On 5 Okt 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In wireless networks it can be handy to shape by packet rate
rather than bytes/s (because capacity is packet-rate-limited).
Has anyone done any work on packet-rate shaping ?
Don't know any wireless details. But I guess in the end it is very
similar to
skip /
Has anyone done any work on packet-rate shaping ?
iptables: limit, hashlimit, dstlimit work on pps basis.
--
Peter V. Saveliev
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Peter V. Saveliev wrote:
skip /
Has anyone done any work on packet-rate shaping ?
iptables: limit, hashlimit, dstlimit work on pps basis.
doh ! yes, I'd thought about that stuff but somehow
discounted it as 'not worthy' for traffic shaping.
Thanks.
David Boreham wrote:
iptables: limit, hashlimit, dstlimit work on pps basis.
doh ! yes, I'd thought about that stuff but somehow
discounted it as 'not worthy' for traffic shaping.
Actually, I remember now why iptables doesn't work :
All it does is drop the excess packets over the limit.
В сообщении от Saturday 06 October 2007 05:16:38 David Boreham написал(а):
David Boreham wrote:
iptables: limit, hashlimit, dstlimit work on pps basis.
doh ! yes, I'd thought about that stuff but somehow
discounted it as 'not worthy' for traffic shaping.
Actually, I remember now why
Peter V. Saveliev wrote:
skip /
Simple packet drop works for ordinary tcp congestion algorithms as a channel
overload, and tcp decreases speed. So works RED policing filters and so on.
Well...red isn't exactly 'simple' packet drop :)
In fact, if I could combine packet-rate-limit with red
I think it is better to use an IFB device and shape the upload traffic
using source IP before the NAT
http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/IFB
On 6/13/07, VladSun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ethy H. Brito написа:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:02:31 +0300
VladSun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TC is
PLEASE disregard this. My MUA gone crazy and resent a lot of my emails today.
Forgive me.
Ethy
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:18:28 -0300
Ethy H. Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:02:31 +0300
VladSun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TC is performed after POSTROUTING, so you can
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:25:14 -0300
Marco Aurelio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is better to use an IFB device and shape the upload traffic
using source IP before the NAT
http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/IFB
Before NAT?!?! Where does IFB hook netfilter tables??
Before mangle
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:02:31 +0300
VladSun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TC is performed after POSTROUTING, so you can not do any IP related TC
filtering. You can use CPU friendly patches for iptables like IPMARK or
IPCLASSIFY. Take a look at them.
Ok. Can someone point me the right direction
Ethy H. Brito написа:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:02:31 +0300
VladSun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TC is performed after POSTROUTING, so you can not do any IP related TC
filtering. You can use CPU friendly patches for iptables like IPMARK or
IPCLASSIFY. Take a look at them.
Ok. Can someone
Use IFB which seems to be already on kernel 2.6
On 6/11/07, VladSun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ethy H. Brito написа:
Hi all
I am using a pass trhu router and I need to QoS some clients output by its
IP address. The problem is that QoS is due after NATing.
Is there some clever way of doing
On 11/15/06, Daniel Musketa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 12:07, Daniel Musketa wrote:
Could I setup HTB better than below? Should I reduce eth1's queue length
(now 1000)? If yes, how?
The txqueuelen can be changed by
ip link set eth1 txqlen len
I tried values
Am Donnerstag, 16. November 2006 17:37 schrieb Larry Brigman:
On 11/15/06, Daniel Musketa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can watch traffic coming in on ppp0 with `iftop` and it never exeeds
900kbit. Why could a 2000kbit headroom be not enough for clean receiving
of 80kbit VoIP data?
Because
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 12:07, Daniel Musketa wrote:
Could I setup HTB better than below? Should I reduce eth1's queue length
(now 1000)? If yes, how?
The txqueuelen can be changed by
ip link set eth1 txqlen len
I tried values of 100 and 3 but can't hear an improvement.
I can watch
Georgi Alexandrov wrote:
Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
The keyword here is better, and that was my argument for using a
bridge in the first place. It would appear to be easier to shape
filter away from the messy scripts of pppd radius servers, but this
raises the next issue. For the bridge, is the
Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
The keyword here is better, and that was my argument for using a
bridge in the first place. It would appear to be easier to shape
filter away from the messy scripts of pppd radius servers, but this
raises the next issue. For the bridge, is the pppoe sessions
Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
Guys
After reading through the archives I found some insightful ways to be
able to shape traffic to pppoe clients from the server. I have two
questions on the topic of setting up a pppoe server however...
1. The clients will all be connected to each other using a
On 5/23/06, Georgi Alexandrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
Guys
1. The clients will all be connected to each other using a normal
ethernet network, the segments connected with managed switches. The
capacity is roughly 500 nodes. Will these pppoe sessions interfere
with
If they are all on the same ethernet device, you can match them with:
tc filter add dev ${DEVICE} parent 1: protocol all u32 \
match u16 0x8864 0x at -2 flowid 1:${ID}
8864 is the PPP session ethernet protocol
you can play around with u32 if you want to match tos or ports and stuff..
helo
Hello again Rani,
: helo again. I think this question i am asking is worth:
:
: we know that pppoe-server creates a pppX device on each
: connection done to it. So, when i have to shape, i have to shape
: each pppX connection device on itself alone. What i know is that
: the borrowing
Hello Rani,
: i am currently now serving PPPoE in my area. i had a script
: generated from tcng that worked perfectly before i started
: serving PPPoE. the issue is not in the script it self BUT in that
: tc code is not shaping on the ethernet anymore BUT INSTEAD on
: the pppX devices.
hi, i use the roaringpenguin pppoe-server and limit the bandwidth per
interface with this script:
(im using freeradius plugins too, thats the reason of the
/var/run/radattr.pppx file)
(/etc/ppp/ip-up.d/0pppx_up)
#!/bin/sh
DOWN=`cat /var/run/radattr.$1 | grep 'RP-Downstream-Speed-Limit' |
Laimis wrote:
If in one time 3 IP adresses using internet. TC script:
DEV=eth0 # LAN
SERVER_IP=192.168.1.2 # eth0 ip address
tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 255
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 384Kbit quantum
1500
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid
Yes (depending on exact setup/requirements) - it's just gone in the
latest net tree it's called ifb.
http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev%40vger.kernel.org/msg05208.html
Hmm, this sounds interesting, although it would mean upgrading the kernel
to 2.6 on a router that's hard to get to physically
Flemming Frandsen wrote:
I'm trying to set up a shaper that can shape the inbound traffic to around
40 subnets, that hang on 3 different interfaces of the router.
As Linux can't do ingress shaping I'm left with having to set up 3
seperate shapers, one for each internal interface.
This is not
What do you call few seconds delay?
What is your link speed, and rates?
Damian Jakubowski wrote:
What traffic shaper must I use to shape small rates (~1kBps) without
significant latency? I have experience with htb and i now that htb is
not very good solution in this case. With so low rates it
Dnia poniedziałek, 5 grudnia 2005 13:58, Dave Weis napisał(a):
That's because you are putting all /24 network into one single HTB. You
have to make one HTB (SFQ for every user helps a lot too) for each
computer in the network:
tc qdisc del root dev eth1
tc qdisc add root dev eth1
Dnia niedziela, 4 grudnia 2005 23:11, Dave Weis napisał(a):
I'm trying to shape each machine on an interface to 256k each, but I'm
getting stuck and only able to shape an entire interface to 256k. What
should I be doing differently here?
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root
tc qdisc add dev eth0
On Sunday 04 December 2005 23:11, Dave Weis wrote:
What should I be doing differently here?
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100MBit ceil
100MBit
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle
I thought sending email went out on port 25?
When I look with ethereal, outbound email transfers were on port 58020.
The destination port is 25. The source port is chosen by the kernel.
--
Homepage : http://geocities.com/arhuaco
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself
and you
Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
Lartc readers
I have a peculiar problem with shaping and firewalling.
My tc rules work great, below is a smaller version:
#Root
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 100
#Root Class
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate
Hi!
George Spiliotis wrote:
Dear all
My current setup is the following:
Normal Hosts + eth0 eth1
|+--+
+--| F/W box |--- Internet
|+--+
High priority hosts--+
Your questions are very typical. It
Jan Rovner wrote:
Hello,
does anyone have a working solution for the shaping both incoming and
outgoing traffic in such
way, that for a given client the *sum* of incoming and outgoing traffic
is somehow defined?
My ISP does the same thing, it gives me just a line of a defined rate,
no matter the
Hello,
Hello!
See also http://www.docum.org/docum.org/faq/cache/69.html
I cannot found one example on the new but maybe you have time to figure
out how it works.
---
Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
catab at deuroconsult.ro
http://kernel.umbrella.ro/
___
Dimitris Kotsonis wrote:
Justin Schoeman wrote:
Hi all,
I am having some fun with traffic shaping, and have run into an
interesting situation. Here is South Africa, most internet links are
heavily oversubscribed, which means that in most cases the local link
is _not_ the bottleneck, and
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 13:50, Paras pradhan wrote:
hi all:
the following scipt is wokring perfectly with limiting ...on limimitng
per ip basis..
eth0=public static ip
eth2= private ip ( 192.168.2.1)
--
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -s ! 192.168.0.0/32 -d
On Friday 31 December 2004 12:44, Paras pradhan wrote:
how do we mark in single iptables line using for ex: --dport 21 and -d
192.168.3.88
or have to do seperatly.
I'm not sure if you can do it in 1 command. Just try it out.
Stef
___
LARTC mailing
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 13:50, Paras pradhan wrote:
hi all:
the following scipt is wokring perfectly with limiting ...on limimitng per
ip basis..
eth0=public static ip
eth2= private ip ( 192.168.2.1)
--
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -s ! 192.168.0.0/32 -d 192.168.2.101/32
On Monday 20 December 2004 23:21, Miguel Sanz wrote:
Hi,
I've a router configuration with a dsl connection and two ethernet NICs.
How can I control the traffic of the dsl connection when then destination
of the traffic can go out of the router using two diferent interfaces?
ppp -- router
On Thursday 25 November 2004 13:01, Chris Bennett wrote:
Quick answer is: you can't. You need to know the bandwidth so that you can
control the queue.
Indeed. I suffer from the same problem with my PPPoATM link, where my shaping
configuration assumes I'm operating over an Ethernet link when
On Friday 26 November 2004 00:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
At first I must tell you that I´m a real newbie with Linux (and english as
well...) I´m using 2 vlans and shaping works quite well without vlan
Now I want to do load balancing at these vlans.
Any vlan should get the same
Justin Schoeman wrote:
Hi all,
I am having some fun with traffic shaping, and have run into an
interesting situation. Here is South Africa, most internet links are
heavily oversubscribed, which means that in most cases the local link
is _not_ the bottleneck, and shaping on the local link does
Thanks everybody for your advice... This is going to be an interesting
one to try and solve ;-).
-justin
Justin Schoeman wrote:
Hi all,
I am having some fun with traffic shaping, and have run into an
interesting situation. Here is South Africa, most internet links are
heavily oversubscribed,
it's worse than that. we faced the same problems in china. an
oversubscribed adsl system. in fact there is more than one problem with
the public internet in these scenarios. the first as you have identified
is the lack of capacity. then you can't control the downstream routing -
eg traffic
On Sunday 31 October 2004 18:51, you wrote:
Where can I get some tricks to minimize the delay or latency? Actually, I
have tried some configurations but I still get too big delay or latency.
The prio parameter of htb classes can help.
Remember, you can not remove the delay. You can only give
On Saturday 30 October 2004 23:13, Avidianto Widodo wrote:
Hi,
How can I configure shaping bandwidth on htb/cbq without delay or latency?
Please give some example.
You can not shape without delay or latency. You can only try to minimize the
delay or latency for certain connections.
Stef
--
Minimize having a good CPU...every thing that travels lost some
time...even in the wire or in the air :) or in the vacum the
comunications with the MARS have biig delays :)
Stef Coene wrote:
On Saturday 30 October 2004 23:13, Avidianto Widodo wrote:
Hi,
How can I configure shaping
Dave Scott wrote:
Another question, I was also thinking of limiting everyone's bandwidth
to like say 500K each, so no connection can get more then 500k, then
it would take about 6 people using full connections to max the line.
And then what? If the line is maxed, then it's maxed, wether that's
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 23:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, inbound is affected even though outbound transfers are suspended.
The inbound in shaped to 39K. This is what totally confuses me. I thought
with my script that only traffic leaving source ports 5-51000 65437
should be
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 23:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, inbound is affected even though outbound transfers are suspended.
The inbound in shaped to 39K. This is what totally confuses me. I thought
with my script that only traffic leaving source ports 5-51000 65437
should be
Is the inbound rate affected even if there are no outbound transfers? Is
the speed actually being limited to a certain speed, or are you just
noticing that the inbound/upload traffic is slower than it should be.
The reason I ask is because you're tagging all outbound ftp-data traffic
(ports
Try this link, might help:
http://omg.wp.gg/wshaper-howto/
- Original Message -
From:
Stephan M. Ott
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 8:57
AM
Subject: [LARTC] Shaping not
working
Hi
folks,
Im
trying to shape two clients in
We're running a small ISP and all the users are shaped to 384/512/768k
both ways (whichever package they choose).
The router is a linux (debian sarge), the kernel is 2.4.25 right now.
All users are getting 10.1.1.* ip addresses (eth1) and eth0 connects
to the isp using ethernet (via a media
what's your MTU size?
Scrive micah milano [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been following the HOWTO, and reading mailing list discussions
about throttling bandwidth, and have had some success, but I just want
to tie off some loose ends. Essentially what I am wanting to do is to
keep our bandwidth
tc qdisc del dev ethx root
tc qdisc add dev ethx root handle 1: htb
tc class add dev ethx parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 30kbps
tc filter add dev ethx parent 1: prio 0 protocol ip handle 1 fw flowid 1:1
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:07:37 -0400, nix4me [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to
I coud possibly help but I'm using tc + htb and dont know anything about
wondershaper. If you want a script I could do it for you.
- Original Message -
From: nix4me [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 2:42 AM
Subject: [LARTC] shaping passive ftp traffic
Have you tried limiting the maximum outgoing bandwidth in proftpd
itself?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 10:25 AM
To: lartc; nix4me
Subject: Re: [LARTC] shaping passive ftp traffic
I coud
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 10:25 AM
To: lartc; nix4me
Subject: Re: [LARTC] shaping passive ftp traffic
I coud possibly help but I'm using tc + htb and dont know anything about
wondershaper. If you want a script I could do it for you
On Friday 18 June 2004 20:18, ThE LinuX_KiD wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a script in order to do
traffic control on a ciber cafe LAN, with
linux router.
Ciber has about 40 hosts, and I haven't much
bandwidth (512kbit).
Also, I've a squid cache and it works very good!
I've found Jim QoS
Hi Mike @2004.05.31_15:17:21_+0200
I have thought of that, but that is not ideal for a couple of reasons, the
two most important being:
(a) You can't add 1 leaf node at a time with HTB or CBQ which makes it
rather messy to add large numbers of
Not the answer you're looking for, but why not just specify your total
bandwidth being much larger than your interface actually is and then
subdividing into your groups?
Mike.
-Original Message-
From: Abraham van der Merwe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 8:58 AM
Hi.
Stef Coene wrote:
But tc sees the fwmark value that iptables has attached to a packet,
right? Hence the idea to accomplish the destination host distinction
with iptables-rules, setting fwmark accordingly and let tc decide on the
different fwmark values.
But when do you see the hostname? In
On Saturday 08 May 2004 09:08, Michael Renzmann wrote:
Hi.
Stef Coene wrote:
You could achieve this by using different firewall marks for the
different traffic classes, and shape upon that marks. IIRC there is an
iptables-extension available that allows to match strings, so you could
try to
Hi.
jayesh rathod wrote:
Is there any way by which we can shape domain name(not by IP address)
Eg : suppose i want to shape tarrif to a particular domain www.xyz.com
which has multiple ips and i am not aware of there ips
You could achieve this by using different firewall marks for the
On Friday 07 May 2004 15:37, Michael Renzmann wrote:
Hi.
jayesh rathod wrote:
Is there any way by which we can shape domain name(not by IP address)
Eg : suppose i want to shape tarrif to a particular domain www.xyz.com
which has multiple ips and i am not aware of there ips
You could
Hello,
Possible solution is make smaller burst parameters:
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:0 classid 1:122 htb rate 12kbit ceil 16kbit
burst 1500 prio 3
In this case pages whith size more than 1500 bytes will limit outgoing speed.
Good evening, everybody!
I have a simple question about
Gordan,
I've noticed that you are trying to use aliased IP addresses and traffic
control together, and you are a bit frustrated that tc doesn't handle
aliased interface names.
: I understand that device aliases (e.g. eth2:3) are not shapeable.
: Does anybody know if this functionality is
On Monday 19 January 2004 18:08, Gastón wrote:
Hi, I´m shaping traffic using htb on both interfaces, I noticed that
shaping download traffic is workinggreat but shaping upload traffic is not
working at all (no sent packets, no dropped, no overlimits)
If you don't have dropped packets, you are
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 19:22:53 +0100
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Shaping inbound ok, outbound wrong
On Monday 19 January 2004 18:08, Gastón wrote:
Hi, I´m shaping traffic using htb on both interfaces, I noticed that
shaping download traffic is workinggreat but shaping
Yes, I think my problem is on the filters. Actually I`m quite confused.
If I have eth0 facing the link and eth1 facing the LAN. I should shape
download in eth1 and upload in eth0, right?
Correct.
So, for example I should use this filter for shapìng upload
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0
Gordan Bobic wrote:
I understand that device aliases (e.g. eth2:3) are not shapeable. Does
anybody know if this functionality is planned in the future?
None of the new(er) networking tools recognise device aliases, because on
all recent linux releases, aliases don't exist.
the ethX:X notation is
Oh, I am sorry, I knew that, it's jsut that I was playing with the numbers and I
didn't check the sums.
I know how to shape traffic coming from different users,
..protocol ip dst IP...etc, And I know how to shape traffic
from each service. I just don't know how to glue them together.
So what
On Thursday 31 July 2003 05:00, Martin A. Brown wrote:
Good questions Damion,
: I've noticed as of late, everyone saying 'you can't shape incoming
: traffic' but the best solution is to use the imq device.
Well(you'll love this) the reason everyone is saying you can't shape
incoming
On Thursday 31 July 2003 05:55, Rio Martin. wrote:
On Thursday 31 July 2003 10:00, Martin A. Brown wrote:
Well(you'll love this) the reason everyone is saying you can't shape
incoming traffic is because you can't shape incoming traffic (without
IMQ).
Well, i shape incoming traffic
On Thursday 31 July 2003 12:00, Rio Martin. wrote:
On Thursday 31 July 2003 16:46, you wrote:
If I understand correctly, you have 1 router with 2 nics. So you shape
incoming traffic on nic1 by shaping outgoing traffic on nic2. This is
fine for your setup, but if you 3 nic's and you are
On Thursday 31 July 2003 10:00, Martin A. Brown wrote:
Well(you'll love this) the reason everyone is saying you can't shape
incoming traffic is because you can't shape incoming traffic (without
IMQ).
Well, i shape incoming traffic without IMQ (:
I made my bandwidth.manager is on top of
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:14:11 +0200
Daniel Ortiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Anyone has experience on a FreeBSD Bridge with ipfw shaping?
: I configured the bridge and apparently works correctly but connections
: hangs without any error.
:
: I know that this list it's about Linux TC, sorry.
I have since fixed my problem. I am not sure if it's useful to anyone,
but I'll briefly describe what I did to get it working.
In the end, I am not using the 'iptables' program at all. I am using
ebtables to mangle the packets on eth1 as they come in. What I was
doing before with ebtables
I should add some additional comments.
I have gone through most of the LARTC archives dealing with tc.. it
seems a lot of people have attempted this, but no one ever posts
solutions to these things.
There are a bunch of archive posts I found somewhat helpful.
How to use red qdisc? can anyone give me an example?
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 18:03, Andreas Wright wrote:
Hello ,
I would like to know if it is possible to do the following ?
To give priority to incoming IP packets from a specific source (IP
address).For example I have packets coming in through an interface eth1
going to higher layer
On Tuesday 19 November 2002 16:25, Eric Leblond wrote:
Hi,
I can't find a solution to the problem of shaping efficiently non linear
protocol as passive ftp, H323.
Is there a way to use netfilter conntrack to class packet ?
For ftp, you can use iptables. There is a helper function that can
On Saturday 26 October 2002 00:25, Axel Loewe wrote:
hi,
i want to decrease the upload-bandwith used by a user with the uid xyz
(only one programm running under this user), so i mark the packets with
iptables by adding the following rule:
iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -m owner --uid-owner xxx
On Wednesday 16 October 2002 15:11, raptor wrote:
|Yes, the imq device. This is a virtual device (you can have more then
| one) and you can add a qdisc to it. You can redirect packets to it with
| iptables and this can be done on each interface and for in and outgoin
| packets. In your case
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 22:05, Sebastian 'spax' Pape wrote:
hi!
I searched the archives and found this question a few times, but I
didn't find any answer :o Also I didn't find any hint at the howto.
I want to shape outgoing traffic over multiple devices (let's say eth0
and eth1). If I
|Yes, the imq device. This is a virtual device (you can have more then one)
|and you can add a qdisc to it. You can redirect packets to it with iptables
|and this can be done on each interface and for in and outgoin packets.
|In your case you have to create 1 imq device and redirect all
On Friday 20 September 2002 11:37, Sumit Pandya wrote:
Hi,
Many of traffic shaper products provide shaping based on certain
application type. How can we implement shaping of recognized application
types? Like FTP can take only 64Kbps irrelevant of weather FTP Server is
running on port
Hi!
Currently I'm controlling 4 Mbit Connection based on
the source and
destination ports, so that ftp traffic doesn't clog
the line and udp packets
and other time critical things (ssh, irc, etc...) get
priority.
Normally that works just fine, but two problems
remain:
- How do I recognize
Hi. yes afaik you're right: the ipac (for 2.2) and ipac-ng (vor 2.4) just
insert iptables-rules in INPUT/OUTPUT/FORWARD, and so they don't see the
droped/delayed-because-of-shaping packets..
the only solution i know is ugly and/or unpractiable: read the
interface-stats from /proc/net/dev. but
On Monday 22 April 2002 20:57, Isak Badenhorst wrote:
Hi all
I am trying to shape the e-mail going out on my network. When i send some
outgoing mail it just eats up all bandwidth available. I would appreciate
some help. I have a 128kbit link to my provider.
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root
91 matches
Mail list logo
