, 12.1X45-D25, 12.1X46-D20,
12.1X47-D10, 12.2R8, 12.3R6, 13.1R4, 13.2R4, 13.3R2, 14.1R1, and all
subsequent releases (i.e. all releases built after 14.1R1).
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA
delete from the top level of the
config.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
And then start making sure UDP/123 is blocked in your lo0 firewall
filters.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
overview documentation
explaining what the default rate-limits are for each type, but I'm not
finding it.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
with it anyways, even turning on NSR caused nothing but problems.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
on the floor and forcing
people into other solutions with other vendors. I really can't imagine
that the benefit of selling an extra MX240 chassis, even if sold at
regular price, is worth the money being lost from everyone else.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e
tin.
I begged them to do this right when that box first came out, but there
were no takers. They cripple it in software so the XRE can't be made to
run rpd stand-alone and act as a route reflector.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID
auto-bandwidth calculations?
This issue causes one of the biggest problems with auto-bandwidth on
Juniper, the lack of L2 overhead in the counters makes it possible for
high-pps traffic like a DoS attack to be completely invisible to RSVP,
causing uncompensated for congestion.
--
Richard
), but there aren't any corrosponding drops on the mqchip
fi counters or show chassis fabric statistics, plus none of them are
MX960 + 16-port MPC so they should be getting full fabric capacity
anyways. Does an MQ drop count as a fabric drop maybe?
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
.
:)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper
in exactly the same way, so I'm going to guess
that no other large network dares to run NSR either. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
is 14.88Mpps, and when you suddenly can't do more than
4Mpps per port because of a couple dozen flowspec rules, I consider this
a BIG problem. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
useful tools for blocking, as Chris indicated, but nobody needs to
block 800K /32s.
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2011-January/030051.html
Still has the same issue. Juniper has basically let Flowspec bit-rot
into complete uselessness since Pedro left.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r
760875(top) 4766 1 xe-4/1/0.0
idx:xx xx.xx.142.62 Push 262153, Push 792036, Push
691439(top) 3473 1 xe-4/1/0.0
Any ideas, about this or about troubleshooting the forwarding plane for
VPLS in general? Other than that VPLS just sucks... :)
--
Richard
, but alas lack of common sense knows no bounds. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
on the
device, the more you'll see that it totally stalls the installation of
routes into the FIB. At this point I can't describe it as anything less
than a major architectural flaw which Juniper is completely powerless to
fix.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
MX80 existed.
I dunno what he's complaining about, JTAC solved the issue in less than a
year, so he's already ahead of the curve. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
in anything less than an hour, even if I turn
off most of the BGP sessions so it converges faster. Either stop
carrying so many routes (14x full tables = you're screwed), or go buy a
Cisco. :(
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 03:43:33PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 01:59:55 AM Richard A Steenbergen
There is a serious issue with MPLS RSVP auto-bandwidth in
10.4R9, which can cause the reservation calculations to
be off by quite a bit. The least broken code we've
, for example the proceed button at the bottom of the
EULA acceptance is non-functional in lynx or elinks if you're trying to
download your JUNOS images via a unix shell.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF
to be off by quite a bit. The
least broken code we've found so far is 10.4S9, I'm surprised they
haven't done an R10 yet.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:19:01PM -0400, Chris Morrow wrote:
counting is hard... let's go shopping?? wtf?
Yeah, it's not like we need to bill customers with these routers or
anything. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC
... bullshit, I can't believe we're not
able to use even a calculator these days... even highschool exams
allow calculators!
I don't remember any of this on any Juniper exams I've ever taken, but
if you can't do simple binary-hex-decimal math you have bigger
problems. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r
it now
that I've taunted them though (I can think of at least 5 or 6 usual
suspects who probably know this off the top of their head :P), so just
consider the above as generic advice for when this question comes up
again in the future. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http
rebuild on the hw and makes the badness go away. And just
consider yourself lucky that it doesn't cause the FPCs to crash when you
reorder firewall terms like on EX8200 running 11.1R5. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59
to maintain an inventory of everything and still sell them
at close to wholesale prices. There just isn't any money in it, which
is why everyone who cares self-spares (often with the help of tuneables
as universal donors) .
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG
showstopper bugs in a bugfix-only code train even at
10.4R8, maybe this is a bad idea.
I really don't know what else to say about this issue, other than:
*SIGH*
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF
.
FWIW they've actually had serious problems interoperating correctly with
copper SFPs from other vendors, on EX and MX. There are still unsolved
issues with ports showing link state up despite nothing being plugged
in. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
SFP+'s seem to not set off the NON-JNPR flag in
EX without any additional hackery required, though I have no clue at all
if they'd work properly in a QFX.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA
components.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
as much demand for people doing the former, but they're still
probably justified in blocking the duplicate serial #'s of Cisco
products.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
some logic behind it.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
then? :)
It would almost be funny, if it wasn't so tragic.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
device doesn't speak CDP), and thus discards.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
Juniper to provide a more
extensive list, but it's pretty safe to assume that nothing about the
config you mentioned above will be impacted by DPC non-E's at all.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41
0 0 0
HOST_DROP_CNTR0 0 0
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
interest in providing some software assistance.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
classify as serious at any rate).
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
unwilling to consider cost when designing their architecture,
until they go bankrupt of course. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
ACTUALLY trying to make a cheaper LSR. :)
If more people used MPLS, and if some competetive vendor could figure
out how to write all the protocols for it to run on a small/cheap box,
the core router market could get REALLY interesting.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http
this opportunity to
offer an extreme DIAF to whoever butchered the use of the word
modular on these products!) for exactly this reason. But I've been
told there are no immediate plans to actually add any support for it in
software, if ever. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
it. :) PTX is also priced very similarly to MX hardware, so while it
may indeed be cheaper than T, that doesn't really mean much (except
for which Juniper business unit gets the revenue :P). It's not anything
revolutionary, that one is still waiting to happen.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e
.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:52:45PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Dear Juniper,
You guys broke your mime types again, at least for all the 10.4S6.6
service release URLs. :)
Sigh... I know nobody wants to bother trying to be standards compliant
or testing things on any platform other
have already destroyed the RE, and thus
are completely ineffective at defending the boxes from attack. The only
way to correctly block control plane traffic on EX is with ingress
filters on real intefaces (or RVIs).
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG
in the days of Junos 5, 6, 7 and 8.4, as they
say, Those were the days.
About as good as Cisco is where I'd put things today on the code
reliability scale. Not to say that I'm happy with that state of
affairs, but as Homer would say, urge to kill... fading :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e
when it would boot. You
could show int terse gr-#/#/# and they just wouldn't be there, no
matter what the config was, etc. I'd have more reliable internet at home
if I had a Linksys. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59
Dear Juniper,
You guys broke your mime types again, at least for all the 10.4S6.6
service release URLs. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
to 10.4S6, or wait for
10.4R7.
We hit this bug on several MX devices running junos 64 at the 49 day
mark. 10.4R7 isn't due until October, so if you're running the new REs
you probably want to go with S6.6 for the fix.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key
to the other platforms.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 07:33:20AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
I'd rather they slip and put out well tested, stable code than to just
release what they have on a specific time schedule.
Don't worry, they can still find a way to fail at both.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
and successfully ignores it. Again no PR on this yet.
No experience with it on 3200/4200/4500/VCs yet, but based on our
experience w/EX8200 so far this code should come with a warning label,
may be hazardous to your health. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net
a new
rpd coredump the other day, but it's a hell of a lot better than any
previous 10.4 builds, and now seems to be the right time to pick up the
EEoL release.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF
this already. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
if you aren't doing automatic PMTUD is 4096, go figure.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
really do well to introduce a 1U small/simple external RE
which can be connected over Ethernet, to redundantize a box like the
MX80, and to be a reasonably sized BGP route reflector.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59
is to make it do SMP they may have had to
disable some of the normal routing operations and only make it capable
of controlling other EX chassis. I'm sure it would make a fine, if very
overpriced, Olive though. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG
RE needs to have their head
examined. :) How freaking hard can it be to take an off-the-shelf 1U PC,
slap a Juniper logo on the front, mark it up 20x like everything else,
and sell it to us as a fully supported RR? I'm still confused how this
has managed to escape their attention.
--
Richard
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 07:11:31PM -0700, Doug Hanks wrote:
The new MX REs run 64-bit Junos.
64-bit JUNOS != SMP enabled. The only difference is the amount of ram it
can address, those fancy quad-core CPUs only run on a single core. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http
about, hoping for
anything else is a complete fantasy.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
. Util. 1.251%
DB 3 Egr PACL:0/1024 (current/max) rules. Util. 0.000%
DB 4 Egr PCL1: 103/8188 (current/max) rules. Util. 1.258%
But you get the gist. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59
it ?
show interfaces diagnostics optics
You may also be interested in http://juniper.cluepon.net/OS_dom, which
adds a sorely needed summary view for DOM.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA
routes are just silently dropped from the RIB, which is
certainly a lot better than the Cisco method of disabling CEF and making
the box unusuable until someone goes to reboot it. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59
hands if you try to run that code in production. Oh and
BTW, 11.1 on EX will also blackhole your packets while BGP converges
following bootup, for up to 15 minutes in our testing. Consider
yourselves warned. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 05:17:46PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Richard A Steenbergen
We hit this issue while testing 11.1R1, and oh what a mighty big screwup
it was on Juniper's part too (that it even tries to parse the packets
that are killing it in the first place, when
config components. It's not
pretty, but unfortunately this is really the only practical way to get
the kind of config reuse you're looking for, not to mention the only way
to actually protect the control plane on the EX. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
for the first time in close to 2 years :P),
but it's still just too buggy in the lab, so we're still doing 10.3R3 on
new MX deployments/upgrades. Overall 10.3R3 has been relatively less
bad than a lot of other recent code.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net
the
neighbor down, can I close this case?
I couldn't make this stuff up if I tried. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper
too RMA happy and throw that out
as the solution instead of actually trying to find the real issue.
Personally I'd be far more inclined to believe that the problem is
software than it is two bad cards in a row, especially where 10.4R2 is
involved. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
, but the last I heard there was
at least some interest in implementing this some time in the next year
or so. If you agree that this is an important feature, please ask your
account teams to make this a higher prority. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 08:23:31PM -0400, Jesus Alvarez wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to change the SSH port for managing the EX switches and M
routers? We normally avoid using the standard port 22.
No, I've been asking for this feature. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
for intra-rack stuff.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
customers), which is definitely an
improvement over a lot of other recent JUNOS code. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp
in 10.4R2. Hope everyone learned their lesson about
trusting JTAC version recommendations. :)
From 10.4R3 release notes:
The mib2d process leaks memory during SNMP walks. [PR/586074: This issue
has been resolved.]
I'm going to assume it's that. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
the reboot time for EX2200, EX3200, EX4200, and
EX4500 switches by 5 to 10 minutes. For EX8200 switches, the reboot time
increases by 10 to 25 minutes per Routing Engine, and additional reboots
are required.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:46:36PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
The process of upgrading to a resilient dual-root partitions release
takes longer due to the additional step of upgrading the loader software
and a longer reboot time while the disk is reformattedto four partitions
optics, they just slap a label on optics from a variety of other
suppliers. Fortunately Juniper doesn't play games with vendor locking of
optics, so you shouldn't have any problems.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204
if you aren't talking about a 7600 stuffed full of
expensive ES/SIP cards. You've really gotta get into ASR9k before you
can even start to make a comparison to MX in most categories, which is
no big shock considering ASR9k was made specifically to compete against
the MX.
--
Richard
to
end up using it much on EX8200 (as I said, we're being forced into 11.1
to support specific hardware anyways).
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
, but that certainly doesn't take much. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
down, all the other ports on the switch should be
disabled as well.
I think uplink failure detection is on the roadmap for 11.1, though I'm
not sure about the EX-specificness of it.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59
that the dst IP is 1.2.3.4, but they don't send the field
to tell you that the dst route was 1.2.3.0/24), so we're still waiting
to do anything serious with it. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA
literally cut months off the time it
takes for a case to be resolved.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
would be a serious pain.
Technically not true, MPCs (the modular ones, not the 16x10G card) have
TCAM on them, it's just not actually used by any software yet, and it
would be used for accelerated firewall lookups not routing. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e
, it just means there are some
customers out there who believe the hype. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
issue.
I'm sure you can find people who will vehemently testify that their quad
shielded 4 thick $300 Monster HDMI cable makes their tv's picture
noticably better too, but that doesn't make it true.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID
.
Is anyone aware of this issue and is there any workaround or is a
software upgrade the only solution ?
restart mib-process
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
order in routing engine BIOS?
DEL will work, you've just gotta work on your timing. It's very tricky.
:)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
done it hundreds of times, it DOES work, but the timing is tricky.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper
to
something 'reasonable'.
Carrying a bogons bgp feed is pretty darn close to worthless really, but
you're in no danger of bumping an MX's route capacity unless you're
running multiple tables.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59
, but you'll be far better off with 10.3R2 than you
will with 10.2R1 in the config above.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp
stable, the fun starts with the brand new MPC/Trio cards. If it ain't
broke, why fix it. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper
counter issues on
that code.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
mib-process gracefully;
}
var $result = jcs:invoke($restart-mib2d);
}
}
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
that works immediately (and if you don't mind that sflow doesn't work at
all on routed interfaces in pre-10.2 code). If you can wait a little
while, we're currently targeting 10.3R3 as our new try to fix
everything release for EX8200, and it's due out at the end of Jan.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e
. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper
Dear Juniper,
I will deploy one of these on every router until all my cases are
resolved. :)
http://cluepon.net/ras/juniper-accessory.wmv
Love,
ras
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA
1 - 100 of 440 matches
Mail list logo
