Thanks Lynn. The RCDLinks = in your uDHCPC is "S,S38 6,K38" . I will
try RCDLINKS="2,S38 3,S38 6,K38" which looks more consistent with other
packages (including uDHCPD which I hadn't noticed earlier).
Thanks again. Fingers crossed.
David Pitts
IT Services Manager
Reid Library
University of W
Am Montag, 10. Februar 2003 06:19 schrieb Mike Leone:
> OK; so I think I'm making progress ...
>
> Anyway, when ipsec starts, I get:
>
> # svi ipsec start
> ipsec_setup: Starting FreeS/WAN IPsec 1.99...
> ipsec_setup: Using /lib/modules/ipsec.o
> ipsec_setup: WARNING: eth0 has route filtering turne
If you are using Win2K clients, Chad has put up a good chapter. It would do
good to understand what exactly it does. I then used Marcus Mueller's IPSec
utility. It uses a freeswan ipsec.conf file and allows you to define the
policies using IP assigned by your ISP to your interface by acquiring it
Yes in a single line beginning with ":". It is really easy to use this than
to extract and transfer. Moreover, newer systems do not have fswcert. On
RH7.3 and 8.0 which I use, I did not have them. I also downloaded fswcert,
compiled and checked it out. Since both worked, I let it be.
Mohan
-O
On Sunday 09 February 2003 11:35 pm, David Pitts wrote:
> One more time.
>
> Lynn, as you suggested I checked out the RCDlinks= parameters in
> Shorewall and uDHCPC init.d scripts. Unfortunately, I didn't make too
> much sense of them. What number indicates the order in which the
> scripts will r
One more time.
Lynn, as you suggested I checked out the RCDlinks= parameters in
Shorewall and uDHCPC init.d scripts. Unfortunately, I didn't make too
much sense of them. What number indicates the order in which the
scripts will run?
I also noticed that the start script I had included a note t
OK; so I think I'm making progress ...
Anyway, when ipsec starts, I get:
# svi ipsec start
ipsec_setup: Starting FreeS/WAN IPsec 1.99...
ipsec_setup: Using /lib/modules/ipsec.o
ipsec_setup: WARNING: eth0 has route filtering turned on, KLIPS may not work
ipsec_setup: (/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0
At 10:59 PM 2/9/03 -0500, Camille King wrote:
I'm having some major problems with my Linkys 4-port/wireless cable/dsl
router.
My regular wired connection works with no problems and I'm using the dhcpd.lrp
so that all my internal network connections are assigned addresses by
dhcp. Even
my wireles
I'm having some major problems with my Linkys 4-port/wireless cable/dsl router.
My regular wired connection works with no problems and I'm using the dhcpd.lrp
so that all my internal network connections are assigned addresses by dhcp. Even
my wireless network connection is assigned all the proper s
S Mohan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 02/09/03 at 21:18:
> You do not need fswcert for Freeswan 1.96 upwards. In the ipsec.secrets
> file, you can give the name of the pem file itself. Freeswan will
> "automagically" discover the format of the key and extract it at
> startup.
Good to kn
I have been using Dachstein for a few years. I recently decided to give
Bering a try. I use an app, EyeBall chat, to video chat to relatives.
It worked just fine under Dachstein. It is NOT working under Bering.
It appears the app uses a number of dynamic UDP and TCP connections for
the audio/vid
You do not need fswcert for Freeswan 1.96 upwards. In the ipsec.secrets
file, you can give the name of the pem file itself. Freeswan will
"automagically" discover the format of the key and extract it at
startup.
Your ipsec gateway's certificate should be stored in the
/etc/ipsec.d/private directo
Hi all,
Just to follow-up on a previous post of mine RE:"Bering1.0-stable
Problem with 2.4.20 on net4501". I managed to duplicate the probolem
everytime by just pinging any interface on the box.
...Steve
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored b
Chris..
What you propose is likely do-able--- some of it fairly straightforward, other parts more complex. Trying to support a wireless client as well as a router/firewall from the same wireless interface could be troublesome. Note that we used Orinoco 802.11b adapters, which would not be suita
Hi all,
I'm getting the following kernel panic on my bering1.0_stable box with
kernel 2.4.20 This is running on a Soekris net4501 . Anyone else see
this?
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual addr ess
printing eip: *pde =
Oops:
CPU:
OK Charles. I understand. As you know by now, I only really do this stuff
at home. I have helped a buddy by putting a LEAF router at his office.
So, not being the guru and not having a great amount of time, I will
eventually read bits and pieces.
I only ended up with Win2K server because my dr
I'm trying to set up my Bering 1.0-stable installation to use IPSec
(eventually, I want to do IPSec passthru to my office's Pix firewall, but I
might also want to use IPSec to connect into my LAN from the outside).
I'm following http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/buipsec.html, creating
the c
> I've recently tried switching from Bering 1.0 (stable) to Bering-Uclib
> in order to have room on my single floppy for sshd. However, it seems
> that my router running the Uclib version works much less well. I
> can't be very specific about what "much less well" means: the network
> connection
I've recently tried switching from Bering 1.0 (stable) to Bering-Uclib
in order to have room on my single floppy for sshd. However, it seems
that my router running the Uclib version works much less well. I
can't be very specific about what "much less well" means: the network
connection feels slow
Hi,
The flashfxp util probably uses the passive ftp protocol. This will open some
higher port for the actual data connection.
What I had to do to get passive ftp up and running behind my bering firewall
was the following:
add the following lines to /etc/shorewall/rules
DNATnet
20 matches
Mail list logo
