RE: [JBoss-user] configuring security if web and ejbs on different machines

2002-11-21 Thread Jason Westra
I thought splitting my app between two machines should also give me a significant performance even though the serialization overhead, shouldn't it? This was believed to be true early on in J2EE (1999-2000), but now most vendors advise in-JVM web and EJB containers to minimize the

RE: [JBoss-user] Roles

2002-11-20 Thread Jason Westra
It's personal preference for me. I create another directory to keep the standard JBoss deployed files separate from anything I deploy. If separating system-level configurations from applications is a requirement, you could also do it by role with multiple custom deploy directories. For instance,

RE: [JBoss-user] User Monitoring

2002-11-08 Thread Jason Westra
? thanks. .peter -Original Message-From: Jason Westra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 12:14 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] User Monitoring You make the custom solution sound way too hard! It is quite easy

RE: [JBoss-user] User Monitoring

2002-11-04 Thread Jason Westra
You make the custom solution sound way too hard! It is quite easy. You need 2 classes. 1 Class implementing HttpBindingListener called MonitoredUser.java 1 MBean called CurrentUsersMBean.java, which holds a list of MonitoredUser objects representing currently logged in users. When

RE: [JBoss-user] Entity Bean Performance Tuning Help

2002-10-29 Thread Jason Westra
Hi JBoss friends, I tend to agree with Bill and Dain's last posting here. There are certain things that CMP is not designed to do *well* and large, heavy reads is one of them. I'd venture to guess the same performance problem will occur on other app servers, in which case, it is not a war of

RE: [JBoss-user] Entity Bean Performance Tuning Help

2002-10-29 Thread Jason Westra
;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Entity Bean Performance Tuning Help Jason Westra wrote: Hi JBoss friends, I tend to agree with Bill and Dain's last posting here. There are certain things

RE: [JBoss-user] Port 8082

2002-10-24 Thread Jason Westra
Its much better this way, because you can have multiple instances of JBoss running on the same machine, each using a different port. The old 8082 way only allowed one JBoss console to be accessed per-machine. You could always change the port for the JMXHtmlAdaptor, which allowed multiple JBoss

RE: [JBoss-user] Netboot issues

2002-10-11 Thread Jason Westra
/*.jar files or are they required to be in the jboss/server/config/lib? sorry for the questions, but i can't seem to find docs about this. Ryan -Original Message- From: Jason Westra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss

RE: [JBoss-user] Netboot issues

2002-10-10 Thread Jason Westra
It works fine for me under a local Apache instance. Haven't tried it remotely. It is really cool, but takes forever to boot since it copies the jars thru http: rather than a nice local copy. My version is jboss3.0.2-tomcat4.0.4 and there is no crimson.jar. Jason -Original Message-

RE: [JBoss-user] JBoss 3.x shared JBoss install

2002-09-30 Thread Jason Westra
Just set them in the System properties at startup of JBoss. Here are some system properties I set in an Ant start task. They are self-explanatory, I hope. sysproperty key=jboss.server.temp.dir value=${dynamic} / sysproperty key=jboss.server.data.dir value=${persist} / Jason -Original

[JBoss-user] deploying via HTTP URLs

2002-09-27 Thread Jason Westra
Hi! I want to keep all deployed apps in a single location on our network and start up multiple (non-clustered) JBoss instances that deploy the apps from HTTP URLs. I know this is *possible* with JBoss however... 1. Is it recommended? If not, why? If so, what are some gotchas to look out for,

RE: [JBoss-user] deploying via HTTP URLs

2002-09-27 Thread Jason Westra
via HTTP URLs Warning, I haven't tried much of this, and may not be 100% accurate. On 2002.09.27 12:01:57 -0400 Jason Westra wrote: Hi! I want to keep all deployed apps in a single location on our network and start up multiple (non-clustered) JBoss instances that deploy the apps from HTTP

RE: [JBoss-user] deploying via HTTP URLs

2002-09-27 Thread Jason Westra
, the new app's URL should be added to the list in the config file, since changes to MBean attributes are not remembered. Jason Westra wrote: Here are the results of my findings for HTTP deployment using the supplied URLDeploymentScanner and URLDirectoryScanner classes. URLDeploymentScanner

RE: [JBoss-user] JaasSecurityManager caching - hard-coded constant?

2002-09-24 Thread Jason Westra
Use a Scheduler MBean or the JMX Timer services on your own if you want the cache autoflushed every so often. Just have it call the example code below. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Randahl Fink Isaksen Sent: Tuesday, September

RE: [JBoss-user] home.findByPrimaryKey HANGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2002-09-20 Thread Jason Westra
Saroj, You could try configuring your container-transaction settings in ejb-jar.xml to be Supports for your entity bean getters and finders. This should keep locks from happening as well. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Saroj

[JBoss-user] Illegal Lock usage UCL error

2002-09-11 Thread Jason Westra
Hi! We are porting an app from one app server to Jboss. The app starts its own threads (actually subclasses of threads), and each maintains state during the course of its lifetime (thus MDBs were not used since they are essentially stateless). Also, the thread does no synchronized method