages are great.
> If not, be prepared to eat it in the long run on man
> hours / maintennance.
And remember that eating used tissue-paper is never a good thing
d on the port. Since the look is already done that will
be easier.
Man we are going to have a blast doing that port.
marcf
>
> Not the best situation...
>
> - Matt
>
> -Original Message-
> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursd
ng is easy
marcf
>
> - Matt
>
> -Original Message-
> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:56 PM
> To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] PHP problems
>
>
> OK so we are really in a bin
> I agree Julien. HTML/CSS sucks. Takes about 80% of my time
> when I do it. In fact, the port to PostNuke would have taken
> me 1 or 2 days less.
given that it took you 4 days that would be a feat indeed :)
marcf
---
This SF.NET email
uary 09, 2003 3:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matt Munz
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
>
> What's good in PN is that the underlying model is proven to work.
> Also reusing all HTML, CSS and icons is very good.
>
> I am a java coder not a we
IWE. Go Go Julien Viet!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt
> Munz
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
>
> Marc & group,
>
&g
eal-world case to justify my PHP allergy :)
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:56 PM
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
Subject: [JBoss-dev] PHP problems
OK so we are really in a bind here. The script kiddy code
're gonna call it JNuke
MM> sounds interesting...
MM> - Matt
MM> -Original Message-
MM> From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
MM> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:55 PM
MM> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MM> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] PHP
MM> new website. Its
ssue. It is not PHP vs. J2EE, but Post-Nuke vs. a J2EE-based CMS that
apparently DNE.
Not the best situation...
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] PHP
> Bill,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of James Higginbotham
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
>
> Funny, I was just doing research for a CM
OK so we are really in a bind here. The script kiddy code may be
functional, this lack of caching is really killing us. The site is
pegged at 100 with dips at 50% on occasion but all in all the profile
looks pretty bad. The Java code was 3 times faster. I feel good on one
hand because this is y
rsday, January 09, 2003 1:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
>
> Bill,
>
> Don't worry, I'm not going to blast you for not "eating your
> own dog food".
>
> > JSP/Servlets/J2EE is better, but PostNuke is a good C
> Bill,
>
> Don't worry, I'm not going to blast you for not "eating your
> own dog food".
you should.
> > JSP/Servlets/J2EE is better, but PostNuke is a good Content
> Management
> > System.
>
> This statement, in and of itself, is a rationale for using
> J2EE instead of PHP ;) Could y
MAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] PHP
new website. Its PHP and PostNuke. Its OK. JSP/Servlets/J2EE is better,
but PostNuke is a good Content Management System. Julien Viet is looking
into porting it to the Java wo
X
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt
> Munz
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:38 PM
> To: JBoss Developers Group (E-mail)
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just noticed that many o
Hi all,
I just noticed that many of the pages on the website end in ".php". Has it always
been this way, or is it new? I'd be very interested in hearing the rationale for
using PHP over a servlet-based or other solution. I'm not all-to familiar with PHP,
but I'm seeing it a lot lately...
48 matches
Mail list logo
