First a comment: The 1680 image, isn't that really a
1722 image? That causes MAJOR problems after you back
it up a couple of times. Seems to "mount" ok as a 1680,
but writes don't work too well!
The question:
After modifying the floppy (static IP, delete some
stuff) I added libz and sshd.
you might need
additional packages. Also run a DF on boot and make sure /dev/ram0 isn't
completely full
S
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [Leaf-user] Dach Floppy
>Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:28:27 +
>
>First a comment: The 1680 image, isn&#
> First a comment: The 1680 image, isn't that really a
> 1722 image? That causes MAJOR problems after you back
> it up a couple of times. Seems to "mount" ok as a 1680,
> but writes don't work too well!
No...the floppy is 1680K format...
> The question:
>
> After modifying the floppy (static
> > After modifying the floppy (static IP, delete some
> > stuff) I added libz and sshd. I boot up and after a
ps
> > aux, there is no sshd running.
> >
> > I started it manually (sshd -i) and get "Protocol
> > Mismatch" and its not running. I also started it
> > without the -i (sshd) and it doe
Strange about the 1680 size. Maybe I changed that after
I downloaded it? Oh well. I would have, because I need
the space.
SSHD - Nothing in any of the logs. I've set this up on
a few PCs in the past w/o problems. Maybe I'll copy the
file again. I had another issue last week where it
tu
Ok, sshd -d (debug!) returns:
Stuff
More Stuff
Bind to port 22 on 0.0.0.0 failed: Address already in
use.
Cannot bind any address.
-
This was Dach Floppy modified to be a static address.
How can I tell what is
> Strange about the 1680 size. Maybe I changed that after
> I downloaded it? Oh well. I would have, because I need
> the space.
>
> SSHD - Nothing in any of the logs. I've set this up on
> a few PCs in the past w/o problems. Maybe I'll copy the
> file again. I had another issue last week whe
: Address already in use
fatal: Bind to port 22 failed: Transport endpoint is not connected.
so what you probably need to do is:
svi sshd stop
sshd -d
Then you might get output that is a lil more helpful.
S
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Dach Flo
Thanks, I did already work around that one.
I've been working with your 'stein diskettes for awhile
now, and they are really starting to make sense.
I'd hate to have to switch to another distro! In fact,
what I'm woring on now could probably be done easier
with another diskette disto (ox
tal: Bind to port 22 failed: Transport endpoint is not connected.
>
> so what you probably need to do is:
>
> svi sshd stop
> sshd -d
>
> Then you might get output that is a lil more helpful.
>
> S
>
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, January 11, 2002 1:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Dach Floppy
Thanks, I did already work around that one.
I've been working with your 'stein diskettes for awhile
now, and they are really starting to make sense.
I'd hate to have to switch to another distro! In
t; -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Dach Floppy
>
>
> Thanks, I did already work around that one.
&g
BTW, that is a literal "0.0.0.0" in the debug output,
not just me hiding my ip.
Sean
> Ok, sshd -d (debug!) returns:
>
>
> Stuff
> More Stuff
> Bind to port 22 on 0.0.0.0 failed: Address already in
> use.
> Cannot bind any address.
>
and opens them based on
different configuration files
S
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "Simon Bolduc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Dach Floppy
>Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:13:38 +
>
>No luck. Same results.
>
orwarded or not. You
> could always try SeaWall - as it closes all ports and opens them based on
> different configuration files
>
> S
>
>
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: "Simon Bolduc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> &
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> BTW, that is a literal "0.0.0.0" in the debug output,
> not just me hiding my ip.
>
> Sean
> > Ok, sshd -d (debug!) returns:
> >
> >
> > Stuff
> > More Stuff
> > Bind to port 22 on 0.0.0.0 failed: Address already in
> >
offered info. I know just enough Unix (and
that's useland not admin) to get myself into trouble.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt Schalit
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user]
Check in /etc/inetd.conf if there is a service configured for port 22
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>
> BTW, that is a literal "0.0.0.0" in the debug output,
> not just me hiding my ip.
>
> Sean
> > Ok, sshd -d (debug!) returns:
> >
> >
> > Stuff
> > M
"Sean E. Covel" wrote:
> Thanks to all of you who offered info. I know just enough Unix (and
> that's useland not admin) to get myself into trouble.
>
> Sean
The motto in my favorite unix newsgroup,
is "Learn by destruction."
Best,
Matthew
___
Lea
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Matt Schalit wrote:
> "Sean E. Covel" wrote:
>
> > Thanks to all of you who offered info. I know just enough Unix (and
> > that's useland not admin) to get myself into trouble.
> >
> > Sean
>
>
> The motto in my favorite unix newsgroup,
> is "Learn by destruction."
>
> Best,
Jack Coates wrote:
>
> > The motto in my favorite unix newsgroup,
> > is "Learn by destruction."
> >
> > Best,
> > Matthew
> >
>
> I got started by installing Slackware 2.1 on a *tiny* 386 with a 160MB
> hard drive; in the first six months, I must have whacked and reinstalled
> that box about f
21 matches
Mail list logo
