That would be the appropriate response - then IBM could release the original
Un*x source code under the BSD or LGPL license to make sure that this sort of
silliness gets cut off at the source (pun intended ;^)
Wesley Parish
On Friday 04 April 2003 08:48 am, you wrote:
> James Melin wrote:
> > I
Hi Leland:
Adding the following near the top of
/usr/src/linux/net/ipv6/addrconf.c will
probably take care of your problem.
EXPORT_SYMBOL(addrconf_lock);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(in6_dev_finish_destroy);
I got bored so I thought I'd test it out. The solution was right, but the
file was wrong. Add the above
Ok; this is the 2nd place I've see a reference to a 3390 mod 27.
Would someone point me down a short path to the details on this beast?
TIA
Garry E. Ward
Senior Software Specialist
Maritz Research, Automotive Research Group
419-725-4123
-Original Message-
From: Marcy Cortes [mailto:[EM
On Gwe, 2003-04-04 at 02:17, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> And besides: a virus scanner is a lousy solution to the problem. Have
> you noticed that you have to keep it up-to-date to make it efficient?
> Why not keep your system patched instead? (this can be automated just as
> well. Easily).
There is a m
> Ok; this is the 2nd place I've see a reference to a 3390 mod 27.
> Would someone point me down a short path to the details on this beast?
Garry:
The IBM Enterprise Storage Server (aka Shark) has the ability to create
3390 format volumes of up to 32,760 cylinders. This is three times the
capaci
Funny -- globus has been available on Linux/390 for months, as has the
GT3 and OGSA toolkit. I seem to remember completing this port more than
a few months ago and demoing it at Marist's Data Center of the Future
conference September 19th of last year.
We've been building these things for at leas
Thanks; missed that one.
Garry E. Ward
Senior Software Specialist
Maritz Research, Automotive Research Group
419-725-4123
-Original Message-
From: Jim Elliott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 8:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DASD technology for VM and Li
We are looking along those lines right now as well. Would anyone posting private
e-mails on this please include
me too? :)
Thanks
-Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Ward, Garry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: DASD technology
In z/VM 4.3 announcement:
* Support for up to 32,760-cylinder Enterprise Storage Server(tm) (ESS) 3390
volumes. The 32,760-cylinder 3390 volume helps relieve device address
constraints and improves disk resource utilization. Storage administrator
productivity may be improved by providing the abilit
A lot of companies, mine included strip attachments at the mail gateway,
that way new viruses will not get through, assuming you've blocked that type
off attachment. This helps prevent the -our vendor doesn't have definitions
for that yet or their ftp server is unreachable.
> -Original Messag
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=8734
Baron Gunther Freiherr von Gravenreuth - better known as Herr G|nther von Gravenreuth
- those
little dots are important.
Anyone who can be bothered should go to http://www.google.de and search on the correct
spelling, asking for pages from Germany. They'
Thanks John- I'll post this reply to both groups as a polite way of doing so then. :)
Most of our (my!) problems are with the different Linkage conventions under Linux of
course.
It uses a simple register based method to pass arguments to SVCs and C-Libraries
functions,
and yet it still uses a s
I'm just finishing up a cost case for a similar environment, and the
numbers look very good if you can live with some of the technical
restrictions. As others have said, there are limits on the size of the
databases supported by UDB, however with the ability to run multiple
copies of UDB in the VM
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Ryan Ware wrote:
> A lot of companies, mine included strip attachments at the mail gateway,
> that way new viruses will not get through, assuming you've blocked that type
That's a bit excessive. Using attachments is perfectly legitimate, and
with procedures like that how can s
We don't block all attachments, only those that are viruses 99% of the time,
.vbs .js .exe .pif .scr, etc. As far as word, it is a necessary evil in the
corporate world. The gateway gets the bulk of all the nasties, the mail
then goes to the virus scanner before ending up in anyones mail box.
The
> http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=8734
> Baron Gunther Freiherr von Gravenreuth - better known as Herr G|nther
> von Gravenreuth - those little dots are important.
I am not an IP lawyer, but... Linus is the registered owner of the
trademark Linux in the US (see the link below).
http://tess2.
Hi Paul,
I did something similar. Except I took C source, compiled it under Linux,
used TAS to assemble it, and linked it up on OS/390 to produce non-LE based
zlib and bzip2 libraries. You can find the libraries in the assembler
section over at http://www.homerow.net, but here's a snippet from t
> I've recently had a number of IBM web pages pointed out to me
> that talk
> about zSeries boxes being useful in grid computing.
390's are useful in grids, but primarily as storage management nodes and
as control nodes. As Mark points out, 390s don't produce enough raw
cycles to be very interesti
> > http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=8734
>
> > Baron Gunther Freiherr von Gravenreuth - better known as Herr G|nther
> > von Gravenreuth - those little dots are important.
>
> I am not an IP lawyer, but... Linus is the registered owner of the
> trademark Linux in the US (see the link below).
>
> I got curious and went googling. I turned up this snippet at
> http://ftp.nl.linux.org/linux/bk2patch/linux-2.4/SCCS/s.MAINTAINERS:
> SNA NETWORK LAYER
> P: Jay Schulist
> M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> W: http://www.linux-sna.org
> S: Supported
>
> Possibl
And I thought we (the U.S.) had the monopoly on "stupid lawyer tricks". :-(
-Original Message-
From: Phil Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Oh,, look who's popped out of the woodwork
> > http://www.theinquirer.net/?ar
I've posted a couple more patches to the kernel source over at:
http://www.homerow.net/projects/zlinux/kernelfixes.htm
Just 3 for now. The small VMPOFF and VMHALT patch I posted to the list a
while back, one that allows SLES8 users to use DEVFS, and one that allows
you to compile IPV6 into the k
http://www.sueddeutsche.de/aktuell/sz/getArticleSZ.php?artikel=artikel104.php
I apologize for yet another German link, but I've just not seen this story anywhere in
English.
Basically Steve Ballmer was on a skiing holiday in Switzerland and interrupted it to
dash over
to Munich for urgent talks
below is my samba config
i can't get zvmlinx1 to show up in my network places
what am i doing wrong
i can get to it by doing a start run \\zvmlinx1
that works no problem... it just don't show up in MNplaces
any help is appreciated
Ralph
zvmlinx1:/etc/samba # cat smb.conf
# Samba config file
No, just a monopoly on stupid lawyers...
They say there are three signs of stress in your life. You eat too much junk food,
you drive too fast and you veg out in front of the TV. Who are they kidding? That
sounds like a perfect day to me!
Gordon Wolfe, Ph.D. (425)865-5940
VM & Linux Servers a
n Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:04:58AM -0600, Noll, Ralph wrote:
> i can't get zvmlinx1 to show up in my network places
Well, you're using eth0, which is presumably broadcast-capable...but I
bet your desktop and zvmlinx1 are in different subnets.
Try setting wins proxy=yes as well.
Adam
Marcy,
In the long run, I want to use the FCP capability that IBM just recently
announced. That will let me access storage boxes natively, and not have to
go through the blasted 3390 emulation nonsense. When I was at the VM/VSE
Tech Conference in October, Neale Ferguson showed me a 200GB partiti
really i am using hypersockets
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Thornton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 11:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: samba
>
>
> n Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:04:58AM -0600, Noll, Ralph wrote:
> > i can't get zvmlinx1 to show up i
> i can't get zvmlinx1 to show up in my network places
>
> what am i doing wrong
>
> i can get to it by doing a start run \\zvmlinx1
Probably your hostname is the same as the netbios name? If so, my guess
is it's just falling back to using dns here.
> that works no problem... it just don't show
Is nmbd running? That can sometimes cause this problem, but I wouldn't
expect "start run \\zvmlinx1" to work in that case. (As Daniel pointed out,
it might work, if you have a DNS entry for zmvlinx1.)
I normally specify my "interfaces" parameter as ip.address/24 (or whatever
your netmask is). I
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:51:39AM -0600, Noll, Ralph wrote:
> really i am using hypersockets
Ah *HA*.
HiperSockets don't do broadcast. Try what Mark said about turning on
remote announce.
Adam
The second story relates to a zSeries shop. I wonder who GK is?
See: "http://linuxtoday.com/it_management/2003040401226NWBZDP";
Some companies don't want to walk on the bleeding edge of a technology.
In these true tales from the Linux trenches, two large companies didn't
even want to test the edg
Paul,
You probably already know about it, but IBM's ELF Application Binary
Interface
Supplement describes the calling conventions quite nicely.
http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/documentati
on-2.4.19-may2002.shtml
Leland
> > really i am using hypersockets
>
> Ah *HA*.
>
> HiperSockets don't do broadcast. Try what Mark said about turning on
> remote announce.
Well, now the significance of lacking broadcast support really depends
on what else you got going on in that subnet.
If the samba server is the only smb/cif
On SuSE SLES7 and SLES8, I am mounting a z/VM SFS filespace and when I
try to list the files on the mount, on the console of the Linux z/VM
userid gets constant error messages of:
NFS: short packet in readdir reply!
I have been using this "setup" on a SuSE 2.2.16 to the same SFS for
quite a while w
not to be on the negitive side but
the performance of linux on s390 doesn't
seem to be as fast as an x86 box
do i have something configured wrong..
i am using suse sles8 31 bit for s/390
on a z/800 0a1 running vm 4.3 with 2 vse's and 6 linux instances
when i do the ind command.. following.. does
I have SAMBA set up and running on my Debian 3.0 s390 system. I can see the file share
from the "Computers Near Me" screen on my Win 2000 machine. When I double click on the
server, I get the error message "\\Ss390 is not accessable. The network path was not
found."
What do I do to fix this pro
From: "Noll, Ralph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: performance
> the performance of linux on s390 doesn't seem to be as fast as an x86
> box
> i am using suse sles8 31 bit for s/390 on a z/800 0a1 running vm 4.3
> with 2 vse's and 6 linux instances when i do the ind command..
> following.. does
Rod,
You might need something like this:
browseable = Yes
guest account = nobody
map to guest = Bad User
Some of these are defaults, so they may not show up in your smb.conf file.
Do a "testparm | less" command to see what the current values are.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Rod
so then why am i running my linux on a z/series and not x/series??
z series and VM is what IBM was selling to so that is what we bought
not trying to be rude... just commenting
Ralph
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Elliott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 1:56 PM
On Gwe, 2003-04-04 at 20:55, Jim Elliott wrote:
> A z800-0A1 is equivalent (in pure compute power) to a 280MHz Intel
> system. Don't forget, this is the second smallest system IBM sells
> today in the zSeries family.
280Mhz which x86 CPU out of curiosity ?
Mark,
I am using SWAT to configure SABMA.
I found browsable = Yes and guest account = yes on the share, but map to guest is not
listed.
Is there another name for this in SWAT?
THanks,
Rod
>Rod,
>
>You might need something like this:
>browseable = Yes
>guest account = nobody
>map to guest = Bad
where is the nmbd logs??
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Jarboe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 11:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: samba
>
>
> > i can't get zvmlinx1 to show up in my network places
> >
> > what am i doing wrong
> >
> > i can get
Rod,
Under Global Variables
Security Options
map to guest
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Rod Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 3:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba Problem
Mark,
I am using SWAT to configure SABMA.
I found browsable =
We've been over this several times in this list.
The beauty of Linux on z/VM is not how much computing power the mainframe has.
actually, mainframes don't have a lot of computing power. However, if you run an
application that does a LOT of I/O, say a webserver that serves out a LOT of files o
I would add to this: very fast context switching between tasks.
As Barton Robinson has said a number of times:
z/VM is very good at managing large numbers of small things.
This implies a lot of context switching, which the mainframe design handles
quite well.
Mark Post
-Original Message---
Ralph never said if he was running LINUX on an IFL, if not he needs to be.
Loren Charnley, Jr.
Tech Support Administrator
Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
Phone: (704) 847-6961 Ext. 2000
> -Original Message-
> From: Post, Mark K [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 3:33 PM
>
Mark,
I made the change, and recycled the 2 smb tasks, but the windows client is still
giving me an error message:
\\Ss390 is not accessable. The network path was not found.
Rod
>Rod,
>
>Under Global Variables
> Security Options
>map to guest
>
>
>Mark Post
>
>-Original Message-
>
Jim, what are you smoking?
Saying goes: Great minds think alike - I say: Great minds think for
themselves!
Carlos A. Ordonez
IBM Corporation
Server Consolidation
|-+>
| | Alan Cox |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|
Roy,
I suspect that the 2.2.16 version of SuSE was using NFS V2, and the newer
ones are using V3. If the z/VM system is expecting version 2, and getting
version 3 protocol stuff, it might throw up errors similar to what you're
seeing. You might be able to turn of V3 support in the Linux/390 syst
nope.., no IFL..why would i need it??
> -Original Message-
> From: Loren Charnley, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 2:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
>
>
> Ralph never said if he was running LINUX on an IFL, if not he
> needs to be.
Daniel,
I have been looking for them. What directory are they usually in?
How do I set one up using SWAT?
Thanks,
Rod
>where is the nmbd logs??
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel Jarboe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 11:02 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> S
On a -0A1, the "general purpose" CP is "crippled" or slowed down. If you can
afford an IFL, then the IFL runs at "full speed" even on a "crippled" z/800.
Are you running a z/OS or z/OS.e workload at all? If not, then I would
suggest that you should have gotten a -0LF which is "Linux only". Of cours
Rod,
"log file = " will set the value. testparm | grep "log file" will tell you
where they're currently going.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Rod Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: samba
Daniel,
I have been
Rod,
Make sure you have security = user (or server or domain) and not share.
Make sure you have encrypted passwords turned on.
Bump your logging level up, and see what, if anything shows up in the smbd
logs, either for the smbd task, or your Windows client.
log level = 2 (or 3 or 4)
log file = /
You can't smoke ignorance.
On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 12:42, Carlos Ordonez wrote:
> Jim, what are you smoking?
>
>
> Saying goes: Great minds think alike - I say: Great minds think for
> themselves!
>
> Carlos A. Ordonez
> IBM Corporation
> Server Consolidation
>
>
>
> |-+-
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 21:42, David Boyes wrote:
> > But this does not simulate the same effect.
>
> Field testing seems to indicate that there is a noticeable benefit to
> this approach.
> Is it equivalent to PAV? Maybe not. Perhaps I don't understand PAV well
> enough.
I have done some work on th
I'm not sure who you're referring to as being ignorant or about what, but if
it's Jim Elliott and his knowledge of IBM's processor capacities, then you
are s wrong.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 4:02 PM
To: [
Mark,
Here is the log output with IP addresses altered to protect me. :-)
Thanks,
Rod
ss390:/var/log/samba# cat smb.log
[2003/04/04 16:10:17, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(81)
added interface ip=nnn.nnn.nnn.5 bcast=nnn.nnn.nnn.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
[2003/04/04 16:10:17, 3] smbd/server.c:m
That is the best environment for LINUX on zSERIES. I have a z800-0A1 with a
80 MIP standard engine and 1 192 MIP IFL engine. I am in the process of
installing zVM 4.3 on the IFL engine. The next part of the project is to
install SLES 8 under zVM and moving a couple of LINUX instances to it.
Afte
- Original Message -
From: "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 2:57 PM
> On a -0A1, the "general purpose" CP is "crippled" or slowed down. If you
can
> afford an IFL, then the IFL runs at "full speed" even on a "crippled"
z/800.
> Are yo
It seems that your migrating or testing WEB releated from INTEL to
ZVM.
Is you problem only in this LINUX instances, how is VSE running?
Look at Your IP connection from INTEL(server) to "PC" -vs- ZVM
how many router(hops) ???
Are you running APACHE on the INTEL and the
Rod,
I can't say that tells me much. Were there any entries in the samba log for
your specific Windows system?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Rod Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 4:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba Problem
Mark,
Here is
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Lucius, Leland wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I did something similar. Except I took C source, compiled it under Linux,
> used TAS to assemble it, and linked it up on OS/390 to produce non-LE based
> zlib and bzip2 libraries. You can find the libraries in the assembler
> section over
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, David Boyes wrote:
> > I got curious and went googling. I turned up this snippet at
> > http://ftp.nl.linux.org/linux/bk2patch/linux-2.4/SCCS/s.MAINTAINERS:
> > SNA NETWORK LAYER
> > P: Jay Schulist
> > M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > W: ht
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Phil Payne wrote:
> http://www.sueddeutsche.de/aktuell/sz/getArticleSZ.php?artikel=artikel104.php
>
> I apologize for yet another German link, but I've just not seen this story anywhere
> in
> English.
>
> Basically Steve Ballmer was on a skiing holiday in Switzerland and inte
> > For instance, calling BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress() would
> require you
> > to reserve the standard 96 bytes, plus 8 more since it has 7
> > parameters. So:
> >
> > LR15,Stkptr Get address of stack
> > AL R15,=F'4096' Point to end of
Hey Jim - is a 0A1 the crippled processor able to run z/OS?
Basically, while I am not disputing your expertise, I sure don't
follow your logic.
I *know* that a 2.8mhz PC system running Linux will bog down,
even when connected to an EMC storage unit for DASD, a whole
lot faster than a z800 will. :)
68 matches
Mail list logo
