I am trying to get some cross browser consistency of obtaining the
true image size.
In Firefox, there is two fields,
image.naturalWidth
image.natualHeight
IE does not recognize these fields. I think I am either over thinking
the issue, and probably not seeing something I thought jQuery
This is probably isn't a jquery question, but I am using jQuery media
plugin in this case, so I am wondering if someone can assist here.
I have a http folder with my server-side scripts for media stuff
/public/wcflash/wcflash.wcx<-- server side compiled script
for our web server
I f
I have this code below which I reduced to this for posting.
Essentially, I have a bunch of screen shots which I display in reduced
size as a block "menu" with the idea that when the user clicks
on a image, it is fully displayed in a block below
the "image menu."
What is odd is when I have the
Shelane,
I recently made changes to jQuery.autocomplete.js that doesn't require
jquery.dimensions.js and adds a exception trap for bgiframe non-
existence.
http://beta.winserver.com/public/test/MultiSuggestTest.wct
This modified verison also offers support for scrolling large list
that do
Whoa! Rey, what a different between IE and FF.
I am not interested in the half-truths in any of this, but rather what
does the test show to improve jQuery, if anything?
--
HLS
On Nov 1, 1:59 pm, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Prit,
>
> Please do a search in the archives for this
On Oct 26, 12:19 am, Eric Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, I checked into it and I have the FireFox NOSCRIPT plugin. Just too
> > dangerous out there to willy nilly allow all sites use Javascript. So
> > I turn it on on a site by site basis. NOSCRIPT puts alittle clickable
> > icon in
speed, it worked very well.
--
HLS
On Oct 25, 9:12 pm, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice, but it doesn't work under FireFox. Started IE and I was able to
> see the demo. Let me try Opera. Slow, but it worked.
>
> Good for your first plugin once you get the X-Br
Nice, but it doesn't work under FireFox. Started IE and I was able to
see the demo. Let me try Opera. Slow, but it worked.
Good for your first plugin once you get the X-Browser issues
resolved. :-)
--
HLS
On Oct 25, 5:14 pm, Eric Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 25, 8:05 am, "R. Raj
Good slides, I like - but for whom? not sure. Now I have a better
idea about prototype and comparible features, providing me some
incentive to explore prototype. I love jQuery, but its QA, in
particular consistent x-browser behavior is something to keeps
bothering me.
Anyway, the slides only sh
I am still exploring all these, but currently with the idea of
minimizing DOM and jQuery work, I have a table like so:
c1c3c3
where block initially has no rows.
The ajax call, runs a server side applet which returns the rows, a
table without the tags and this result is injected
I would like to see if I can move our server side mail tag injection
to jQuery on the client side.
I guess I am wondering if the logic I am thinking will prevent any
premature browser processing before jQuery gets to perform the
filtering.
When a message is going to be displayed on our system, t
I wrote a tip plugin for our needs and spent much of the design time
getting the cross-browser correct placement of the tip box within a
BODY container (viewport) or a user-defined viewport (a specific
id passed to the plugin settings). I think I finally got it all
worked out.
The requirements
t 13, 5:24 am, Wizzud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you make a test page available that demontrates this problem?
> And what version of IE has the problem?
>
> On Oct 13, 6:47 am, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am not sure how I missed this early in my plugi
I am not sure how I missed this early in my plugin development, but I
see it now.
For my new hover plugin, I noticed jQuery was extending the event
structure with extra mouse information such as:
event.pageY and event.pageX
and that this extended event is passed to my show and hide handlers.
Hi Mike,
I didn't analyze your code, but as I said (or maybe I was thinking of
saying it but do not) is that JavaScript, to me, a guy is extremely
strict and high software quality development practices, promotes bad
coding habits. I say that because I have already caught myself doing
stuff that
) break;//done
> > copy[i] = cache[i];
> > copy.length++;
> >}
> >cache = copy;//replace the old cache
>
> > }
>
> > The other option is to have 2 parallel arrays of keys and values...
> > Hope that helps.
>
> > Ariel Fl
ociated name with the array index.
Thanks
--
HLS
On Oct 11, 4:26 am, "Michael Geary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Pops
>
> > Is this the only way to iterate through an object?
>
> > for ( x in myObject) {
> > }
>
> Ultimately
Is this the only way to iterate through an object?
for ( x in myObject) {
}
and how can you remove an field in an object?
For example:
var obj = {
x1: 1123,
x2: 212,
x3: 123131
};
I want to remove obj.x2 the obj object to end up with:
{ x1: 1123, x3: 1
as setting?
var settings = {
...
show: "slideDown".
speed: 50,
...
};
$box[ settings.show || 'show' ](settings.speed);
Correct?
--
HLS
On Oct 9, 1:49 am, "Michael Geary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > F
:
xxx.apply(x,[y,z]);
>From what I am understanding, x is "this" inside the function xxx and
x,y is the parameter to the function?
Is that correct in general when using .apply? or am I off base
completely?
---
HLS
On Oct 9, 1:49 am, "Michael Geary" <[EMAIL PROTEC
I am completing a new plugin where I have a function JSON option to
fade in instead of just show(). So the code is:
settings.fadeIn?$box.fadeIn():$box.show();
settings.fadeIn is passed as a true or false value in the plugin
function settings parameter:
var settings = {
..
Thanks rey, this is good enough. I just needed something for our
automated build/distribution process.
-
HLS
On Oct 8, 9:24 am, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pops,
>
> Check out YUI compressor:
>
> http://www.julienlecomte.net/blog/2007/08/13/introducing-th
What I can download to pack and "minified" my javascript code?
Thanks
Tim,
Try wrapping a try/catch around it to see if there any untrapped
error:
try {
your stuff
} catch(e) {
alert(e.message?e.message:e);
}
Also, if you are using FireFox, install FireBug debugger plugin which
will give you alot of debugging information with the ajax call.
--
HLS
tion: "open2space",
start: new Date("2007-09-24 18:14:00"),
end: new Date("2007-09-24 22:14:00"),
duration: "4",
work_type: "Programming",
project: "simpleTracker",
description: "Tst 10" }
]});
jsonp (
I did the following to make it work:
I wrapped the data as such:
MyJSON({
items: [
your items here
]
});
then I created a function:
Function MyJSON(data)
{
var json = data.items;
var tbl = "";
tbl += "";
tbl += "Id";
tbl += "Client";
tbl += "Project";
tbl += "Start";
tbl += "E
there is a truncate plugin ... yup, there
> > is (http://www.reindel.com/truncate/). I'm not sure if that helps
> > or not.
>
> > --
> > Brandon Aaron
>
> > On 9/22/07, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Brandon,
>
> > Maybe you can assist here as
; $this.remove();
> // remove the element from the jQuery collection
> return false;
> }
> // Otherwise keep the element in the jQuery collection
> return true;
>
$this.remove();
> // remove the element from the jQuery collection
> return false;
> }
> // Otherwise keep the element in the jQuery collection
> return true;
> });
>
&
l.
--
HLS
On Sep 22, 1:39 pm, "Brandon Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The .not and .filter methods only run against the matched elements within
> the jQuery collection. In order to filter all elements you will need to add
> all elements to the collection. I think something l
I noticed some example using something like so:
data = $(data).not("style, meta, link, script, title");
to filter out thes tags.
I tried using this to filter img as well:
data = $(data).not("style, meta, link, script, title, img");
and what I noticed is that this doesn't work if the elem
I'm wondering if there a CSS gradient filter for FF/Mozilla like there
is for IE?
Here is an old Microsoft example for IE that I just changed using
jQuery.
http://beta.winserver.com/public/test/demo-gradient.wct
--
HLS
IGEST + COOKIE combined authentication logic. Its a "trick"
used to force the browser credentials to be released. IE 6.0 now
includes a Javascript command to release credentials.
--
HLS
On Sep 19, 8:42 am, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 19, 6:22 am, "Erik Bees
On Sep 19, 6:22 am, "Erik Beeson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know 410 isn't exactly made for this, but I'm wondering if there are
> any side effects to the technique in generally, and specifically to
> using 410. Would something else be more appropriate? Are there other
> techniques for dealin
played normally, and with js on, the css will be added and, in your
> case, hide the elements you want to be hidden..
>
> http://www.bobbyvandersluis.com/articles/dynamicCSS.php
>
> dennis.
>
> Pops wrote:
> > Now that I finding myself doing the following in a few areas, I do
Erik,
Are you asking if using 410 is appropiate here?
--
HLS
On Sep 18, 5:43 pm, "Erik Beeson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been thinking about using HTTP Status codes and a global ajax event to
> deal with session timeouts. Here's a little example:
>
> http://erikandcolleen.com/erik/proje
Now that I finding myself doing the following in a few areas, I don't
quite like it for a finalization of the code.
Basically, for the most part, a good bit of my jQuery usage is to add
dynamic toggling of current views already established in various pages
in our package.
In some cases, I want t
sionSection").click(function() {
> $(this).nextUntil("tr.versionSection").toggle();
>
> });
>
> And here is John's test page:
>
> http://dev.jquery.com/~john/jquery/test/nextuntil.html
>
> Hope that he
I have a table with some is used as divide other rows:
...
..
..
..
..
...
..
..
etc.
In lieu of changng the HTML page, I want to see if I can find the
after each class="versionSection" row. I want to do a toggler for
each section.
//-
Not a jQuery method but a String "replace" method. Try this:
var s = $().text();
s.replace(/\n/g,"");
---
HLS
On Sep 18, 12:03 pm, Mike Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any jquery functions that can take a text value and convert
> any newlines to tags?
I am wondering if there is a better solution than looking for a
"onMinimize/OnMaximize" events.
Basically, I have a hidden container with a tag that
was injected with a button click. Once injected the applet is auto-
activated.
If the page is minimized and restored, the applet is reactivated
a
and
> probably identically in the case where the container
> element is already empty.
>
> -Mike
>
> > From: Pops
>
> > hmm, seems to work now. Never mind.
> > On Sep 16, 2:57 pm, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Why do I need to .append() to a
hmm, seems to work now. Never mind.
--
HLS
On Sep 16, 2:57 pm, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do I need to .append() to a container rather than use .html() for
> tags?
>
> function PlayAudioWav(src)
> {
>var s = "";
>if (jQuery.browser
Why do I need to .append() to a container rather than use .html() for
tags?
function PlayAudioWav(src)
{
var s = "";
if (jQuery.browser.msie) {
s += '';
} else {
s += '';
s += '';
s += '';
}
//$("#divAudio").html(s); // html() does not work, use append()
computed style from its parent
--
HLS
On Sep 15, 11:34 pm, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 10:17 pm, "Erik Beeson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Oh, just read your message again. I'd say make your "widget" page fix
> > itsel
Thanks Mike. I tried this but I think we need to get the
"computedStyle" not sure if that is correct, but that seems to return
something.I think I have it (close) but it comes back in rgb
format which I need to convert, I think. Style exploring. :-)
--
HLS
On Sep 15, 10:45 pm, "Michael Ge
On Sep 15, 10:17 pm, "Erik Beeson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, just read your message again. I'd say make your "widget" page fix
> itself. I'm not sure how cross platform this is, but cursory testing
> indicates that you can do:
>
> if(window.parent == window) {
> // standalone page
>
>
I have a master-detail display with an iframe to display the detail.
The iframe URL is autonomous in that it was originally designed to be
displayed in its own page and hence it has its own style sheet.
What I would to do is automatically change the style sheet (colors
mostly) of the iframe cont
On Sep 12, 11:13 pm, "Brandon Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/12/07, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IMO, whatever excuse there is, this pattern of showing a lack of
> > backward compatibility, altered method behavior pattern with the
> >
Hi,
You are not clear on what the issue is, "waiting for Ajax response"
Are you saying that you don't see anything?
I'm working on a jQuery Ajax improvement and I can't wait to finish it
up and get it releases as a plugin replacement. It resolves quite a
few issues with the jQuery AJAX implemen
Alex,
For what it is worth, I was able to confirm with three recent working
v1.1.4 treeview applications are now no longer working "the same"
when I simply change the
Yes thank you.
Incidently, I just found a .wrapText() method in the jQuery
MoreSelectors plugin that does the same thing!
// Plugin to wrap html around non-empty text node(s) within an
element:
// (ignores text in child elements)
// Eg: $("LI").wrapText("")
// B
On Sep 8, 10:09 pm, "Piotr Petrus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, now that's big. I'd try just this:
>
> $('ul > li').each(function() {
> if (this.firstChild && this.firstChild.nodeType == 3) {
> $(this.firstChild).wrap('')
> }})
So you can wrap() this.firstC
On Sep 8, 6:38 am, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For my List tree plugin, it needs to handle situations where the
> structure contains LI tags with text and not text wrapped with a HTML
> tag (normally a A tag)
>
> ...
>
> So short of removeNode()/createNode,
For my List tree plugin, it needs to handle situations where the
structure contains LI tags with text and not text wrapped with a HTML
tag (normally a A tag)
For example:
title
...
...
My CSS and tree code handles it nicely when the text wrapped with a
Hi,
I took a moment to look are your stuff and I am not sure what you are
expecting.
Of course your jQuery version will be slower than your native
version.
I personally think it can reduced tremedously, there is alot of
overhead in there for a rather simply application. I can see
immediately t
I have a tree with I noticed that when the UL are collapsed, with IE
there is "visible space" where with FF there is none.
The solution for me was to add logic in my initialization code:
function prepareTree(idTree)
{
...
//
// IE Needs this to remove "whi
On Sep 7, 6:31 pm, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some random helpful hints. (or not)
All comments are helpful even if it may not apply. These do
apply! :-)
> $("ul:visible") gives you just the ones that are not display:none.
Ok! I was using .is(":hidden")
> $("ul.open") might b
Ok, got it!
$("[EMAIL PROTECTED]").show().parents("ul").show();
Duh! It reads so logical from left to right!
That gives me the exact number of elements and show() events!
With my real tree many list, its a major different in speed!
--
HLS
On Sep 7, 5:14 pm, Pops <[
Item 1.3
---
HLS
On Sep 7, 4:49 pm, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That worked! Perfect! Thanks!
>
> I did get an idiom to work but it was returning too many recursive
> elements:
>
> var $v = $("[EMAIL PROTECTED] :first-ch
d that .parents(filter) will continue to
propapate upward! That's perfect!
Thanks again
--
HLS
On Sep 7, 4:10 pm, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about this? (in the open function)
> $(this).parents("ul").show();
>
> Glen
>
> On 9/7/0
I have a tree list and when I toggle a deep item to expand/show, I
want all its parents to expand as well. What selector or method will
give me this?
I guess this is expanding the sub-tree which I can do natively, but
would like to do it via jQuery.
TIA
--
HLS
On Sep 6, 4:50 am, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pops wrote:
> > Sorry if I am a dounce, but I still don't see the invalidity of it.
>
> > Do you have an example to show how this is incorrect in relationship
> > to anything (DOM? CSS?) ?
>
blah
>
> blah
>
>
>
>
> But these are invalid:
>
>
>
> blah
>
>
>
>
> blah
>
> blah
>
>
>
> Browsers probably attempt to twist the invalid code into a valid
> format, but you can&#x
Klaus,
Today, this has thrown me for a loop:
> Is that reallly the HTML? If so, it is invalid and you cannot expect any
> selector to be reliable in any browsers. I'm not refering to the missing
> slashes in the closing tag - I assume you just left them out in the
> example here -, but the incor
On Sep 5, 4:11 am, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is that reallly the HTML? If so, it is invalid and you cannot expect any
> selector to be reliable in any browsers. I'm not refering to the missing
> slashes in the closing tag - I assume you just left them out in the
> example here -,
o inject an hidden div with id
that might conflict with yours?
Thanks for your comments.
--
HLS
On Sep 5, 4:36 am, "Aaron Heimlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/5/07, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > No, I am not describing CSS.
>
> Perhap
On Sep 5, 2:40 am, "Aaron Heimlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/5/07, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yes, $('#foobar') returns the 1st one, but you can have as many
> > id="foobar" your applications needs and
On Sep 4, 2:53 pm, "Andy Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One issue though...$('#foobar') would only return the first occurrence of
> foobar because it uses getElementbyID which returns the first occurrence.
> That's desired behavior as there should only ever be one ID of a certain
> name
DIVs, etc, the long way :-)
--
HLS
On Sep 4, 5:44 pm, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pops wrote:
> > You can so do multiple selects, like find all divs and h3
>
> > $('div h3')
>
> > but if you use the comma:
>
> > $('di
On Sep 4, 2:42 pm, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can so do multiple selects, like find all divs and h3
>
> $('div h3')
>
> but if you use the comma:
>
> $('div,h3')
>
> that says find the H3 tag that is within div, I think
I kn
On Sep 4, 10:11 am, "Andy Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hrm...
>
> But that didn't work. So I'm wanting to learn HOW I can do this sort
> of thing and a tutorial on these methods would help immensely.
Have you tried the interactive Selector tester tool?
http://www.woods.iki.fi/interac
Andy,
I'm not selector expert (yet), but this worked for me:
var $l = $('label').filter(function() {
return $(this).html() != " ";
});
---
HLS
On Sep 4, 10:11 am, "Andy Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hrm...
>
> That didn't seem to work. Using this HTML:
>
> A
> N
>
> D
> Y
>
> Wit
I pressed SEND to fast before correcting some typos and adding some
needed clarification:
Here is the general rule of thumb:
Use POST when the data:
1) Produces a command line over 1024 characters.
GET has its line limits. Do not assume all servers will accept
anything much longer than that
Duncan,
Here is the general rule of thumb:
Use POST when the data:
1) Produces a command line over 1024 characters (GET has its line
limits)
2) Complex and by I mean:
-
- > think it will do no harm. GET operations change state, and links
> > that change state are confusing to u
Done John.
Thanks
--
HLS
On Sep 2, 2:09 pm, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you post this to the jquery-dev list as opposed to the general
> discussion list? Thanks.http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev
>
> --John
>
> On 9/2/07, Pops <[
Hi,
A number of folks have independently come across this issue. What I
would like to hear from John Resig or from other team members if the
change was intentional? and why?
In short, what I found is that $(document).ready() behaves differently
in 1.1.4 for FF and IE.
In appears to me that the
; http://jquery.com/blog/2007/08/24/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-...
>
> --Erik
>
> On 9/1/07, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Kevin,
>
> > Thats interesting. I just switched it to 1.1.3 and I now see what you
> > were talking about. Oh
Kevin,
Thats interesting. I just switched it to 1.1.3 and I now see what you
were talking about. Oh gosh, you weren't making things up. :-)
I have to keep this mind for future stuff when we begin to embed
current html with native DOM reference statements.
--
HLS
On Sep 1, 10:44 am, <[EMAIL P
On Aug 31, 6:38 pm, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as you suggested and while it does run the alert message, it
> still fails out on the document.getElementByID in the destination
> page with the same error: TypeError: document.getElementById("blah1")
> has no properties
>
> Would you be able to
On Aug 31, 4:51 pm, "Michael Geary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here is a example JSON:
>
> > var json = {
> > fields:
> > [
> >{prompt1: "Login Name"},
> >{prompt2: "Real Name"},
> >{prompt3: "Location"},
> >{prompt4: "Password"},
> >{prompt5: "Security Group"},
> >
On Aug 31, 2:37 pm, "John Beppu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2) Best way to create a toJSON() string or object.
>
> anyObject.toSource()
Hi John,
Yes, at first, that is what I thought and at first, i said "Ah ha!,
thats it!"
But its not quite right for all situations and worst, atleast up
On Aug 30, 5:25 am, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simulating block scope in which you can safely use the $ shortcut...
Ok, and now that I came across the need, I saw you and Michael talk
about this.
Before I discovered jQuery 3 weeks ago, I discovered the simple
"alias" trick for $
On Aug 30, 4:45 pm, Mitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am so pleased you took the time to look closely at my project. Your
> analysis is perfect, but I do have some questoins below. Some may
> sound dumb because I am so new to all this.
My pleasure. I learning from all this too. :-)
> >
> >
Michael Geary wrote:
> > IE doesn't like:
> >
> > json = {};
> >
> > but will accept:
> >
> >var json = {};
>
> Let me take a guess...
>
> You are executing this code inside a function, and you have an HTML element
> in your page with the id 'json'.
> ...
> Did I get it right?
Gawd, I sh
Michael Geary wrote:
> > I figured it out know. You got to look at the constructor type to see
> > if its an Object, Array or String. From there you can decide to use
> > for each or for in or for loop.
>
> You don't have to write that code yourself:
>
> http://jollytoad.googlepages.com/json.j
Sean wrote:
> Oh, I just tried it and actually you're right! Bummer. It worked in
> the code I was using, anyway ;-)
>
> That behavior actually doesn't make much sense to me; it doesn't seem
> like, in practive, you'd ever have immediate siblings that could be
> some class (or whatever) that yo
Klaus Hartl wrote:
> Yes, there is a direct method, just use a for loop:
>
> for (var key in json) {
> console.log(key); // key
> console.log(json[key]); // value
> }
>
> Maybe I didn't get the question right?
Hi Klaus,
Ok, Now I see why I asked the question. Yes, I did try the abov
Klaus Hartl wrote:
> I'm going to answer the first question (low hanging fruit)...
:-)
> Yes, there is a direct method, just use a for loop:
>
> for (var key in json) {
> console.log(key); // key
> console.log(json[key]); // value
> }
>
> Maybe I didn't get the question right?
I don
Kevin, I am not sure why you get this property error, but I believe
that the blah1 script will not be evaluated when you go native with
getElementById().
Atleast not here when I did a quick emulated test of your code.
However, changing it to:
$("#destDiv1").html(thehtml);
worked perfectly, wit
Now that getting a handle on the JS/jQuery language, I have these
basic questions
1) For an JSON object, how do you get the key name?
Example
var json = {field1: "data2", field2: "data2"};
I know how to get the data, but how do you get the field names? IOW, I
want to get the names of the keys
I see you have a typo and wrong id?
$("#commentform form").submit(function(){
var uname = $("#commenter").val();
^^ wrong id?
var email = $('#email').val();
var url = $('#website').val();
Thinking about this, ideally, this would the way a "ideal JS/DOM/HTML"
system would behave:
function divConstructor(self) {
...
}
What happens now is that when the page is being rendered (spit out by
the server and received by the browser), when DOM sees elements like
tis with the onC
Rey, I think, if its the same thing I am thinking would be where many
developers and working sites mix up HTML and
example. What would be its purpose to
have this wrap?
---
HLS
On Aug 30, 4:37 am, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whoa! I thought I was beginning to understand this stuff, and
> then.
>
> Ok, I thought that this piece of JS code in the tag like so:
>
&
Whoa! I thought I was beginning to understand this stuff, and
then.
Ok, I thought that this piece of JS code in the tag like so:
(function($) {
... Does it see HTML tags? ...
})(jQuery);
html tags ..
That the whole purpose of (function($) {.. })(jQuery) was so it
Mitch,
I have to say - excellent job, very nice. I do have some comments,
and this is not just you but nearly all the web 2.0 sites:
- No Javascript
Since it depends on JavaScript, and you don't want to make it work in
web 1.0, then add the following:
This site requires JavaScript to be enab
r with the URL paths are
different. Not just with XHR.
So I need to continue looking to see if this can be solved for
FireFox.
Any "time saving" comments would be appreciated. :-)
---
HLS
On Aug 29, 6:01 pm, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm pulling my hair on this
I'm pulling my hair on this one. It might not be a jQuery issue but
just the BROWSER issue. But since I am planning to use jQuery, the
issue applies to it as well.
First, this is under FIREFOX only. I don't see this behavior with IE
and OPERA. But I think maybe it may something by FF design an
Thanks mike
On Aug 29, 3:21 pm, "Michael Geary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Pops
>
> > This might be slightly off topic, a javascript script
> > question, but its being applied to jQuery. :-)
>
> > Ok, there is a different in other languag
1 - 100 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
