Hi Karl,
Thanks a lot, that's exactly what I needed.
Freud
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Toggle-on-TR.onclick-but-not-on-content-link-tf4956507s27240.html#a14208303
Sent from the jQuery General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi;
I've sussed out a solution with cloning rows that are are part of a
form submit and I'd appreciate any feedback you might have.
Here's an image to follow along with:
http://www.hinde.net/images/jqueryhelpgraph.png
I have an application where users enroll in a class. After a search is
done,
Ok, I updated it. I made it Very jQuery.
$("input[type=checkbox]").click(function(){
divClass = $(this).attr("class");
if ($(this).is(":checked")) {
$("#" + divClass).show();
}
else if($(this).not(":checked")) {
$("#" + divClass).hide();
}
});
I refactored it three time
Hi,
I've made a custom method with addMethod to check a captcha.
Basically, the captcha image is made in php and its value is sent to a
session variable. So I make an AJAX post request to a php page which
checks the input's value against that session variable.
verify: function(value, element)
Ahh, I think I get it.
Input 1 and 2 both are controlling the first div.
Input 3 controls div 2
input 4 controls div 3
input 5 controls div 4
Yes? I can modify the demo.
Glen
On Dec 6, 2007 2:46 PM, Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This part works:
> Select X, get Div 1
> or
> Select Y, ge
I've always found the best solution is to build the navigation as you
would like it to appear without JavaScript enabled and then manipulate
it with jQuery. Since the css doesn't have to wait for the DOM to be
built like jQuery, the effects will kick in instantly.
Example:
link 1
li
To get "this" to chain with the .click() method, you need to wrap it
in $() so it looks like: $(this)
Better still, don't bother with the .each().
$("[EMAIL PROTECTED]'button'].button1").click(function(){MyFunc(this);});
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.lear
Hi all, I hope my question is not too silly... I just wanted to get a
little feedback -- basically wondering what I am doing wrong here:
..
$('#' + what).fadeOut('slow', function() {
$(this).load(this.href, {'targ': what}, function() {
$(this).fadeIn('slow');
});
});
..
Basically, I want
Rey Bango wrote:
> Splitter by Dave Methvin
>
> http://methvin.com/jquery/splitter/default.html
It's a pity there isn't an easy way to deal with "snapping" of divs to
their containing element...
Something like:
$('#div1').snap('top'); // sets width to that of container and snaps the
div to t
Basically, I got it to where I hide all visible "ul li ul" but I only
want to do that when a user hovers over the root "ul li a",
In other words, I only want it active on the first set of "ul li a",
not the sub menus.
I want "ul li ul li a" to remain visible when I hover over a "ul li ul
li a".
My question has been hijacked with another! :)
On Dec 6, 4:36 pm, "Jake McGraw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps try instead of ...>.
>
> Haven't tested, but it looks like maybe your form is trying to submit before
> the AJAX gets a chance to resolve.
>
> - jake
>
> On Dec 6, 2007 1:53 PM
I'm able to use the dynamic loading method to create an xml file via
php that gives me the list of image urls. However, i'd also like to
pull in another node from the xml file 'pid' to help me construct the
link that will be associated with each image.
the xml i'm creating is below:
11
> I ended up doing modifications to the jQuery core to make this
> possible.
Thank you for the response. I think I'll try my callback method
described (sorta) above, if no one else can come up with a better
solution. I'd rather write more code now and stay on the upgrade path!
I have a javascript function like MyFunc(btn), and I would like to
associate a click event to all my button with button1 class in the
page to this function. I tried the following code and is not working
for me:
$("[EMAIL PROTECTED]'button'].button1").each(function()
{
this.click(f
Thanks guys. I use the document.ready function. Actually, it only
happens on IE (both 6 and 7), not on Firefox or Safari.
I used the "display:none" css rule tiphipps pointed out and now I have
the opposite problem: the current menu is hidden and after a second
pops out. It's not ideal, but it's a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Although I keep coming up against the following:
>
> 1. Is jQuery going to be here for the long term?
> 2. Why not use prototype, what are the benefits of jQuery over it?
>
We're hitting those two questions on a regular basis. The first is
pretty easy to deal with -
Sadly... no.
If I were to do that then I would get double escaped data...
The code that converts an object to a serialized form is already
calling encodeURIComponent on the key names and the values... (see
http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/jquery/src/ajax.js line 454ish)
-ben
On Dec 6, 3:27
This part works:
Select X, get Div 1
or
Select Y, get Div 1
or
Select X and Y, get Div1
This part doesn't:
When X and Y are selected, Div1 is showing
If X is unselected and Y remains selected, Div1 is still showing
Basically, if X and Y are selected and then X is unselected, I want
Div1 to remai
Freudian slip, of course I had intended to either say, increases
development speed, or decreases development time. Thanks for
correcting me.
~Sean
On Dec 6, 2007 3:51 PM, tlphipps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I have to say it:
> ** > jQuery simplifies and reduces code size, and offers a
Has anyone found a way to solve this display problem on IE:
http://education.llnl.gov/jquery/bigiframe.png
Demoed here:
http://education.llnl.gov/jquery/adv_auto3.lasso
(type mod)
So that I can optimize my autocomplete, I'd like your opinion.
There are cases where there might be a couple hundred results - even if the
full name of a person is typed in (like "Miller" or "Johnson"). Most of the
time there are *that* many. But as I type, "Mi" ... "l" ... "e", the
results are
Perhaps try instead of .
Haven't tested, but it looks like maybe your form is trying to submit before
the AJAX gets a chance to resolve.
- jake
On Dec 6, 2007 1:53 PM, Marcelo Wolfgang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi list
>
> Long time lurker, first time poster, so here it goes:
>
> I have a
Ahh. Music to my ears. :-)
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Dec 6, 2007, at 3:36 PM, Dan wrote:
Thanks Karl for the modification. This works perfectly for me too!
-Dan
On Dec 6, 1:38 pm, Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Karl,
Than
Sorry, I have to say it:
** > jQuery simplifies and reduces code size, and offers a plugin
system
** > that rapidly increases development time.
I would prefer it to DECREASE my development time! :)
On Dec 6, 12:55 pm, "Andy Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dugg
>
> _
>
> From: jquery
Cool, thanks.
Now if i want to extend the $.paginator to add a function so i could don't
something like this
this.go_to_page(this.options.current_page);
would i do:
$.paginator.extend(
{
go_to_page: function(number)
{
this.option.new_pag
I dont get it. :)
Say it again as a use case:
1. click on X
2. expect results: div Y does something.
Glen
On Dec 6, 2007 11:22 AM, Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually, what I need it to do is show one instance of Div 4, not
> two. I'm using the div for a text field, so I only need to
Thanks Karl for the modification. This works perfectly for me too!
-Dan
On Dec 6, 1:38 pm, Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Karl,
>
> Thank you for making the modification. I'm trying to do the same thing
> as driven. Your modification works great in my situation.
>
> Spencer
>
> On Dec 6,
Can anyone think of a way to pass the value of a variable, not a
reference to that variable (since the value of the variable might
change after the AJAX request is sent) to an anonymous function
defined for a success callback for AJAX? Or, is the only way to do
this to have my /ajax/asset/insert c
Im puzzled by this part.. when you do something such as $
('img').ajaxStart(function(){ // code }); this is called every time
an ajax request is sent.. what if i just want it related to a specific
ajax request only? this does not seem very piratical to have
everything change at once
Do $.extend instead of $.fn.extend to get the result that you want.
--John
On Dec 6, 2007 4:02 PM, Eridius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Ok, I have looked at other code and still get get it to work
>
> (function($)
> {
> $.fn.extend(
> {
> paginator: function(options)
>
Ok, I have looked at other code and still get get it to work
(function($)
{
$.fn.extend(
{
paginator: function(options)
{
$.extend(this.options, options);
//this.go_to_page(this.options.current_page);
Sean Catchpole schrieb:
2. Why not use prototype, what are the benefits of jQuery over it?
jQuery simplifies and reduces code size, and offers a plugin system
that rapidly increases development time.
Yeah, and instead of 10 lines of pure JavaScript, it reads your mind and
produces 5000
I am doing something encodeURIComponent(url) in a wordpress plugin, would
that help?
On 12/6/07, Ben Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Sadly. That doesn't do it either.
>
> I am deliberately trying to send a ? (since the bug occurred when a
> user typed it into an input box that I use as th
aldur,
Let's see a demo, dude! :o)
-Chris
On Dec 6, 2007 9:05 AM, aldur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> $(document).ready(
>function(){
>$("#chessboard").chess();
>}
> );
>
>
>table.board{border:1px solid black}
>table.board td{
I'm trying to use the Cluetip plugin to display data on mouseover of
the tr tag. The data displayed is stored in the title attribute. It
works great in FireFox, but in IE7 the browsers default title displays
along with the Cluetip. Am I missing an option that would allow
Cluetip to override the
Thanks for the response. That plugin has equal width for all content areas.
I need my content areas to only be as wide as the content inside that
specific area.
See my example to know what im talking about:
http://architexture.ca/_burnkit/index.html
You will notice Approach is the widest, so th
Hi list
Long time lurker, first time poster, so here it goes:
I have a simple form that call a $.get, if I have a my code works but if I have a it
doesn't ... can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? here's the code:
$(document).ready(function(){
$("#btSubmit").click(fu
Shawn,
What is the order in which you're importing the js files?
Dan
On Dec 3, 7:12 pm, Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, maybe this was misleading. I have a form that looks something
> like so:
>
> Employee:
>
> Start Date: ___ #
>
> The employee
So stud jQuery coder Remy Sharp has been hiding something. Something
that he let out of the bad today. Its a new site that will help
designers become proficient in jQuery.
http://jqueryfordesigners.com/
Very stealthy Remy!
Rey...
Actually, what I need it to do is show one instance of Div 4, not
two. I'm using the div for a text field, so I only need to show one
version of it. The checkboxes showing the div are independent of each
other in value, but have the same corresponding text field which
should be filled out if eit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Well I tried it, and it seems to work, however it triggers the 'error'
handler too:
If you'd be actually using the version I pointed to, there would be an
error saying $.ajaxQueue is not a function. Please check that you are
actually using the right version.
And
Shelane Enos schrieb:
Sorry it took a while. I had a very busy day.
This example shows the focus bug:
http://education.llnl.gov/jquery/adv_auto2.lasso
This example shows the other bug:
http://education.llnl.gov/jquery/adv_auto3.lasso
This bug is the bug where the first set of results will ove
I can't seem to remember since it has been ahile since I want to do this, how
do i make a jQuery plug that i can access like
var paginator = $.paginator({/*data*/});
paginator.next_page();
//etc...
currently my code is like this:
(function($)
{
initialize= function(options)
{
Karl,
Thank you for making the modification. I'm trying to do the same thing
as driven. Your modification works great in my situation.
Spencer
On Dec 6, 9:30 am, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> The default is to return false on a link click if the href and the
> tipA
Thanks for explaining that Dave.
On 12/6/07, Equand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> yeah i'm using ajax ) thank you very much, now i see i was using
> pretty unstable selector, thank you ;)
>
> On Dec 6, 7:17 pm, David Serduke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > jQuery only takes two parameters on $()
Dugg
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Glen Lipka
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 12:53 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: [NEWS] Getting jQuery Adopted in Corporations
Wow, the "digg this story" thing worked. :)
http://dig
Wow, the "digg this story" thing worked. :)
http://digg.com/programming/Getting_jQuery_into_Big_Corporations
Glen
On Dec 6, 2007 10:12 AM, Sean Catchpole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1. Is jQuery going to be here for the long term?
> Yes, with a large and active community jQuery is in it fo
yeah i'm using ajax ) thank you very much, now i see i was using
pretty unstable selector, thank you ;)
On Dec 6, 7:17 pm, David Serduke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jQuery only takes two parameters on $(). (the second one is optional)
>
> $(expression, context)
>
> http://docs.jquery.com/Core/jQ
Possibly a styled version of the horizontal accordion plugin?
http://dev.portalzine.de/index?/Horizontal_Accordion--print
Glen
On Dec 6, 2007 10:16 AM, sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The menu needs a specific width set for the "contentwidth" portion of the
> slider.
>
> Do you know ho
I whipped a demo. Does this do what you want?
http://www.commadot.com/jquery/checkBoxShow.php
Couple of tips:
1. Try to avoid putting onclick handlers in your html. jQuery does
this really easily and makes your html easier to read.
2. getElementByID can be expressed as $("#yourID").dos
I am having trouble reproducing the error. I see a different weird
behavior.
Hover on the links or not doesnt seem to change this.
If I mouse over the column and mouseout before it finishes animating, then
it never closes.
Could you elaborate a little on the problem you are seeing?
I am in FF
G
jQuery only takes two parameters on $(). (the second one is optional)
$(expression, context)
http://docs.jquery.com/Core/jQuery#expressioncontext
so your first attempt had 3 parameters. The last one was ignored.
The second one became the context so jQuery was looking for a tag
in the string "
Sadly. That doesn't do it either.
I am deliberately trying to send a ? (since the bug occurred when a
user typed it into an input box that I use as the basis of an AJAX
request). The bug occurs because jQuery is treating =? as a special
string, but it can happen for mundane reasons, and there is
The menu needs a specific width set for the "contentwidth" portion of the
slider.
Do you know how I could make my content widths variable? or to just display
the content inside the container?
Does this make sense?
Here is a link to the code: http://architexture.ca/_burnkit/index.html
You wil
> 1. Is jQuery going to be here for the long term?
Yes, with a large and active community jQuery is in it for the long
run. Help is always easy to find.
> 2. Why not use prototype, what are the benefits of jQuery over it?
jQuery simplifies and reduces code size, and offers a plugin system
that ra
Glen Lipka wrote:
Well it sounds like you are in a better place than last week. :)
Absolutely -- thanks for your help.
danielpunt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have two unordered lists and both its listitems are draggable and
> droppable on the other list. Until this point everything is working
> exactly as it should.
>
> But, one of the lists should be sortable, and thats where it goes
> wrong. The list isn't sortable an
I'm completely versed in the show/hide options available, but have a
problem I haven't been able to figure out. I'm hoping jquery will have
the answer. I have 5 checkbox input options, the first two options
providing the same show div. For example,