The "problem" here is that the quickstart is meant to show developers
how to get started fast. I believe this was the first concern of those
asking for the demo apps. There is already the petstore app running on
Jboss to show full E-Commerce style abilities. Im not against donating a
full app
User developers. There are plenty of those around who just want a
quickstart. Which about a week ago was what everyone was talking about I
think. (the days blend together, it could have been 2 days ago, or
yesterday even anymore)
Al
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Is this meant for JBoss developer
Is this meant for JBoss developers (those that contribute to JBoss) or for
User developers (those that use JBoss to run there J2EE/JMX applications)?
--jason
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Allen Fogleson wrote:
> The "problem" here is that the quickstart is meant to show developers
> how to get started
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:03 PM
|To: Allen Fogleson
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App
|
|
|Is this meant for JBoss developers (those that contribute to
D]]On Behalf Of Jason
>|Dillon
>|Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:03 PM
>|To: Allen Fogleson
>|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App
>|
>|
>|Is this meant for JBoss developers (those that contribute to JBoss) or for
>
04, 2001 8:03 PM
> |To: Allen Fogleson
> |Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App
> |
> |
> |Is this meant for JBoss developers (those that contribute to JBoss) or for
> |User developers (those that use JBoss to run there J2EE/JM
FreeBay !
Jules
--- "Hicks, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
I've been doing a few hours of thinking and came to
> a conclusion for a demo
> app.
>
> Would anyone like to assist me in creating an E-Bay
> style bidding
> application?
>
> James Hicks
>
>
Yess, but i want to known wath are doing,
So what does have an auction application need,
hmm,
1) goods: some things that are for sel (query,details)
2) calendar: what is for sell when (with notification)
3) users: some kind of user management. and security constraints
(guest,user,admin)
4) views
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:28, marc fleury wrote:
> hey,
>
> where would you guys see the link for petstore, I am drawing a blank on
> where it would fit on the current website, maybe under downloads?
> documentation? (just to make sure people can see it running) under "success
> stories"... I dont
hi,
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 18:57, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I have modifications for Postgres DAO support if anyone else finds Postgres
> support useful.
+1
christian
p.s.: nice e-mail address :)
msg14140/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
>From reading all the emails, I think the majority of people would benefit
from several small applications that each deal with a specific feature of
JBoss 3.0.
Do yall ( im texan ) think it is feasible to design these small independant
applications so that in the end, a wrapper application could
I think this is a great idea, though, James. I've long believed that the
J2EE specification needed examples beyond the scope of a PetStore.
Jesse
> -Original Message-
> From: Hicks, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:36 PM
> To: [
Hicks, James wrote:
>>From reading all the emails, I think the majority of people would benefit
> from several small applications that each deal with a specific feature of
> JBoss 3.0.
>
> Do yall ( im texan ) think it is feasible to design these small independant
> applications so that in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Tilly, Jesse
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 4:23 PM
> To: 'Hicks, James'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App
>
>
> I think you'd be trying to bite off too much too fast
Tilly, Jesse wrote:
> I think you'd be trying to bite off too much too fast. An application that
> encompassed all of the extensive features of JBoss and J2EE would be very
> large and very complex. That's why I don't like the PetStore application.
> Many people look to it for development pat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Others get frustrated because there's no
>CMP/BMP-hybrid EJB that joins 4 tables used by a stateful session EJB
>that's, in turn, called by a stateless session EJB to control transactional
>context. (Whew!)
>
Hopefully noone is calling sfsb from slsb :) But the point
Mostly because the projects page is on the for developers page. Its 3 or
4 clicks deep. Users of Jboss may or may not explore there. If it was
right on the main page though they would probably explore it.
Al
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:38, Allen Fogleson wrote:
>
>>How
>
>
> Or are just bad ideas - see my earlier post on the user list.
I agree there. Much of the petstore is poor quality coding also. Just
take a look at all those querys in there. I dont even remember a
preparedStatement one. Yet the queries happen over an over... a perfect
place for PS over
, December 05, 2001 2:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App
>From reading all the emails, I think the majority of people would benefit
from several small applications that each deal with a specific feature of
JBoss 3.0.
Do yall ( im texan ) think it is feasible to des
on 1-12-05 22.44, Bill Burke at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, and these examples should ship with the JBoss distribution. They
> should also be run with the nightly build so that we know whether or not
> they work. I think these examples are crucial now that the bulk of
> documentation will b
on 1-12-06 05.09, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I can think of two demos now : namely snoop.jsp and includeEJB.jsp that both
> are causing failiurs in the WebUnitTestSuite now ( well < yesterday ;-) )
> since they where not deployed ...
ahhh... my mistake WebUnitTestSuite are act
on 1-12-06 07.01, Allen Fogleson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> So do we :
>> - create a demo folder ?
>> ( jboss-all/demo, jboss-3.0.0alpha/demo )
>> ( have some deploy by default
>> or
>> from there be able to do manual deploy drops )
>>
> That makes sense. actually I think they should all de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>on 1-12-05 22.44, Bill Burke at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>So do we :
>- create a demo folder ?
>( jboss-all/demo, jboss-3.0.0alpha/demo )
>( have some deploy by default
>or
> from there be able to do manual deploy drops )
>
That makes sense. actu
on 1-12-06 07.01, Allen Fogleson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> has anyone started working on dukes bank on Jboss 3?
U mean the BanUnitTest ? ... It usually works just fine ... so how would We
double some of the tests as demos ? or just use the Tests as the demos ? ...
how can we combine ? that i
No dukes bank is the Sun J2EE demo for EJB2. Somewhere around here I
have a copy of it.
Al
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>on 1-12-06 07.01, Allen Fogleson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>has anyone started working on dukes bank on Jboss 3?
>>
>
>U mean the BanUnitTest ? ... It usually works just fi
We could do both. For new users I think it makes sense to have all of
them available from one demoapp.ear really this is just a wrapper
around the stuff. using my items you might have an index.html which
contains each line item like so...
1) go to EJB cmp2 relations tutorial.
This would have
When the new ClassLoader code is checked in, I shall
work on a proper JSP solution. Until then, everything
is just a temporary hack.
If you want JSP compilation to work, you have to tell
JBoss where the tools.jar is. We can't ship it with
JBoss because it is part of the JDK.
Jules
--- Peter
We could,
but:
1. some architectures (One of my first beta testers is
on MacOS X) do not seem to have the jar at all - it
seems to have been collapsed into the rest of the
runtime.
2. Many people will be running JBoss on a JRE not a
JDK, and precompiling their JSPs during development.
I am wil
Please move the demo-app discussion on the online forum,
I have created a forum just for it, it is called "J2EE design pattern" but please move
this over there as it really doesn't belong on this forum
thanks
View: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=4941
__
on 1-12-06 15.44, Julian Gosnell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1. some architectures (One of my first beta testers is
> on MacOS X) do not seem to have the jar at all - it
> seems to have been collapsed into the rest of the
> runtime.
ahhh . a special for OSX ... hmmm .
> 2. Many people will be
on 1-12-06 16.22, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 2. Many people will be running JBoss on a JRE not a
>> JDK, and precompiling their JSPs during development.
Could We not just say clearly :
SDK required - else If running under JRE please copy tools.jar here ...
/peter_f
___
on 1-12-06 15.56, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please move the demo-app discussion on the online forum,
Yes very good - We still need to find a structur -here now :
Scenario :
I dload JBoss3.0 binary
- it comes with a demo folder of deployable examples
In dload JBoss3.0 src i
32 matches
Mail list logo
