Hi all,
Now, let's talk about the content and its structure. From the first
email, I have shared some references, maybe we could go from there.
Some things need to be considered are:
- what contents we're gonna provide to the visitors?
- which contents need to be displayed on the main page?
-
Several things which should be easily visible/accessible to anyone who
comes for the first time, or wants to get started with Lazarus:
"What is it?" - explaining in short what is Lazarus, LCL, FPC, Lazarus-CCR
"How does it look like?" - screenshots of Lazarus on different
platforms, different Laza
@Aleksa
I almost completely agree.
There should probably be a section with these information on the first
page. The first page should primarily be for those who come for the
first time - to attract them, and show them what Lazarus really is.
Exactly. This is important and could be done in rea
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 18:20, theo wrote:
>
> Only thing I do not agree: I think we should not compare Lazarus with Delphi
> and other tools. It's a little cheap / bad taste.
>
> Theo
I think it's important to have some as-objective-as-possible
comparison for people who used and liked Delphi (li
Aleksa Todorovic schrieb:
Only thing I do not agree: I think we should not compare Lazarus with Delphi
and other tools. It's a little cheap / bad taste.
Theo
I think it's important to have some as-objective-as-possible
comparison for people who used and liked Delphi (like most of us are,
I be
look at online help. Also, I think that
win7/vista users need a Microsoft download to run the chm version.
best wishes
Mike
> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:49:56 +0100
> From: Aleksa Todorovic
> Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Reconstructing Lazarus Website 2: the content
> To: Lazarus
It does not need to be part of a CMS - can just be static pages,
linking to documentation, wiki.
Yes, that's what I'm gonna do first. Just a good appearance with a
collection of bunches of links and some appropriate semi-marketting
words campaign. Once it's settled, the CMS could utilize th
theo wrote:
@Aleksa
I almost completely agree.
There should probably be a section with these information on the first
page. The first page should primarily be for those who come for the
first time - to attract them, and show them what Lazarus really is.
Exactly. This is important and could b
Bee Jay wrote:
It does not need to be part of a CMS - can just be static pages,
linking to documentation, wiki.
Yes, that's what I'm gonna do first. Just a good appearance with a
collection of bunches of links and some appropriate semi-marketting
words campaign. Once it's settled, the CMS cou
I've made a very basic design, just to show off my page layout and
content structure proposal. It's not yet about the true design (color,
theme, etc) and the accessories (images, icons, etc).
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
On this design, at the topp
02.02.2010 14:49, Bee Jay wrote:
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Still I think that we must use blue colors. IDE uses blue logo, blue
icons. Everywhere the blue color dominates. Web site can't be brown but
everything else blue. And I think that we are
Hi,
Just thought I would mention that static pages is probably easier than any
CMS. Applying relatively simple CSS can make it look beautiful without the
need for fancy HTML.
To help with maintaining the website, we have done the following in the
tiOPF project. The HTML content is actually in the
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Still I think that we must use blue colors. IDE uses blue logo, blue
icons. Everywhere the blue color dominates. Web site can't be brown
but everything else blue. And I think that we are not able to change
logo and al
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Bee Jay wrote:
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Still I think that we must use blue colors. IDE uses blue logo, blue icons.
Everywhere the blue color dominates. Web site can't be brown but everything
else blue. And I think that we
Something like this could easily apply to Lazarus too, and it is
relatively
little effort to setup. Also designing the website so that in
doesn't use
serverside includes etc makes it easier for users to checkout the
website
from the repository and simply use a web browser to view the content
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 14:49 +0700, Bee Jay wrote:
> I've made a very basic design, just to show off my page layout and
> content structure proposal. It's not yet about the true design (color,
> theme, etc) and the accessories (images, icons, etc).
>
> Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 09:26, Bee Jay wrote:
>>> Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
>>
>> Still I think that we must use blue colors. IDE uses blue logo, blue
>> icons. Everywhere the blue color dominates. Web site can't be brown but
>> everything else blue. A
Looks good. Maybe we can add a tagline to the brownish header. 'Code
once, compile everywhere' could be it maybe. It has to tell what
Lazarus/fpc is as less as words possible.
Yes, as I asked previously, I need help about the wording. Somebody
who has a bit knowledge about marketting may propo
Personally, I like the other color scheme more than this one. But, I
would rather go with color scheme which is more in spirit of whole
project. (btw, how about having blue behind Lazarus less "intense" -
maybe more like those at the top and bottom?)
BTW, my post is about the content structure a
Bee Jay wrote:
>
> Here's the blue one:
> http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/3214/lazwebnew020210blue.png
Looks good, but isn't there a spelling mistake in the title on content. It
seem so many people make this mistake.
The correct spelling is "Free Pascal" and *not* "FreePascal".
See website
Bee Jay wrote:
>
> Here's the blue one:
> http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/3214/lazwebnew020210blue.png
Another spelling mistake in the bottom of the page. The spelling is "IDE"
and not "I.D.E". :-)
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
h
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 15:35 +0700, Bee Jay wrote:
> > Looks good. Maybe we can add a tagline to the brownish header. 'Code
> > once, compile everywhere' could be it maybe. It has to tell what
> > Lazarus/fpc is as less as words possible.
>
> Yes, as I asked previously, I need help about the wordin
Bee Jay wrote:
>
> Is there anything still missing from there?
No the content is MUCH better than the current website. I like the "summary
information" and the roadmap (links) at the bottom. On page for the user
and they can easily branch off from there no more specific information.
Easy to spot!
02.02.2010 15:44, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Brown. But that's personal, offcourse.
No matter what we like. I believe it is possible to draw it perfect
using blue colors. Again IDE icons and logos can't be in another color
sheme as a web-site.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
--
__
Hi Bee Jay
I really like the page design!
I have a suggestion for the wording at the top of the page - see it below.
You will see it is a bit more explanatory, perhaps more suitable for students.
It also omits 'native', and I suggest this can be picked up in your
'cross-platform' stuff below. (
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 15:40 +0700, Bee Jay wrote:
> > Personally, I like the other color scheme more than this one. But, I
> > would rather go with color scheme which is more in spirit of whole
> > project. (btw, how about having blue behind Lazarus less "intense" -
> > maybe more like those at the
Bee Jay wrote:
>
> BTW, which one do you like? the brown one or the blue one? :)
Yes, the 'Code once, Compile everywhere' slogan is important. Just like the
similar slogan used in Java.
As for color, I think the blue theme should be used. After all, FPC,
Lazarus, Wiki and Mantis websites alread
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Paul Ishenin wrote:
02.02.2010 15:44, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Brown. But that's personal, offcourse.
No matter what we like. I believe it is possible to draw it perfect using
blue colors. Again IDE icons and logos can't be in another color sheme as a
web-site.
I a
2010/2/2 Mike Parr :
> It also omits 'native', and I suggest this can be picked up in
> your 'cross-platform' stuff below.
For any advanced user "native" is as important as "cross-platform".
This tells one that FPC is not interpreter or VM based, but real
native compiler.
--
_
For example, when you click on 'support(s)' what kind of page do you
see? Of is if a menu which shows when you hover your mouse above it,
so
that 'Mailing lists','online forum', 'IRC' etc appears?
My approach is to be less JS as possible, more static HTML/CSS. It'll
be easier to maintain. S
Bee Jay wrote:
Personally, I like the other color scheme more than this one. But, I
would rather go with color scheme which is more in spirit of whole
project. (btw, how about having blue behind Lazarus less "intense" -
maybe more like those at the top and bottom?)
BTW, my post is about the con
Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
> Perhaps i'm the only one missing a link to the Wiki pages?
It is there, at the bottom of the page under "Public Contributions", then
the first link "Public wiki".
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://
Perhaps i'm the only one missing a link to the Wiki pages?
It's available on the footer section.
It's my understanding that most of the current content for
developers is placed on the wiki. So perhaps such a link should be
placed in the top bar along with the downloads and support.
The to
Bee Jay wrote:
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Still I think that we must use blue colors. IDE uses blue logo, blue
icons. Everywhere the blue color dominates. Web site can't be brown
but everything else blue. And I think that we are not able to change
l
I really like the page design!
Thanks.
I have a suggestion for the wording at the top of the page - see it
below.
You will see it is a bit more explanatory, perhaps more suitable for
students. It also omits 'native', and I suggest this can be picked
up in your 'cross-platform' stuff belo
02.02.2010 16:27, Bee Jay wrote:
- native (more to Lazarus)
- cross platform (more to FPC)
I would say vice-versa.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mail
A design like this can even be served using current smf/tp site
(till our own pascalbased is ready)
Well, actually I'm thinking about Wordpress. I'm trying to collaborate
both ideas, using available mostly php-based CMS or build custom CMS
based on fpWeb. Also the contents can be obtained f
The big header section isn't static. It will be slide-like
presentation that will highlight key features of both FPC and Lazarus.
One more thing. The header section is available on the front page
only. It wouldn't be available on the other deeper pages. The top link
section and footer sitem
Bee Jay wrote:
A design like this can even be served using current smf/tp site (till
our own pascalbased is ready)
Well, actually I'm thinking about Wordpress. I'm trying to collaborate
both ideas, using available mostly php-based CMS or build custom CMS
based on fpWeb. Also the contents can be
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 16:35 +0700, Bee Jay wrote:
> > The big header section isn't static. It will be slide-like
> > presentation that will highlight key features of both FPC and Lazarus.
>
> One more thing. The header section is available on the front page
> only. It wouldn't be available on
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 16:35 +0700, Bee Jay wrote:
> > The big header section isn't static. It will be slide-like
> > presentation that will highlight key features of both FPC and Lazarus.
>
> One more thing. The header section is available on the front page
> only. It wouldn't be available on
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:49:07AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Bee Jay wrote:
> >
> > Is there anything still missing from there?
>
> No the content is MUCH better than the current website. I like the "summary
> information" and the roadmap (links) at the bottom. On page for the user
> and
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:45:12AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Bee Jay wrote:
> >
> > Here's the blue one:
> > http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/3214/lazwebnew020210blue.png
>
> Another spelling mistake in the bottom of the page. The spelling is "IDE"
> and not "I.D.E". :-)
I would not
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:45:12AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Bee Jay wrote:
Here's the blue one:
http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/3214/lazwebnew020210blue.png
Another spelling mistake in the bottom of the page. The spelling is "IDE"
a
> I place the wiki link on Contribution section, not on Docs section,
> because I want to emphasize the "contribution" rather than the
> "document". ;)
It means lots of contents must be moved from wiki to the new static pages,
right?
Regards,
Juha Manninen
--
___
02.02.2010 17:16, Juha Manninen wrote:
I place the wiki link on Contribution section, not on Docs section,
because I want to emphasize the "contribution" rather than the
"document". ;)
It means lots of contents must be moved from wiki to the new static pages,
right?
Not exatly. Maybe the main
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:05:05AM +0100, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >> Another spelling mistake in the bottom of the page. The spelling is "IDE"
> >> and not "I.D.E". :-)
> >
> > I would not use the term IDE, but RAD, and reserve IDE for the textmode IDE.
>
> No, since lazarus is not a RAD. It
On 02/02/2010 07:49, Bee Jay wrote:
I've made a very basic design, just to show off my page layout and
content structure proposal. It's not yet about the true design (color,
theme, etc) and the accessories (images, icons, etc).
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew0202
Ok, and how a user can 'see' where he is? And what we are looking at
now
is the first level navigation. What about the second and third?
Good question. I haven't finish the deeper pages layout proposal. The
content pages, will have a navigation bar below the shrinked header.
The shrinked h
Instead or in addition to the "text feature highlights" some icons
or screenshots? So users can visually recognize the most important
features?
Yes, that's the plan. My designer needs some time to design the
required images and icons. Once it's done, I will post it on the
appearance thre
Hi,
> Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
> Below it, it's an animated large header which will show some highlight
> features of FPC/Lazarus in rotation.
Please don't make the animations very heavy for CPU.
There are many pages with animated ads that hog 70
Juha Manninen wrote:
>
> Please don't make the animations very heavy for CPU.
Yes, please don't. And please don't use cheesy animations like the running
cheetah either - that is so 80's style! Very cheesy!!
> There are many pages with animated ads that hog 70% of my CPU and I don't
> want
> t
On Feb 2, 2010, at 6:13 PM, Juha Manninen wrote:
Please don't make the animations very heavy for CPU.
There are many pages with animated ads that hog 70% of my CPU and I
don't want
to keep them open for long.
It'd be a simple JS animation, not flash and nothing fancy.
Another wish:
I stil
Marco van de Voort schrieb:
I would not use the term IDE, but RAD, and reserve IDE for the textmode IDE.
IMO RAD is a development model or qualifier ("RAD Studio"), while IDE is
a concrete implementation (FP IDE, Lazarus IDE, Delphi IDE). In the
given context it should be clear that the "Laz
Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
> Marco van de Voort schrieb:
>
>> I would not use the term IDE, but RAD, and reserve IDE for the textmode IDE.
>
> IMO RAD is a development model or qualifier ("RAD Studio"), while IDE is
> a concrete implementation (FP IDE, Lazarus IDE, Delphi IDE). In the
> given
Juha Manninen schrieb:
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Below it, it's an animated large header which will show some highlight
features of FPC/Lazarus in rotation.
Please don't make the animations very heavy for CPU.
I have a mental problem with an
On 02/02/2010 14:08, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Juha Manninen schrieb:
Take a look at
http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Below it, it's an animated large header which will show some
highlight features of FPC/Lazarus in rotation.
Please don't make the animations ver
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Juha Manninen schrieb:
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Below it, it's an animated large header which will show some highlight
features of FPC/Lazarus in rotation.
Please don't make the animations ve
On 2/2/2010 2:49 AM, Bee Jay wrote:
I've made a very basic design, just to show off my page layout and
content structure proposal. It's not yet about the true design (color,
theme, etc) and the accessories (images, icons, etc).
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew0202
On 2 February 2010 16:08, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
>
> If somebody knows how to deactivate animations in Firefox, any hints are
> very welcome!
Very easy.
In address URL type: about:config
Accept the "I'll be careful" message.
Search for "image.animation_mode" The default value is "normal"
On 2 February 2010 18:01, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> And that should be it.
Ah you beat me to it, I should have read all message before I replied.
Sorry for the duplicate
--
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI too
On 2/2/2010 04:59, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:45:12AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Bee Jay wrote:
Here's the blue one:
http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/3214/lazwebnew020210blue.png
Another spelling mistake in the bottom of the page. The spelling is "IDE"
and n
On 2/2/2010 06:13, Juha Manninen wrote:
Hi,
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Below it, it's an animated large header which will show some highlight
features of FPC/Lazarus in rotation.
Please don't make the animations very heavy for CPU.
There are ma
On 2/2/2010 09:08, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Juha Manninen schrieb:
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Below it, it's an animated large header which will show some
highlight features of FPC/Lazarus in rotation.
Please don't make the animations very h
The content pages, will have a navigation bar below the shrinked
header. The shrinked header will be static which will show the
appropriate slide in regard with the content being displayed.
Here's my proposal for content page layout:
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/676/lazwebnewsubpage03021
Paul Ishenin wrote:
Still I think that we must use blue colors. IDE uses blue logo, blue
icons. Everywhere the blue color dominates. Web site can't be brown
but everything else blue. And I think that we are not able to change
logo and all icons to brown in a reasonable time.
Blue is only
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
If somebody knows how to deactivate animations in Firefox, any hints
are very welcome!
Use the about:config
url.
filter on
image.animation_mode
Set value to 'none' (no quotes)
And that should be it.
Bingo! :-)
DoDi
--
__
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 14:58 +0700, Bee Jay wrote:
> > The content pages, will have a navigation bar below the shrinked
> > header. The shrinked header will be static which will show the
> > appropriate slide in regard with the content being displayed.
>
> Here's my proposal for content page la
On 03/2/10 7:58, Bee Jay wrote:
Here's my proposal for content page layout:
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/676/lazwebnewsubpage030210.png
Please share your idea and opinions.
Your work, even in drafts is good, and bodes well for a revamped web
presence that has flair and simplicity as well
On Feb 3, 2010, at 4:28 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Nice.
Thanks.
I think that this part should be the same throughout the whole site.
No, the header will be changed according to what content being
displayed on the page. If it's FPC specific, then the header will show
FPC banner. If
However, if we are making a concerted effort to present a more
'professional' web image, perhaps it is time to impose a more
consistent style on the more public and static pages, and agree on a
few rules of style and spelling (British or American English? IDE or
I.D.E.? and suchlike). What
And here's mine, with more 'elegant' touch to it. I use large fonts
and white overall to make a neutral appearance --as I don't know
Lazarus' "color"--. The page uses less text as possible on the front
page, inspired by Mercurial, VLC, Wordpress website so that new
visitors wont be overwhelmed by i
Hi.
> And here's mine, with more 'elegant' touch to it. I use large fonts
> and white overall to make a neutral appearance --as I don't know
> Lazarus' "color"--. The page uses less text as possible on the front
> page, inspired by Mercurial, VLC, Wordpress website so that new
> visitors wont be o
On Feb 3, 2010, at 8:16 PM, Klenongan wrote:
And here's mine, with more 'elegant' touch to it. I use large fonts
and white overall to make a neutral appearance --as I don't know
Lazarus' "color"--.
Yes, it look more elegant. It's a nice design, I must say.
The page uses less text as possible
I took minimalist approach because most new visitors will be
overwhelmed by things they have to read just to download the damned
thing. There are many reason why open source projects nowadays put a
big button on their front page just so anyone who visit the page for
the first time (either by word o
> > I suggest we use our own images. I already asked help from someone on the
> > other thread to help us on this.
I think these pictures are under CreativCommons
http://animalphotos.info/a/topics/animals/mammals/cheetahs/
http://www.piqs.de/schnelluebersicht/search/gepard/
--
___
Choose the picture you like it and trace it with Inkscape or corel draw then
start to clean it up.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Michael Schneider wrote:
>
> > > I suggest we use our own images. I already asked help from someone on
> the
> > > other thread to help us on this.
> I think these p
On 2/3/2010 08:16, Klenongan wrote:
And here's mine, with more 'elegant' touch to it. I use large fonts
and white overall to make a neutral appearance --as I don't know
Lazarus' "color"--. The page uses less text as possible on the front
page, inspired by Mercurial, VLC, Wordpress website so that
Klenongan schrieb:
And here's mine, with more 'elegant' touch to it. I use large fonts
and white overall to make a neutral appearance --as I don't know
Lazarus' "color"--. The page uses less text as possible on the front
page, inspired by Mercurial, VLC, Wordpress website so that new
visitors wo
Michael Schneider schrieb:
I suggest we use our own images. I already asked help from someone on the
other thread to help us on this.
I think these pictures are under CreativCommons
http://animalphotos.info/a/topics/animals/mammals/cheetahs/
The "Three Cheetahs" image could reflect the multi-p
On 2/3/2010 18:37, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Michael Schneider schrieb:
I suggest we use our own images. I already asked help from someone
on the
other thread to help us on this.
I think these pictures are under CreativCommons
http://animalphotos.info/a/topics/animals/mammals/cheetahs/
The
I think these pictures are under CreativCommons
http://animalphotos.info/a/topics/animals/mammals/cheetahs/
http://www.piqs.de/schnelluebersicht/search/gepard/
Is it just me or are there others that would agree that using real life
animal pictures are just plain cheezy? (Well, the current L
On 04/02/2010 05:24, Paul van Helden wrote:
It seems a significant portion of open source projects pick some
animal, almost as some type of "mascot", and that is cool. There isn't
one example, however, that I can think of where such website looks
like some page on National Geographic. From pe
Paul wrote
A related topic that's been bothering me: can we please discuss a
name change for Lazarus as well? It's not like a name change will
hurt the project at this stage, methinks...
Have you noticed that Firefox now has an add-on called Lazarus?
Isn't that irritating?
Cheers
Lance
04.02.2010 13:27, Lance Collins wrote:
Have you noticed that Firefox now has an add-on called Lazarus?
Isn't that irritating?
If you goodle for Delphi you find more things than Delphi from Embarcadero.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
--
___
Lazarus m
Klenongan wrote:
>
> Preview:
> http://xs.to/image-FAED_4B6973FF.jpg
The big cheetah image makes me feel like I'm on a wildlife website and not
a software tools website.
PS:
I had a good laugh at the year range in the copyright notice. Very
optimistic that Lazarus will still be around. If it is
On 2010/02/04 07:56 AM, Martin wrote:
I had the "National Geographic" impression too... I did like the
proposal from Bee Jay (
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/676/lazwebnewsubpage030210.png )
I don't like the gradient fill blue (old fashioned) and even less the
idea of rotating banners in
I took minimalist approach because most new visitors will be
overwhelmed by things they have to read just to download the damned
thing. There are many reason why open source projects nowadays put a
big button on their front page just so anyone who visit the page for
the first time (either by word
I don't like the gradient fill blue (old fashioned) and even less
the idea of rotating banners in that position (annoying)
Please note that it's a work in progress, nothing is final. Please
read my other emails regarding this.
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...wri
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 20:16 +0700, Klenongan wrote:
> And here's mine, with more 'elegant' touch to it. I use large fonts
> and white overall to make a neutral appearance --as I don't know
> Lazarus' "color"--. The page uses less text as possible on the front
> page, inspired by Mercurial, VLC, Wor
On 04/02/2010 07:29, Paul van Helden wrote:
On 2010/02/04 07:56 AM, Martin wrote:
A related topic that's been bothering me: can we please discuss a
name change for Lazarus as well? It's not like a name change will
hurt the project at this stage, methinks...
-1
I don't see why changing the
Paul van Helden schrieb:
Is it just me or are there others that would agree that using real life
animal pictures are just plain cheezy?
+1
I vote for simply using the "paw"
(/images/splash_source/paw.png). It is a beautiful piece of artwork.
This image may conflict with Jack Wolfskin, who
Martin schrieb:
I had the "National Geographic" impression too... I did like the
proposal from Bee Jay (
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/676/lazwebnewsubpage030210.png )
Just another thing: I'd prefer the term "multi-platform", in favor of
"cross-platform", which latter is frequently used
> I don't like this design at all. Bee's design is much better.
>
...
>
> What you expect on a home-page is links, links, links and a few lines
> explaining things. Because every new-comer has a different reason to
> come to that page. Some like screenshots, and decide what this product
> is on tho
Hello Lazarus-List,
Thursday, February 4, 2010, 5:15:25 PM, you wrote:
K> Strange, I can see the images just fine. Maybe something wrong with
K> your proxy, or network settings? The xs.to is one of my bookmarked
K> image host, I choose it because i can call it out of my head, being
K> just 'xs.to
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 23:15 +0700, Klenongan wrote:
> > I don't like this design at all. Bee's design is much better.
> >
> ...
> >
> > What you expect on a home-page is links, links, links and a few lines
> > explaining things. Because every new-comer has a different reason to
> > come to that pag
On Feb 4, 2010, at 11:15 PM, Klenongan wrote:
Well that's interesting, you don't know what Lazarus because you do
not want to read the text, which right next to a big picture. A text
below the name 'Lazarus' made bigger than the rest of the page, well
placed to be seen first, not only that I took
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 07:24:25AM +0200, Paul van Helden wrote:
> > http://www.piqs.de/schnelluebersicht/search/gepard/
> >
> >
> Is it just me or are there others that would agree that using real life
> animal pictures are just plain cheezy? (Well, the current Lazarus logos
> with cheetahs
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:29:55AM +0200, Paul van Helden wrote:
> > I don't see why changing the name. Any Name except for "Pascal
> > RAD-IDE" needs branding => users have to learn to associate it with a
> > pascal RAD-IDE.
> Well, perhaps there are other people that are having the same experie
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:14:51AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Klenongan wrote:
> >
> > Preview:
> > http://xs.to/image-FAED_4B6973FF.jpg
>
> The big cheetah image makes me feel like I'm on a wildlife website and not
> a software tools website.
Keep in mind that for Africans this is all mo
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
