Hi Andrew,
thank you for your quick answer! I tried countless writings of the fonts, but
none did work.
The solution was that fontconfig did’t search in the User-Fonts I stored in
/Users/[Name]/Library/Fonts. I added the search part and everything worked
fine. Seems to me that the relative pat
On 2016-04-11 13:37, Daniel Fütterer wrote:
Hello,
I want to use alternative fonts for my documents, but I have problems
including them. I’m using 2.18.2 with the patch for alternative music
fonts (which all work fine). [...]
I tried some different fonts, including Charter (worked) and Alegery
Hi Daniel,
it just so happens I also use Linux Biolinum and Linux Libertine with lilypond.
The names need to be right, as you said.
To see all fonts you can use:
$ lilypond -dshow-available-fonts
In your case:
#:roman "Linux Libertine O"
#:sans "Linux Biolinum O"
Exactly what I use. Quite ni
Hello,
I want to use alternative fonts for my documents, but I have problems including
them. I’m using 2.18.2 with the patch for alternative music fonts (which all
work fine).
I tried the following snippets within the \paper-variable:
#(define fonts
(set-global-fonts
#:music "scorl
Ah, after a further search I found that it's a known issue:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1129
with a workaround by Neil Puttock:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-lilypond@gnu.org/msg16599.html
Though this function appears to preserve the fonts requested but not the
staff s
- Original Message -
From: "Hilary Snaden"
To: "LilyPond Users"
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 11:11 AM
Subject: Font problems in \bookparts
I'm making a score including a number of pieces in \bookparts. If I add
a \layout block to a bookpart, that
I'm making a score including a number of pieces in \bookparts. If I add
a \layout block to a bookpart, that bookpart ignores my font definitions
and uses the defaults instead.
Is it possible to change sizes etc for each bookpart while still
recognising the new fonts?
--
Hilary
_
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Simon Bailey"
<...SNIP SNAP...>
>> This leads me to conclude that there seems to be a problem with the
>> 64-bit version of the font libraries in the build system for the
>> release packages. Can anyone com
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Bailey"
To: "lilypond-user Mailinglist"
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:20 AM
Subject: 64-bit font problems in GUB
Hello,
I kicked this thread off last week sometime:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-01
Hello,
I kicked this thread off last week sometime:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-01/msg00762.html
TL/DR summary: ligatures were not being shown for lilypond-generated output.
further investigation led me to:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-01/msg00804.
Python and midi2ly seem OK, but now lilypond.exe doesn't seem to do
anything useful. I tried:
lilypond -h
lilypond somefile.ly
both from a Windows command prompt and from within Cygwin and
there are no printouts or output files whatsoever. It doesn't make any
difference if I specify a full path fo
Mats Bengtsson writes:
> Thanks for your efforts! However, is it really that hard to make a simple
> test case yourself? There are still a number of problems to solve:
Please have a look at the new and bug-free 2.6.4-4! Python and argv0
relocation should both work now (at least, they work for me
Mats Bengtsson writes:
> Thanks for your efforts! However, is it really that hard to make a simple
> test case yourself?
Yes, it is. To me, the whole Windows platform is some sort of ugly
black voodoo, as you can see from the snippets I sent, it works for
me. Just as the previous release worked
Thanks for your efforts! However, is it really that hard to make a simple
test case yourself? There are still a number of problems to solve:
When you run from the Windows (XP) command window:
1. Python is still not setup correctly. For example, you get:
>>midi2ly
Traceback (most recent call last
Mats Bengtsson writes:
> On the other hand, I just tried John Mandereau's hints:
I have prepared 2.6.4-3 packages with python compiled for console and
incorporating John's hints (apart from downloading python manually :-).
For PATH, PYTHONPATH and PATHEXT to be set automagically, you may have
to
Mats Bengtsson writes:
> Well, one reason is that you then would have to set the value of
> the libdir variable at the top of midi2ly.py in the installation program,
> since you don't know before then what installation directory was actually
> used. Moving the dll:s and .py include files into bin\
The primary problem is that the file isn't found at all, since the lines
adding to the python path are completely off relative to the windows
setting.
How is that? Can't we get them completely ON? ;-)
Well, one reason is that you then would have to set the value of
the libdir variabl
Mats Bengtsson writes:
> I did try that and all other possible flags and there's no output
> whatsoever.
ah, that's probably the -mwindows (gui) flag again.
> The primary problem is that the file isn't found at all, since the lines
> adding to the python path are completely off relative to the w
Mats Bengtsson writes:
> I just tried a clean installation of the new package and lilypond
> itself works like a charm.
Thanks.
> However, I couldn't manage to run python. For example, I would
> expect /Program Files/LilyPond/usr/bin/python2.4.exe in a command window
> to start the interpreter,
However, I couldn't manage to run python. For example, I would
expect /Program Files/LilyPond/usr/bin/python2.4.exe in a command window
to start the interpreter, but it seems that the command doesn't do
anything at all.
That's not much. You did set PYTHONPATH? Try using -v to see what
t
I just tried a clean installation of the new package and lilypond itself
works
like a charm. However, I couldn't manage to run python. For example, I would
expect /Program Files/LilyPond/usr/bin/python2.4.exe in a command window
to start the interpreter, but it seems that the command doesn't do
Mats Bengtsson writes:
> GNU LilyPond 2.6.4
> ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link:
> ERROR: file: "libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-2", message: "can't open the module"
I've prepared 2.6.4-2, would you like to give that a test? It took me
longer than I'd hoped, but as a bonus you should be able to do
PY
No,
I do have a problem with fonts with Lilypond 2.6.4.
I am using Lilypond 2.6.4 for Cygwin, because I want to integrate it
with TeX and the best way to do this seemed to be cygwin.
Lilypond itself runs fine, but when I use lilypond-book (with the
--psfonts option) it failes to extract Ayba
Mats Bengtsson writes:
> I just realized that I could run lilypond from the Cygwin command
> line if I added the path to the mingw version to PATH. Then I could
> also see the error message when running 2.6.4 (installed without a
> previous install of 2.6.3). It's:
>
> >>lilypond testfile.ly
> GN
I just realized that I could run lilypond from the Cygwin command
line if I added the path to the mingw version to PATH. Then I could
also see the error message when running 2.6.4 (installed without a
previous install of 2.6.3). It's:
>>lilypond testfile.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.6.4
ERROR: In procedure
I did use the full installation, not only the upgrade, but I didn't remove
the previous installation first.
Trying Uninstall + Install of mingw LilyPond 2.6.4 is unfortunately much
less successful. Double clicking on a .ly file or drag&drop onto the
LilyPond
icon doesn't produce anything. When I
Mats Bengtsson writes:
> I didn't notice any problems!
Ok. I tested my newly released Cygwin 2.6.4 and that works fine too.
Maybe it's just a coincidence. Seems like we need people to ask to
run LILYPOND_VERBOSE=1 again (without typo's).
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU L
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>> I didn't notice any problems!
>
> Ok. I tested my newly released Cygwin 2.6.4 and that works fine too.
Waitaminute. Did you install the -upgrade exe? If so, could you
uininstall and test the full version (the support libraries were
rebuilt, that may have introduced
I didn't notice any problems!
/Mats
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Anyone tried 2.6.4 and got good results with text fonts on Windows?
Jan.
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal In
Anyone tried 2.6.4 and got good results with text fonts on Windows?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lily
Stefán Sigurjónsson wrote:
the sakura-sakura.ly and xiao-haizi-guai-guai.ly files from the
C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\share\doc\lilypond-2.5.29-2\input folder
fails completely ('warning: don't know how to embed
"MS-Gothic"="C:/WINDOWS/fonts/msgothic.ttc"') .
Are there some additional font
Update: Seems I was too trigger happy before, I figured out I was not
using utf8, but an 8bit encoding, the Icelandic is fixed :D
Thanks for a great program btw :D
SS
Stefán Sigurjónsson wrote:
I was trying out the new windows installer, compiling a song by an
icelandic composer.
It seems
I was trying out the new windows installer, compiling a song by an
icelandic composer.
It seems that icelandic characters do not work in this version (replaced
with spaces) even with the source as a utf8 doc, and trying to compile
the sakura-sakura.ly and xiao-haizi-guai-guai.ly files from the
The problem is solved: I downloaded ec-fonts-mftraced_1.0.12-1_all.deb
from www.lilypond.org/download/fonts, installed it and the good fonts
are back.
Thanks for your help,
Antonio
D Josiah Boothby wrote:
I think that has something to do with the config file that the sid
version of ec-fonts-mft
tonio
-- Initial Header ---
From : "D Josiah Boothby" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : "Antonio PALAMA'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : lilypond-user@gnu.org
Date : Thu, 12 May 2005 19:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Subject : Re: Text font problems with 2.4.5
I
io PALAMA'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : lilypond-user@gnu.org
Date : Thu, 12 May 2005 19:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Subject : Re: Text font problems with 2.4.5
> I think that has something to do with the config file that the sid version
> of ec-fonts-mftraced has. Try downgrading to the ve
I think that has something to do with the config file that the sid version
of ec-fonts-mftraced has. Try downgrading to the version that is in sarge
(which, I believe is the same version but with the right config file).
Josiah
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Antonio PALAMA' wrote:
After upgrading from 2.2.
Run lilypond --verbose ... to get more information on what happens,
especially when lilypond calls dvips. Then, search the mailing
list archives. I guess most possible problems have been discussed
several times here.
/Mats
=
Mats Bengtsson
After upgrading from 2.2.x to 2.4.5 on my Debian sid system, all the
text (title, composer, rehearsal marks, markups etc.) is typeset using a
strange font which resmbles Courier. I tried to reinstall
ec-fonts-mftraced 1.0.10a-1 but the problem is still there.
Do people have any idea about how to
> "Mats" == Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mats> Did you compile it yourself or install from an RPM? Are the
Mats> symbols missing both in DVI, PS, PDF and printed output?
Mats> Do the PDF files from the on-line examples at the documentation
Mats> page for your LilyPond version w
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> (LILYPONDPREFIX is for gurus like me, who run LilyPond from the
> compile directory)
Nah, real don't even use LILYPONDPREFIX for that, just set a clever
--prefix ;-)
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4al
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Here's some more data:
>
> There appears to be an incompatibility in the meaning of the
> envirnoment variable LILYPONDPREFIX between lilypond-profile.sh and
> lilypond. I have lilypond installed in the directory
> /usr/local/coop/share/lilypond. In order to get lilyp
Here's some more data:
There appears to be an incompatibility in the meaning of the
envirnoment variable LILYPONDPREFIX between lilypond-profile.sh and
lilypond. I have lilypond installed in the directory
/usr/local/coop/share/lilypond. In order to get lilypond to work from
the command line, I f
> "Mats" == Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mats> Did you compile it yourself or install from an RPM? Are the
Mats> symbols missing both in DVI, PS, PDF and printed output?
I compiled it myself, since it needs to be installed in a non-standard place.
Mats> Do the PDF files from t
Did you compile it yourself or install from an RPM?
Are the symbols missing both in DVI, PS, PDF and printed output?
Do the PDF files from the on-line examples at the documentation
page for your LilyPond version work on your computer?
If it's only a problem in the PS and PDF files, but the DVI file
I've installed LP 2.2.6 on RH 9. Things work fairly well, except for
the following which I would guess is some sort of font problem:
No brace is printed to the left of a piano staff (even from some of
the precanned examples). No dynamic markings, like p, pp, etc. are
printed. Any suggestions ab
I guess that the PDF file you get doesn't look too good, at least not
on screen, since it will contain bitmap fonts instead of vector fonts.
What LilyPond does internally, is to call dvips with the following
flags:
dvips -Ppdf -u+lilypond -u+ec-mftrace filename.dvi
What happens when you try this ma
Thanks for your reply,
I have no problem with missfonts (anyway kpsewhich ecrm10.pfa returns
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/ec-fonts-mftraced/ecrm10.pfa)
Xdvi runs fine with dvi generated by lily ; but gv displays strange symbols for
graces notes and fermata on bar.
Anyway, I dug a little
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Thanks for your reply. I've just had a closer look at a few things, and
> I found a log file named missfont.log in my project directory, which
> contains the line
>
> mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+0/8000 --dpi 8000 ecrm1000
>
>
> Does this give any clu
ron Horsburgh wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just downloaded Lilypond 2.3.24 (Debian Sid) from Pedro's
repository. I had a few font problems, which I fixed by upgrading to
the latest ec-fonts-mftraced, also from Pedro's site.
Now, however, when I use a global staff size less than 20 points I
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just downloaded Lilypond 2.3.24 (Debian Sid) from Pedro's
repository. I had a few font problems, which I fixed by upgrading to
the latest ec-fonts-mftraced, also from Pedro's site.
Now, however, when I use a global staff size less than
te:
Hi folks,
I've just downloaded Lilypond 2.3.24 (Debian Sid) from Pedro's
repository. I had a few font problems, which I fixed by upgrading to the
latest ec-fonts-mftraced, also from Pedro's site.
Now, however, when I use a global staff size less than 20 points I get
greater-
Hi folks,
I've just downloaded Lilypond 2.3.24 (Debian Sid) from Pedro's
repository. I had a few font problems, which I fixed by upgrading to the
latest ec-fonts-mftraced, also from Pedro's site.
Now, however, when I use a global staff size less than 20 points I get
greater
Jan Kohnert wrote:
Am Dienstag, 10. Februar 2004 11:47 schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
Please always specify a subject on your emails. In these
days when there are lot of spam and virus emails, it was
just about to delete your email withour reading it.
Just answered, didn't care for the not specified
Am Dienstag, 10. Februar 2004 11:47 schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
> Please always specify a subject on your emails. In these
> days when there are lot of spam and virus emails, it was
> just about to delete your email withour reading it.
Just answered, didn't care for the not specified subject, Sorry :-
Please always specify a subject on your emails. In these
days when there are lot of spam and virus emails, it was
just about to delete your email withour reading it.
Also, always tell what operating system you use (and what
distribution if it is a Linux systems) and how you installed
LilyPond (from
Also, there a bug in the latest stable versions 1.6.x. If you
try to use the Type1 (vectorized) fonts instead of the default
Type3 (bitmapped) fonts, the wrong fonts will be shown in the
Postscript or PDF. I think that's what happened to you.
The simple solution, if you just want a PS file to view
That's because the fonts have changed.
You must clean the fonts (they are build when LaTeX need them and then
cached ; you must clean the cache...)
See /buildscripts/clean-fonts.sh in lilypond src directory...
Alex.
neuro wrote:
> Need help to my problem...
>
> I installed Lilypond 1.6.5
Need help to my problem...
I installed Lilypond 1.6.5-1 from rpm on RedHat Linux 8.0, and it works
well.
The other day, I found the Lilypond 1.6.6-1 rpm from
http://www-ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/soundapps.html#lilypond
, so I rpm -Uvh, but it goes differently; the font is not right
> > /home/russell/docs/music/examples/feta-nummer10.600pk
> > /var/lib/texmf/pk/bjtzzs/feta-nummer8.720pk
> > /var/lib/texmf/pk/cx/feta-nummer8.300pk
>
> You have pk files for three different resolutions on your disk. You
> state that you're running Red Hat 7.3, but this is (hopefully) not a
> co
Russell Smiley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I also tried 'ly2dvi -p' to output pdf. This appears to fix the problem
> as you suggested.
Good.
> The only much more minor (cosmetic) complaint is that
> the bracket for the piano staff appears to be the wrong size.
Strange.
> I've attached the ou
I've attached the output of 'locate feta'.
I also tried 'ly2dvi -p' to output pdf. This appears to fix the problem
as you suggested. The only much more minor (cosmetic) complaint is that
the bracket for the piano staff appears to be the wrong size.
I think I can live with that. :-)
Thanks for yo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I hope you saw the other postings on this problem which I think answer
> your question.
>
> Any ideas?
Still the only thing I can think of is some kind of resolution
mismatch. (are you sure you removed everything, i.e. what does locate
feta say?) Second, if you use ly2
I hope you saw the other postings on this problem which I think answer
your question.
Any ideas?
Russell.
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 17:03, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
>
> Does this happen on the Xdvi screen or in the PS? What happens if you
> try ly2dvi --pdf and view the result with gv ?
>
> (It
Mats,
Removing the feta* files in my local directory made the dvips and ly2dvi
generated files look the same. Unfortunately it didn't fix the squashed
font problem.
Sorry about the 16 versus 20 font size oversight. I'm usnig denemo to
enter the music which defaults to 16 so I have to change it by
> dvipslist:
> kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.vf) =>
> kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.720pk) => ./feta-nummer8.720pk
> kdebug:search(feta16.vf) =>
> kdebug:search(feta16.720pk) => ./feta16.720pk
> kdebug:search(feta-braces4.vf) =>
> kdebug:search(feta-braces4.720pk) => ./feta-braces4.720pk
Simply remove
xdvi use. Normally, the same fonts should be
> used by both dvips and xdvi.
>
> By the way, have you tried to print the PS file generated by
> dvips. Some month ago, one guy on the list experienced font
> problems when viewing the PS file in gv/ghostview/... but
> they
le.dvi 2>&1 | grep '=>' | grep feta > xdvilist
This will give you two log files with paths to the font files
that dvips and xdvi use. Normally, the same fonts should be
used by both dvips and xdvi.
By the way, have you tried to print the PS file generated by
dvips. So
You're correct. I just did a clean font. I viewed my example with xdvi
and tried "kpsewhich feta20.pk" again. No response again.
However I did notice that there is no font problem with xdvi (and the
rests are okay, they have also been a problem)...see the attached png.
> xdvi -v
xdvi version 22.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have this font problem which existed in 1.4.x and appears to persist
> in the 1.6.5 redhat rpm. I have run the buildscripts/clean-font.sh and
> it appears to not make any difference.
>
> Can anyone suggest any further efforts to eliminate the problem?
>
> I'
> Jan,
>
> I'm running Redhat 7.3 with standard kernel and appropriate updates. I
> first saw the problem on Redhat 7.1 or 7.2.
>
> > mf --version
> Metafont (Web2C 7.3.1) 2.7182
> kpathsea version 3.3.1
Same as on my machine!
> > rpm -q tetex
> tetex-1.0.7-47
> > rpm -q glibc
> glibc-2.2.5-34
Jan,
I'm running Redhat 7.3 with standard kernel and appropriate updates. I
first saw the problem on Redhat 7.1 or 7.2.
> mf --version
Metafont (Web2C 7.3.1) 2.7182
kpathsea version 3.3.1
> rpm -q tetex
tetex-1.0.7-47
> rpm -q glibc
glibc-2.2.5-34
Here's the responses to the kpsewhich you sugge
Russell Smiley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have this font problem which existed in 1.4.x and appears to persist
> in the 1.6.5 redhat rpm. I have run the buildscripts/clean-font.sh and
> it appears to not make any difference.
> You can see the 3 on the time signature is squashed. This
> also
Hi,
I have this font problem which existed in 1.4.x and appears to persist
in the 1.6.5 redhat rpm. I have run the buildscripts/clean-font.sh and
it appears to not make any difference.
Can anyone suggest any further efforts to eliminate the problem?
I've attached a png illustrating the problem (
Brishen Viaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes you were both right, it was old fonts causing the problem. I had run
> the 'clean-fonts' script a few times, and had tried to go through manually
> and get rid of some of the fonts but I had obviousliy missed some. Now
> that I've removed them I"m
> >> Did you remember to clean out the old fonts first? Refer to INSTALL.txt or
> >> http://lilypond.org/stable/Documentation/topdocs/out-www/INSTALL.html
> >
> > Yes I did.
>
> Do it again :-)
Yes you were both right, it was old fonts causing the problem. I had run
the 'clean-fonts' script a f
Brishen Viaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Did you remember to clean out the old fonts first? Refer to INSTALL.txt or
>> http://lilypond.org/stable/Documentation/topdocs/out-www/INSTALL.html
>
> Yes I did.
Do it again :-)
What does
kpsewhich feta20.pk
Say?
It really looks like an
> "W. Brishen Viaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am now have trouble with the fonts. The note heads are very oddly shaped,
> > and the tails are all 1/64 for quarter notes. The staffs are also wrong with
> > a bass clef in place of a treble one, and also further down then it should be
> > (
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 00:58:12 -0400
"W. Brishen Viaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am now have trouble with the fonts. The note heads are very oddly shaped,
> and the tails are all 1/64 for quarter notes. The staffs are also wrong with
> a bass clef in place of a treble one, and also further
Hi, hopefully this will be quite simple and simply something that I've
overlooked.
I have just installed version 1.6.4 on my system (slackware 8.0) over top of
the my older 1.4.9 version.
I am now have trouble with the fonts. The note heads are very oddly shaped,
and the tails are all 1/64 f
> Hi,
>
> I installed lilypond on my debian system via apt. The postscript file that
> is generated can not find the font feta. Doesn't that come with lilypond?
> Or did I do something else wrong?
> When I generate tex or dvi, the displayed score is very different from
> what I entered in rose
Hi,
I installed lilypond on my debian system via apt. The postscript file that
is generated can not find the font feta. Doesn't that come with lilypond?
Or did I do something else wrong?
When I generate tex or dvi, the displayed score is very different from
what I entered in rosegarden. Rest s
82 matches
Mail list logo
