On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Pi,
> Thanks for the offer. I'm thinking along the lines of setting up mirror(s)
> for the site right now. I think we should keep the main site on SF for now.
>
> IMHO, if VA runs into problems, someone will pick up the support for
> SourceForge. It never
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Mike Noyes wrote:
> At 2001-11-13 12:14 -0500, David Douthitt wrote:
> >FSF Europe is advising authors to move away from SourceForge.
> >
> >What do you think?
> >
> >http://www.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-10-20-01.en.html
>
> David,
> I now have a user id on Savana. Do yo
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, David Douthitt wrote:
> 1. What does the error code of 153 from gunzip mean? It's not a GNU
> compatable code...
>
> 2. What does the error code of 153 from mkfs.minix mean?
I am making a wild guess here, but could it be that either program does
not set an explicit exit-valu
On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, George Metz wrote:
> Hey everyone.
>
> Just thought it was time to explain why I disappeared over the past few
> months. It's been a rough time for me, but I seem to finally be getting
> clear.
>
> [snip work stinks]
Heya George,
You're not the only one who got too busy wit
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Mike Sensney wrote:
> Palm Upgrades
>
> [Updated, 16:20 PDT] Empower Technologies Inc., a 30-person company based in
> Redmond, WA, today announced what they are calling "the world's first major
> operating system upgrade for Palm IIIx and IIIxe handhelds". A preliminary
> "d
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> > We will probably perpetually disagree in our viewpoints here then. Which
> > doesn't matter, diversity == strength :)
>
> Being a vi nut, I'm used to being alone :-)
I use vi solely as my editor when I work as root and when I do I prefer it
to be a
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> Hey! What's with this VI stuff...it's emacs all the way!
> ;-)
Heh, I can see it now:
Connected to 192.168.1.2
Escape character is ^]
Welcome to Nitrogen
Username: jrhacker
Password:
1..Interface Configuration
2..Route C
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Luis.F.Correia wrote:
>
> >Take a look at Cisco I'd say. I never have to compile IOS from source, but
> >they're pretty responsible in reporting security issues.
>
> Provided you'll pay for the fixes.
>
> They do NOT offer nothing for free... but they never said that either..
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> Mike Sensney wrote:
> >
> > At 12:26 PM 06/14/2001 -0500, David Douthitt wrote
>
> > Windows users who don't know Linux/ipchains should just skip installing a
> > LEAF firewall since it will add no protection? Well, that will simplify
> > things a lot
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> Jack Coates wrote:
>
> [speaking of Portage, a version of the BSD ports tree for Linux]
> > That would rock, speaking as one who's been bitten by many an
> > rpm-related problem... Does picoBSD have anything like that? Could be a
> > good place to raid
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > >P.P.S. what steps have been taken to store and or mirror sourceforge
> > >locally should VA Linux go away?
> >
> > I backup our web site, and the content in the DocManager here:
> > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/archives/
> >
> > SourceForge
Those who followed my CISH efforts a bit know that I started it off by
writing a wrapper for ipchains which accepted and displayed cisco-syntax
access-list rules. I've taken this concept one step further now and put
this functionality in a separate binary. This new command no longer needs
the ipch
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, John wrote:
> This issue _will_ get publicity and it casts a very bad light on Linux and
> Open Source (Guilt by Association). A public statement is warranted.
> Morgan Reed's draft is good and should serve to limit the damage of
> otherwise unfettered reporters (ZDNet fanat
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Scott C. Best wrote:
>
> I just wanted to split a quick hair. No affront to
> Pi, I just needed a handy quote to speak from:
>
> > My point: This is an LRP issue. Deal with it in LRP and try not to
> > generalize it into something larger. Abstaining from politics is pol
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Pim van Riezen wrote:
> My point: This is an LRP issue. Deal with it in LRP and try not to
> generalize it into something larger. Abstaining from politics is politics
> as well.
Doing a bit of a follow-up on myself here. I think it may help if I point
out what my
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Morgan Reed, 2001-06-12 00:52 -0400
> >This is an inital rough draft that I think/hope represents all of the
> >ideas mentioned here.
>
> Morgan,
> It looks pretty good to me. For this to work we need all of our project
> admins and a strong majority of de
On Tue, 29 May 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> Pim van Riezen wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 29 May 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> >
> > > My compile time environment is Red Hat 6.x with the glibc 2.0
> > > compatability libraries - thus I've gotten to appreciate
On Tue, 29 May 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> My compile time environment is Red Hat 6.x with the glibc 2.0
> compatability libraries - thus I've gotten to appreciate make -e quite
> well.
I created a redhat5.2 install in a separate directory with rpm --root and
I chroot() to there when I want to
On Tue, 29 May 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> Here it is:
>
> COMPILE TIME ERRORS FOR TCP WRAPPERS AGAINST GLIBC 2.0
>
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/pub/oxygen/src/net/security/tcpwrappers/tcp_wrappers_7.6'
> i386-glibc20-linux-gcc -O2 -g -DFACILITY=LOG_DAEMON
> -DHOSTS_ACCESS -DDAEMON_UMA
On Tue, 29 May 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> libnsl appears to be required by:
>
> cpio
> strace
> tcpd
>
> I've compiled tcpd (tcpwrappers) without NIS support, but with glibc
> 2.2 (sigh). The i386-glibc20-linux-gcc compiler complains about using
> -c and -o with multiple compilations (huh?).
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Peter Nosko wrote:
> pn] I was thinking it took a long time to create the root.lrp during the
> backup, but wasn't paying enough attention to say so for sure. I checked
> the boot partition, and the root.lrp file is 4,176,896 bytes. I tried to
> pkzip it so I could get it t
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Arne Bernin wrote:
> What is missing right now is thread support. That's for sure ;-)
There are not that many programs which use threads. For the couple that
do, porting the essential bits to linuxthreads symantics sounds like not
too hard? Writing a simple wrapper for the 9
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Arne Bernin wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> i didn't wrote when you where discussing it (Quite busy with other things),
> but my "dream" is to have a lrp/leaf system based on uClibc.
> It is not usable for this right now but seems to go right into that
> direction, and if it supports
On Wed, 16 May 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> Sounds like a good reason to shift from using glibc 2.0 to using glibc
> 2.1 or 2.2. I, too, have seen teh MESS that comes from trying to
> compile things for glibc 2.0. In particular, there are several
> applications which don't seem like they'll co
On Wed, 16 May 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> I must say I've been surprised at all the excitement over Linux
> 2.4. I've noticed that all of you kernel wizards are scrambling to
> get Linux 2.4 installed on LRP, while glibc 2.1 gets ignored.
>
> To me, Linux 2.4 offers only this:
>
> * State
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Jack Coates wrote:
> well, http://www.mac.linux-m68k.org is probably a better fit for David
> -- ain't nothing running on a Mac Plus except what it came with. I think
> PalmOS might be a good fit, but the HCI issues would bite :-)
minix ;)
Pi
_
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, S.C.Best wrote:
> Jeff:
> Sorry you don't agree. What I mean to say was, suppose
> my currently running system has a working /etc/dnscache (for
> example). I'd be ill advised to extract a new dnscache.lrp without
> carefully controlling where it untar's. The defaults wou
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Scott C. Best wrote:
> Pi:
> Woof!
> That's terribly annoying.
I agree, it just always seemed to annoy me personally at times where
taking a better look at it was not an option.
> So...forgive my non-sed'ness, but what would be the
> equiv of, say: "grep -
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Scott C. Best wrote:
>
> Am having trouble with normal grep options in
> eigerstein 2.2.16. Anyone else seen this? Getting error
> messages like "sed: can't read foo..." for simple
> things like:
> grep -v foo /etc/passwd
>
> Huh? sed with greap? Any thought
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> Someone (Matt?) said that busybox more segfaulted in termio.
>
> Now, I have more to add for SegFaults:
>
> * more still segfaults (after a while)
> * tftp segfaults: enter tftp, type "?" and watch
> * file segfaults - right away
> * fdisk segfaults -
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Eric Wolzak wrote:
> you're right about that
> the winkler prins (dutch encyclopedia) calls this "mountain"
> grebbeberg ;)
I fell for the "new spelling" trap.
> but you exagerated the height
> (driehonderd meter, kom nou ;) )
Depends on the water level, really :>
Pi
--
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Steven Peck wrote:
> I think the new image should remain hard to spell. :)
>
> Kilamanjaro?
I could offer you our 300m garguantan "mountain":
Grebbenberg
This would be hard to spell _and_ pronounce :>
Pi
___
Leaf-devel mail
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> F) Security enhanced/updated versions of key libraries/utilities (stolen
>from David D's Oxygen)
Could anyone provide me with an overview of what problems there are with
what library/utility versions? And, if relevant, where to get n
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:41:18PM +0100, Pim van Riezen scribbled:
> > What amazes me, on both the leaf and my stats, is that so very few people
> > actually access the site with lynx. You'd expect that the h4xx0r-value of
>
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> It looks like your getting about 2000 hits a day. Is your site listed in
> any web directories?
The average for this month was 3341 hits per day, averagely 267 visitors.
But it's all a function of how much activity I put out. A freshmeat
announcement usua
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Everyone,
> We received 4196 visitors since moving to phpWebSite (includes data from
> the old phpWebSite too). The SourceForge statistics page is incorrect. Here
> are the stats from the phpWebSite "Client Stats" page.
>
> Browsers
> Internet Explorer
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Paul Batozech wrote:
> Steven
>
> I think you stated this rather succinctly, that's just about what I got
> out of the LDP docs when I was considering converting an html howto to
> DocBook. The 'write it once, spew forth multiple formats' is quite
> appealing. When I looked a
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> CISH team,
> Would you like to join the LEAF project on SourceForge?
>
> Our project description and goals are listed here:
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/phpwebsite/
Hey Mike,
Getting into contact with the LEAF project was still on my list of things
to d
38 matches
Mail list logo
