I would support Eric's request but understand the cost. But how about
providing an alternate kernel for those of us who want it. I know it is more
effort for you Jacques but there does seem to be a community of interest out
here who would appreciate it.
rgds/andy
-Original Message-
Yes, I hva now found out it´s PPTP to PPPoA connection. I need a dial up
client for Bering. Where do I find a like?
r/Halldor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Etienne
Charlier
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 4:27 PM
To: Halldór Þórólfsson;
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 21:37, Simon Bolduc wrote:
Not true - I tried installing Eiger on a 486sx previously and it didn't work
with the standard kernel complaining about a lack of FPU on the chip. AFAIK
all 486sx CPUs shipped without FPU - altho I believe you could get add-on
chips for
Hi,
I have setup the lrp firewall and a couple of my machines using mostly
defaults in the network.conf file. I have tried several trial and error
methods to get our printer recognized in this setup. I have and HP laserjet
4mp with an external print server... JetDirect EX plus. This print
I have been using Eiger 3.1 over DSL pppoe for some time now with no
problems. But, I have run into one concerning the execution of
/etc/ppp/ip-up.
I have some software that requires the leaf box to port forward certain
port numbers. That's no problem. I first did it in a script file and had
no
I have setup the lrp firewall and a couple of my Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)
machines using mostly
defaults in the network.conf file. I have tried several trial and error
methods to get our printer recognized in this
I assume you just want to use the printer internally. Here is how I setup my
print-server (actually it has nothing to do with the LRP):
Connect it to the hub (e.g. 192.168.1.x), from another computer, open a
Command-Prompt box set the printer IP by typing (supply yours)
arp -s 192.168.1.207
Hello Andrew, you wrote.
I have not done much with the dachstein -CD version, but I possibly
found a cause.
I don't have a dachstein running ( using Bering :) )
The main difference between your eigerstein and your dachstein
setup seems to be the route.
eigerstein
139.130.0.0/16 dev ippp0
Hi Victor, hi Charles, hi all
My wish list of programs to be included on the next DCD version include
xntp.lrp and psentry.lrp both from
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/ddouthitt/packages/
Yes, I agree with Victor, PortSentry is really a very useful tool and
doesn't need much space. I
Hi all
Wouldn't it be possible to do a reverse lookup on all blocked IPs (via a
script) when they are blocked, add it to a file, and then every
few hours do
another lookup to see if the FQDN associated with the IP has
changed - (if
it has then remove it from list)? This does of course
I compiled the 1.1 version of psentry. If Charles consider to include
psentry.lrp, I'd suggest to use this package:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/sminola/files/packages/psentry.lrp
If Charles is really going to include MY package, I definitely must update
the help and version files in
- I run VPN-client on the internal W2K machine to connect to my
office. According to Charles, I will not be able to use it if I install
IPSEC gateway on the router. If say I have 2 internal subnets, say
192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x. If I only setup the IPSEC for
remote-accessing
Very interesting... thanks for the insight, Charles.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Eric B Kiser; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Floppy VPN (Dachstein based)
I have seen this
Thank you Charles.
I will try to find somebody running Dachstein firewall and test with them. But then I
need to modify my internal subnet so that it is different from the one on their
system. For e.g., 192.168.9.x instead of 192.168.1.x, as probably they will use
192.168.1.x by default.
Is
I will try to find somebody running Dachstein firewall and test with them.
But then I need to modify my internal subnet so that it is different from
the one on their system. For e.g., 192.168.9.x instead of 192.168.1.x, as
probably they will use 192.168.1.x by default.
Is that correct?
Drudging up a dead thread is sometimes boring, but here goes..
I too purchased (now three) one of these DOM's, but I did not see anything
about being able to write protect it on the link to the nagasaki.com
website, and even more when I contacted the sales people at BWI, they told
me that there
Hello,
I have two Dachstein LEAF boxes at separate locations. One has a static
IP, the other is dynamic. I would like to establish a VPN between the two
locations. Does any one have a sample ipsec configuration script I could
reference? If so it would be most appreciated.
These are from
I have already modified my subnet at home to use 192.168.3.x (to make it
simpler on your end) and I am available for some testing. I have gotten my
copy of Dachstein/IPSec working. I am in the middle of writing up my diary
to post to the list, I would be glad to help as much as possible...
Might help http://rr.sans.org/encryption/cisco_router.php
Upnet Joe
- Original Message -
From: Eric Wolzak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Routing Problem with Dachstien CD and ISDN
Hello
Hi everyone.
Could someone tell me the expected packet per second performance of a
100, 200, 400 and 700 mhz pentium systems.
OR a source that could give me a means of calculating this data myself.
Any info or leads would be greatly appreciated.
Assume 64 MB or 128 MB of memory and a 100
20 matches
Mail list logo
