2011/9/21 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:27:02PM -0400, Aleksandr Andreev wrote:
/home/sasha/lilypond-git/build/out/lybook-db/snippet-names-5304161007275961614.ly
Does anyone have any idea what could be going on?
What's in the above file? It'll probably
On Sep 21, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2011/9/21 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:27:02PM -0400, Aleksandr Andreev wrote:
/home/sasha/lilypond-git/build/out/lybook-db/snippet-names-5304161007275961614.ly
Does anyone have any idea what could be
David Kastrup writes:
The main problem is that it is catastrophic with regard to rebasing, and
still rather disruptive with regard to merging.
+1
Personally, I'd prefer it if we focused on solving rather than creating
real problems.
+1
Also, I'm not going to start the C++ indentation
http://codereview.appspot.com/5075047/
This is for tracker issue 1801.
Explain as an example, that \repeat unfold 2 {music expression} is
not always the same as writing out the music expression twice - especially
in a \relative context
--
--
James
carl.d.soren...@gmail.com writes:
I'd be lying if I said I understood everything going on here, but I
think I get the gist.
Same here.
I like moving this way!
I like the approach of simplifying things.
I like having optional predicates, and optional predicates with
defaults.
I will
Hello,
2011/9/21 m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com:
On Sep 21, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2011/9/21 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:27:02PM -0400, Aleksandr Andreev wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 09:29:32PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
For 22:00 MDT Wednesday September 21, and *far* too early for an Autumnal
equinox!
As an experiment, I have changed all (hopefully?) of these issues
from Patch-review to
2011/9/21 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 09:29:32PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
For 22:00 MDT Wednesday September 21, and *far* too early for an Autumnal
equinox!
As an experiment, I have changed all (hopefully?)
2011/9/21 Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com:
Hello,
2011/9/21 m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com:
On Sep 21, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Out of curiosity i searched for snippet-names-5304161007275961614.ly
file in build/out/lybook-db/ and... it doesn't exist. In fact i
Reviewers: ,
Message:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-09/msg00331.html
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1909
Description:
Doc: add a note about \relative f to notation
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/5096046/
Affected files:
M
LGTM.
From what i see, the surprise in this behaviour comes from two meanings
of music expression - it can be understood as a piece of ly input or
a piece of music. Shall we write a sentence about this difference?
I.e. Using \repeat unfold is equal to writing out a fragment of music
several
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode258
Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:258: If you carefully consider
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2011/9/21 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 09:29:32PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
For 22:00 MDT Wednesday September 21, and *far* too early for an
Autumnal
equinox!
janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
LGTM.
From what i see, the surprise in this behaviour comes from two meanings
of music expression - it can be understood as a piece of ly input or
a piece of music. Shall we write a sentence about this difference?
I.e. Using \repeat unfold is equal to
For figured bass, the situation is different: Here we use
LilyPond's digit font, which is completely under our control, and
having accidentals fitting those digits better is a good thing.
I will prepare shorter versions of accidentals.
Thanks!
Would you help me with writing code that
On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
For figured bass, the situation is different: Here we use
LilyPond's digit font, which is completely under our control, and
having accidentals fitting those digits better is a good thing.
I will prepare shorter versions of accidentals.
Just wanted to throw this observation out: the current work on optional
arguments is one area where working with Rietveld is getting really
strained. The reason is that Rietveld just supports discussing and
improving a single patch/commit.
The current patch series consists of one infrastructure
2011/9/21 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
LGTM.
From what i see, the surprise in this behaviour comes from two meanings
of music expression - it can be understood as a piece of ly input or
a piece of music. Shall we write a sentence about this difference?
I.e.
On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:27 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Just wanted to throw this observation out: the current work on optional
arguments is one area where working with Rietveld is getting really
strained. The reason is that Rietveld just supports discussing and
improving a single patch/commit.
LGTM, with one comment
http://codereview.appspot.com/5081048/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5081048/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi#newcode143
Am 20.09.2011 08:59, schrieb Marc Hohl:
Hello list,
while trying to get more insight into the engraver stuff, I encountered a
problem. I hope I can explain it:
I need some kind of a array of vectors:
Nevermind - smells like the wrong way to go ;-)
I think I found a more generic solution.
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:27 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Just wanted to throw this observation out: the current work on optional
arguments is one area where working with Rietveld is getting really
strained. The reason is that Rietveld just
On 2011/09/21 08:43:09, Trevor Daniels wrote:
But if you leave the configure option in it should be
./configure.
Ah, that was a bit simplistic. In-tree and out-of-tree
builds are different wrt configure, I think.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5081048/
Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com writes:
On 20 September 2011 21:50, Benkő Pál benko@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know what to do, could you help me?
The attached patch works for me (haven't run make check on it though).
I have taken the liberty of pushing it after looking it through (I
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:01 AM, tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2011/09/21 08:43:09, Trevor Daniels wrote:
But if you leave the configure option in it should be
./configure.
Ah, that was a bit simplistic. In-tree and out-of-tree
builds are different wrt configure, I think.
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:35 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
For what it's worth, I run into the same problem from time to time - I
recently sent an e-mail to the list about a 1-line patch to fix kneed beams
that I needed to apply for other work.
So, and this
Suggestion to text.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode263
Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:263:
Janek,
pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Suggestion to text.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode263
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:35 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
For what it's worth, I run into the same problem from time to time -
I recently sent an e-mail to the list about a 1-line patch to fix
kneed beams that I needed
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:35 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
For what it's worth, I run into the same problem from time to time -
I recently sent
Am Wednesday, 21. September 2011, 04:27:02 schrieb Aleksandr Andreev:
Unfortunately, I cannot get my documentation to build. As was
suggested earlier, I nuked my build folder and redid everything from
the beginning (configure.sh, make all, touch, make doc). However, make
doc errors out with
On Sep 21, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Peekay Ex wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:35 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
For what it's worth, I run into
Am Wednesday, 21. September 2011, 12:45:17 schrieb David Kastrup:
Because it doesn't make sense to combine unrelated patches in that
manner. You can't find them in the history then, and if the large patch
gets applied or reverted, the independent small patch has to go along.
To submit a
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
Am Wednesday, 21. September 2011, 12:45:17 schrieb David Kastrup:
Because it doesn't make sense to combine unrelated patches in that
manner. You can't find them in the history then, and if the large patch
gets applied or reverted, the
What's in the above file? It'll probably contain 5-10 other
filename
Yes. All the different snippets seem to have something to do with percussion.
Aleks
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
2011/9/21 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
Am Wednesday, 21. September 2011, 12:45:17 schrieb David Kastrup:
Because it doesn't make sense to combine unrelated patches in that
manner. You can't find them in the history then, and if the large patch
Am Wednesday, 21. September 2011, 10:52:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
Perhaps it would be nice if we found a way to play with Gerrit,
supposedly a git-based system similar to Rietveld.
I looked at gerrit a while ago. If you want to take a look at it:
http://server.kainhofer.com:8088/
Here is a
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Aleksandr Andreev
aleksandr.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
What's in the above file? It'll probably contain 5-10 other
filename
Yes. All the different snippets seem to have something to do with percussion.
Aleks
http://codereview.appspot.com/5081048/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5081048/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi#newcode143
Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi:143:
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
Am Wednesday, 21. September 2011, 10:52:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
Perhaps it would be nice if we found a way to play with Gerrit,
supposedly a git-based system similar to Rietveld.
I looked at gerrit a while ago. If you want to take a look at
Am Wednesday, 21. September 2011, 15:04:05 schrieb David Kastrup:
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
Am Wednesday, 21. September 2011, 10:52:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
Perhaps it would be nice if we found a way to play with Gerrit,
supposedly a git-based system similar to
2011/9/21 Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com:
Am Wednesday, 21. September 2011, 15:04:05 schrieb David Kastrup:
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
Am Wednesday, 21. September 2011, 10:52:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
Perhaps it would be nice if we found a way to play with
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
Am Wednesday, 21. September 2011, 15:04:05 schrieb David Kastrup:
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
Am Wednesday, 21. September 2011, 10:52:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
Perhaps it would be nice if we found a way to play with
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
I might be willing to do this (since there are no other volunteers).
Can i see this web app?
Private email sent.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
[snip]
It's the first time i tried compiling docs, so i may have screwed
something. Here's what i did:
rm -r build
sh autogen.sh --noconfigure
mkdir -p build/
cd build/
../configure
make
make doc
2011/9/21 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
In gerrit you really need to clean up your patches before you
submit them for review. I typically have lots of small commits in a
branch when I upload a patch to rietveld. git-cl will simply take the
diff
I've added a few updates to the CG concerning regression tests - it answers
some FAQs that have come up about regtest comparison. I took the liberty of
a direct push as 173c86fbf69abf076ec9c16147c1bf106c52b541
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel
On 9/21/11 6:48 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote:
Am Wednesday, 21. September 2011, 10:52:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
Perhaps it would be nice if we found a way to play with Gerrit,
supposedly a git-based system similar to Rietveld.
I looked at gerrit a while ago. If you
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 08:31:51AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
As an experiment, I have changed all (hopefully?) of these issues
from Patch-review to Patch-countdown. You can see the complete
list here:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:39:01AM +0100, Peekay Ex wrote:
So, and this is a genuine question, why do you need to make a tiny
patch so that a (next) larger patch works. Why not include the tiny
patch in your larger patch (if that makes sense)?
Remember when you were first learning doc stuff,
On my fast build system, I can't currently get a successful make. Abort
changes, pull, clean build directory. The build ends with:
make[2]: Entering directory
`/media/IntelSSD/lilypond/lilypond-git/build/Documentation/topdocs'
LILYPOND_VERSION=2.15.13 [snip options] out/NEWS.tely
New patch set.
I hope this is ready for to be pushed, now.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4553056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 05:13:00PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
On my fast build system, I can't currently get a successful make.
Abort changes, pull, clean build directory. The build ends with:
...
As you see, the problem is a missing AUTHORS.texi. The odd thing is
that on previous make runs,
2011/9/21 Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com:
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Aleksandr Andreev
aleksandr.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
What's in the above file? It'll probably contain 5-10 other
filename
Yes. All the different snippets seem to have something to do with percussion.
You did
David Kastrup dak at gnu.org writes:
The reason is that Rietveld just supports discussing and
improving a single patch/commit.
A counterexample http://codereview.appspot.com/4830064/
More complicated sets can benefit from Reitveld's ability
to load patch sets relative to different
Reviewers: ,
Message:
This allows defining music functions that can be used as directionless
events, a frequently made request. It may be noted that the amount of
code needed for implementing this functionality is not exactly
staggering given the current infrastructure in lexer and parser.
I forgot to send the final version here. It was added to the CG,
and nobody complained about the final versions being in the CG,
but I should have still sent it for the email archives.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/gop_002dprop-9-_002d-behavior-of-make-doc
** summary
I haven't looked at the code itself, but a regtest is definitely missing
from the patch.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Not acceptable in current form because it would cause GUB to fail a
build. I suggest an alternate make target for this type of build.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5067042/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://codereview.appspot.com/5081048/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5081048/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi#newcode143
Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi:143:
reinhold.kainho...@gmail.com writes:
I haven't looked at the code itself, but a regtest is definitely missing
from the patch.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/
Writing regtests is one of my least favorite occupations. This feature
has been requested so often that I'd appreciate
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode258
Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:258: If you carefully consider
LGTM.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5075047/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Neil, David,
I don't know what to do, could you help me?
The attached patch works for me (haven't run make check on it though).
I have taken the liberty of pushing it after looking it through
thanks to both of you: the patch works and I've learnt something
about LilyPond again.
p
Am Wednesday, 21. September 2011, 21:26:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
reinhold.kainho...@gmail.com writes:
I haven't looked at the code itself, but a regtest is definitely missing
from the patch.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/
Writing regtests is one of my least favorite
On 2011/09/21 19:40:37, reinhold_kainhofer.com wrote:
Huh? How do you verify that your feature works at all? I'm sure you
are using
some simple test file for this. So, simply take that file, add a
\header {
doctitle=some short description } and you're done.
The example David's posted
On 2011/09/18 19:55:47, Bertrand Bordage wrote:
Another update that fixes some variable errors.
It now passes make.
thanks Bertrand, this is great work;
I can now print flexae just the default way!
(so long I had to use non-default viewers and lpr commands.)
p
http://codereview.appspot.com/4553056/diff/106003/Documentation/included/special-characters.ly
File Documentation/included/special-characters.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4553056/diff/106003/Documentation/included/special-characters.ly#newcode1
http://codereview.appspot.com/5030053/diff/2004/lily/mensural-ligature.cc
File lily/mensural-ligature.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5030053/diff/2004/lily/mensural-ligature.cc#newcode74
lily/mensural-ligature.cc:74: = (me-layout ()-get_dimension
(ly_symbol2scm (blot-diameter)));
On 2011/09/21 19:44:46, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 2011/09/21 19:40:37, http://reinhold_kainhofer.com wrote:
Huh? How do you verify that your feature works at all? I'm sure you
are using
some simple test file for this. So, simply take that file, add a
\header {
doctitle=some short
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/diff/1/scm/c++.scm
File scm/c++.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/diff/1/scm/c++.scm#newcode38
scm/c++.scm:38: (define-public (event? x)
I'd prefer a less vague name for this since it's going to conflict with
the stream event predicate
LGTM.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4841052/diff/25001/input/regression/spacing-loose-polyphony.ly
File input/regression/spacing-loose-polyphony.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4841052/diff/25001/input/regression/spacing-loose-polyphony.ly#newcode1
Needs a regression test.
This might do:
\relative c'' {
\set strokeFingerOrientations = #'(up)
\override StrokeFinger #'avoid-slur = #'outside
a-\rightHandFinger #2 16( b)
}
http://codereview.appspot.com/5056041/diff/1/lily/slur.cc
File lily/slur.cc (right):
I've added make it work like emacs to the proposal.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_10.html
** Proposal summary
Speaking academically, scheme code style is a “solved problem”.
Let’s pick one of the existing solutions, and let a computer deal
with this. Humans should not waste their time,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 09:27:39AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 9/21/11 6:48 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote:
I looked at gerrit a while ago. If you want to take a look at it:
http://server.kainhofer.com:8088/
Gerrit is certainly an option, although I'm not encouraged
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 09:32:55AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:09 AM
* 1-5 hours: automatically switch any Patch-review to
Patch-needs_work if there are any non-LGTM comments.
Hmm. There are often comments which don't
Thanks a lot, Neil.
Could you have a last look at the Scheme files?
I'm not sure of the indentation.
I created a new scm/text.scm file for the definitions I couldn't put
elsewhere.
Bertrand
http://codereview.appspot.com/4553056/
___
lilypond-devel
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 09:04:39PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
My impression is that the main problem is the duplicancy of data and
e-mail threads. Over and over again i'm getting lost, for example:
I can't see that going away.
- email is the most convenient option for quick discussion
-
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/diff/1/scm/c++.scm
File scm/c++.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/diff/1/scm/c++.scm#newcode38
scm/c++.scm:38: (define-public (event? x)
On 2011/09/21 21:32:30, Neil Puttock wrote:
I'd prefer a less vague name for this since it's going to
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 07:05:04AM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
The remaining case is where there are no comments when a countdown
expires. I've been taking that as silence implying consent, but
with no assurance that anyone has actually reviewed the patch.
Yes, that's correct. Think of the
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/diff/1/scm/c++.scm
File scm/c++.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/diff/1/scm/c++.scm#newcode38
scm/c++.scm:38: (define-public (event? x)
On 2011/09/21 22:14:40, dak wrote:
On 2011/09/21 21:32:30, Neil Puttock wrote:
I'd prefer a less
Updated Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely to show new
glyphs, reflecting comments by Neil.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
pkx1...@gmail.com pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 05:13:00PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
On my fast build system, I can't currently get a successful make.
Abort changes, pull, clean build directory. The build ends with:
...
As you see, the problem is a missing
Ok, I have made this based off origin/master, and I moved the stuff to
using ly:event? instead of event? (not really addressing Neil's issue at
all, merely for somewhat more symmetry to ly:music?).
Untested.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/
___
If this can be verified as working, it might go on the patch countdown,
barring comments that require addressing.
Note that ly:event? is not part of the public API of
define-event-function: if ly:event?'s function name changes at some
later point of time, uses of define-event-function will not
Yet another rm -fdr build/ and re-run of make, etc., eliminated my
original problem with snippets.
Now, my make doc command crashes with the same error message that
Janek is getting.
Looks like there's a missing file web.texi.
Aleks
___
On 11-09-21 04:13 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 09:04:39PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
My impression is that the main problem is the duplicancy of data and
e-mail threads. Over and over again i'm getting lost, for example:
I can't see that going away.
- email is the most
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 01:59:53AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
pkx1...@gmail.com pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 05:13:00PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
On my fast build system, I can't currently get a successful make.
Abort
On 9/21/11 9:25 PM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
On 11-09-21 04:13 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 09:04:39PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
One thing comes to my mind: there is some code revieving tool on
Google Code. I remember that i saw it being used in some other
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 09:25:45PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
I'm solidly with Janek here, Graham. As it sits, a person wanting
to follow the trail of a (bug/issue/enhancement request) has to find
the thing on two separate web-sites, where developers log in despite
your comment above, using
For 20:00 CDT Friday September 23 (no, the time is not a typo: I'll be
visiting my Mother in Ontario, and hope to borrow her browser)
Issue 935 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=935:
Enhancement: optional arguments in music functions - R 5023044
2011/9/21 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
- Original Message - From: Janek Warchoł
janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
[snip]
It's the first time i tried compiling docs, so i may have screwed
something. Here's what i did:
rm -r build
sh autogen.sh --noconfigure
mkdir -p build/
2011/9/21 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
On 9/21/11 6:48 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote:
Am Wednesday, 21. September 2011, 10:52:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
Perhaps it would be nice if we found a way to play with Gerrit,
supposedly a git-based system similar to Rietveld.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:22:13AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Overnight i tried making doc on current master and it failed too.
ef8dd3eaee73588faf1a6687407a6fda60cff591
worked perfectly in ubuntu 10.04 (not quite lilydev) for me a few
hours ago.
63cfd5548c42a98c7dae43f1f92e67772969e53c
worked
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5038045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:17:59PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
For 20:00 CDT Friday September 23 (no, the time is not a typo: I'll be
visiting my Mother in Ontario, and hope to borrow her browser)
I've just nuked two of those because there's existing
complaints/suggestions on Rietveld.
2011/9/21 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 08:20:39AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
David Kastrup writes:
Personally, I'd prefer it if we focused on solving rather than creating
real problems.
+1
Automatic indentation *does* solve real problems. Take
2011/9/22 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:22:13AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Overnight i tried making doc on current master and it failed too.
ef8dd3eaee73588faf1a6687407a6fda60cff591
worked perfectly in ubuntu 10.04 (not quite lilydev) for me a few
98 matches
Mail list logo
