I have to report using SVN Version SVN-20130218 that I do not have a
file named:
75-cd-aliases-generator.rules
I also searched the source directory: systemd-197 and found 3 files
starting with "75" but not the right one.
Is there somewhere else the file should be?
--
James Tyrer
Linux (most
I am not new to Linux from Scratch. However, a few days ago, a I
started for the first time to make a clean LFS installation on a new
disk. Previously, I have done it over an existing install, or used the
minimum Fedora install that would boot as a starter. This meant that I
was using mostly
t; openssh, which, and bc (for my scripts).
>
Although none of those packages works at the same low level.
>
> Perhaps adding the page to BLFS and expanding the first paragraph in
> section 9.3 of LFS would be the way to go.
>
>-- Bruce
>
> Richard
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/
e following
reasons:-
1. It's basic system software.
2. It's a new and better way of doing things.
3. It will obviate the problems some people on the LFS list have had with
devices randomly changing nomenclature.
4. The point immediately above should result in fewer posts.
rmore, supervising processes and restating them when
they fail is very much akin to Erlang -- one of the most fault-tolerant
languages available.
Richard
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
in what you are able to discover.
>
>
>-- Bruce
>
>
>From what I understand the main time benefits gained from deploying Systemd
are in shutdown rather than boot.
Richard
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Ag. D. Hatzimanikas a écrit :
> On Mon, Jan 28, at 11:10 Richard Deletang wrote:
>> No idea for my problem ?
>>
>> Regards.
>> Richard
>>
>> 2008/1/25, Richard Deletang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Hi, i have a error with udftools :
>>&g
No idea for my problem ?
Regards.
Richard
2008/1/25, Richard Deletang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi, i have a error with udftools :
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/multimedia/udftools.html
>
> I'm using LFS & BLFS svn book, (gcc 4.2..2)
>
> Thi
tion gawk explicitly, since they use a gawk specific syntax
for commands, and should not rely on awk (references to this name
should use POSIX compatible program arguments and scripts
definitions).
2 cents more :-)
--
Richard 'riri' GILL
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://riri.houbathec
It's seems to be OK with the parameter :
echo "CFLAGS += -O3 -march=athlon-xp" > configparms
Ken Moffat a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 12:23:41AM +0100, Nicolas FRANCOIS wrote:
>
>> Le Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:25:37 +0100 Richard Delétang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
mization"
make[2]: *** [/usr/src/glibc-build/tcb-offsets.h] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/glibc-2.7/csu'
make[1]: *** [csu/subdir_lib] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/glibc-2.7'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Best regards,
Richard
--
http://linuxfro
e task to make it stable is big too, in regards to
the functionnalities they went to implement it too.
* Grub2 may not be the first choice anymore for the 'amazing simple,
little, powerfull' bootloader we all now know.
I just hope the Grub team will make us tell a lie ...
--
Richard &#
2007/10/5, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (-O2 -pipe -s -fno-strict-aliasing -mtune=i686) by default, and very
Oops, I forgot to mention the -s I use too :-)
--
Richard 'riri' GILL
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://riri.houbathecat.info
http://nasgaia.org
« Frimo
me stages of gcc, because configure override the flags.
My host machine has an i486-linux-gnu toolchain, and is reported as an
i686 GNU/Linux (uname -m and uname -o).
Hope this help
--
Richard 'riri' GILL
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://riri.houbathecat.info
http://nasgaia.org
« Fr
an old habit of mine :-)
I could have used sed -i too
--
Richard 'riri' GILL
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://riri.houbathecat.info
http://nasgaia.org
« Frimousse en excessivité émousse son expressivité »
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfrom
; contains your findings plus additional information.
>
> You would probably save some time by reviewing what we
> already know. :-)
Ok, thank you for the info, and sorry for inconvevience ;-)
--
Richard 'riri' GILL
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://riri.houbathecat.info
http://na
workaround (as the doc isn't essential in 'tools'):
cp -v Makefile Makefile.orig
cat Makefile.orig | sed 's/SUBDIRS = intl po lib doc/SUBDIRS = intl po lib/' \
> Makefile
Regards
--
Richard 'riri' GILL
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://riri.houbathec
wait the specialists take a look at this ;-)
At this time, I compiled gcc - it took more time than the 4.1.2, but
not so much. However, I've problem building glibc 2.6.1.
I'm not in a hurry to get last versions so... :-)
--
Richard 'riri' GILL
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
on, sure I'll report my feeling
and tips if useful.
In all cases, thank or reply and all this information. ;-)
--
Richard 'riri' GILL
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://riri.houbathecat.info
http://nasgaia.org
« Frimousse en excessivité émousse son expressivité »
-
ter 5
don't do 'make bootstrap' but only 'make'. For other passes, use
'--disable-bootstrap' with configure.
Comments welcome
--
Richard 'riri' GILL
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://riri.houbathecat.info
http://nasgaia.org
« Frimousse en excessivité émou
a specific BASH_ predefined variable would have
been good to keep compatibility with existing script - but that's a
bash list request, not a LFS one :-). Fortunately, we don't have much
of these construct, so it's not hard to change them.
Regards,
--
Richard 'riri'
x27; fix in
the patch (look for COND_REGEX) ; I guess the problem is there. I
don't have any fix for the patch for now, and not sure to be able to
do so.
Regards
--
Richard 'riri' GILL
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://riri.houbathecat.info
http://nasgaia.org
http://www.gnurou.org/Wri
Hi!
As I don't see any traffic in all the MLs I subscribe for the last 2 days,
I wonder if there is any problem with my suscriptions?!? :/
Is there?
TIA,
Richard
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.or
27;voyage of discovery'
there any more.
So I think the project needs a challenge. Trouble is I can't think what
it is!
Blessings and peace,
Richard.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
For the benefit of the community I copy you my email upstream due to a bug
in Bash-3.1.17: it gets lost looking for end of string in certain contexts.
Would be nice if other fellow participants of the list could confirm
similar finding. I hope it's not just me...
Ri
Joe Ciccone wrote:
> I put this page together with the users and groups from LFS and BLFS.
> The only addition I made to this page is a users groups with a gid of
> 100. Anyone that wants to set something in stone, this would be a good
> place to start. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~jciccone/use
Isn't it good since the subscribe-only policy came in.
I really like this.
I'm really sending this to see if gmane posting works, so please don't
moderate it through.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above
The Cross-LFS book says to go and register with the LFS counter. If
Cross-lfs is your first LFS, then you can't choose an appropriate
version! The Cross-lfs and HLFS versions need to be put in the list.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ./configure --prefix=$(kde-config --prefix)
>
> Thoughts?
>
Neat. I like it.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Hopefully the name of the two different threads is not so similar that
> it looks to all as one thread. :-)
>
> I'm adding K3b to the book. Some preliminary testing has shown that
> it will work when installed in a prefix other than $KDE_PREFIX. Note
> that thi
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Richard A Downing FBCS CITP wrote:
>> Well, that's that then.
>
> Indeed :-( Thanks to you and George for forwarding the news on.
>
> My own naive take on this is that Jim and co. should aim towards getting
> the santizing script into a stat
Well, that's that then.
Over to you Jim, mate.
R.
--
Richard A Downing FBCS CITP
http://www.langside.org.uk PGP fingerprint:
D682 49A5 7050 E781 229C A2F0 DE1F C040 DE78 53E8
--- Begin Message ---
LLH hasn't seen a new release for a lot more than six months now and up until
today
Greg Schafer wrote:
> But that doesn't escape the fact that this "every man for himself"
> approach is essentially wrong. Yes it's been talked about for years, but
> Linux *needs* a centralized linux headers project of some sort. Llh is a
> step in the right direction and IMHO there is still plent
I've written two wiki pages, Libgphoto2 and GPhoto2, as a start of set
of packages on the general theme of Digital Photography.
There doesn't seem to be a good place to link these into the index.
What is suggested?
Richard.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> Nothing *depends* on vim, so
>>
>>> leave it at the end.
>>
>>
>> I depend on vim. Put it at the front.
>> Only just :-)
>
> Actually, if we were to repla
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Nothing *depends* on vim, so
> leave it at the end.
I depend on vim. Put it at the front.
Only just :-)
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>> Maybe someone should pull the CVS and build it to see if this issue is
>> resolved.
>
> Depending on the outcome of this testing, we'll want to discuss now if
> we want to downgrade shadow back to 4.0.13, or wait for its next release
> if there is a known release date.
>
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>> I just built the cross-lfs book, and noticed that the version of su
>> installed comes from shadow. This version doesn't support -c, which IMO
>> makes it useless. The version built in coreutils is the one I'm u
Richard A Downing wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Richard,
>>
>> I'm at work at the moment so can't reply on list. Shadow's 'su' is
>> documented to support the '-c' parameter, at least in man/su/su.1.xml.
>> I'm pre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Richard,
>
> I'm at work at the moment so can't reply on list. Shadow's 'su' is
> documented to support the '-c' parameter, at least in man/su/su.1.xml.
> I'm pretty certain I've used 'su -c' before
I just built the cross-lfs book, and noticed that the version of su
installed comes from shadow. This version doesn't support -c, which IMO
makes it useless. The version built in coreutils is the one I'm used to.
Which version would SVN build? And after alphabering it? I never
build PAM, s
;t kill people!
> People kill people!
>
> William Harrington (Ratrophy)
> --http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
William,
Come home safe, you hear?
You'll be in
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>> I tried Jim Gifford's Cross-lfs udev patches, and they work fine, so
>> that's what I'm going with for now.
>
> I'm not familiar with these patches, and I can't seem to find them in
> t
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>
> ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="?*" MODALIAS=="?*", RUN+="/sbin/modprobe
> ${modalias}"
Thanks Brian. I understood that. Unfortunately changing the rules
didn't fix my problem. Nothing loads the modules. So I guess I must
have a typo somewhere else.
I tried Jim Gifford's
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>> However since mine is a a non-branch SVN converted
>> to Udev (no hotplug) I may have missed something.
>
> One immediate thought. Did you update the rules file to follow what's
> in the udev branch? i.e. remove
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 2/18/06, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Alternatively, what purpose does populating /dev do at this stage? Does
>> something we build later on actually require devices in there that we
>> haven't yet got available to us?
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> Glad to hear some
DJ Lucas wrote:
> The directories shm and pts are not created automagically in /dev
> anymore. I just realized, however, that I have no idea how they had come
> to exist before. Using 2.6.15.4 and udev-084. In the udev
> instructions, add 'mkdir /lib/udev/devices/{shm,pts}' to the first
> instruc
Jens Olav Nygaard wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/13/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,70179-0.html?tw=wn_index_2
Nah, it's fat bastards that cause flame wars.
I once sent the Head of HR in my old firm a
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
stuff.
I don't normally like quoting scripture here but these are serious times:
Matthew 18:21
Richard.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Alan Lord wrote:
> I know - posting to my own message but...
>
> Just d/l the OOo linux-intel-x86 package and it's all in bloody RPMS!!!
If you convert the RPMS to tar.gz with rpm2targz then the tar.gz's will
unpack to /opt/openoffice.org2.0.
http://downloads.linuxfromscratch.org/rpm2targz.t
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>
>> I hadn't been following this branch, but decided that this is the next
>> important leap forward for Linux-kind - getting rid of hotpig, I mean,
>> so I am now in class and paying attention.
>
> OK then, y
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 19:31:03 +
Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (or am I missing a sarcasm-detection plugin)
That, along with my attention deficit disorder (which is why I can't
stand long sentences).
:-)
I hadn't been following this branch, but decided that this is the next
imp
The excellent page 7.4 on "Device and Module Handling on an LFS System"
has a minor wording difficulty for me. In 7.4.4 the
sentence "A kernel driver may not export its data to sysfs." means that
a kernel driver is not allowed, by some unspecified rules, to export its
data to sysfs. What I think
Sorry, I tried to stop this getting out with the attachment. Not
quick enough!
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:36:34 -0600
Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Ennis wrote these words on 01/24/06 00:23 CST:
>
> > This may well be the case, but many people will
> > view the site using this particular non-standard,
> > whether or not they are a target audience.
> > If it
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:29:27 -0500
Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>
> > I have a login ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) for BLFS which I know
> > the password (and checked it with Bogzilla), but trac doesn't let
> > me log in. O
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:25:36 -0500
Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
> > immediately though, of course. I think another two weeks of
> > testing by *all* members of the community, be they developers or
> > our beloved users, is still necessary to ensure we can al
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 22:39:52 +1100
Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do we want use 2.4 headers with patches, like the distro's? (NO!,
> > may loose some 2.6 ABI functionality)
>
> Amazingly, this is what the distro with the most Linux professionals
> working for it does (ie: RH/Fedora
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:38:32 -0800
Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we all have come to realization that LLH headers are not
> coming out. So I've been checking into how to make these headers. So
> I'm asking everyone's opinion on this before I pursue this task.
Well done Jim, som
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:34:39 +
Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>
> > The problem is that I no longer want UTF-8 in trunk.
>
> Well, I do. I consider it a bug that we can't cater for folk wanting
> to use UTF-8 locales without breaking groff, man, gr
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:49:56 -0800
Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please reply to both lists
>
Jim,
Cross-lfs is not on gmane. Can you get it on there please, then I'll
monitor it. I don't do mailing lists anymore.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: ht
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:47:54 +0500
"Alexander E. Patrakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> >So, if you're following this thread and you have a strong feeling
> >that you'd like the UTF-8 changes to be added in as the default or
> >prefer them to be stored in an appendix, ple
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:34:20 -0800
Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/20/06, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, this broke jhalfs, because it assumes that the book
> > has to be followed in the linear way. Further patches will not be
> > provided u
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:50:23 +0500
"Alexander E. Patrakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:27:42 +0500
> >"Alexander E. Patrakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>It&#
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:27:42 +0500
"Alexander E. Patrakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:50:04 -0500
> >"Waywardness D. Norma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>(sp
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:50:04 -0500
"Waywardness D. Norma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> П о к у п а е м б/у а в т о м о б и л и
> отечественного, японского , американского , европейского и др.
> производителей , джипы , минивены , легковые и автобусы, в любом
> техническо
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:27:06 + (GMT)
Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, David Mascall wrote:
>
> > I wonder why this only occurs under jhalfs ? I cant find any
> > reports of this error from people building current SVN non-jhalfs.
>
> More generally, the number
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:05:39 -0500
Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>
> > I edited the perl file in commands and removed the make test! Then
> > rerun. Cheating, I know.
>
> And I hope by re-run you meant that you did somethin
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:10:45 +
David Mascall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:27:26 +
> >David Mascall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Richard A Downing wrote:
> >
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:40:26 +
Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> > Why is it that the package URL is not listed, but only the location
> > where it *should* be?
> >
>
> > So, why not just list the package URL?
>
> Short answer...it's a historical oversi
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:27:26 +
David Mascall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>
> >Perl is now failing on my jhalfs build of SVN at
> >ext/DB_File/t/db-recno, Test 87.
> >
> >Probably something to do with db?
> >
> >Or i
Perl is now failing on my jhalfs build of SVN at
ext/DB_File/t/db-recno, Test 87.
Probably something to do with db?
Or is it me?
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:40:35 +
Richard A Downing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:25:45 -0600
> Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Richard A Downing wrote these words on 01/10/06 03:26 CST:
> Perhaps I'm in a minority, b
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:11:07 +
Richard A Downing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:55:57 -0500
> Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I would really like to get everyone's opinion.
> All things being equal I think thi
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:25:45 -0600
Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote these words on 01/10/06 03:26 CST:
> > On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:10:04 -0600
> > Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>The BDB dependencies hav
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:10:04 -0600
Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joel Miller wrote these words on 01/09/06 18:08 CST:
>
> > Additionally, IIRC, BLFS is no longer going to list BDB as a
> > dependence (i.e. they assume it will be installed).
>
> The BDB dependencies have already bee
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:55:57 -0500
Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would really like to get everyone's opinion.
I like the look of this too. You've done a good job getting the
look-feel like the website.
I really like the SVN browser and the Changelog.
My only criticism is that t
I was reading one of the mailings about stable and unstable versions...
You know, in almost five years of doing this LFS stuff, I have never
once actually NEEDED a later version of an LFS package. OK, when it
arrived, the improvements were sometimes good, but I was never
actually waiting for it.
Recent kernels don't seem to support this configuartion switch any more.
Does this mean the FAQ needs adjusting?
CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS=y
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:37:49 -0600
Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote these words on 01/07/06 13:26 CST:
> > I noticed that this switch is in the LFS book for BerkyDB, I haven't
> > built that for some time (when something says it needs
I noticed that this switch is in the LFS book for BerkyDB, I haven't
built that for some time (when something says it needs a DB that I'm
testing).
Does Man-DB need this? I'm amazed if it does - the rationale for
using it is that it's maintained and modern and handles all sorts of
UTF-8 stuff. An
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 20:09:47 +0500
"Alexander E. Patrakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
> > Can someone point me to the discussion thread that decided this
> > change of man package? I want to review the reasons to make my own
> &
Can someone point me to the discussion thread that decided this
change of man package? I want to review the reasons to make my own
decision on it.
A quick archive search (+man-DB and then +man +Berkeley) didn't reveal
anything useful other than it's a better fit for a UTF-8 system. I can
see the
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 11:22:53 -0800
Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To both guys,
>
> Thanks for all the hard work on the hardware issues. I promise it is
> appreciated by others on the list whether they're vocal about it or
> not. I don't think I'm alone when I say that I'm eager to s
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 15:51:01 -0500
Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just looking for ways to reduce the temp-system in /tools as much
> as possible. I've built LFS systems before without having ncurses
> there and it works fine. I believe the only issue is texinfo - many
> programs in
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:04:13 +
Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks very much for all your hard work on this Alexander.
Da. +1.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
editing, got tendonitis, took up
Randy-baiting as a new hobby
But seriously though folks, thanks for another fantastic year, well up
to Scratch. Special thanks to Randy for putting up with me - I'll get
you next year.
A Happy and Holy Christmas to you and yours.
Richard.
--
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:06:53 +0100
"Feldmeier Bernd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you call this that way ok.
> But marking some packs as optional
> that is really educational in my mind.
>
> The user can decide wether to include that
> not essential stuff like devel-packs ...
>
>
Bernd,
We
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:53:11 -0600
Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 12/18/05 23:25 CST:
>
> > Well, with all due respect DJ, you are flat wrong.
>
> Sometimes my fingers just put on the screen what is in my head.
> Darn the fact that I keep thinking
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 13:13:37 -0500
Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> > It's not that no one has anything to say, it is probably the fact
> > that the author of that text is the only one qualified to say
> > anything.
> >
>
> Alright, well thanks for that, Ra
inappropriate
occasion.
Bruce already did the change -- thanks.
Richard.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
in welcoming Andy to the team.
Welcome Andy, I'm sure you'll make a big difference. I wish you well,
and offer my thanks in advance.
Bruce, You can do two edits to the who's-who section at once and take
my name out as you add Andy's. (introduction/credits.html)
Richard.
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:04:50 -0500
Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Benton wrote:
>
> > Bing. You hit the nail on the head there. As Richard said, Fedora Core 4
> > isn't a suitable distro to build the stable version of the book. It
> >
them. I'm not sure about the list search
- it usually lets me down - but then maybe I should read more about
queries.... We also need a new acronym: YAAWGA (you are a ,GO AWAY).
Finally a wee advertisement:
1) For people thinking of doing LFS:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~richar
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 20:37:44 -0700
Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The target
> audience of this book has fallen drastically, and my one shot in the
> dark request for trunk would be to rip out a lot of the text that is
> currently in it and take it back down to circa the 3.0 days when it had
>
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:35:50 -0600
Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Furthermore, if you start thinking about packages to pull from LFS,
> then you need to start looking at Perl as well. Where do you stop?
>
True. However Perl used to be needed for GCC tests to run (IIRC). We
DO need
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 21:51:02 -0600
Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
> > Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 11/24/05 21:23 CST:
>
> >>It is a mystery why Unix admins who wouldn't even trust their employer
> >>with more than a normal user account carelessly execute
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 21:58:24 -0500
Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is kind of a brave request, and I'm fully prepared to be shot down.
> In fact, I think I'd be surprised if the group went for it. ;) However
> after thinking about this for some time, I'm going to venture a requ
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 20:28:27 +
Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Murphy's law being as it is, the moment we add such a message to the
> book, an updated version of LLH will be released and make it immediately
> out of date!
Anyone tried asking the llh devs about their plans?
--
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:26:02 -0700
Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I read all the lists (I think, I didn't check for new ones recently).
> > I have not seen this on lfs-dev or blfs-dev. Which lists?
>
> cross-lfs
Damn it, there would be one! I didn't notice that cross-lfs had it
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
