All three nic's are loaded by a single entry in /lib/modules "tulip"
All three nic's are PCI.
For the sake of $17, I'm just going to buy another SMC 1255TX nic. Just
way too much head scratching. : )
David, thanks for the suggestions
Scott
- Original Message -
> All the questions a
Jay Langford wrote:
> I performed the following steps in setting it up
>
> ( P.S I am setting up a PPP connection (modem connected to PPP0 (external)
> internal net eth0 )
> * Download Image
> * Run self-extracting image
> * Edit syslinux.cfg and add/remove modules required
> * Deleted from flop
Hi Peoples!
I'm getting this error in the startup of a new install of bering v1.0-rc2...
Error. 'ptables: Invalid Target Name 'icmpdef'
I'm thinking this has something to do with shorewall configuration but am
stumped as to where I've gone wrong..
I performed the following steps in setting it u
Not wanting to rain on anyone's parade, but I am of the opinion that this is
a *bad* idea... for one main reason:
Power Consumption.
As Steve alluded to, solar equipment is not cheap. I think the key to a
cost-effective solution is to buy a real access point that can function as a
repeater. Th
Charles
thanks for you reply much appreciated. I've had a reply from nocat.net
regarding WRP
"We discontinued development on WRP ages ago...
When last I visited it, wireless and ethernet worked fine, as long as
the drivers for your hardware are included. It does provide dhcp,
routing, and nat.
All the questions about buses weren't answered, nor the way the drivers
are loaded in /etc/modules.
As a test, load only the driver for the 10bt modules in /etc/modules. See
that it gets eth0 assigned.
Now load the driver for the other nics. They should get 1 and 2. I would
think you would ge
Their all PCI, all use tulip.o,
I've tried mixing the nic's around to see if there is order to this, oddly
regardless of what slot the 10bT nic is in it is always comes up eth2.
While the other two can be interchanged. Though this motherboard seems to
assign eth0 starting on the nic furthest fr
Scott
PCI? ISA?
ISA cards get assigned addresses according to mac address with eth0
getting the lowest mac address. You will want to disable pnp for ISA bus
cards, and load that driver first to grap eth0.
PCI cards appear to get assigned in slot order with the lowest number
going to the sl
Please ignore my last post.
New question...
I have 2x 10/100 tulip nics and one 10baseT nic. How do I assign what eth#
to each nic. Currently eth0=10/100, eth1=10/100, eth2=10bT
I need eth0=10bT(adsl), eth1=10/100(lan), eth2=10/100(dmz)?
Thanks inadvance
Scott
Tom Eastep wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Tom Eastep wrote:
>
> >
> > Theww things:
> >
>
> Great proofreading Tom :)
Now, Tom, when are you going to take that break??:-)
--
Patrick Benson
Stockholm, Sweden
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Tom Eastep wrote:
>
> Theww things:
>
Great proofreading Tom :)
Tom Eastep\ Shorewall - iptables made easy
AIM: tmeastep \ http://www.shorewall.net
ICQ: #60745924 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Eric B Kiser wrote:
> I have finally gotten the opportunity to test this out...
>
> I added these lines to the bottom /etc/shorewall/rules and I am still unable
> to connect to my IPsec endpoint on the other side of my Bering box. These
> are the only modifications from the d
I have finally gotten the opportunity to test this out...
I added these lines to the bottom /etc/shorewall/rules and I am still unable
to connect to my IPsec endpoint on the other side of my Bering box. These
are the only modifications from the default install of Bering.
ACCEPT net loc
Finally decided to try dach. Though when I try to find what irq's and io's
the pci cards are using through /proc/pci. The pci file is missing. Whats
going on, is this intentional?
Dachstien 1.0.2
BTW for those bearing users where is pci-scan.o? its no longer kernel
Worked great!
Thanks for the assistance
Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Victor
McAllister
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 6:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] DSL Router returns a 192.168.1.2
Eric Kubischta wr
Ray has given you some great info.
Another thing to consider is that the NE* chipset is a true POS and
should have been abandoned when PCI came out these cards
will not perform anywhere near the "rated" bandwidth under ideal
conditions. If none of the other considerations shed any light on t
I ran across these small "Internet Servers" from 3-Com, being sold by
CompGeeks for $199:
http://www.compgeeks.com/details.asp?invtid=3C19504
3Com has discontinued the product, and I have no idea if it would make a
workable platform for LEAF or a generic linux install (it's almost certianly
runni
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 11:50, steve crowl wrote:
> Hello. I received the following log message attempting to run
> dachstein (I have successfully run eigerstein on same configuration):
>
> firewall dhcpd: No subnet declaration for eth1 (0.0.0.0).
> firewall dhcpd: Please write a subnet declarati
This message may come up if your NICs aren't being initialized. Log in and
run ifconfig or ip addr - chances are your nic aren't there. Double check
your modules file, make sure the correct modules are uncommented, if they
are PCI nics make sure that pci-scan is loading before the NIC modules
Just a couple notes - I'm running a VPN on a 486/66 without an issue in
terms of bandwidth performance (its only 1 tunnel, but it does 45
Kilobytes/sec without any problems - thats the max both ends of the tunnel
can send at give or take a couple of kilobytes). I'm also running a few
other "n
I've seen this on a Bering box where eth1 was a PCMCIA device. The
problem was that the device was not yet activated at the time that dhcpd
was started. Hence it didn't find the IP declared in dhcpd.conf and
gave this cryptic error (dhcpd is edited to suit your system I hope?).
My solution was t
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, David McBride wrote:
> I would like to use "Redundant Internet Connections" as described in this
> article http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1824/sam0201h/0201h.htm
>
> I wanted to make sure that the Dachstein v.1.0.2 has the needed kernel
> options and stuff namely:
> CONFIG
All,
This is a follow up message for the post originally titled - ip_masq_ipsec.o
for Bering.
After communicating with three different sources on the Netfilter mailing
list here are the results. There are /no/ additional modules required.
Below is a brief of the messages exchanged...
[my post]
Hi Ray,
> (Can someone remind me how to check this in Dachstein? I usually
> use top for this, but I don't think Dachstein includes it.)
Well, I can tell you how I do it (using Dachstein, and Matterhorn). I
use the c server-component for lrpStat and then display "device" cpu0 as
a graph. It's
I would like to use "Redundant Internet Connections" as described in this
article http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1824/sam0201h/0201h.htm
I wanted to make sure that the Dachstein v.1.0.2 has the needed kernel
options and stuff namely:
CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROTUER=y
CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y
CONFI
At 12:04 PM 4/30/02 -0500, Dennis Stephens wrote:
>Have started this morning with a cable modem problem and worked through it
>with Tech Support. Now the through put is less than half of what it should
>be. How can I determine that the problem is on the provider's side of the
>system and not
At 11:50 AM 4/30/02 -0500, steve crowl wrote:
>Hello. I received the following log message attempting to run dachstein (I
>have successfully run eigerstein on same configuration):
>
>firewall dhcpd: No subnet declaration for eth1 (0.0.0.0).
>firewall dhcpd: Please write a subnet declaration in you
Have started this morning with a cable modem problem and worked through it
with Tech Support. Now the through put is less than half of what it should
be. How can I determine that the problem is on the provider's side of the
system and not in my firewall or home network? They are taking the
Hello. I received the following log message attempting to run dachstein (I
have successfully run eigerstein on same configuration):
firewall dhcpd: No subnet declaration for eth1 (0.0.0.0).
firewall dhcpd: Please write a subnet declaration in your dhcpd.conf file
for the
firewall dhcpd: network s
pn] Thanks Kim and Ken (yes, you got the right bits). I think my problems is even
worse than a
mere brain fart. I think I'm getting used to Active Directory. :/
--- Ken Gentle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IIRC, you must have at least 'x' (execute, or 1) access to every directory
> in the pat
Lynn,
Will do. I will let you know as soon as I try the commands.
Thanks,
Jason L. Massey
guitarlynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/29/2002 07:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: [leaf-user] Error from udhcp.lrp, I think
> I'm putting in a wireless link from friends in city to farm for faster
> Internet access and need to have a remote repeater site on hill running
> from battery and solar power. LEAF should be ideal for this. I will make
> a power supply to run the mother board direct from the battery to reduce
>
Discovered that accessing block devices generates entropy.
Ran a background job to mount and umount the drive a couple
times and now rsasigkey 1024 takes about 3 seconds.
Phillip Watts
04/29/2002 03:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: entropy and ipsec
experimenting with 2.4 (
IIRC, you must have at least 'x' (execute, or 1) access to every directory
in the path to access a specific file. To get a list of files in a
directory, you must have 'x' access to all directories in the path, and 'r'
(read, or 4) access to the directory you wish to list. I may have the
octa
Hi,
I have a very long rate of this martians in my logs.
Apr 30 08:08:06 tptrtr kernel: martian source for ff01a8c0, dev eth1
Apr 30 08:08:06 tptrtr kernel: ll header: ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 50 04 a4 f2 09 08 00
Translated
ff01a8c00.0.0.0 for
35 matches
Mail list logo
