On Tue, Dec 8, 2015, at 01:04 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On 8 Dec 2015, at 21:01, Dave Cridland wrote:
> > On 8 December 2015 at 20:53, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > On 12/8/15 1:07 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> >
> > Certainly I do have the feeling that as an
>
event.
Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
___
Hey folks,
Fanout ( http://fanout.io/ ) raised money this summer so we can actually
afford to pay people. Hooray!
If you're a high scalability person that can hack in C/C++/Python and
you live in the SF bay area, let me know.
Justin
___
JDev
On 04/18/2014 08:23 AM, Abmar Barros wrote:
The Buddycloud team is pleased to announce the release of the Buddycloud
hosted platform.
Buddycloud hosted enables developers to quickly start using Buddycloud
by providing a self hosted version of the full stack, which means an
XMPP-enabled domain,
random but
the from address is checked.
Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
___
-time employment elsewhere is not
acceptable. Must be in the SF Bay area and willing to meet regularly near
Mountain View. If interested, email me privately.
Thanks!
--
Justin Karneges
Fanout, Inc.
530-220-7222
___
JDev mailing list
Info: http
On 03/29/2013 09:55 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Justin Karneges jus...@affinix.com wrote:
The reason I bring this up here is to discuss some protocol. I think all
that is really needed for a system like this to work is for the smart entity
to act as a proxy
In thinking about federated social networks, I started to wonder if certain
features enjoyed in monolithic systems might not carry over very well to our
world. There are many situations where Facebook tailors your view based on its
all-knowing graph database, but these kinds of things may be
people to be able to whip
up simple apps for, then you pretty much have to offer HTTP at minimum.
Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
___
be useful and the irony
kills me.
Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
___
been in place some months. Can't remember if I mentioned it
at the summit. But I finally wrote about it now:
http://blog.fanout.io/2013/01/12/using-the-api-via-xmpp/
Is anyone else doing this sort of thing?
Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Info: http
a new XEP that
specifically discusses a file format. Even though it's not a network protocol,
I
think the XSF is not a terrible place to pursue this. It reminds me of XEP-38
(emoticon file format).
Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Info: http
, and this is a fine thing.
Curious about others' experience in the clustered server space.
Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
___
also got some really good HTTP stuff, for those that need it, like
webhooks and long polling. Your one stop shop for scaling push.
Here's the full announcement:
http://blog.fanout.io/2012/09/03/realtime-multicasting-over-http-xmpp/
I'm very interested in feedback. :)
Thanks,
Justin
I'm curious if anyone still needs to put this in their DNS to support legacy
servers? Does anyone do it? I noticed I had it in mine. Anyone know when
_xmpp-server showed up in jabberd1?
Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org
, the challenges of writing realtime code and scaling it,
and business aspects. Pretty cool to have a whole conference about realtime.
Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
___
a
case for some XMPP over Websockets transport binding, but beyond that these
are two separate technologies with different purposes.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
___
not completely in sync unless the server
send probe on behalf of already online users.
Which it could (and probably should).
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
iq type=result from=u...@example.com id=1
query xmlns=http://jabber.org/protocol/delegate;
service type=pubsub jid=users.freepubsubforall.com/
service type=livefyre jid=services.livefyre.com/
/query
/iq
Just tossing it out as a rough idea to start from.
-Justin
people find the
event to be rude. I know that breaking an active subscription isn't the same
as denying a subscription request, but I'm sure there's overlap in the code
so I just wanted to throw that out there.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http
://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jdev/2010-March/088164.html
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
___
before being fed into psimedia.
Let me know if you have further questions or need more explanation.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev
or maintain an intermediary service to
act as a signaling channel, then this looks like a neat tool.
It probably has no fit with XMPP though. We have a signaling channel where we
can use STUN correctly. And we can do more than just STUN, too.
-Justin
, or for networks
that block UDP), but just not nearly as useful.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
___
be conservative about our changes
to the core specs.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
___
). If
unspecified, then the authcid is assumed to be the JID node.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
___
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 12:43:22 Robert Quattlebaum wrote:
I know google talk does this, or something similar. I believe they do
this because they found several clients which were not properly
calculating the hash or the image in te vCard.
It also has the nice effect of making your avatar
on the domain name
specified by the peer server.
You can put many names into one cert. For a short set of domains, this ought
to be practical.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org
recommended Google Talk to new users. It doesn't really
matter if Google has better uptime. The point is to get the blame right.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman
was to actually get rid of jabber.org
entirely. ;-)
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
___
them more widely -- perhaps just Europe and North America
to start, but eventually in many locations so that people can use local
relays everywhere.
I don't think it can hurt to do this, if the resources are there.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Forum
at a JID.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
___
On Sunday 25 January 2009 13:03:12 Tim Julien wrote:
anyone heard any updates on this?
http://developers.facebook.com/news.php?blog=1story=110
http://bugs.developers.facebook.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3152
The latest word as of November is: some people are working on this. it will
probably be
the
user can type the connect host in advance, to mark as trusted).
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
___
if the right host has multiple host keys for the xmpp service, the
attacker could cause you to successfully authenticate to the wrong XMPP host?
Well, whether that attack is really a problem or not, at least XEP-233 does
close it off.
-Justin
___
JDev
encouraging the behavior.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
is publicly reachable and has a valid domain name, then
yes.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
.
This dialback procedure is a standard mechanism in Jabber to prevent domain
spoofing.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman
/digest-md5-crash.html
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
compiler installation. I
suggest taking that issue to a different forum.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman
..
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
of its own
connected clients. This is a widespread problem with c2s connections,
usually among wi-fi or mobile users.
Anyway, the c2s case is not your problem. The s2s case you just do the best
you can.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http
On Thursday 02 October 2008 21:09:37 Justin Karneges wrote:
Periodically reacquainting yourself with remote servers is really the only
solution.
(... to clearing away stale presence)
Suppose you want to check on interesting JIDs every 10 minutes. Instead of
connecting to a remote server
behavior like this for round-trip optimization.
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL
/.
I don't think you're supposed to send response data with PLAIN, are you?
success/ (no response data) is correct, not success=/success (response
data of zero-length).
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq
transmission of other stanzas (you cannot
send many stanzas in parallel over one stream).
Any XMPP-based protocol which might need to transmit large datasets should
have a mechanism for chunking or paging. See XEP-47 or XEP-59 as building
blocks.
-Justin
to :)
And a random resource isn't necessary anyway, just good privacy control on the
server. (/me still wants a server that will bounce all iqs from people who
don't have his presence.)
-Justin
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 09:33:32 Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Justin Karneges wrote:
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 07:55:58 Kevin Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
you also test presence leaks using guessed well-known resources like
need an AIM account to use AIM through GTalk, so it's
clearly not federated.
What's interesting is that Yahoo federates with MSN. Somehow I don't see
Microsoft's blessing on a Yahoo-GTalk federation due to the doors that
would open.
My hopes are on Facebook..
-Justin
On Monday 10 March 2008 2:01 am, Sergei Golovan wrote:
On 3/10/08, Justin Karneges [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Further, since some XML parsers throw error when an unrecognized prefix
is encountered, those clients/servers would most likely respond not with
a stanza error, but with an xml
clients shouldn't be generating invalid XML, but servers shouldn't be routing
it either. A good server would disconnect whoever sent gajim:die rather than
routing it and DoS'ing other clients.
-Justin
that supports edge servers such as jabberd+jadc2s.
-Justin
a protocol issue, but a server
deployment/implementation issue.
-Justin
where the original message came from.
I believe this is a bug in ejabberd muc. I don't know the status of a
solution.
-Justin
practices
here, or possibly some protocol elements.
-Justin
On Friday 25 January 2008 7:06 am, Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 12:23:38PM -0800, Justin Karneges wrote:
On Thursday 20 December 2007 2:52 pm, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
2. Else, if the contact has no available resources, the server MUST
either (1) reply
On Friday 25 January 2008 11:09 am, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 12:23:38PM -0800, Justin Karneges wrote:
On Thursday 20 December 2007 2:52 pm, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
So a nice server
reply, while not causing existing servers to
become non-compliant.
-Justin
attempts by third-parties to access the AIM
integration. What if someone wrote a new Jabber transport that required 4
fields: gmail account name, gmail password, aim account name, aim password?
Would this give the rest of the XMPP world legit access to AIM via
double-transporting?
-Justin
On Monday 03 December 2007 6:48 pm, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Magnus Henoch wrote:
I've started hacking a server-side implementation of XEP-0198 (stanza
acking). Connect to bazarhoff.cd.chalmers.se and try it out.
Super.
I think Justin Karneges may still have some changes to make
I didn't even tie the announcement to XMPP, leaving the readers to figure it
out.
-Justin
, possibly an email address (like how anonymous FTP
would often ask you to put your email address as the password, that's what
this essentially replaces). It might be interesting to specify in XEP-175
that the trace data may be used as a node suggestion.
-Justin
. They do not
have child text nodes.
You mentioned Qt DOM. In that case consider QDomAttr.setValue(value). More
conveniently, just call QDomElement.setAttribute(name, value).
-Justin
documenting.
-Justin
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 12:22 am, Sergei Golovan wrote:
On 8/8/07, Justin Karneges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't put this at the IBB level. A negotiation timeout will work
well enough there.
The problem you speak of, which does indeed happen a lot, has more to do
with the SI
be
misinterpretted. Rather than fiddling with the x:data form, how about going
the traditional route and adding some new namespaced elements/attributes?
We can take a time machine back to 2003:
http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/2003-August/002570.html
-Justin
not have
any of the problems described in the igniterealtime thread. The situation
may not be as bad as you think.
-Justin
login to the Jabber server
only, and then individually login (or logoff!) transports.
-Justin
is the only standard file transfer.
-Justin
Yes. Also Jabbin, SAPO Messenger (Mac), and more..
Psi/Iris has a steeper learning curve than the other options, but it is a
well-proven client platform.
Also, I like to think of the Qt dependency as a feature. :)
-Justin
On Monday 23 April 2007 11:55 am, Nathan Fritz wrote:
Doesn't KoPete
how this value is calculated or verified
though.
This should be described in RFC 2831, read deeper. :)
-Justin
members in the security community that not only
will do a basic error check, but will also ask important questions like, why
the hell are you doing it this way? :)
I'll be implementing RFC 3923 until then.
-Justin
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 12:24 pm, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Justin Karneges wrote:
First, we need thorough security
reviews of all the specifications by multiple parties.
All the existing specs (RFCs/MUC/etc.) or the esession specs?
Security reviews of all the existing specs is a good
.
-Justin
simplifies down to
one character for presentation, then we should probably respect this in
XHTML-IM.
-Justin
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 9:17 am, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Justin Karneges wrote:
This seems unlikely
though, as I think the RFC revision has already been made, and there was
no consideration for these features.
It is not accurate to say that the RFC revision has already been made
is too much to ask for, when just an
element or two in XMPP over TCP will solve our problems.
-Justin
On Friday 03 November 2006 11:00 am, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 10:50:37AM -0800, Justin Karneges wrote:
On Friday 03 November 2006 8:29 am, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Norman Rasmussen wrote:
It might make sense in rfc3920bis to make a small note that SCTP can
.
http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/ack.html
-Justin
it
even got a XEP number). The JSF Council recommendation was to take care of
these features in the XMPP-Core RFC instead of a XEP. This seems unlikely
though, as I think the RFC revision has already been made, and there was no
consideration for these features.
-Justin
-im.org/
The Help and General Chat section is for anything at all. There are many
Jabber developers reading the Psi forum so you'll probably get help.
-Justin
to pick
the right one. For Hal's purposes, SRV alone is probably enough.
-Justin
).
-Justin
in the 'from' attribute of the stream header
sent before termination.
This could happen if there is an error while the stream is being set up, like
if you telnet to port 5269 and type jibberish.
-Justin
does it so people can have jabber
subdomains without modifying the DNS, but all this does is break the network
for non-Wildfire users.
-Justin
'
version='1.0'
You get this:
Jabber Server Responds:-
failure xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-tls'//stream:stream
-Justin
wondering how to do it in code, have a look at the qca-openssl
plugin from the QCA project:
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdesupport/qca/plugins/qca-openssl/qca-openssl.cpp?rev=540405view=auto
Search for 'XMPP' in there.
-Justin
- system
Safari - system
Firefox - bundled
Thunderbird - bundled
Psi 0.11 - system
-Justin
. :) It is a
standard format by the way, not a Microsoft-ism, and OpenSSL has supported it
since forever. I plan to support both methods.
And that will go for Psi too, when specifying a client cert (something I don't
think you mentioned in either thread?).
-Justin
of GnuPG slowness being bad for fast
typers. However, this has more to do with Psi's disabling (graying) of the
chat input field during encryption than the speed of GnuPG. The behavior in
Psi is intentional, but it is not the only behavior possible.
-Justin
, but
acceptable.
-Justin
, but so far it hasn't really
caught on. There have been a couple of attempts at a client daemon, the
most recent being Edrin's xcd for Windows.
I'd like to revive this idea sometime in the future, but I'm not sure when.
-Justin
, this problem is not fixed.
-Justin
Stepehn Marquard
Justin Kirby
, such as XMPP. I guess if things
get complex then the user will want to bring along an ASN.1 parser, but at
least it will be possible.
--
Good luck,
-Justin
like a
namespace, and the prefix helps give an idea of what it is for, which I think
is Identity-OtherName (just a guess). This namespace string doesn't appear
in the Certificate anywhere, only the OID does, so there's no reason to get
too hung up about it.
-Justin
a Matlock show, where
Andy knows who did it, even if he doesn't have court-admissable evidence yet.
-Justin
.
-Justin
tricky.
-Justin
starttls. Sadly, no one actually uses this great spec.
-Justin
1 - 100 of 378 matches
Mail list logo