On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>> libevent master pulled as of Jan 11,
>>> fails tests for me. System details:
>>> OS: Ubuntu 12.04.2 64 bits
>>>
>>> Here's one failure lo
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Leo 'costela' Antunes
wrote:
> On 17/06/11 17:42, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>> * AGE: With how many previous versions of the ABI is "Current"
>> version backward-compatible? This increments whenever the ABI changes
>> in
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Leo 'costela' Antunes
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the process of building the Debian package for 2.0.12, I noticed
> Makefile.am contains VERSION_INFO=6:1:1, but the generated libs have all
> SONAME=*.so.5
>
> I'm still parsing through the build-system (I'm the new guy hel
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Marcel Roelofs
wrote:
Hi, Marcel!
Thanks for the
I'd like to see a lot more optimization work in Libevent 2.1. One
thing that this really needs IMO is more work on benchmarking and
profiling. Chris Davis started work on a benchmarking tool last year;
his site
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Shiqing Fan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When using libevent 1.4.13 in another project on Windows, we found some
> structure are redefined in _libevent_time.h and winsock2.h, for example
> 'struct timeval'.
>
> I made a patch to solve this problem, but I'm not sure if it's c
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 05:17:22PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Haiping Zhao wrote:
> > When I call event_base_loopexit() with a timeout, and say it?s not
> > triggered, because event_base_loopbreak() breaks out of the loop before
> > timeout is reached, I saw a memor
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 04:40:01PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> I have a protocol which needs to secure outgoing packets like so:
>
> FROM:
> [n bytes protocol data]
>
> TO:
> [j bytes padded/encrypted data][16 bytes IV][12 bytes HMAC]
>
> What is the most clean/efficient way of using evbuffers for this
s
from wherever they have wound up.]
Niels, could you please update the website to point to the new list,
and either disable the old one or make it forward?
Thanks for your patience, everyone!
yrs,
--
Nick Mathewson
___
Libevent-users mailing list
Libev
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:39:59AM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 10:39 -0700, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > > but I am willing to submit another patch (the one with
> > > accessor to base->event_gotterm/event_break) if you think that's
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 07:45:08PM -0700, Raine Fan wrote:
> Hi, yesterday I 'git cloned' the reference manual book from
> git://git.torproject.org/~nickm/git/lebook and I'm having problems when
> compiling it. Here is the output:
>
> ERROR: 01_intro.txt: line 270: missing listing block closing
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:09:52AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
> > > Nick, is this actually documented anywhere?
> >
> > Not that I recall, and it really ought to be. Anybody want to write the
> > documentation pat
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:57:25AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Well, the order of which you can do this depends on what the underlying OS
> will
> "do for you".
>
> I'd suggest sticking to "delete event, close socket" usage. Anything else
> isn't portable.
>
> Nick, is this actually documented
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:56:59PM +0200, nicolas dumont wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using events in 1.4.12-stable.
[...]
> Finnaly, to prevent to go in the infinite loop ,
> do I have to run event_del(&ev) each time before using event_set(&ev) ?
This is exactly so. You can't call event_set or event_
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 08:11:07PM +0200, Tommy van Leeuwen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After upgrading from 2.0.2 to the latest 2.0.3 (r1431) i got this assertion.
>
> epoll.c:166: epoll_dispatch: Assertion `res < epollop->nevents' failed
Just fixed it this morning in r1432, thanks to another helpful u
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 06:21:03PM +0200, Bas Verhoeven wrote:
[...]
>
> But, I gather from that note that it should be possible now?
Indeed it should be! Did you set up threading on the event_base
before running it? Is the base notifiable?
You might want to try poking through event.c in the
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:04:52AM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 09:16 -0700, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:42:47AM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I do realize that this breaks existing assumptions about retu
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:42:47AM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote:
[...]
> I do realize that this breaks existing assumptions about return values.
> What if instead of using a different return value, we don't reset
> base->event_gotterm and base->event_break when triggered? We can reset
> them at the
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 01:07:40PM +0900, Brodie Thiesfield wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 9:42 PM, q6Yr7e0o
> nIJDVMjC wrote:
> > Would it be possible to create cmake scripts for 2.x, too since they
> > will much likely be included into the release
>
> I'll look into it, but at the moment I'm u
ports
zero-copy much better.
- About a zillion fixes for tricky bugs in the new Libevent
2.0.1-alpha code.
Special thanks to everybody who helped find bugs and improve the code,
especially James Mansion, Zack Weinberg, and Joachim Bauch.
yrs,
--
Nick Math
everyone who reported bugs or supplied patches. My
apologies if I've forgotten to credit any patches in the ChangeLog; let me
know and I'll fix it.
Many thanks,
--
Nick Mathewson
___
Libevent-users mailing list
Libevent-users@monkey.or
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:29:21PM +0200, q6Yr7e0o nIJDVMjC wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> how is it possible to schedule a callback in the next eventloop
> iteration? Of course i could add a timer event with timeout 0 but this
> seems like a lot of overhead. I just want a function to be called in
> the next
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 07:00:46PM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote:
> In buffer.c:28 an include "event-config.h" is wrapped by HAVE_CONFIG_H,
> but on line 85 there's a bare include "event-config.h". Should the 2nd
> include and the HAVE_CONFIG_H check removed?
IMO, pretty much all of the '#ifdef HAVE
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 01:05:33PM +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
[...]
> Hm. How about this - keep using min-heap, but let each slot contain
> doubly-linked list of events. So equal (abs) timeout values would
> share the same slot. This would bring minimal additional complexity
> to codebase.
Sorr
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 01:00:13PM +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
[...]
> The timeouts are kept in min-heap structure, whose goal is to make easy
> to find smallest timeout. It does not store the event addition order
> in a way that works 100% of the time, although it may happen to work 90%
> of the t
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 05:50:00PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:09:26 +0100
> James Mansion wrote:
>
> > Is there any example of the libevent2 support for IOCP being used to
> > provide a scalable custom socket server?
> >
>
> I would give http://www.wangafu.net/~nickm/libevent-
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:31:35PM -0400, Alex wrote:
[...]
>
> Hey, great book! I checked it out of git about an hour ago and have
> been reading it ever since. Since I am decrypting data from the TCP
> stream I might also want to look in to filtering with the BEV_NEED_MORE
> flag as well as the
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 03:17:00PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> Hey there. When working with bufferevents, in what order does libevent
> execute callbacks? Does it fill all the buffers first and then call the
> CBs, or does it fill a buffer and call its corresponding CB, one at a
> time?
>
> From what I un
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:19:46PM +0100, James Mansion wrote:
[...]
> >(While some Windows people consider Unix's fork() call a mistake, Unix
> >people generally consider CreateProcess() to be an odd hybrid of
> >fork(), exec*(), and a few other syscalls. _De gustibus non est
> >disputandum_, I
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 09:21:20PM +0100, James Mansion wrote:
> The WIN32 code path execs a copy of the tester as a subprocess to
> isolate it.
>
> Why isn't that the norm? In the presence of pthreads you pretty much
> have to do
> the same thing, and it can hardly be worth having a special ca
be
a fine thing.
(One of the reasons that tinytest runs each test case in a subprocess
is so that old tests can fail by calling exit() or assert() without
bringing the entire testing process to a halt.)
--
Nick Mathewson
___
Libevent-users mailing list
L
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 05:38:58PM +0100, James Mansion wrote:
> Nick Mathewson wrote:
> >Good morning, evening, night, or afternoon!
> >
> >The first alpha release in the long-promised Libevent 2.0 series
> >is finally out. You can download Libevent 2.0.1-alpha f
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 08:29:01PM +0100, James Mansion wrote:
> Nick Mathewson wrote:
> >"A private type"? What kind of thing do you mean here?
> >
> The struct just has a couple of integer fields and won't vary by
> platform, so
> having a libevent s
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 07:44:36PM +0100, James Mansion wrote:
> Nick Mathewson wrote:
[...]
> >So reading that message again, I guess I wasn't as explicit as I
> >should have been. Short version: "yes, I think the next release will
> >build okay with visual C. B
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 06:03:18PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
[...]
> With respect to building it with Visual C, please see my message to
> this very list from last Thursday:
>
> http://monkeymail.org/archives/libevent-users/2009-May/001650.html
So reading that message agai
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 07:10:47PM +0200, q6Yr7e0o nIJDVMjC wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> > For one example of how to use the 2.0.1-alpha API, you could have a
> > look at chapter 1 of
> > ? ? ?http://www.wangafu.net/~nickm/libevent-book/ .
>
> Would it be possible to link that book on
> http://monkey.org/~
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:46:03PM +0100, James Mansion wrote:
> Nick Mathewson wrote:
> >Good morning, evening, night, or afternoon!
> >
> >The first alpha release in the long-promised Libevent 2.0 series
> >is finally out. You can download Libevent 2.0.1-alpha f
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:20:08PM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been tracking down a bug with boehm gc prematurely collecting the
> bufferevent callback arg value. This occurs when one is the middle of
> processing another bufferevent in the read callback.
>
> I've tried to grok the c
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 05:26:04PM +0200, q6Yr7e0o nIJDVMjC wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> can somebody guide me how to write a simple echo server using libevent 2.0?
> I've read into the sources of libevent (especially http.c) because i wanted
> to know how to bind to a socket, accept new connections and re
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:01:30PM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > (Also, once 2.0.2-alpha is out, somebody needs to work on decent
> > project files for the 2.0.x series. ?The ones we have now are kind of
> > stupid and
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 04:58:02PM -0700, Rush Manbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have done some searching and have read a couple of posts on this
> subject, but nothing that quite answers my questions.
>
> I am writing a Windows port of the Thrift RPC library
> (http://incubator.apache.org/thrift/ )
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:32:46AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > Libevent 2.0 is intended to be backward compatible with the Libevent
> > 1.4 APIs[*]. ?Any program that worked with Libevent 1.4 should still
> > work with
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 08:46:51PM -0700, Raine Fan wrote:
> Hi Nick/Niels/Libevent staff!
>
>
> Meanwhiloe reading the great documentation of Libevent-2.0
> (http://wangafu.net/~nickm/libevent-book/) I was a bit confused on
> some warnings. Could explain in more details, if possible?
>
I've trie
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:08:02PM -0700, hop...@omnifarious.org wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Eric Hopper
> # Date 1240605517 25200
> # Node ID 97768cd771be8ea7a4db8bd46998030dcd8c6650
> # Parent 07c00814a3436ebd1d8628fa8c3c1d921523d1e5
> Properly detect sense of should_check_environmen
Hi, all. I've started work on a tutorial and reference manual for
Libevent. Right now, they're far from complete: the tutorial only has
a few examples, and the reference manual has nothing but instructions
on how to create and use an event_base.
You can get the latest version from
http://wan
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 08:33:58AM -0700, Raine Fan wrote:
> Hi! I'm just curious if libevent 1.5/2.0 will be carrying this
> improvements (epoll keyed wakeups - see article on LWN.net:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/317489/) from epoll patch set that was
> merged recently on kernel 2.6.30-rc1 this week
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 02:23:37PM +0100, Richter, J??rg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not really libevent specific, but perhaps someone here has seen this before
> and can help me with this one.
>
> The problem is that epoll_wait hangs longer than requested.
> This is a "strace -t -T -e epoll_wait" output
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:23:24PM -0700, Haiping Zhao wrote:
[...]
> Anyways, I'll have to re-think our model. At the same time, may I
> ask why the change? Was that for calling gettimeofday() less number
> of times to be more efficient? But the code only updates
> base->tv_cache once per loop,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 08:00:39PM +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
[...]
> Well, I attached a draft of it, but its totally untested and the
> minheap code is not very parseable for me. So somebody with
> has better understanding of the code should review it. (Maxim?)
>
> Basic idea - if you replace an
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 02:24:15PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Good morning, evening, night, or afternoon!
>
> The first alpha release in the long-promised Libevent 2.0 series
> is finally out. You can download Libevent 2.0.1-alpha from
>http://monkey.org/~provos
Here's the current draft "What's new in Libevent 2.0" document.
What's New In Libevent 2.0 so far:
1. About this document
This document describes the key differences between Libevent 1.4 and
Libevent 2.0, from a user's point of vie
Good morning, evening, night, or afternoon!
The first alpha release in the long-promised Libevent 2.0 series
is finally out. You can download Libevent 2.0.1-alpha from
http://monkey.org/~provos/libevent-2.0.1-alpha.tar.gz
To make sure that you're getting the real Libevent source and no
other
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:01:00PM +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
> Given heap shape of:
>
> 1
>/ \
> / \
> 10 3
>/ \ / \
> 11 12 5 6
>
> And now deleting '11', it seems to fail to keep heap property.
>
> The bug is probably hard to notice in pra
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:06:37AM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 11:17 -0700, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > If you want to try 0-copy stuff with bufferevents, you'll need to wait
> > for Libevent 2.0. Libevent 1.4 doesn't really support that so well.
&
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 01:38:44PM -0700, Phoenix Sol wrote:
> Thanks, Nick.
>
> Is zero-copy possible at all with the current libevent? (I already assumed
> it wouldn't work with bufferevent)
If you mean, just using the regular event_base interface, without any
bufferevent or evbuffer interface
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 11:12:10AM -0700, Phoenix Sol wrote:
> Is it alright to call evbuffer_readline() on a buffevent's evbuffer?
> ( Or any of the other evbuffer functions for that matter? )
You can do nearly anything with the evbuffers. I think the only
limitations right now are that you shou
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:57:46PM +0100, Richter, J?rg wrote:
[...]
> Note that the Linux definition has the same comment about the
> compare operator as the AIX one. But the comment seems to predate
> the Linux definition.
I'd guess that the comment is there because, if you're writing a
portabl
on Linux and OS X, and IIRC Niels is pretty eclectic
about his OS choices. It would be neat to have a regression test for
this case, if you have the time to write one.
Yrs,
--
Nick Mathewson
___
Libevent-users mailing list
Libevent-users@monkey.org
http://monkeymail.org/mailman/listinfo/libevent-users
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 01:45:21PM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
[...]
> I see two ways to handle this. One is with very, very nasty application
> logic, and the other is to simply set two separate events with the SSL
> fd, each waiting on EV_WRITE. So when the SSL fd comes ready for write -
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 09:16:26AM -0500, Brian wrote:
> Thanks Guillaume for the feedback. Unfortunately malloc/calloc method
> didn't work for me. I think I will just go back to how it was. Does
> anyone know if there is an inherent flaw, perhaps, with doing the
> event_init()/event_dispatch() wi
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 01:35:07AM +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
[...]
> I raised the possibility of breaking out the non-"event" code into
> separate libraries with enforced API boundaries. We were talking
> about various directions 2.0 can go in (in the context of doing
> sensible async IO that wil
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 08:09:18AM -0500, jamal wrote:
> olla,
>
> I dont know what the process for submitting patches here,
> but this is against version 1.4.9.
>
> This makes it easier to integrate libraries that provide their own
> read/write functions (such as openssl).
Hi, Jamal!
Thanks fo
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:26:36PM -0500, Mark Seger wrote:
> I've seen a few of these over the years via google but didn't really see
> anything that described the fix.
> I'm running on RHEL5.3 and downloaded libevent-1.4.9-stable. I did:
> ./configure
> make
> make install
> make verify
>
> al
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:56:22PM -, Richard Brice wrote:
> I am getting the following compile error in regress_http.c on a Cygwin
> platform
>
> make[4]: Entering directory
> `/home/rbrice/curl-loader-0.47/build/libevent/libevent-1.4.4-stable/test'
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..-I.. -
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 01:11:17PM -0800, Raine Fan wrote:
[...]
> What make me post here to ask if it's possible to you (libevent
> staff) to share what it's coming (features and
> theorical-release-date) on the next release (dunno if will be called
> 1.5 or 2.0).
The easiest way to see what's b
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 08:54:03PM -0200, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Niels Provos wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Rodrigo Campos
> >> wrote:
> >>> I wanted to know how public is the "struct event
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 11:43:32AM +0100, Rapsey wrote:
> This program works normally on ubuntu, but on os x leopard it immediately
> exits with errno: "Operation not supported". Why does it not work on
> os x?
Short version: You're using stdin, and it looks like the backend
libevent uses on leopa
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 03:03:34PM +0200, Malek Hadj-Ali wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> It seems there's a small bug in libevent-trunk (1.5?, 2.0?) when
> passing a 'wrong' event_config to event_base_new_with_config.
> By 'wrong' I mean a configuration that doesn't make sense, like
> avoiding epoll and r
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 08:16:21PM +0100, James Mansion wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi, all
> >
> > http://spserver.googlecode.com/files/libevent-1.4.5-stable-iocp-2.zip
> >
> Is there any likelihood of this code being merged, either with or
> without a config option to enable it?
See
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:01:33AM +0200, Ron Arts wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I get this error on libevent 1.3e on CentOS5. Upgrading to
> a higher version is not easy to push through, to say the least,
> so that's why I am asking the list first.
The error message looks like an event that's already been
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 07:59:45AM -0700, Teunis Peters wrote:
> I've not found any code to work with - but is there any reason that
> libevent would not work with standard files?
>
> I keep getting permission denied
>
> more or less:
>
> fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY)
> event_set(&ev, EV_READ |
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:00:28PM +0800, liusifan wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> Libevent svn main trunk cannot build with vs2008.
>
> The patch is in attachment.
> Changes: Rename INPUT to EVRPC_INPUT and OUTPUT to EVRPC_INPUT
Hi! This patch has the same problem as the last three patches that
did this
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 07:08:57PM +0200, Shiqing Fan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm testing Libevent 1.3 with VS2005 on Windows.
>
> The same problem below there happens on my machine, select() always
> returns -1. Does anyone know the reason? Sorry for polling this old
> mail up, I just found some
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 01:51:53PM +0800, liusifan wrote:
[...]
> Integrate Windows I/O Completion Port into Libevent
>
> IOCP is true async i/o model, and libevent is event-driven i/o model.
>
> 1. How to emulate event-driven recv/send ?
> It is possible to use IOCP to emulate event-driven mode
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:18:24AM +0200, Valery Kholodkov wrote:
>
> Below is the new version of file test_et.c. The resulting
> executable should return 1 whenever ET works, 0 otherwise.
Applied to trunk; thanks!
--
Nick
___
Libevent-users mailing l
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 08:02:18PM +0200, Valery Kholodkov wrote:
>
> For the convenience I'll answer to Nick's questions from
> SF's patch tracker in this list.
>
> > A few initial questions:
> > - How exactly does the test_et.c file test the edge-triggered behavior?
> > As near as I can tell,
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 05:40:16PM +0200, Valery Kholodkov wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Since discovering libevent for myself I've been wondering
> why where is still no support for Edge-Triggered behaviour, which
> from my point of view could be easily implemented.
Basically, because nobody had writt
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 07:37:32PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 05:34:04PM +0400, Eugene 'HMage' Bujak wrote:
[...]
> > * Winsock library needs to be initialized and freed explicitly on win32.
>
> This is true, but it's not libevent's
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 05:39:51PM -0400, Phil Budne wrote:
> I needed to do apples-to-apples comparison between rtsignals and epoll
> for a client, so I fixed rtsig.c from 1.3e (see an earlier post) to
> compile, then fixed it to work, and ported that to 1.4.3-stable.
>
> NOTE WELL! Used only for
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:03:26AM +0100, Lyes Amazouz wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> I want to know when the version 1.4.4 of the libevent will be released, I
> asked a question about a cygwin compilation problem last Thursday, and Nick
> said that this new version may resolve it. He also said th
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 05:34:04PM +0400, Eugene 'HMage' Bujak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to submit a more complete patch for VC6.
>
> This one makes all elements of the code compilable and this code is
> being used on a production-level project at work.
>
> The patch is in attachment. Compiles and
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 05:05:20PM -0500, Dan wrote:
>
>
> Its to bad when people write emails like this, clearly no social skills.
Dan, please take this off-list. This kind of flamewar does not help
libevent, libev, or anybody.
yrs,
--
Nick
___
Lib
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 05:23:27PM +0200, Lyes Amazouz wrote:
> Hello list,
> I want to make running my application, which is a sipmle file server, under
> cygwin. It compiles well and I can run it. But when I try to make a request
> on it, it makes a "segementation fault" error.
> Have I missed s
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 11:47:09PM -0700, Niels Provos wrote:
> Hi Manual,
>
> this is a good suggestion. Nick and I are currently working on how
> buffers and http work in libevent 2.0. You might want to check out
> trunk to see some of the progress there. In any case, it seems that
> your s
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 02:01:44PM +0100, James Mansion wrote:
>
> >Also, I think this change will double-initialize winsock on all
> >programs that use multiple event bases, and double-shutdown winsock
> >whenever the bases are closed on those programs.
> >
> From the MSDN docs:
>
> An applica
on older compilers, so we can't add C++-style
comments to libevent.
Otherwise, though, this looks like solid work, and I'm quite glad that
somebody has a copy of VC6 and the willingness to do it! If you can
send in a revised patch, that'd b
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:00:29PM -0300, Daniel Morales wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since libevent doesn't have a *.pc file to use with pkg-config, i need to
> add some manual check to a configure.in.
Hm! pkg-config! Yes, that's a good idea; we should support that in
libevent 2.0 and later. Would yo
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 06:58:32PM +0300, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote:
[...]
> >I've made some modifications to patch to attract your wishes, thought
> >I've not tested it in production yet.
>
> Sorry, attached reversed diff.
>
Hi, and sorry about the delay! Now that libevent 1.4 is stable, I'm
ab
What's New In Libevent 1.4:
0. About this document
This document describes the key differences between Libevent 1.3 and
Libevent 1.4, from a user's point of view. It was most recently
updated based on features from libevent 1.4.2-rc.
1. Packaging Issues.
1.1. The great library division.
terface here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/levent
many thanks,
--
Nick Mathewson
___
Libevent-users mailing list
Libevent-users@monkey.org
http://monkeymail.org/mailman/listinfo/libevent-users
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 07:17:50AM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
> while looking into an async dns solution i found the code to recheck
> dns servers in libevent. I dont think checking for google.com is a very
> good choice. In the past even ccTLDs have disappeared or start to
> disappear
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:12:08AM -0800, Tani Hosokawa wrote:
> These are four broken functions that didn't make it into the latest
> release -- I noticed that one of them is even marked as not being
> thread-safe.
Thanks! I've checked your patch into trunk and into the 1.4 branch.
__
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:54:57AM +0100, Frank Schaeckermann wrote:
> I have installed transmission-daemon (a Bittorrent client) svn revision
> 5051 on my Maxtor Shared Storage II (ARM little endian) with Linux
> 2.6.12. Very soon after starting the daemon it segfaults.
Hi, Frank! Here are som
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 07:16:45PM +0800, wenew zhang wrote:
> when i try to run test.sh,
> it's skip all include kqueue,
> and then:
> make clean,
> make
> i got a message:regress.c1242 error:'from_name' undeclared(first use in this
> function)
> ..
>
> i get the same message in libevent1.41
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 04:37:49PM +0200, Eran Sandler wrote:
> Nick Mathewson wrote:
> >
> >It should all be checked in to the subversion repository. I added a
> >.sln file and a .vcproj file; is there anything else?
> >
> >As noted, I'm not much of a wi
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 08:40:28AM +0200, Eran Sandler wrote:
[...]
> Any chance you can simply check in your VS2005 project files. I think
> its about time we can start using VS2005 and leave MSVC (unless there is
> anything specific in VS2005 that is preventing us from doing so).
It should all
de Charles
Kerr, Ilya Martynov, and others on sourceforge. To report a bug, make
a feature request, or submit code, you can use our sourceforge
interface here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/levent
Peace on earth, and good will to everyone!
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 07:29:02PM +0200, Eran Sandler wrote:
> Hello Niels,
>
> I've spoken with Dormando, one of the memcached maintainers and they
> haven't test it with LibEvent 1.4.0. They do, however work with 1.3e on
> memcached 1.2.4 and the first tests of memcached 1.3.0.
I hope they g
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 08:39:47AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> For my python binding to evhttp (temporarily called fapws2
> http://www.opensource4you.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=fapws2;a=summary), I
> would like to implement the concept of virtual host.
>
>
> Is there anyone having expertis
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:12:49PM -0800, Christopher Layne wrote:
> Separate build dir issue.
Applied to trunk.
yrs,
--
Nick Mathewson
pgppVzvy8jLzH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Libevent-users mailing list
Libevent-users@monkey.org
h
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 07:46:53PM -0800, Christopher Layne wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 06:23:33PM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 06:27:04AM -0800, Christopher Layne wrote:
> > > [ Warning: this is long and detailed, but includes details of a pr
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
