The LoggingService starts even before your application is deployed. As a
result, the classes present in your application are not yet loaded by the
classloader and hence the ClassNotFoundException. Place the jar/classes
representing your wrapper logger in the %JBOSS_HOME%/server/default/lib
Dear all,
We have experience error at our JBoss 4.0.3 version, and I also capture the
error from client side below. We suspected that occurred under heavy loading
on JMS MQ.
| Jul 10, 2006 2:18:23 PM SGT Warning EJB Cmapp2 Server2
ExecuteThread: '39' for queue:
jaikiran!
Thanks a lot for your prompt help and advice.
Worked !
best.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3956595#3956595
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3956595
jaijiran,
sorry to bother you again.
Now as I have said, I have no problems building the extra trace level, but when
I call mylogger.trace() method, it is not showing up in the console and in the
file.
I have log4j.xml
which I have modified :
!-- start of what I have actually added
One more feature:
When deploying project without topic's configs in JBoss - JBoss tells me, that
it can't find topic topic/com/mysy.
But, if configs with topic/com/mysy. are in JBoss deploy folder - on
deploying i get a message mentioned in the first post. About
TOPIC.com/mysyst...
Which MQ jars did you deploy and have you set up the conntection factories via
MQ JMS Admin ?
Rgds,
iris
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3956297#3956297
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3956297
See if this helps:
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-07-2003/jw-0718-mdb-p2.html
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3955745#3955745
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3955745
Using Tomcat but
For those interested, the missing piece that I could not deduce from the
documentation, was the need for an annotation in my MDB class. Specifically:
@ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = providerAdapterJNDI,
propertyValue=java:/WSMQJMSProvider)
The annotation references the following which
For those interested, the missing piece that I could not deduce from the
documentation, was the need for an annotation in my MDB class. Specifically:
@ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = providerAdapterJNDI,
propertyValue=java:/WSMQJMSProvider)
The annotation references the following which
anonymous wrote : topic does not exist: TOPIC.com/mysystem/mq/JobInvocationTopic
I am not sure why the server is looking up the topic at
TOPIC.com/mysystem/mq/JobInvocationTopic instead of
TOPIC.topic/com/mysystem/mq/JobInvocationTopic
Try out the following:
Change your
The other thing that you can do is, use the jmx-console to see to which
jndiname the topic is bound. Here's how you can do it:
- Access http://localhost:8080/jmx-console
- Here you will find a list of services that have been deployed in jboss.
- On this page, under the section
I've do it.
So, that's what i got^
[CODE]
16:38:12,445 WARN [JMSContainerInvoker] Could not find the topic
destination-jndi-name=topic/com/mysystem/mq/JobInvocationTopic
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: com not bound
at org.jnp.server.NamingServer.getBinding(NamingServer.java:529)
It's not a mistake during deploy...
I think it's differences in JMS providers...
But how can i solve it?
JBoss documentation is silent about it. Or, maybe, i watch it not so closely...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3955564#3955564
Reply to the
I replaced jms folder in 4.0.4 by analog from 4.0.2
And got the same.
Downloading of Jboss-messaging-1.0.1.CR2 have been finished.
Tomorrow will try to solve my trouble using it...
Is here nobody, who was confronted with these difficulties?
View the original post :
There are examples in JBoss, did you try them?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3955684#3955684
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3955684
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
What's the type of the object? E.g.
Object o = ...
System.out.println(class is + o.getClass());
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3955686#3955686
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3955686
Using
JMS is always async for sending.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3955687#3955687
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3955687
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Thanks genman..
The type of the Object is org.jboss.mq.SpyQueue. But I dont need to use
SpyQueue or SpyConnectionFactory. I prefer to use QueueConnectionFactory and
Queue Connection in my program. But When do a JNDI lookup like
SpyConnectionFactory factory = (SpyConnectionFactory)
Have a look at:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=WhyDoIGetStreamCorruptedException
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3955197#3955197
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3955197
Using Tomcat
I am also having some issues with JBoss Collaboration server MQ's. I am trying
to lock down the queues, and context but am a little lost.
I am using the user roles properties file
It has two users
there roles are listed as such...
user1=calendaruser,adminuser
user2=calendaruser,adminuser
and
The degug message got chopped off a little... :(
The full stack trace is:
DEBUG [org.jboss.mq.il.uil2.ServerSocketManagerHandler] Exiting on IOE
java.net.SocketException: Socket closed
at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:162)
at
I don't suppose you've got a link to the issue in the bug DB have you? I've
just had a look but can't spot anything relevant. I'll definately investigate
the table locking issue you're suggesting. Nothing else should be using the DB
at the time, so I'd guess if table locking was to blame, it
Thank you genman, for sharing your thoughts.
anonymous wrote : Why can't you create two queues called MyQueue1 and MyQueue2
?
I can very well do that and that is going to work without any issues.
But, we do have a requirement where we need to deploy 2 applications which
listen on a queue
I don't see anything particularly useful from doing that, although to be honest
I get swamped in data, so I may be missing something.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3954308#3954308
Reply to the post :
Have a look at:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=IGetIOExceptionPingTimeoutHowDoIFixIt
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3954313#3954313
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3954313
Using
Have a look at:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=ConfigJMSProvider
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossJMSRA
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=IntegrationWithWebSphereMQSeries
View the original post :
What exception?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3954468#3954468
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3954468
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done
Sounds similar to this one:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1368
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3954469#3954469
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3954469
Using Tomcat but need to do
Nevermind. It ended up being the port (I dropped the port and it worked). I'm
not sure why that worked, but it did.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3954508#3954508
Reply to the post :
Please post on the JBoss MQ forum, this forum is about JBoss Messaging.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3953935#3953935
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3953935
Using Tomcat but need to do more?
anonymous wrote : I am not clear on what exactly is your requirement
I wish to have multiple queues, each with its own security-domain.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3953942#3953942
Reply to the post :
anonymous wrote : I wish to have multiple queues, each with its own
security-domain.
Interesting. I think this is what you might have to do, in that case:
For configuring your queues, you use something like:
mbean code=org.jboss.mq.server.jmx.Queue
|
I've done that, though I think you need to do the Queues like this:
| mbean code=org.jboss.mq.server.jmx.Queue
name=jboss.mq.destination:service=Queue,name=myQueue1
| depends
optional-attribute-name=DestinationManagerjboss.mq:service=DestinationManager/depends
| depends
anonymous wrote : notice that it doesn't just depend on the custom
SecurityManager--it actually specifies that it uses it
You are right.
anonymous wrote : Unfortunately this does not appear to work
I suggest, you enable TRACE level logging of jboss security and post the logs
here. Here's how
Anyone from jboss team?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3954007#3954007
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3954007
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get
I'm not really from the team. What it sounds like is you want two copies of
JBossMQ running in the same JBoss instance. Which is possible, but probably a
bit complicated to set up, especially for MDBs.
Why can't you create two queues called MyQueue1 and MyQueue2 ?
Alternatively, use a topic
Do you have some sort of table locking issue? There might have been some issue
resolved re. this, look at the bug DB.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3954157#3954157
Reply to the post :
please help
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3954180#3954180
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3954180
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done
I am not clear on what exactly is your requirement, but the place where the
jbossmq security domain is specified is in jbossmq-service.xml file in the
%JBOSS_HOME%/server/default/deploy/jms directory. Here's the extract:
mbean code=org.jboss.mq.security.SecurityManager
Any thoughts on this guys? The problem has re-occued today...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3953352#3953352
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3953352
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to
If you are looking up XAConnectionFactory you will need to use HAJNDI.
See JBossHAJNDIUseCluster on the Wiki.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3953358#3953358
Reply to the post :
Hi gcoleman,
Thanks for your reply, my server is configured to use HA-JNDI by default and it
have jndi.properties as mentioned in Wiki in conf directory. When I am
accessing ConnectionFactory within server I am just calling new
InitialContext() since it is within server do I have to
Terrian,
Yup, that's a 3.x config alright.
here's one that works for me on 4.0.2. I can't guarantee that you don't have
other stuff misconfigured. You are lucky, I had to figure this out for myself
with no help, vague docs, and inapplicable examples 8)
ProviderName should be something you name
Thanks. I will check it out.
-Pratik
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3953545#3953545
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3953545
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
Hello All,
I'm new to this forum and was wondering if this particular issue had been
resolved. We are having the same problem and are currently at a loss on
what, exactly, the problem is.
We are currently running JBoss v3.2.7 RC1 on a SUSE Linux v2.6.5. Any
help on this issue would be much
Hi Guys,
I haven't heard any thinh about my posting, as follow up we decided to use
local queues for time being and seems like working fine
Local Queue Questions:
1. If we have a local queue and switch to Oracle then assume that we have x
boxes in cluster, if box1 places message into it's
anonymous wrote : some pointer how to integrate MQ Series with JBOSS..
This might help:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=IntegrationWithWebSphereMQSeries
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3952925#3952925
Reply to the post :
guess it would help to mention that it's UIL2
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3953060#3953060
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3953060
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
I know that I can change the default timeout value from the default 300 seconds
in jta-service.xml but I am looking to change the transaction timeout for this
transaction only. I've also read the spec but with no luck.
Anybody out there?? Please help!
View the original post :
General:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=MonitoringManagementAndProfilingTools
Specific on setting up e-mail notifications:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossMonitoring
-dave
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3952817#3952817
Found the problem. I needed to increase the max-pool-size significantly (to
100 for now) to get past that bottleneck. I'll have to play with that number
until I find the optimal setup for my app.
Thanks.
View the original post :
I don't think the spec allows you to do this. Why not resubmit this message?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3952050#3952050
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3952050
I wonder if
|mbean code=org.jboss.tm.TransactionManagerService
| name=jboss:service=TransactionManager
| xmbean-dd=resource:xmdesc/TransactionManagerService-xmbean.xml
| attribute name=TransactionTimeout3000/attribute
|
in your conf/jboss-service.xml needs to be
Interesting. Are you using the JCA adapter, i.e. java:/JmsXA? You should use
this to obtain a new JMS connection each time.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3952178#3952178
Reply to the post :
Yes, I'm using the JmsXA to create a connection on each request.
Any idea what the createQueueSession method might be waiting on?
Is there a connection pool setting that I should play with? I tried changing
the max-pool-size on the JmsXA resource but it didn't seem to have any effect.
Also,
Here's a code snippet:
InitialContext iniCtx = new InitialContext();
|
| Object tmp = iniCtx.lookup(java:/JmsXA);
| QueueConnectionFactory qcf = (QueueConnectionFactory) tmp;
| QueueConnection jmsConn = qcf.createQueueConnection();
|
| jmsConn.start();
|
| Session sess =
anonymous wrote : UserTransaction aUT = ctx.getUserTransaction();
|aUT.begin();
|aUT.setTransactionTimeout(360);
Change the above to:
UserTransaction aUT = ctx.getUserTransaction();
|aUT.setTransactionTimeout(360);
|
|aUT.begin();
i.e. set the
Also, if you are expecting any exception to be thrown on a transaction timeout,
then it wont happen. No exception is thrown, the transaction state will set to
MARKED_FOR_ROLLBACK. Later on, if any operations are done using this
transaction, only then will a exception be thrown.
You might want
Search for this.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3951366#3951366
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3951366
___
JBoss-user mailing list
I encounter similar problem in our MDB onMessage. The mode is auto-acknowlegde
and the destination is Queue. During process the message, I got the similar
exception, but the message is finished processing and return correctly, but
JBOSS/JMS somehow redelivered the same message again to our
I am using JBoss 4.0.3SP1
MDB use the configuration Singleton Message Driven Bean
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3950822#3950822
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3950822
I am not sure if I understand your problem correctly, but if you want to spread
your load equaly to all the MDBs, you may want to change the default load
balancing policy to RoundRobin. The following WIKI explains how to do it. We
had similar problem with one of our clients and it works great.
Thank you for our answers. jaikiran were absolutely right - the bean used
Container managed transaction. I added a:
@TransactionManagement( value=TransactionManagementType.BEAN)
annotation and now it works as a charm, concurrently processing and sending
messages.
The normal use case of the
Just to clarify some of the assumptions and also I think I am starting to
understand the issue a little deeper, so in a way I am attempting to answer my
own question.
In JBoss MDBs are not clustered. They are just message listeners. We can
configure various load balancing policies on Queues
XSLT and HSQL DB (in its CSV read-mode) are useful for handling these and are
provided with JBoss. You have to write this part yourself, it's quite easy.
The difficult part of handling messages (persistence, transactions, threading,
etc.) is handled by JBoss.
View the original post :
Hey
Reading the explanation of your problem, I would suspect that it is a design
issue and hardware limitations. Here is what I think. You probably have a
single processor machine and while publishing the messages in the loop you
taking most of the resources of the machine. Also, since message
anonymous wrote : If I wish to send a large number of messages in sequence, the
MessageListener won't start processing the messages until the sender has
finished sending all its messages - the while()-loop has ended and the method
invoked in the Stateless Session EJB has finished.
This is
You need to use the correct MQ series ConnectionFactory.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3950044#3950044
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3950044
___
Here is the configuration from my jbossmq-destinations-service.xml that I've
been trying to use. I think this is the correct MQ series ConnectionFactory,
but maybe that's my problem.
Thanks,
Jim
mbean code=jmx.service.wsmq.WSMQConnectionFactory
|
Thanks, that did the trick.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3950227#3950227
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3950227
___
JBoss-user mailing list
${jboss.bind.address} can be set using the -b param with run.sh
E.g., ./run.sh -c all -b 192.111.78.256
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3950228#3950228
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3950228
I saw that method getObject is signed as 'not implemented'. Are there any plans
to implement sending objects?
Regards,
Michal
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3949873#3949873
Reply to the post :
getObject is difficult, because you would need some explicit knowledge about
the object being transferred in order to translate it from java to c#.
I recommend either using xml + serialization to a string with a text message,
or implementing externalizable in java and a corresponding
sorry, meant to say use externalizable to write your object into a byte message
that you know how to decode on the client.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3949910#3949910
Reply to the post :
I noticed that JBoss 4.0.4 still does not allow us to disable the message id
generation for JMS messages. I was wondering what the reason maybe if there is
one.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3950006#3950006
Reply to the post :
Yes, Logs indicate that. Thread (getting the session and creating the receiver)
handles the java.lang.Exception. Still we see the thread dying. So my query is
does the task of (getting the session and creating the receiver) can ever
throw an Error (not derived from the Exception class)? This
Out of connections?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3949425#3949425
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3949425
___
JBoss-user mailing list
Oracle driver issue? Thin/OCI?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3949427#3949427
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3949427
___
JBoss-user mailing list
Hi ,
Yeah I am using thin driver . I was using oracle thin driver for 9i
. Now I have changed to 10g driver . I have checked the way JBoss writes a
blob . It not the way oracle expects it to be :
Oracle?s way to write a Blob through a JDBC code is a TWO Step procedure :
Unfortunaltely this forum doesn't support post removal. I solved the problem.
The answer is acually in FAQ:
Use the java:/JmsXA connection factory.
We used the wrong connection factory - there should have been java:/JmsXA
instead of ConnectionFactory (I've no idea, who in our team placed that
Sounds like a bug to me, but I haven't checked the spec. Have you?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3949257#3949257
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3949257
Hi there,
I've encountered the same problem with 4.0.3sp1 and 4.0.4.GA on Solaris 8/JDK
1.4.2 and have painstakingly working on it for couple of days, without any clue.
Anyone out there with similar problem and solutions/clues? Pls help, thanks in
advance!
View the original post :
I am using JBoss 4.0.1 sp1 and oracle 9i for persistence.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3949034#3949034
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3949034
I have gone through the site name given by you.
But, I am unable to set a client ID,i don't know what should i set as clientId.
**If i am setting any arbitrary string there,i am getting null pointer
exception.
**Also in configuration of jboss,i am unable to set clientId.
Plz tell me how can i
i hope limit can go beyond the memory if the queue/topic is a durable one...
becozmessages are stored in a persisternce DB, pls. correct if i am wrong
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3947922#3947922
Reply to the post :
Have a look at:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=ConfigJBossMQSecurity
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3947925#3947925
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3947925
Yes you can create a durable subscriber. Have a look at:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=WhatIsTheCorrectWayToMakeADurableSubscription
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3947929#3947929
Reply to the post :
Well i do have it working without any issues. In my case the remote queue is
named queueOn2177 and is deployed on the remote server using the following
entry in jbossmq-destinations-service.xml file:
mbean code=org.jboss.mq.server.jmx.Queue
|
Whats the acknowledgement mode specified on the session. Usualy, it is
AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE. Looks like the message consumption is NOT being acknowledged
leading to re-delivery of the message
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3947988#3947988
Reply to
Hi jaikiran
The acknowledge mode is set to AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE only
this is the code from my ejb-jar.xml of MDB
message-driven
ejb-nameLogTopicMDB/ejb-name
ejb-classcom.mobio.srv.logging.mdb.LogTopicMDB/ejb-class
transaction-typeContainer/transaction-type
Sure, there's plenty of docs.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3948170#3948170
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3948170
---
All the advantages
where do you put those three files? in the META-INF directory of the project?
my problem is that my mdb does not listen to incoming messages,
so maybe i forgot a descriptive file like yours so that it is not deployed
correctly.
config:
- jboss 4.0.4GA
- jboss-messaging-1.0.1.CR2
-
Thanks jaikiran, I solved the problem although I'm not happy about it! In my
jms-ds.xml I had specified:
attribute name=QueueFactoryRefjava:/XAConnectionFactory/attribute
which is how the DefaultJMSProvider is configured. When I changed this to
attribute
Hi obn,
In my configuration my ejb jar file looks like this:
com/mycompany/mypackage/mbdclassfile.class
meta-inf/ejb-jar.xml
meta-inf/jboss.xml
jms-ds.xml is in your JBossHome/server/*configuration*/deploy/jms
It sounds like you have another MDB (MDBExample) listening to the same queue...
The size is limited by memory only. The server uses about 2-3x times the byte
size of the message in memory for handling it. For a 32 bit JVM on a 4GB box,
you're probably going to hit a limit of about 1 GB for your message, probably
less though.
View the original post :
jboss configuration is this:
depends
optional-attribute-name=DestinationManagerjboss.mq:service=DestinationManager
depends
optional-attribute-name=SecurityManagerjboss.mq:service=SecurityManager
View the original post :
Anyone?
I supose i don't have to call the stop method beacuse the transaction is manage
by Jboss, isn't it?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3947483#3947483
Reply to the post :
Plz tell me if i can create durable subscriber in jboss-3.2.3 and if yes plz
tell how??
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3947515#3947515
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3947515
Genman,
Yes, it?s a DEBUG Message but the message is not delivered to listeners at all.
I see this debug exception only when i write / publish the message on topic
and I can?t ignore this message as it not delivered to other applications /
listeners.
Thanks
Ram
View the original post :
mskonda wrote : use the Singleton configuration:
|
| | message-driven
| | configuration-nameSingleton Message Driven
Bean/configuration-name
| | ejb-nameXARecovery2ResMDB/ejb-name
| |
destination-jndi-namequeue/@QUEUE_NAME@/destination-jndi-name
|
1 - 100 of 4014 matches
Mail list logo
