OK, there are two issues here.
mayscript and scripting. "maynotscript" is just my invention to remove
the "mayscript" tag. You could do otherwise. I don't think it is
browser-safe to use mayscript=false, because, as I recall, the
original specification was just for the word "mayscript" in the appl
El 10 Dec 2008 a las 18:34, Robert Hanson escribió:
> Something's not right.
>
> mayscript = false in no way prevents jmolButton from being created,
> and with mayscript=false, the jmolButton still works fine.
>
> Something else is going on there.
I though it weird, but that is tested on an in
Something's not right.
mayscript = false in no way prevents jmolButton from being created,
and with mayscript=false, the jmolButton still works fine.
Something else is going on there.
Bob
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Angel Herráez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2008 at 7:36, Robe
On 10 Dec 2008 at 7:36, Robert Hanson wrote:
> But, really, it's simpler than that if you want to disallow all
> callbacks and every last bit of JavaScript capability of the applet --
>
> just don't have "mayscript" in the applet tag.
Ah, interesting.
But then jmolButton() et al. do nothing. I
It is true for all browsers because Jmol checks the tag itself and
explicitly denies itself access
On Dec 10, 2008, at 7:53 AM, "Angel Herraez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> All -- I'm pretty sure that if you invoke _jmol.noEval = true in your
>> wiki code, you will completely shut down any
> All -- I'm pretty sure that if you invoke _jmol.noEval = true in your
> wiki code, you will completely shut down any JavaScript functionality
> of Jmol except callbacks. This setting cannot be changed within Jmol
> -- it is checked upon applet creation and cannot be changed within the
> applet. S
All -- I'm pretty sure that if you invoke _jmol.noEval = true in your
wiki code, you will completely shut down any JavaScript functionality
of Jmol except callbacks. This setting cannot be changed within Jmol
-- it is checked upon applet creation and cannot be changed within the
applet. So it does
>>
>
> I suspect this would be easier for users and could likely be made more
> secure. However, I have no idea how this would be implemented. The
> mediawiki language seems to aim to remove as much direct html use as
> possible.
>>>
Our students use Jmol Mediawiki extensively. We have come up aga
You can also embed these javascript calls into the pdb file itself,
if it has an embedded Jmol script into it.
Paul
Le 9 déc. 08 à 14:41, Angel Herraez a écrit :
> El 9 Dec 2008 a las 14:03, Nicolas Vervelle escribió:
>> For example, I think you can stillrun Javascriptwithscripts
>> calling oth
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 02:03:17PM +0100, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Angel Herraez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to keep this discussion going, so here is a little bit more,
> > picking up on the possibilities to have Jmol supported in Wikiped
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 01:21:01PM +0100, Angel Herraez wrote:
> I'd like to keep this discussion going, so here is a little bit more,
> picking up on the possibilities to have Jmol supported in Wikipedia
> and other Wikis:
[Nico's message snipped]
> And on 1 Dec 2008 9:49, Brian Salter-Duke w
On 9 Dec 2008 at 17:14, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
> I am rather thinking as Rolf does, that to convince Wikipedia people it would
> be better to really
> deactivate Javascript in Jmol itself (would it be possible to pass an option
> to Jmol applet
> whenstarting it ?), rather than trying to bloc
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Angel Herraez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El 9 Dec 2008 a las 14:03, Nicolas Vervelle escribió:
> > For example, I think you can stillrun Javascriptwithscripts
> > calling other scripts:
> > * Create a wiki page with contents corresponding to a Jmol script with
>
Angel Herraez wrote:
> El 9 Dec 2008 a las 14:03, Nicolas Vervelle escribió:
>> For example, I think you can stillrun Javascriptwithscripts
>> calling other scripts:
>> * Create a wiki page with contents corresponding to a Jmol script with
>> Javascript in it.
>> * Add a tag in a page
El 9 Dec 2008 a las 14:03, Nicolas Vervelle escribió:
> For example, I think you can stillrun Javascriptwithscripts
> calling other scripts:
> * Create a wiki page with contents corresponding to a Jmol script with
> Javascript in it.
> * Add a tag in a page with a script calling the ot
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Angel Herraez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to keep this discussion going, so here is a little bit more,
> picking up on the possibilities to have Jmol supported in Wikipedia
> and other Wikis:
>
>
> On 30 Nov 2008 22:53, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
> >
>
I'd like to keep this discussion going, so here is a little bit more,
picking up on the possibilities to have Jmol supported in Wikipedia
and other Wikis:
On 30 Nov 2008 22:53, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
>
> On the matter of security issues, there are at least 2 things to do :
> * Being able to
Take a look at this blog:-
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.com/2008/12/jmol.html
More publicity to get Jmol properly working on wikis.
Brian.
--
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
then you win."
-- Gandhi, being prophetic abou
Hi Gerard
Thanks for the suggestions.
Jmol is already fully internationalized and localized, over 10
languages:
http://wiki.jmol.org:81/index.php/Internationalisation/Current_Status
I'm not sure if the MediaWiki extension would need any further
localization.
Does the testing environment th
Hi folks,
Gerard Meijssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked me to pass this on
to the Jmol list. I responded to this discussion on the Commons-l list:-
[Commons-l] Support for Chemical Markup Language - followup
--
Hoi,
If you want to
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:53:29PM +0100, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have been quite busy for several months on other matters than Jmol, so I
> haven't worked at all on the extension.
> I am happy to see people interested in making it work, and bringing it to
> Wikipedia.
>
> On
Hi everyone,
I have been quite busy for several months on other matters than Jmol, so I
haven't worked at all on the extension.
I am happy to see people interested in making it work, and bringing it to
Wikipedia.
On the matter of security issues, there are at least 2 things to do :
- Being ab
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 01:16:21AM +0100, Angel Herráez wrote:
> On 30 Nov 2008 at 9:48, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > That is great news. Thanks, Henry. My page on the Jmol wiki is now
> > working and I have something I can point the wikipedia tech folks to so
> > that they can look at Jmol.
> B
On 30 Nov 2008 at 9:48, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> That is great news. Thanks, Henry. My page on the Jmol wiki is now
> working and I have something I can point the wikipedia tech folks to so
> that they can look at Jmol.
Brian, I'm quite surprised that your page has started to work NOW. Unless N
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 02:53:18PM +, Rzepa, Henry wrote:
>
> On 29 Nov 2008, at 01:41, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
>
>> The question of having Jmol used on wikipedia has again been raised on
>> the commons email list. On contributor to the discussion says that the
>> jmol mediawiki extension now
On 29 Nov 2008, at 18:43, Angel Herráez wrote:
> Henry, I'm glad that you found the cure for your problem, and to
> have been a catalyst in that
> cure :)
>
> On 29 Nov 2008 at 14:53, Rzepa, Henry wrote:
>> In the distribution
>> http://jmol.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jmol/trunk/Jmol-extension
Henry, I'm glad that you found the cure for your problem, and to have been a
catalyst in that
cure :)
On 29 Nov 2008 at 14:53, Rzepa, Henry wrote:
> In the distribution
> http://jmol.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jmol/trunk/Jmol-extensions/wiki/MediaWiki/
>
> edit the file Jmol.php to make the c
I have gotten the Jmol Mediawiki to display a variety of more
interesting modes:
https://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki2/index.php/Mod:jmol
(although I dont think it can do everything a conventionally invoked
applet can).
-
This
On 29 Nov 2008, at 01:41, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> The question of having Jmol used on wikipedia has again been raised on
> the commons email list. On contributor to the discussion says that the
> jmol mediawiki extension now only works with an older version of
> mediawiki. Certainly my example
On 29 Nov 2008 at 8:12, Rzepa, Henry wrote:
> http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki2/index.php/Mod:jmol
>
> I currently have it down to a "silly mistake" somewhere, probably a
> variable in LocalSettings.php. The correct source code is being
> generated, including the Jmolinitialize script etc, but it
Brian,
We are currently running courses with no issue using the "old"
implementation
http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/
(which has proved VERY robust. We often have classes of 50 students
all hammering pages with 10 or more embedded Jmols, with no issues).
but have also been struggling to im
The question of having Jmol used on wikipedia has again been raised on
the commons email list. On contributor to the discussion says that the
jmol mediawiki extension now only works with an older version of
mediawiki. Certainly my examples at:-
http://wiki.jmol.org:81/index.php/User:Bduke
are not
r-2007 06:22
To
jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol MediaWiki extension, works in preview but not on
live page
Hi Joseph,
Can you give an URL to your wiki so that I can check myself ?
I have uploaded the latest version of JmolExtension.ph
Hi Joseph,
Can you give an URL to your wiki so that I can check myself ?
I have uploaded the latest version of JmolExtension.php on the Jmol
Wiki:
http://wiki.jmol.org:81/index.php/MediaWiki/JmolExtension.php
At the end of the mail, I have put a stripped version of my
LocalSettings.php file.
;
23-Mar-2007 19:06
To
jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol MediaWiki extension, works in preview but not on
live page
Bob Hanson wrote:
Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
If you can easily test modifications, I can try to help you
Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
> If you can easily test modifications, I can try to help you with ideas
> to make the extension working.
> I have some problems with understanding the internal workings of
> MediaWiki, and this part is really difficult (finding how to include
> the links to Jmol javascr
To
jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
cc
; }
> }
> $this->mJmolTagPresent = false;
> }
606c621,622
< $wgHooks['ParserAfterStrip'][] = $wgJmolExtension;
---
> // $wgHooks['ParserAfterStrip'][] = $wgJmolExtension;
> $wgHooks['BeforePageDisplay'][] = $wgJmolExtension;
If you can easily test modifications, I can try to help you with ideas
to make the extension working.
I have some problems with understanding the internal workings of
MediaWiki, and this part is really difficult (finding how to include
the links to Jmol _javascript_ files only once per page, an
Hi Nico. Changed line 576 as you suggested, but no joy -- the behavior is
the same.
--JRM
"Nicolas Vervelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
23-Mar-2007 15:33
To
jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol MediaWiki extension, works in pr
Hi folks. I support a small internal wiki for group use within my
company. Recently a chemist inquired about embedding Jmol within a wiki
page, and I found the Jmol MediaWiki extension:
http://wiki.jmol.org:81/index.php/MediaWiki
I installed the extension according to the instructions and fou
41 matches
Mail list logo
