Hello Mpourtounis,
: When i start downloading from node, its http taffic for examle is
: really shaped at 50. When i start downloading via sftp (port 22),
: its sftp traffic is really shaped at 30. But, if when there is an
: http as well as an sftp session at the same time, total
OT: Dudes, why i have to reedit To field and delete CC field, gmail
see this as spam
Now, make sure you compiled the kernel with htb, latest stable kernel
is 2.4.26 or 2.6.7
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:58:40 +0200, Antonin Karasek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make run a simple
Check if you have HTB support in your kernel.
it must be in kernel/net/sched
- Original Message -
From: Antonin Karasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:58 PM
Subject: [LARTC] HTB tc
Hi,
I'm trying to make run a simple shaping *through HTB*. I
I've found that i have messagess like this in /var/log/messages:
Jul 20 20:11:26 (none) last message repeated 9 times
Jul 20 20:11:30 (none) kernel: NET: 173 messages suppressed.
Jul 20 20:11:30 (none) kernel: dst cache overflow
Jul 20 20:12:59 (none) kernel: NET: 14 messages suppressed.
-
On Saturday 10 July 2004 05:54, toto toto wrote:
Hello,
I have problems setting up HTB.
This is my setup :
NET
1024/256 ADSL
eth1
Linux Firewall
eth0
LAN 10.a.a.a
I want to GUARANTEE for an IP (10.x.y.z) a 800kbit
bandwidth for HTTP download.
But When 10.x.y.z does no HTTP download,
yes but I'm not sure if RB three lib is in 2.4.14
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Can I backport 2.4.20 kernel version's HTB related changes to 2.4.14 ? Will this
work w/o any issues ?
Please consider this urgent and replay asap.
Thanks in advance,
Reema.
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Glen Mabey wrote:
I'm getting the following error/warning at some point in my config
script, and I'm not sure which class it is referring to.
htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!
What qdisc is attached to this class?
I [think I] understand that htb is a non-work-conserving
Hi all,
Our ISP has given us 5 static IP address plus one router IP address and I
was wondering if I could get rid of their stupid EN5861 router and set up
the linux machine to handle all the static addresses and routing. I figured
I'd have to set up alises for other IP addresses eg ifconfig
Our ISP has given us 5 static IP address plus one router IP address and I
was wondering if I could get rid of their stupid EN5861 router and set up
the linux machine to handle all the static addresses and routing. I figured
I'd have to set up alises for other IP addresses eg ifconfig eth0:0
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 09:18:11AM +0300, Catalin BOIE wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Glen Mabey wrote:
I'm getting the following error/warning at some point in my config
script, and I'm not sure which class it is referring to.
htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!
What qdisc is
Yes, that's what I was trying to ask below. I'm still trying to figure
out which class (in the qdisc:classid format) the error message is
referring to.
It's about class 1:7.
So, since I'm not sure which class it is (and I have several htb
qdiscs; oh, I just realized that I neglected to mention
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 19:13, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
Hello.
The problems are:
1. Using HTB I get negative values for tokens and ctokens in tc -s
output, for example:
This is perfectly possible. It depends on your configuration and the
parent-child relation ship between the classes.
Am Thursday 01 July 2004 22:52 schrieb Stef Coene:
So it's possible to drag the tokens negative if the child class is more
sending packets then the parent allows.
If I understand you right, it's only the parent classes that can get
negative tokens this way. But I also have leaf classes with
Am Wednesday 30 June 2004 19:13 schrieb Alexander Kotelnikov:
Using HTB I get negative values for tokens and ctokens in tc -s output
Can't help you there.
class htb 1:13 parent 1:1 prio 7 quantum 1024 rate 8Kbit ceil 16Kbit
[...]
12307 pkts (dropped 20013, overlimits 0)
I get traffic
Hi Devik, I played with your htbfair patch on 2.6.6 and found some
diferences between 2.4 to 2.6 that cause problems when applying it.
Diferences include rb_node that was rb_node_t and some other minor probs.
After fixing those diff troubles I still get the following error
compiling the kernel
pljosh wrote:
Uytkownik Andy Furniss napisa:
I just tried with 2 d/l and 3 classes - I see the same as you now.
Andy.
I am happy that there is finally confirmation of what I've seen :)
But what now? I am just starting with traffic shaping and my question
is: how is that - that so many people are
devik wrote:
Witold Szczerba spent his time evaluating fairness of borrowing. His
troubles inspired me enough to analyze the problem: When a class changes
from yellow to green it disconnects itself from parent's feedlist.
Unfortunately it resets feed pointer to the first child. I created a patch
On Thursday 24 June 2004 13:21, Vincent Perrier wrote:
HTB versus HFSC, both qdisc offer the same kind of service,
if you want to see comparative test results, go to
http://www.rawsoft.org
at the line TEST RESULTS you will find the results for
a sharing test and a burst test.
You will see
Andy Furniss wrote:
I finally got this to work - I forgot to use gcc 2.59.3 to do the module
- the one 3.3.3 made segfaulted and stopped tc and ifconfig from working
thereafter.
I tested and found that the same happens without the patch.
It works - It has fixed the problem pljosh described :-)
Vincent Perrier wrote:
HTB versus HFSC, both qdisc offer the same kind of service,
if you want to see comparative test results, go to
http://www.rawsoft.org
at the line TEST RESULTS you will find the results for
a sharing test and a burst test.
You will see that both qdisc are good.
Nice
I assume you saw the patch - and it's OK now?
Andy.
Yes, I was the one who tested it before Devik made it public :)
(and he wrote my name together with info about this patch)
I wrote to him about that after you confirmed you can see the same
behavior of htb.
Now it works PERFECT!
(three times
On Wednesday 23 June 2004 01:57, Svetozar Mihailov wrote:
Shouldn't this:
tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:200 htb rate 100Mbit prio 10
be parent 2:?
Ed W
That change nothing. I have running system with 800 PC , 4 classes for
each. There is no difference for me in using
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 06:19, Mike Mestnik wrote:
On http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm...
There is a nice explanation on how/why to setup a hierarchy with HTB.
Howerver what is missing is how to setup finters for this case?
For more information and examples: http://docum.org/
I finaly found why my filters woulden't work, I was using grouping maches
up with quotation() chars. This caused tc to silently IGNORE thoes
matches while letting other non-quotated matches to work normaly, within
the same tc cmd.
I reworked my whole script to use 10:0 as the parent for filters,
I finaly found why my filters woulden't work, I was using grouping maches
up with quotation() chars. This caused tc to silently IGNORE thoes
matches while letting other non-quotated matches to work normaly, within
the same tc cmd.
I reworked my whole script to use 10:0 as the parent for filters,
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does someone have expirience with HTB and kernel 2.6.5 and up...
Does anyone have tested it with thousand of classes and filters..
How it behaves..
Depends on how many filters/classes, how much traffic. If you have a lot
of filters, you must use
Shouldn't this:
tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:200 htb rate 100Mbit prio 10
be parent 2:?
Ed W
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
pljosh wrote:
HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c.
I did it, recompiled, launched... and i looks like it is even a little
bit worser: user1 has almost twice as much BW as user3...
I DO NOT GET IT
IT LOOKS LIKE HTB WORKS FOR EVERYONE EXCEPT ME :(
I tried with your rc.shape script on my LAN
Uytkownik Andy Furniss napisa:
I tried with your rc.shape script on my LAN using scp. I couldn't get
the bash to work - it looks to me like it will only set one user. But I
Did you launch it passing argument in or ''?
./rc.shape 4 5 6
is quite far different than
./rc.shape 4 5 6
hardcoded my
pljosh wrote:
Uytkownik Andy Furniss napisa:
I tried with your rc.shape script on my LAN using scp. I couldn't get
the bash to work - it looks to me like it will only set one user. But I
Did you launch it passing argument in or ''?
./rc.shape 4 5 6
is quite far different than
./rc.shape 4 5 6
p.s.
I made same test on other network with other PCs and different kernel
version and it was the same...
Have you got something recent? Try a 2.6.5 or newer kernel perhaps -
this has 1000Hz scheduling (I think) and presumably the latest HTB
patches. I guess make sure your tc is up to date
HTB should give fifty-fifty to U1 and U3... but it is not...
What is happening is that HTB gives about 350-380kbit for user3 and
everything else(more than 600kbit) for user1... this period is marked
as t1 on my graph...
Hmm, interesting. Can you switch the order of your IP mappings around
on
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
Hmm, interesting. Can you switch the order of your IP mappings around
on this test so that you can prove that it is some feature of HTB that
user1 always gets more bandwidth, and no something about that machine
(ie if you swap ip's for user1 and 3 that it still remains (the
pljosh wrote:
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
Hmm, interesting. Can you switch the order of your IP mappings
around on this test so that you can prove that it is some feature of
HTB that user1 always gets more bandwidth, and no something about
that machine (ie if you swap ip's for user1 and 3 that it
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
pljosh wrote:
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
Hmm, interesting. Can you switch the order of your IP mappings
around on this test so that you can prove that it is some feature of
HTB that user1 always gets more bandwidth, and no something about
that machine (ie if you swap ip's for
Uytkownik Ed Wildgoose napisa:
(see the htb_lookup_leaf function for details)
Hope that helps...
Hmm... My greatest C program was the most simple snmp client you can
ever imagine - and I was writing it for 2 weeks to finish my classes...
So I think it is not good idea for me to patch (or even to
pljosh wrote:
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
Hmm, interesting. Can you switch the order of your IP mappings around
on this test so that you can prove that it is some feature of HTB that
user1 always gets more bandwidth, and no something about that machine
(ie if you swap ip's for user1 and 3 that it
I just tested with my script and also see a 5-8% advantage for the lower
handle class.
I wouldn't call it a bug though - HTB is written for high traffic setups
and trade off needs to be made between perfect behaviour and CPU usage
and you say it gets better with more classes.
Andy.
Well -
pljosh wrote:
I just tested with my script and also see a 5-8% advantage for the
lower handle class.
I wouldn't call it a bug though - HTB is written for high traffic
setups and trade off needs to be made between perfect behaviour and
CPU usage and you say it gets better with more classes.
Andy Furniss wrote:
I also have half your bandwidth - and it was set at 400kbit for the test.
I meant to say aswell, that if you are doing the tests on downloads you
need to throttle to about 80% of your rate, so you can build up queues
and have a bit of spare for latency.
Andy.
HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c.
I did it, recompiled, launched... and i looks like it is even a little
bit worser: user1 has almost twice as much BW as user3...
I DO NOT GET IT
IT LOOKS LIKE HTB WORKS FOR EVERYONE EXCEPT ME :(
___
LARTC
Thanks very much, Devik and Andy, I had seminar today and I think it has some
success, and (for now?) I do not feel like having unanswered questions.
Dmitry
On Sunday 13 June 2004 21:41, Martin Devera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. In order of priority, we satisfy all leaf classes' rates (while
Dmitry Golubev wrote:
snip
One think I do not understand neither for SFQ nor for HTB (please explain for
both) - how can we maintain fairness in case of differently-sizes packets. As
I understand, one packet is atomic unit, and interface is requesting not more
and not less than one packet.
I
1. In order of priority, we satisfy all leaf classes' rates (while the class
is ?green?)
2. When the leaf classes' rate is reached (all the leaf classes are ?yellow?),
borrow the unused speed from parent classes if they have something to give
(if they are not ?red?). In this case, each leaf
On Saturday 12 June 2004 13:46, Dmitry Golubev wrote:
Hello,
I have been searching for HTB theory documentation and found two
interesting sources - Devik's page and docum.org FAQ. In some places they
are
contradictory which make me think that Devik's theoretic document (marked
actual) is
OK then, could you tell if I understand correctly and correct me if not?
1. In order of priority, we satisfy all leaf classes' rates (while the class
is green)
2. When the leaf classes' rate is reached (all the leaf classes are yellow),
borrow the unused speed from parent classes if they have
tc qdisc add dev ethX parent HTBCLASS handle QDISC pfifo limit 10
Thanks guys, reducing the queue length to 10 packets the delay decreased
from about 2600ms (2.6 seconds) to 80ms. That helps a lot!
Regards
--
Sie haben neue Mails! - Die GMX Toolbar informiert Sie beim Surfen!
Jetzt aktivieren
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Thierry Coutelier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
We got the following message on the console of one of our server:
~ HTB: dequeue bug (8,12140714,12140714), report it please !
The server is a Dell Poweredge with 2 CPUs running a 2.5.25 Kernel.
It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Can someone point me how to reduce this queue length or wich else qdisc I
can use to improve latency? All I need is a short queue in addition to the
shaping accuracy of HTB. Things like SFQ don't help. CBQ is a bit faster but
far more
Jason Boxman wrote:
On Friday 28 May 2004 14:54, Andy Furniss wrote:
snip
Reading your other post I see your small traffic is ~100b - this would
use three cells, so as a temporary kludge you could set your mpu to 159
and see how it goes.
AFAIK the author of the HTB patch is looking into modifying
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
Reading your other post I see your small traffic is ~100b - this would
use three cells, so as a temporary kludge you could set your mpu to
159 and see how it goes.
AFAIK the author of the HTB patch is looking into modifying it to do
the sums properly for DSL. There isn't
Jason Boxman wrote:
On Friday 14 May 2004 03:05, Ed Wildgoose wrote:
snip
I appears that you could change the patch in tc/core in fn
tc_calc_rtable, from:
+ if (overhead)
+ sz += overhead;
to something like:
+ if (overhead)
+ sz += (((sz-1)/mpu)+1) * overhead;
I did that and
On Friday 28 May 2004 14:54, Andy Furniss wrote:
snip
Reading your other post I see your small traffic is ~100b - this would
use three cells, so as a temporary kludge you could set your mpu to 159
and see how it goes.
AFAIK the author of the HTB patch is looking into modifying it to do the
Reading your other post I see your small traffic is ~100b - this would
use three cells, so as a temporary kludge you could set your mpu to
159 and see how it goes.
AFAIK the author of the HTB patch is looking into modifying it to do
the sums properly for DSL. There isn't one answer though -
[...]
I've just noticed that there is a patch on devik's site which does mpu
and overhead.
For dsl users mpu is, for practical purposes going to be 106 -
overhead is still variable though, depending on packet size.
Having these should let you push upstream bandwidth rates a bit closer
to
On Monday 17 May 2004 18:36, Andy Furniss wrote:
snip
Could be this then -
You can make HTB more accurate by setting HTB_HYSTERESIS to 0 in
net/sched/sch_htb.c.
I have been messing with producing graphs with SNMP, so I only just did this.
I was hoping to get before and after graphs to
Jason Boxman wrote:
On Monday 17 May 2004 18:36, Andy Furniss wrote:
snip
Could be this then -
You can make HTB more accurate by setting HTB_HYSTERESIS to 0 in
net/sched/sch_htb.c.
I have been messing with producing graphs with SNMP, so I only just did this.
I was hoping to get before and after
Jason Boxman wrote:
On Monday 17 May 2004 17:23, Ed Wildgoose wrote:
snip
Read the follows to that post as well. Basically it's only an
approximation. The MPU is basically pointing out that your ADSL
stream is encapsulated in an ATM stream. ATM uses fixed size 64 byte
packets. You need at
Am Wednesday 19 May 2004 01:43 schrieb Laurence Arabia:
My default class is 512Kbit DS 256Kbit US. I remembering reading
about this before but cannot find the post now. I have looked on the
HTB site but cannot find a bug report.
Most likely you're putting your local traffic into the same
I imagine that 106 value is a reference to this post:
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q2/012369.html
...
It's my suspicion that the MPU and overhead options for HTB would assist in
resolving this and enable me to resume using 190kbit instead of 160kbit for
the outer most parent
On Monday 17 May 2004 17:23, Ed Wildgoose wrote:
snip
Read the follows to that post as well. Basically it's only an
approximation. The MPU is basically pointing out that your ADSL
stream is encapsulated in an ATM stream. ATM uses fixed size 64 byte
packets. You need at least 2 of these,
Andy Furniss wrote:
You can make HTB more accurate by setting HTB_HYSTERESIS to 0 in
net/sched/sch_htb.c.
To save time - if you built HTB as a module, you can probably (well it
worked for me) get away with editing htb.c and do
make SUBDIRS=net/sched modules
and replacing
On Friday 14 May 2004 05:55, Andy Furniss wrote:
snip
If you can get a cell count from your modem you can work it out with
ping. I don't know what your pppoe is.
I can probably get my USB Stringray out of the closet and hook it up. I think
the Windows diagnostic utility for it actually
Andy Furniss wrote:
Hi.
I wrote in a reply to a mail on here recently that you can't set mpu
(minimum packet unit) on HTB as you can on CBQ.
I've just noticed that there is a patch on devik's site which does mpu
and overhead.
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/
For dsl users mpu is, for
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
Andy Furniss wrote:
Hi.
I wrote in a reply to a mail on here recently that you can't set mpu
(minimum packet unit) on HTB as you can on CBQ.
I've just noticed that there is a patch on devik's site which does mpu
and overhead.
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/
For dsl
Jason Boxman wrote:
On Thursday 13 May 2004 13:28, Andreas Klauer wrote:
Am Thursday 13 May 2004 16:38 schrieb Andreas Klauer:
Am Thursday 13 May 2004 15:54 schrieb Andy Furniss:
I've just noticed that there is a patch on devik's site which does mpu
and overhead.
I'll give it a try. Thanks for
On Thursday 13 May 2004 13:28, Andreas Klauer wrote:
Am Thursday 13 May 2004 16:38 schrieb Andreas Klauer:
Am Thursday 13 May 2004 15:54 schrieb Andy Furniss:
I've just noticed that there is a patch on devik's site which does mpu
and overhead.
I'll give it a try. Thanks for the hint.
On Monday 03 May 2004 13:54, derbel hajer wrote:
Hi,
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 2000Kbit ceil
2000kbit
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 1200Kbit ceil
2000kbit
tc class add dev eth0parent 1:1 classid
Patrick Spousta wrote:
I wish to use HTB shapper with ESFQ scheduler per class. Kernel patched,
compiled and reinstaled with all needed modules. Package iproute is also
patched, compiled and this 'new' version is installed.
When I tried assign HTB as root qdisc with the 'new' tc I got message
Andy Furniss wrote:
Sources for ESFQ patching I take from Debian sources
(iproute_20010824.orig.tar.gz, iproute_20010824-8.diff.gz and
iproute_20010824-8.dsc). I hope it sources are the same version as
original (Debian binary) iproute package.
When I tried apply HTB3.6 patch to iproute
Simon Byrnand wrote:
At 12:46 26/03/2004, Simon Byrnand wrote:
At 18:17 25/03/2004, Andrew Hall wrote:
You need to recompile the kernel after altering this value in
linux/include/net/pkt_sched.h. Also remember that if using SFQ on leaf
qdisc, then the queue length may cause delay problems if
Strange, must be somthing else going on.
I had the same 40 to 50 percent too slow, which was completely fixed bij using
PSCHED_CPU in pkt_sched.h.
Using kernel 2.4.24, I measure the speed with the iptables byte counters.
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:27:42 +1200
Simon Byrnand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Simon Byrnand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeroen Vriesman [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB speed
At 11:14 14/03/2004, Jeroen Vriesman wrote:
Hi,
just putting the answer to my own question here, for those who have
Byrnand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- To: Jeroen Vriesman [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 4:36 PM
- Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB speed
-
-
- At 11:14 14/03/2004, Jeroen Vriesman wrote:
- Hi,
-
- just putting the answer to my own question here, for those
- who have the
- same
At 11:14 14/03/2004, Jeroen Vriesman wrote:
Hi,
just putting the answer to my own question here, for those who have the
same problem, and read the mailing list archive.
The timing of the P4 based on jiffies is hopeless, it's different for
every processor, and can be a wrong by a factor 3.
If
considerably. This change needs to be done in
linux/net/sched/sch_sfq.c. which also needs a kernel recompilation.
- Original Message -
From: Simon Byrnand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeroen Vriesman [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB
in pkt_sched.h:
#define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_CPU
that's all, I wonder why it's not default to do this, or maybe it's an
idea to make the packet scheduler detect the presence of tsc when the
module is loaded.
Hi,
I think not all processors accept this #define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE
Hi,
Indeed, changing the timer to 1000Hz is possible, it turned out that I have a machine
here running with a 1000Hz timer ticker. (I've installed a realtime kernel on it for
audio recording).
About your previous question, I've noticed that the system with 1000Hz ticker (which
has been
Indeed, changing the timer to 1000Hz is possible, it turned out that I
have a machine here running with a 1000Hz timer ticker. (I've installed a
realtime kernel on it for audio recording).
About your previous question, I've noticed that the system with 1000Hz
ticker (which has been running
Hi Jeroen,
Thanx for your fast answer.
to use the TSC, the processor has to have a tsc, you can see that in
/proc/cpuinfo, for as far as I know, every P4 has it (but I'm not sure),
it's in the flags of cpuinfo:
On my P4-1800:
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep
Hi,
to use the TSC, the processor has to have a tsc, you can see that in /proc/cpuinfo,
for as far as I know, every P4 has it (but I'm not sure), it's in the flags of
cpuinfo:
On my P4-1800:
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
pse36 clflush dts
List,
I just logged in to a machine with a modern AMD cpu, it also has a TSC.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 6
model name : AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2000+
stepping: 2
cpu MHz : 1668.736
Hi,
just putting the answer to my own question here, for those who have the same problem,
and read the mailing list archive.
The timing of the P4 based on jiffies is hopeless, it's different for every
processor, and can be a wrong by a factor 3.
If the tsc (time stamp counter) is used, the
On Sunday 29 February 2004 22:30, Ciprian Niculescu wrote:
hi,
i want 5 classes that have rate 50, and ceil to max(or near) and that
borrow bandwidth.
but which config is better and why:
It depends on what you want to do. In the first example, the traffic will be
equally divided and each
At 00:24 25/02/2004, Animesh Bansriyar wrote:
Hi All,
I have set up a test script to limit incoming connections to my Network
Server like this. Running SuSE Linux Professional 8.2. The snippet from
my script is:
SNIP
# Adding some filters
tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:2 prio 1
On Friday 20 February 2004 06:18, Damion de Soto wrote:
Hi guys,
I've just been playing and reading again, and come to the conclusion
that although i've read a lot about quantum ( r2q) settings for the
htb qdisc, i still don't understand it.
If the quantum for each class should be as small
Are you using the tc userspace util binary that has HTB in it ?
-Original Message-
From: Eddie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 February 2004 01:24
To: lartc
Subject: [LARTC] htb kernel 2.4.18
Good day all
I'm trying to install htb under redhat 7.3
I got htb and patched the kernel,mad
On Thursday 12 February 2004 12:23, Eddie wrote:
Good day all
I'm trying to install htb under redhat 7.3
I got htb and patched the kernel,mad a make menuconfig and selected htb
under qos and did the recompile and started up with the new kernel
now when I run the scrip it says
Any Idea pleas
On Thursday 12 February 2004 12:51, Vlad H. wrote:
What can be wrong in this script? Any help is appreciated.
snip
Local traffic and Counter-Strike traffic are ok. But when it comes to HTTP
I'm getting huge delays, lost packets on MSN Messenger. I also found these
errors with dmesg command:
On Monday 09 February 2004 15:00, eddieknows wrote:
Hi all
I'm sure you have heard this before but sorry.I wrote a script once and
never looked at it again.An as my luck will have it I need it now and it
is gone.I'm trying my best to rewrite it:-(
My 1st question is: If my server is a
On Monday 09 February 2004 20:50, Patrick Turley wrote:
I am seeing a lot of messages like this on my console and in
/var/log/messages:
Feb 9 19:27:55 rnsa kernel: htb: class 20001 isn't work conserving ?!
The class it's referring to is the only subclass of an HTB qdisc. Can
anyone
On Sunday 08 February 2004 10:44, Patrick Spousta wrote:
Hi,
I have more ethernet cards. Egress shaping with HTB over eth0 works
fine, ingress shaping with HTB over IMQ works also fine, but in both of
cases I use only one class of traffic.
Now I want to divide traffic to 3 classes on other
On Saturday 31 January 2004 18:00, Alexander Clouter wrote:
On Jan 31, Art??ras ??lajus wrote:
Stef Coene wrote:
Devik told me that disabling hysteresis will give you more accuracy, but
you will loose speed. I had to disable hysteresis when I did some
bursts tests.
On Feb 01, Stef Coene wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2004 18:00, Alexander Clouter wrote:
On Jan 31, Art??ras ??lajus wrote:
Stef Coene wrote:
Devik told me that disabling hysteresis will give you more accuracy, but
you will loose speed. I had to disable hysteresis when I did some
On Saturday 31 January 2004 02:40, Andy Furniss wrote:
I posted earlier when I noticed that htb was releasing packets in pairs,
even though my burst/quantums were 1 pkt.
To fix I set HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c .
This gives a noticable gain in upstream worst case latency, for me
Stef Coene wrote:
Devik told me that disabling hysteresis will give you more accuracy, but you
will loose speed. I had to disable hysteresis when I did some bursts tests.
http://docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/36.html
Maybe this could be set as kernel option and not by editing .c file in next
On Jan 31, Art??ras ??lajus wrote:
Stef Coene wrote:
Devik told me that disabling hysteresis will give you more accuracy, but
you will loose speed. I had to disable hysteresis when I did some bursts
tests.
http://docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/36.html
Maybe this could be set as
Stef Coene wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2004 02:40, Andy Furniss wrote:
I posted earlier when I noticed that htb was releasing packets in pairs,
even though my burst/quantums were 1 pkt.
To fix I set HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c .
This gives a noticable gain in upstream worst case
I got this reply from don would rather answer on list so more people
have a chance to correct any of my misconceptions :-)
[this message off list - feel free to forward it, but leave out my address]
I wanted to see where from a slot the packets got dropped when the queue
was full. (e)sfq
Dan White wrote:
All of the gateways are set up properly, and I can communicate in
all directions, and can place calls clearly when the traffic is low. Now
here is my problem. When I dump a big file over the fiber link, the
voice quality goes down considerably. I hit cancel on the file, the
301 - 400 of 694 matches
Mail list logo
