as it can be
implemented using cross-platform
>APIs with any vendor (this has been a genuine
advantage for me...).
>Remember however that Java is still more or less
proprietary technology
>too... For the time being at least though, Sun are
doing a good job,
>evolving Java in the right d
Yours,
Nasser Dassi
Software & Internet Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Openmindedness Rewards A Lifetime"
- Original Message -
From: "christopher brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 3:56 AM
Subject: R
The key issue here is which parts of .NET are they going to port? I very much doubt
they'll port ASP+ anywhere other than Windows, so JSP will remain the only choice
for cross-platform development of this type. They'll probably just port their very
limited CLR (without the .NET libraries) to Linux
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: JSP vs. ASP+
> ASP+ copies almost JSP identically.
>
> When you modify a JSP page, the JSP engine compiles it into a servlet,
> running under a JVM (Java Virtual Machine). Unless the JSP page is
modified
> aga
ons...
-Christopher Brown
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Sankowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 12:50 AM
Subject: jsp vs asp+
some guys from my company went to a m$ asp+ users group presentation here in
denver a couple
some guys from my company went to a m$ asp+ users group presentation here in
denver a couple of months ago. they were told that asp+ is compiled,
supports a bunch of different languages (like perl??), has built in support
for soap/xml, has some kind of page caching feature, has process recycling,
Hi All,
Can u please explain clearly each and every difference between jsp & asp? TIA,
Som
===
To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff JSP-INTEREST".
Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
> Now here's another take on this issue. Who is working on the project
and
> what are their skills? Our company had (has) a problem where we have
alot of
> ASP programmers and we are looking at a few projects that will require
the
> ability to handle a killer load (milions a day if we're lucky).
P
JSP is an (relatively) open-standard that can run on a variety of
platforms (e.g. there are servlet and JSP engines from a variety of
vendors including open-source projects at www.apache.org).
ASP (in reality JSPs primary competitor) is a proprietary standard
from Microsoft. It runs best on IIS a
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Sam LeBlanc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're starting a new web project and are trying to figure out which
> technology we should use. Could you offer up some opinions on why we
> might use JSP instead of ASP or Cold Fusion.
Scalability, portability, reliability. Can't speak for ASP,
Behalf Of Sam LeBlanc
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 5:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JSP vs. ASP & Cold Fusion
Hi,
We're starting a new web project and are trying to figure out which
technology we should use. Could you offer up some opinions
Hi,
We're starting a new web project and are trying to figure out which
technology we should use. Could you offer up some opinions on why we
might use JSP instead of ASP or Cold Fusion.
Thanks,
Sam
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online w
It depends on the type of web apps you are developing.
If you are just porting your old apps into N-tier web apps, ASP is a much
faster and easier approach. Why? You only have to recompile (and of course,
do some debugging) your source codes into ActiveX dlls (provided they are
developed in VB, V
"Hans Bergsten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2000 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: JSP vs. ASP
> Dmitri Namiot wrote:
> >
> > The big plus for ASP is database integration (ADO).
> > It is much more easy to create DB-relat
Dmitri Namiot wrote:
>
> The big plus for ASP is database integration (ADO).
> It is much more easy to create DB-related pages
> (I did not compare in same time here performance and
> quality of such deal).
IMHO that is not an advantage of ASP over JSP. JSP 1.1 let you
define custom actions, and
The big plus for ASP is database integration (ADO).
It is much more easy to create DB-related pages
(I did not compare in same time here performance and
quality of such deal).
ColdJava: java server side programming
http://coldjava.hypermart.net
___
both (I'm in my first serious JSP
project too).
- Original Message -
From: "Edward Pearson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 4:06 PM
Subject: JSP vs. ASP
> Hello list! This is my first posting and I'm a new
gt;
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 09:52:17 -0600
Reply-To: John Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: A mailing list about Java Server Pages specification and
reference <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: John Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: JSP vs. ASP
Comments: To: David Geary <[E
06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Deepak Goel
Subject:JSP vs. ASP
Hello list! This is my first posting and I'm a newbie to JSP. Actually,
I
know very little about it. We're using NT servers and running Active
Server
Pages (ASP) web applications with SQL 7.0 as our back-end data
Hello list! This is my first posting and I'm a newbie to JSP. Actually, I
know very little about it. We're using NT servers and running Active Server
Pages (ASP) web applications with SQL 7.0 as our back-end database server,
however, we're not thrilled with the performance. I'm wondering if an
Geary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 9:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: JSP vs. ASP
>
>
> I just finished reading Sun's "Comparing JavaServer Pages and
> Microsoft
> Active Server Pages Technologies" article from the Java
> JSP is language specific but platform independent, whereas ASP is
> language independent and platform specific. Language independence is
> probably quite an advantage for companies with legacy systems, whereas
> platform independence seems to be somewhat of a dubious advantage
> because of the f
topic.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Geary [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 9:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: JSP vs. ASP
>
> I just finished reading Sun's "Comparing JavaServer Pages and Microsoft
> Active Server Pa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: David Geary
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 10:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: JSP vs. ASP
>
> I just finished reading Sun's "Comparing JavaServer Pages and Microsoft
> Active Server Pages Technologies" ar
David Geary wrote:
> I just finished reading Sun's "Comparing JavaServer Pages and Microsoft
> Active Server Pages Technologies" article from the Java Web site -- see
> http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/jsp-asp.html.
>
> The article claims that Java provides superior performance over
> interpreted
L PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 9:01 PM
Subject: JSP vs. ASP
<< snipped >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.1 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOCSGoZaPN/z+dlkyEQJj
--- Michael Dinsmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ASP allows the use of
> ActiveX COM objects (C++, VB, Java, etc.) which are
> _definitely_ compiled.
One note, Java COM objects are NOT compiled (at least if you're
using J++ to create them). AFAIK, MS hasn't released a native
code Java compi
More $0.02:
The real problem with ASP is that the scripting languages (VB and
JScript) are not object-oriented, and are not type checked at compile
time. This means that you will only discover mis-matches between COM
functions and ASP code when you exhaustively test each page.
The lack of object
I figured I'd throw my $0.02 in since I saw some mistruth spoken about this:
ASP code gets compiled by IIS and gets stored in its memory cache. I
wouldn't say compiled into C++, but whatever internal mechanism the MS
decided to do -- I haven't heard exactly what it is). ASP allows the use of
Ac
> From: Mike McElligott [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 1999 5:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: JSP vs. ASP
>
> Hi all. I've seen this thread before, but in the posts I've read it never
> really got answered. My understanding is that ASP is c
> -Original Message-
> From: Nic Wise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 1999 1:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: JSP vs. ASP
>
>
> Mike McElligott wrote:
> >
> > Hi all. I've seen this thread before, but in the
Mike McElligott wrote:
>
> Hi all. I've seen this thread before, but in the posts I've read it never
> really got answered. My understanding is that ASP is compiled via C++ and
> that JSP is, of course, interpreted. Does anyone have numbers on what the
you must be JOKING (sorry :) )
If yo
Hi all. I've seen this thread before, but in the posts I've read it never
really got answered. My understanding is that ASP is compiled via C++ and
that JSP is, of course, interpreted. Does anyone have numbers on what the
actual performance differences are? If ASP is significantly faster than
AIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: A mailing list about Java Server Pages specification and reference
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Geary
Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 7:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JSP vs. ASP
I just finished reading Sun's "Comparin
I just finished reading Sun's "Comparing JavaServer Pages and Microsoft
Active Server Pages Technologies" article from the Java Web site -- see
http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/jsp-asp.html.
The article claims that Java provides superior performance over
interpreted scripting languages. Of course
35 matches
Mail list logo
