HTTP/1.1 ...', only once.
WS is so friendly for network and servers. Moreover, faster on HTTP.
With Best regards, for into the good future
On 1月19日, 午前2:27, Daniel Friesen nadir.seen.f...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't like the idea. At this point there is no reason to believe that
any browser
between the
browser and the server that doesn't close after every message.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
tato wrote:
WebSockets is very faster than xhr. I think jQuery had better support
WebSockets in Core.
The following Samples of text mining are speed
would be the more
intuitive way of handling this.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
John Resig wrote:
It's not really clear what it should call - maybe it should only call
the complete request and neither the error or success. When I looked
into it recently
developers just stick with onclick events and don't bother to
replicate the actual range of interactivity with links which is click,
enter, and accesskey.
--
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
(); and $a.activate(function(e) { foo(); }); will
basically behave the same.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
jQuery Development group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery
Ugh... I was under the impression that click events only fire when you
click on something.
Aye, activate is supposed to fire in all those cases as well. Click's
current behavior now seams to really be activate in a confusingly named
guise.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http
I believe something like keypress[shift+e] was proposed in one
discussion, : conflicts with namespacing.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Jeremy Chone wrote:
Hi,
Any thought has been given on adding filter on event. For example
a) Called when enter
in just one function though.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Rick Waldron wrote:
John,
While I'm glad to see a scope arg available, i still think this is
negligent to the future of jQuery and ES standards. I really think a
fn.bind() implementation
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Daniel Friesen
nadir.seen.f...@gmail.com mailto:nadir.seen.f...@gmail.com wrote:
I made a post about how confusing people may find the name bind some
time ago. Suggested renaming bind to something like event, and keeping
bind as an alias of course
() { that.myScroll(); });
or if you add a prototype to match ES5.
this.a = '1';
$(document).bind('scroll', this.myScroll.bind(this));
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Amina wrote:
Cross-posted Jquery-group:
I am suggestion for new small feaute in jQuery.
add
with users that only use standards browsers, but have mothers
and sisters that go and click the IE icon when they want to use the
Internet.
Hmm... IE reminds me of global warming.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
DBJDBJ wrote:
http://www.infoworld.com/d/windows
.
Not really a fan of third.
Fourth, I don't think jQuery is the place for that, write a plugin.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Tobias Hoffmann wrote:
Attached are four extensions to jquery.
One is a
$.text('Test text') utility function, that simplifies cases
More like Google Groups strikes again. John already noted how bad Google
Groups is in dealing with address spoofing.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
DBJDBJ wrote:
This made me to immediately change my google password ...
And to do a deep-scan on my
!?
Now that I think about it. Did I set my auto-props right when I setup my
new laptop ages ago? I retired from major MediaWiki development before
then so I don't remember if I set it up right when I decided to checkout
the repo to do some small commits.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen
shadow to my list.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
jQuery Development group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
is used in init, and wherever else necessary to allow for this
feature to work.
--
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
jQuery Development group.
To post to this group, send email
at that point.
The thing about border radius to be careful of though is -moz's
alternate method of specifying corners.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Enrique Meléndez Estrada wrote:
Hi,
Sorry if I'm completely wrong but I'd suggest to add to the core
to the
browser.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
weepy wrote:
Hi,
I've been working an attempt to bring a packaging system to
javascript, similar to Rubygems et al
Source is here = http://github.com/weepy/bean-server
It's very straight foward. You can
(like have a second status code share the handler of
another) with easev(like adding a new case line into a switch).
~Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
On 7-Sep-09, at 3:24 PM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:08 PM, John
And I've worked on projects that don't need ajax or fx.
I think this falls under the category of wanting a buildable jQuery
where you can disable things you don't need, and enable extra features
that you might want.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name
IIRC json2 supports it... We could get around to fixing that old piece
of missing functionality in jQuery and kill two birds with one stone.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
John Resig wrote:
I'd be wary of adding that - especially since it wouldn't work
Samer Ziadeh wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 00:00, Daniel Friesen
nadir.seen.f...@gmail.com mailto:nadir.seen.f...@gmail.com wrote:
function Person() {
return Object.create(Person.prototype, {
first: { value: '' }
last: { value
undefined.first = '';
Thus rather than setting a global property which depending on your code
may not throw for awhile and leak into the global object, it'll throw
right away because it can't access/set properties on undefined.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http
not-usable stuff that only
few developers will get instantly right.
It is just my opinion.
Regards
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Daniel Friesen
nadir.seen.f...@gmail.com mailto:nadir.seen.f...@gmail.com wrote:
new Person() ES3 style:
create object, set prototype, run user code
Ya sorry.
Shame it's going away, I wanted to use it for my module inclusion
pattern server-side.
with( banana('io') )
with( banana('markup.visual.markdown') ) {
var html = MarkDown.parse(File('./foo.txt').content)
}
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name
unless you use eval.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
Daniel,
I do not think the global object as default this is an error at all,
this is my point.
What does not make sense at all is to use a this referred to an
undefined value
with fetching nodes and
setting attributes that may not be defined.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
with is another misunderstood feature of JS, imho, you have to be
truly a junior to make mistakes with that (and we all did common
{
[parent: Foo.prototype],
foo: I'm a value,
const _bar: You can't set or delete me after this,
};
}
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Samer Ziadeh wrote:
Isn't the 'new' a needed keyword?
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 08:04, Andrea
function Person() {
return Object.create(Person.prototype, {
first: { value: '' }
last: { value: '' }
});
}
You could even chose to make those non-enumerable or lock them with values.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Samer Ziadeh
it folds arrays into the list
rather than adding them as items.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Pauan wrote:
And how is it inferior to set the current item as an argument to the
callback? This is how Array.prototype.forEach works. It causes less
problems
to
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
ludovic wrote:
Hi,
I've got loops in my objects relations. Example :
var father = {
child : {}
}
father.child.father = father;
$.extends( true, {}, father ) causes a infinite loop.
Jquery should reproduce loops
= new F;
}
for ( var k in props )
o[k] = props[k];
return o;
};
})(jQuery);
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
Dunno how many times that bedge has been optimized ;-)
(function(){
var F
it, in fact it's closer to real prototype-based programming than
the `new Class` you see inside of JavaScript.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Tarini wrote:
thanks guys for you answer but I know how to use $.each in OO context...
I would like to understand why
(),
'example.stop': new Function()
});
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
ludovic wrote:
Hi all,
I propose to add the following new feature in events binding :
var o = {
start : new Function(),
stop : new Function()
}
// Will be the same as
// $(target
purposes. Like how I started my Wrench.js project as a
library providing a stdlib of array and string manipulation methods.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Már wrote:
So, would jQuery and jQuery plugin developmers benefit from having
some sort of (highly
There was another discussion on the mailing list about a plugin
authoring plugin. It actually allowed plugins that did things like
$(...).plugin().myPluginFunction().myOtherPluginFunctionWhichReturnsJQ().find(...);
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
tres
typeof fn === 'function'; // Some things like
document.createElement('object'); return wonky results
fn instanceof Function; // Breaks across iFrames
toString.call(fn) === [object Function]; // Works the same across
iFrames and returns more reliable results
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen
don't like the context idea, to me a second
‘restrict’ argument makes the most sense. keep options relevant to X
method in X method's arguments
~Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
On 23-Jul-09, at 8:08 AM, John Resig jere...@gmail.com wrote:
A big
rather than
something more useful (like a list of elements).
What about type hinting?
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
--John
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:06 PM, James Padolsey
jamespadol...@googlemail.com mailto:jamespadol...@googlemail.com
wrote
For what it's worth, `undefined` is an illegal JSON value. You could
pass undefined rather than null or an empty object because json ===
undefined would mean that the json failed since `undefined` is not a
legal json value like `null` and `{}` are.
On Jul 23, 6:33 am, Dave Methvin
)
return this.length;
return this.get(); // on a second note, it would be nice to use a
toArray() instead.
};
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
John Resig wrote:
Nope.
var obj = { valueOf: function(){ return 0; } };
!!obj
true
obj.valueOf
jQuery isn't only for web apps. It's also for smaller websites. And it'd
be a shame for show/hide to stop working in older browsers when it has
no reason to.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
DBJDBJ wrote:
@tres
Voice of reason. Thanks
@all
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4072
I believe John liked it to when I mentioned it in the mailing list.
It was one of those things on my list of things missing in jQuery compared to
the bad local framework I wrote for an app at work.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http
Not to mention it would either be broken, or be a complete hack.
$(selector, context); is actually an alias for
$(context).find(selector); And this.context isn't what was passed to
context.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Working
Renamed are best done by creating the new name and leaving the old
name around for compatibility.
This isn't a rename bind to something else and force everyone to
change it's a give a new standard name for bind leaving the old name
in place for old code so that new projects have a name
://wrench.monkeyscript.org/.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
George wrote:
Yep, I'm inclined to agree that trim() is for trimming!
The only little enhancement that I and several colleagues have often
considered is the ability to specify what character to trim off
don't know how to use one
of JavaScript's core features, closures.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
I think a generic $.browser.IE could always be useful ... sometimes we
have to deal with pixel perfection and I cannot imagine how
jQuery.ui's datepicker has parse/format support and options can be used
to localize both the datepicker and parsing/formatting.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Ricardo wrote:
Not a jQ plugin but worth a good look: http://www.datejs.com/
On Jul 2, 6:45
and check to see if
it's newer than the allinone file's timestamp and regenerate it if it is.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Samer wrote:
I found it tricky to use an automated combiner thingy in that it
doesn't know the order of the javascripts
being mixed into jQuery.
I for one have been thinking of $('...') as tag creation rather than
raw html, or thinking that jQuery did it's own quick parsing for ages.
Now I'll have to go back through 6 months of code to track down all the
code using that pattern.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen
Can we update the documentation to also note that unclosed tags aren't
supported.
Malformed html is obvious, but people don't always think of a single tag
as malformed html.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
John Resig wrote:
To be clear: jQuery supports
one.
--
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
jQuery Development group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev
.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
John Resig wrote:
You say that you still have problems if you split apart the query.
So in this case $button.append( [ ) fails - correct?
What happens if you do:
$button.append( document.createTextNode([) )
--John
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4805
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
John Resig wrote:
This is very helpful analysis. I've added it to my todo list. Could
you file a ticket with your test cases, as well? Thanks!
http://dev.jquery.com/newticket
--John
, ie8, opera, firefox, and midori.
However:
span class=foo
span class=foo
Fail in ie7 and ie8 while they work in firefox, midori, and opera.
Filed as: http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4806
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
John Resig wrote:
This is very helpful
across
browsers be accepted?
That should be something simple like checking if it starts with and
ends with , contains no other 's and doesn't have a / before the
then insert a single / before the last before continuing.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name
Regexes aren't slow. Regex stuff on strings is actually quite fast, and
from the standpoint of practical speed there is no significant difference.
An example of what you're trying to do that I could fix up would be handy.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name
triggered the
change event your onchange would be fired again... And perhaps again...
and so on. An onchange would become an easy way to accidentally create
an infinite loop within the dom that isn't desired.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
BaBna wrote:
Thanks
, etc... which work as both getters and setters.
I was under the impression that this was on the todo list, rather than
already fixed, cause I could swear I ran into this while working with
the 1.3 series.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
John Resig wrote
try using null or undefined, it's a
known issue.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
vdhant wrote:
Not really, because I have simplified my case a little and it actually
looks a little more like this:
input type=text id=TextBox10of20
Hmmm? Clarifying, has $(el).css('width', undefined).someOtherFnMethod();
been fixed?
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
John Resig wrote:
It's always a good idea to either use a ||'' or cast your data to a string
or other proper datatype when using
.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Sam Collett wrote:
IE7 does have native XMLHttpRequest, but even then jQuery does not use
it... I think because it does not work with file:// URIs.
--Sam
2009/6/6 diogobaeder diogobae...@gmail.com
mailto:diogobae
)
.appendTo('#resultspaging');
else
$('span class=page').text(i + 1).appendTo('#resultspaging');
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
androcles wrote:
Hi. I'm having some issues on jquery, specifically with safari. I
need to create dynamic
and
still keep IE6 on the machine. And there is no need to covert the old
system or test it cause you still have the old browser for that.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Jules wrote:
On Jun 5, 3:34 am, Henry rcornf...@raindrop.co.uk wrote:
On Jun 4, 5:23 pm
Yes, .andSelf() exists specifically for the case where someone wants
.find() to also include the previous selection.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Erik Beeson wrote:
I believe that's expected behavior. For your second example, I think
you'd want
;) I still see an if statement there, heh.
I prefer the conditional comments + build system approach.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
DBJDBJ wrote:
... If a user uses new $ this user simply does not truly understand/
know
JavaScript but fortunately
, if it is absent the
property is false.
Thus you use a simple [readonly] to check for the existence of the readonly
attribute. And in your case surround that with a :not() to check for things
without readonly.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
dmcmeans wrote:
Using
: left,
0: top, 1: right, 2: bottom, 3: left,
toString: function() { return [top, right, bottom, left].join(' '); }
};
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Stephen McKamey wrote:
In thinking more about the deeper problem, it seems to me an array of
the values is the right answer
See bug 4295: http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4295
Combined css properties like padding and margin are actually
inconsistent across browsers when they come from the stylesheet.
I sympathize though, I do a huge amount of css cloning myself and this
kind of thing gets in the way.
~Daniel Friesen
iframe.contentWindow.jQuery = jQuery;
create script tag and insert
jQuery(iframe).remove();
However the issue with the iframe sandbox is that the document and
whatnot isn't properly available.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
I feel called in the cause ... globalEval just
Ugh, quick, rename!
IMHO something like .document() would be better.
At some point I had a thought it would be nice to do something like:
$('#foo iframe:document body')
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Brandon Aaron wrote:
Well for example the changes I've made allow you to get
shugartweb.com is offline. Could we get a github repo or something so
the code is always available and open to work with?
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
tres wrote:
Btw, Daniel, I have changed the API to accomodate this.
jQuery.plugin.add('name', func || objectOfFuncs), will now
that there are html libaries
that do this kind of thing.
On Apr 16, 1:03 pm, Richard D. Worth rdwo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Friesen
nadir.seen.f...@gmail.comwrote:
Fact is that jQuery does support using characters like :[] by escaping
them
Barely anyone actually bothers to do it + You never said you did = We
assume you may not have done it and suggest it
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Pink Pig wrote:
On Apr 16, 1:04 am, David Zhou da...@nodnod.net wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Pink Pig
b
, April 15, 2009 9:39 am, DBJDBJ wrote:
Even better: do not use them at all , as part of an id ...
On Apr 14, 6:58 pm, Daniel Friesen nadir.seen.f...@gmail.com wrote:
[] is used for attributes. Use the backslash to escape them for use as
part of an id.
~Daniel
[] is used for attributes. Use the backslash to escape them for use as
part of an id.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Mat Brennan wrote:
Hi all,
Not sure if this is even relevant to the development side of the
group.
I've noticed if i have something such as:
input type=text
Mind showing all the code you are using?
It looks like more of a issue with other code rather than that code.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Rodney wrote:
I am having problems using something as simple as:
$(.filterable tr:odd).css(background-color, white);
table class
it. Not only that but using github you can get a nice
view of all the distributed repos and differences.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Mark Gibson wrote:
Nice one Daniel, I'll check it out when I get time - gonna have to do
a bit of a crash course in git first :)
2009/4/2 Daniel Friesen
I started a GitHub repo:
http://github.com/dantman/jquery.color/tree/master
I also added full rgb support for alpha values.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Mark Gibson wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Sorry for the delay, been on holiday. The code seems to be accessible
at present. I've done
If /this/ is a node as I expect it is in that context, it should
actually be $(this).find('.quantite');
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Gilles wrote:
Bonjour!
Stupid question, but you have made sure to wrap your code inside $
(function(){ /* your code */ }); yes?
As otherwise
Ticket has been opened: http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4461
On Mar 21, 3:15 am, Daniel Friesen nadir.seen.f...@gmail.com wrote:
At work when I was writing my own JavaScript framework (partly inspired
in API by jQuery) I ran into a number of times where I needed to grab a
series of css values
var img = $(.gallery img);
$(img).each(function() {
$(#bild_spel div ul).append( $('li/').append(this) );
});
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Gilles wrote:
For some reason your answer doesn't show on here. You might have mail
me directly, anyway if you want to insert
css rules which is what is required for :hover
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Alexandre Plennevaux wrote:
ok submitted http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4434 it's in the hands of
the jquery team to decide now.
thanks to you all for an interesting investigation !
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009
is a horrible lie.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
DBJDBJ wrote:
Can we just have next jQuery(selector, context) version throw an
exception,
IF context argument is not jQ instance or dom element exception will
be thrown. As simple as that.
I would even suggest going even further
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Gilles wrote:
Ok, I don't have the bug anymore, but my script is no longer working
(and I know why so at least I know where to look)
For information purposes all I did was changed this line
code += init.join(';')+';';
to this line and the error
Rather than an entire other function, what about just a {delay: ms} to .ajax
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Miloš Rašić wrote:
Here's a suggestion for a feature that I think would be useful to AJAX
developers. Sometimes, we need an AJAX feature that could allow a user
to cause
I was thinking of doing some work on the Color library today but it
looks like the code isn't accessible anymore.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Daniel Friesen wrote:
Just following up with a note. I didn't get around to setting up the
repo right away, and on Friday the UI on my
Example 1 is invalid jQuery.
Example 2's speed comparison to Example 3 is trivial. In fact Example 2
has an advantage to it. Do remember IE6's bug with getElementById,
jQuery's selectors have code to fix that bug.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
DBJ wrote:
// jq132-vsdoc.js, line
to not rely on any consistent return for .end() when
using it). It's even more useful when you throw widget objects into the mix.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
DBJDBJ wrote:
My question/comment : What is a CONTEXT LOGIC in jQ ? I think it
should be : dom node inside which
is
completely unnecessary anyways, you already have a jQuery object just
use .find
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
chris thatcher wrote:
I'm trying to follow this thread but it's a little loose so apologies if I'm
missing the point.
The only thing I want to disagree
anything else.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Julian Aubourg wrote:
$(node).filter('.color-black').removeClass('color-black').addClass('color-white').end()
And you find that more readable than
$(node).replaceClass('color-black','color-white') ? ;)
The main issue here is that I dunno
and get both performance and flexibility advantages.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Dave Methvin wrote:
I'm working on a patch to jQuery to make it so that initialization can
support application specific objects through extensibility.
How about if your Widget had a method like
level 2: Fixes to support
css properties in w3 draft like borderRadius and transform in as many
browsers as can handle it (^_^ Heck, we could include animation ability)
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
will this:
$('div/').appendTo(myWidget);
Because jQuery isolates itself inside of a closure to make sure that
overriding the jQuery method will not break jQuery on it's own from working.
--
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
idea has much more promise since you can
use trunk, your own get clone, individual jquery versions, and even
edit in-project versions.
--
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
it to use the array input format to avoid confusion.
Any thoughts? This worth opening an enhancement ticket?
--
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
jQuery
an enhancement ticket?
--
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
jQuery Development group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
differences (The framework I wrote was
actually inspired by jQuery) and finding various parts that can improve
jQuery, and things needing extensibility that get in the way of the
ability to cleanly use jQuery inside the app.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Cloudream wrote:
+1
And I
.
There are dozens of event types, more being added, then there are custom
and namespaced events.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
John Resig wrote:
I remember someone mentioning something like:
.unbind(*, fn)
It could also apply to other things like:
.unbind(*.foo, fn)
.bind(*, fn)
--John
,
);}});
But the idea of natural is that it can be used in more cases.
Basically it's a transition from any set property, to what it would be
like if it was unset.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
John Resig wrote:
We swap the value out to get the value, but don't unset the value
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
