Eric Spakman wrote:
>I'm not 100% certain that it's busybox mount "limitation", but it's my
>best guess. Doing it in fstab is better anyway.
>
>About your suggestion for a default entry in fstab, I don't think that's
>going to work reliable. Not everyone has an USB device mounted on
>/dev/sda1, ma
Am Sonntag, 12. November 2006 18:01 schrieb Jim Ford:
> To facilitate updating and installing packages I thought I'd install
> the sftp package, with it's support packages libcrypto and libz , but
> when I try running sftp I get the message:
> Thanks 'kp', it appears to be working O
Hi Izzy;
Am Sonntag, 12. November 2006 23:46 schrieb Izzy Blacklock:
> Thanks Eric,
>
> I forgot that mount was being provided by busybox. Thats probably
> exactly the problem. :) You're right, I should be specifying the
> filesystem type if it's important, but hey, I'm lazy :) The fstab
> opti
Hi Izzy,
> Thanks Eric,
>
>
> I forgot that mount was being provided by busybox. Thats probably
> exactly the problem. :) You're right, I should be specifying the
> filesystem type if it's important, but hey, I'm lazy :) The fstab option
> is probably the best answer, assuming this is a limitat
Thanks Eric,
I forgot that mount was being provided by busybox. Thats probably
exactly the problem. :) You're right, I should be specifying the
filesystem type if it's important, but hey, I'm lazy :) The fstab
option is probably the best answer, assuming this is a limitation of
busybox. I
Ok thank you. Without this option (kmod), error message in syslog
disappears. However, the option "-J MASQUERADE" still doesn't work, and
iptables give me the same error. (ipt_MASQUERADE is correctly loaded) I will
try to compile iptables, following your url.
>But what patches do you use and what
Eric Spakman wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
>
>
>
I've got libcrypto.lrp and libz.lrp installed. I got them from the
links posted with the entry (103) for sftp.lrp on the 'Packages 3.x' page.
>>> Pls read again:
>>>
>>> 103. sftp.lrp [34 k]
>>> Op
Hi David,
Looking at you initial mail again:
>The last interesting line of syslog is :
>Nov 12 00:19:10 Darkvabox kernel: kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s
>-k ipt_MASQUERADE, errno = 2 . :-S
>Normal, modprobe is not available ...
You probably have your private kernel compiled with
David,
The preferway to do this is to use buildtool:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/buc-buildtool.html
You can tune the kernel config to your like in the setup and add your
specific patches to the ones already applied.
But what patches do you use and what kernel config changes did you make?
Eri
Well, I feared a response of this kind. Compile a kernel is easy, compile
iptables with this kernel too, but compile iptables for uclibc, I never yet
made, and I feel I will have much problems…:D :-/
Which manner I can do that? Install buildroot is the better/only solution ?
As I didn't touch the n
Hi Art,
I don't know if you already got a reply.
I'm no real specialist in accounting tools, but by looking at your
requirements I think pmacct is the best option. Take a look at the
website for the features: http://www.pmacct.net/
Eric
>Hi Folks -- I am exploring the best method for doing t
Hi Jim,
>>> I've got libcrypto.lrp and libz.lrp installed. I got them from the
>>> links posted with the entry (103) for sftp.lrp on the 'Packages 3.x' page.
>>>
>>
>> Pls read again:
>>
>> 103. sftp.lrp [34 k]
>> OpenSSH sftp client & server programs.
>> Requires libcrpto.lrp l
Hi Mats,
>
> (Dear all Users, I had to redirect this to the
> ( larger list, since a one time submission to
> ( leaf-devel was not permitted. My excuses for
> ( any inconvenience. M E Andersson )
>
> Dear maintainters and developers,
>
> may I suggest that in the two new options
KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 12. November 2006 15:24 schrieb Jim Ford:
>
>> KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>>
>>> Am Sonntag, 12. November 2006 14:56 schrieb Jim Ford:
>>>
To facilitate updating and installing packages I thought I'd install the
sftp package, with it's suppo
Hi Izzy,
Note that Debian uses a 'real' mount and Bering-uClibc busybox mount
which doesn't have all the obscure functions of a full mount.
But it's better to always use the -t option anyway and don't rely to
much on automatic guessing. But why not simply make an entry in fstab
? Maybe Debian al
Hi David,
Iptables and the kernel are very close bound. If you compile your own
kernel with different patches, you better can compile your own
iptables too. The iptables Makefile looks at the kernel config, so
it's very well possible it doesn't 'match' or you need some iptables
patches.
Eric
Am Sonntag, 12. November 2006 15:24 schrieb Jim Ford:
> KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 12. November 2006 14:56 schrieb Jim Ford:
> >> To facilitate updating and installing packages I thought I'd install the
> >> sftp package, with it's support packages libcrypto and libz , but when I
> >> t
KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 12. November 2006 14:56 schrieb Jim Ford:
>
>> To facilitate updating and installing packages I thought I'd install the
>> sftp package, with it's support packages libcrypto and libz , but when I
>> try running sftp I get the message:
>>
>> sftp: can't load l
(Dear all Users, I had to redirect this to the
( larger list, since a one time submission to
( leaf-devel was not permitted. My excuses for
( any inconvenience. M E Andersson )
Dear maintainters and developers,
may I suggest that in the two new options of lrcfg
the wo
Am Sonntag, 12. November 2006 14:56 schrieb Jim Ford:
> To facilitate updating and installing packages I thought I'd install the
> sftp package, with it's support packages libcrypto and libz , but when I
> try running sftp I get the message:
>
> sftp: can't load library 'libcrypto.so.0.9.7'
>
> The
To facilitate updating and installing packages I thought I'd install the
sftp package, with it's support packages libcrypto and libz , but when I
try running sftp I get the message:
sftp: can't load library 'libcrypto.so.0.9.7'
The library that the libcrypto.lrp package supplies is
libcrypt-0.
Erich Titl wrote:
> Jim Ford wrote:
>
>> I _had_ a working Bering Leaf UClibc 3.0 Beta 1 running off a CF card!
>> I then tried upgrading to beta 2 and now can't boot off the CF card and
>> have to use a floppy.
>>
>> I'm now trying to repair my CF setup, but run into a problem:
>>
>> I can b
Jim Ford wrote:
> I _had_ a working Bering Leaf UClibc 3.0 Beta 1 running off a CF card!
> I then tried upgrading to beta 2 and now can't boot off the CF card and
> have to use a floppy.
>
> I'm now trying to repair my CF setup, but run into a problem:
>
> I can boot from the floppy, which has
23 matches
Mail list logo
