filters in 10.4 too, so thats worth something (not that I'm vouching
for 10.4 on EX, and I'm completely unvouching for it on MX, R1 is
totally broken there). :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41
can
always pay a lot more money and buy an MX if thats a problem here. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
aside any and all assumptions you have about what should and should not
work on a Juniper router first. If you go into it comparing it against a
6509 instead of an MX, you'll come away with a completely different take
on the product.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e
redistribution layer
to get the routes back into BGP (unless you want to blow out your IGP
with bloat), so I can't get as indignant about it as I'd like. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
as received a
/31 via a routing protocol, which made it a real problem if you ran /31s
and ever needed to add one of those boxes to your network later on.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA
the 2.0.0.0/8 packets anyways, even though you didn't configure that
range in your filter.
Obviously that doesn't sound related to your issue, but the moral of the
story is that I would be absurdly suspicious of EX filter code in JUNOS
that is that old. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e
protocols connections interface-switch yyy interface ge-0/0/3.0
CCC doesn't work on EX (it should really throw an error or something),
you've gotta use vlans and family ethernet-switching on the ports.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID
advance on my case. I'm beginning to think one
of the PFE's is broken somehow..
Is there a way to know what firewall filter -559038737 is?
Clearly not a valid one. What code? Odds are good you should probably
just upgrade. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e
://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos93/swconfig-policy/applying-routing-policies-to-the-forwarding-table.html
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
the point-to-point you're looking for. Find the one under
protocols ospf instead. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp
routing.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
easily crash the box from there.
:)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
. On DPCs it may have been related to what the EZchip
could do, so on Trio the limitations may be totally different. It's
entirely possible that they just haven't written the software to take
advantage of the increased capacity yet, you'd have to ask Juniper.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e
clip demonstrating this with SX
SFPs, pardon the lack of focus on the crackberry camera. :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-_CtbKinpE
Will try to get a video made showing the other ports turn on after you
insert another unrelated optics issue at some point too.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e
aka Cisco Customer
Enragement Feature. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
running into any of them. I on the
other hand, end up trying to collect them all. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp
set take at any rate, I'm
sure there is a completely different set of voodoo potions that goes
into finding a working version for IRB/etc. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
tied to some legacy transport gear
for some reason.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
with
uncommitted changes is to manually undo the changes you made and commit
the blank config. With failure to plan or test features like that, I'm
sure it only gets worse from there. :P
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F
, or if you
only have a 100Mbps uplink feeding the thing in the first place, a sw
router may be fine. But keep in mind that a $100 linux box can put out
225kpps with one NIC tied behind its back, so you'd best hope you never
get a DoS attack.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http
their production traffic, which is actually not as uncommon as
you might think. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp
edge, you WILL
need 2 prefix-lists to implement it on the Cisco, so the multihop
session lets you use a single clean solution to cover all edge routers.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA
to recover your RE
redundancy that way. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
), and no fixes planned for any of
them until 10.2R3.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:38:48PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
I'd suggest 10.2R3, some time in November. There are just a massive
number of things that are very very broken in 10.2R2 (at least in our
testing of the Trio cards on MX960), and no fixes planned for any of
them until
, as IMHO you have to be clinically
insane to spend money on a perfectly good MX port and then waste it
doing L2 switching, but you could always RTFM if you wanna try it. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F
approaching
negative values if you put ANY kind of load on the box.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
to other code
we've used, on MX too for that matter, so you could certainly do worse.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp
will hopefully fix a lot of my other
outstanding issues :P).
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 04:57:57PM -0700, Ben Bird wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:50:58 -0500, Richard A Steenbergen
r...@e-gerbil.net wrote:
Is there a way to syslog a cspf or rsvp bandwidth reservation failure?
The entry at 18:50:14.895 should be logged by rpd, if syslog config has
1, value 2, flag
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
$other-re _ :/var/db/scripts/commit;
}
}
jcs:invoke($cs_delete);
jcs:invoke($cs_copy);
You want to use the delete to handle cases where you don't have
permission to modify the file, for example if you've ever upgraded
scripts as root instead of a standard tacacs user, etc.
--
Richard
at the expense of bumping
up against the rather low TTL expiration rate limits on many routers.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
a tunnel interface without disabling any
physical ports, though the best place to do it will be on the PFE where
the packets are ingressing the router and need to be encapsulated.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F
being able to
replicate it, and it didn't seem like they had a PR on it back when we
were looking, so please open a case on it. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
reboot or non-GRES
switchover to the other RE.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
gonna be
forced into 10.2+ for MX to get full Trio support soon anyways, so there
isn't much benefit to hanging around 10.0 even if it was stable.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
,
10.3, etc, in the above cycle. By the time 10.4 actually gets stable
enough to use in widespread deploys, which is at least a year from
today, where will be some other reason why we're forced into something
newer. There always is. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e
, I really hope they're gonna have this working soon. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
with no impact to your other capacity.
I think that was everything. And if they aren't planning to add it
already, please join me in asking them to add a way to view fabric
utilization, as it would really make managing the local vs fabric
capacities a lot easier.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e
. Technically 4 ports of 10GE would exceed the
55Mpps, 14.488Mpps * 4 = 57.952Mpps, so you wouldn't quite be able to
get line rate on small packets even with local switching.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C
20G6% 33% @10:20 09Jun10 26% 58% @02:25 19Aug10
7 120G 35% 51% @19:38 14Jul101%6% @16:55 03May10
Or at least expose and XML-ify the current one so we can script up
something decent.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e
showing only
locally terminated control plane traffic and not showing interface
transit traffic, the numbers would be about right, but we weren't able
to confirm that before it went away.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59
to imply that local switching on a MPC could
support 30G.
If anybody has better info, I'd absolutely love to hear it. Until then,
I'm assuming that the 3D in the MPC card names actually stands for how
you'll be using them, 3 ports working, one Disabled. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e
help the logical
counter issue. At this point all I can really say is being on the look
out for it, and if you do see it make sure Juniper looks at it quickly
because it goes away on its own and leave no evidence for them to debug
it. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http
.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
has been fixed for a couple
years now.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:46:42AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Saturday, July 31, 2010 11:55:44 am Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
All my policy evaluation bugs are REALLY obscure, for
example subroutine policies which will randomly not
apply any actions in any term that doesn't contain
, but if you really can't figure it out give a
hard clear a try and see if it helps.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing
probably just need to tweak your
localprefs. :)
All my policy evaluation bugs are REALLY obscure, for example subroutine
policies which will randomly not apply any actions in any term that
doesn't contain a then accept. I've never seen a problem with a
configuration as simple as yours.
--
Richard
and start losing business
because of it, and that kind of thing can be very hard to undo.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp
be viable as a standalone RR, since it would have to be priced
at least somewhat reasonably to serve in the function they're marketing
it for. The hardware specs are certainly not terrible.
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/switching/ex-series/options/xre200/
--
Richard
the price
Juniper will charge me for standard PC hardware :P).
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
a tunnel pic, so it doesn't
help you much. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
in an unusable state before abandoning it.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
RE 8.5 may be the last code you can fit
onto the flash anyways. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
to deploy the new cards and discover what a disaster modern
JUNOS has become. Seriously, how the hell do you manage to ship
production code that has broken subinterface counters? Does anyone in
systest actually do anything any more?
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e
.
On a MX960 with RE-S-2000 and a BGP config consisting of nothing more
than an IBGP mesh (28 sessions) and a SINGLE TRANSIT SESSION, it took
just over 12 minutes before a single route from the transit session was
successfully installed to hardware.
So far things aren't looking good.
--
Richard
session flap.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
;
}
}
}
I've been begging for the ability to reset event priorities to more
sensible values in the event policies for ages, but so far there hasn't
been any interest.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F
is a giant pain in the ass already. I'd really
rather not have to hard-code the new priority mapping into a slax
script, when it makes far more sense to do it in the event policy.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204
behind a buggy SRX. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 08:28:01AM +0300, Nahrux M wrote:
Greetings,
Does JUNOS on Intel platform supports SMP (symmetrical multi processing)?
Not the official public builds, yet. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535
as disastrous as
the 2GB flash on EX8200 (where there is so little storage you can't
write a core dump from a large rpd process).
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 07:13:41AM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Not that poor, it's a 1.2GHz PowerPC, which is roughly the performance
of a p4 3GHz. I haven't looked at it in detail yet, but I'd say odds are
good its the exact same integrated CPU/RE that is used on the EX8200 RE
(which
shell pfe) and remote command.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
shell pfe does.
That way the request pfe hierarch becomes the one stop shop for pfe
commands, and people aren't left trying to guess what was that other
command that had no relationship to the first one.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID
it has helped
prevent at this point.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
they did something to break it in chrome (I'm assuming
javascript related).
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing
somebody else the grief that it caused me, before you assume
9.6S5 to 9.6R4 is a safe upgrade. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
and 9.6R4 and be fixed by removing the prefix-export-limit,
even though that limit was in no danger of being hit..
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
for an interface not
found condition to detect this kind of thing, which may or may not be
easy depending on how stateful your monitoring system is.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
THINK this one might not have been fixed until
9.3R3, but I try to repress those days so my memory may be a little
foggy.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
as fast as is humanly possible.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
the logical
system B on the Juniper due to lack of IPv6 support.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
broken as-is. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
the counters in IOS.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:01:05PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Monday 24 May 2010 02:33:08 am Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
Oh and a word of warning before anybody runs out and
tries this, doing this kind of forwarding-table policy
to select specific LSPs seems to SIGNIFICANTLY
it from resignaling excessively.
I'll gladly accept any clue anyone can offer on this one. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
: 2048M Total, 2048M Free
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
2071 root1 1270 991M 975M RUN192.8H 89.16% rpd
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41
be to fix this?
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
output whenever you get into a penis waiving contest
over who has the device with the longest uptime. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
of having to a no-install
on all of the regular LSPs, then match everything without the transport
communities and install them to lsp-regexp IP.*.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
http://www.e-gerbil.net/juniper.jpg
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
have an SRX at home, and trust me I feel your pain). To be
less fair, this is not an isolated problem, and these days JUNOS is less
reliable than IOS.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1
.
If you want to readd it (to see if its actually broken), drop to shell,
su to root, and do:
sysctl -w machdep.bootdevs=whatever
i.e. take your current bootdevs and add disk (the ad1), or whatever
you want to do.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG
to replicate. Given this and the other issues
w/updating prefix-lists referenced in a firewall filter causing crashes,
you might want to lay off that feature for a bit. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41
saw, and it was dated Nov 2009.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
completely broken on EX, if that counts as a reason :P). I'm not sure
what the current release schedule is, but it can't be too much longer,
and there are some pretty serious problems in 10.1S1.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC
a single
IBGP session in 10.1 tests.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
features
Get 10.1R2 (which was due out a couple days ago), we hit a bug in 10.1S1
on EX8200 where FPCs crashed when updating a prefix-list that was
referenced in a firewall filter that is fixed in 10.1R2.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID
. Also note that there are several more issues caused by the
NxSVI approach on Crisco, but that is a rant for a different mailing
list. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
a static route.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
, it will
make life much easier in the future. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
it saves you a flap if
you ever need to turn it on later.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 06:41:05PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Saturday 01 May 2010 04:01:38 am Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
chassisd[1305]: %DAEMON-3-UI_CONFIGURATION_ERROR:
Process: chassisd, path: [edit groups BASE-FORWARDING
forwarding-options hash-key family], statement: inet6
we did find in it (some very serious) Juniper
refused to fix in the 9.5 branch. It would have been nice if they'd made
9.5 an extended support release, but alas no such luck.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F
in the same chassis, I expect a lot of
people are going to be very unhappy very soon when they're forced to
upgrade. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
thorough, only about 20%
of it is actually on the exam, and most of the more complicated
scenarios are nowhere to be found or are only a single question out of a
section. If you read and understand the study guide, you are all but
guaranteed to pass. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
101 - 200 of 440 matches
Mail list logo
