echo $USER
echo $HOME
echo $SHELL
As far as I know these are the same on every version of Linux and Unix (but I
could be wrong).
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
CWells Jackson
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 3:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
What CSH shell script command can I use Under Linux
7.0
to display the environment varibles showing the
current user, home directory and default shellcliffj
=
This is a new Website for over the counter drugs (OTC), please visit at
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Rea
John McKown wrote:
>But, are there any z990 enhancements in the gcc compiler? If not, then
>recompiling will do not good.
Recent GCC versions support the -mtune and -march options to select
which machine to generate code for. See the GCC info page for full
documentation; the most important varia
Brad Johnson wrote:
Depending on the file system, EXT2, EXT3, etc, there are defaults that are
assumed when you create the file system. I myself do not know how to change
that value, but the value gets set, and when the number of times the file
system gets mounted meets this value a file system che
>What emulator are you using? That sounds more like an emulator
problem,
>if
>CP FORCE helped -- if you were hung in CP, that wouldn't do much.
Extra
>is
>particularly bad for hangs in my experience (and the current version
>doesn't
>hang, it GPFs if I type too fast...amazing).
>We use Reflection
On Nov 29, 2004, at 12:33 PM, Brad Johnson wrote:
The problem is that we shutdown these linux images every night and
flash
copy to a IBM Shark
tune2fs lets you vary the number of reboots between fscks.
Adam
--
For LINUX-390 subscr
Depending on the size and number of your filesystems, I think your point
about inconvenient is the key here.
While a home user on a PC may find this inconvenient, a production system
that was expected back up in a couple on minutes may actually qualify for a
small-medium outage ;-)
One problem is
If you're using a journaling file system, it's not unreasonable to turn this
off completely. "tune2fs -c 0 filesystem" will do that, although the man
page does make a case for not doing it, due to "bad disk drives, cables,
memory, and kernel bugs."
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Lin
Perhaps, but I took the question to mean how the OP could find out how much
more space on the volume could be allocated, not how much of the allocated
space was being used on a particular volume.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
thanks
Mark Perry
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To
Sent by: Linux on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
390 Port cc
<[EMAIL PROTE
The problem is that we shutdown these linux images every night and flash
copy to a IBM Shark
James Melin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nepin.mn.us> To
Sent by: Linux on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3
On Monday, 11/29/2004 at 12:16 CST, "McKown, John"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, are there any z990 enhancements in the gcc compiler? If not, then
> recompiling will do not good.
Yes. There is support for the way the z990 schedules instructions. There
may be others; Uli Weigand has the best
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Carsten Otte wrote:
> Yea, I can take you one. A little hard to ship via email (size),
...
Yes, too large to send thru e-mail.
(And not something one would want to post to the list!)
I *thought* there was a sample on the FTP server,
but it appears that there is not. I wil
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Carsten Otte
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 12:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Big Iron change
>
>
> Alan Altmark wrote:
> >To take advantage of z990-specific features, you would
> ac
Depending on the file system, EXT2, EXT3, etc, there are defaults that are
assumed when you create the file system. I myself do not know how to change
that value, but the value gets set, and when the number of times the file
system gets mounted meets this value a file system check is forced.
While
See tune2fs
-Original Message-
From: Brad Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2004 18:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I have noticed that when the Linux Image loads it says that the dasd volume
hasn't been checked with fsck in 20 times. Does anyone know where this is
t
I have noticed that when the Linux Image loads it says that the dasd volume
hasn't been checked with fsck in 20 times. Does anyone know where this is
triggered and why? It appears to be doing a fsck on volumes based on the
time of being mounted.
Thanks
--
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Where is that package from? Might be worth to massage into a proper 2.6
> filesystem driver. Anybody's got some test fs images?
Yea, I can take you one. A little hard to ship via email (size), just let
me know
how I can get it to you. Should work fi
Alan Altmark wrote:
>To take advantage of z990-specific features, you would actually have to
>recompile the kernel with the right options.
Yea, I agree. But since the kernel only computes a small fragment of PU
time usually, it may be worth more
to recompile computing intensive applications for the
>a little question: if I have some "Penguins" installed on z900 (z/VM 4.4)
and
>I change the Big Iron with a z990, did I have any improvement if I
reinstall
>the linux machines?
No, the code shipped by the distribution partners and all middleware I
know of is optimized for the 800/900 series.
No ne
>You can do a "pvdisplay /dev/dasd?#" command for each volume that makes
up
>the logical volume. Or, you can do "cat /proc/lvm/global" and look at
all
>of them at once.
True, but this does not indicate how much user data resides there. The
output indicates how much space
of the physical volume
> /dev/grpnotes/volnotes
> 48G 3.2G 42G 7% /local
>
>but volnotes have 8 volumes 3390 model 9.
>My question: is there any way to know the real usage of each volume?
The basic idea when using logical volumes instead of phyical ones it that
you can create volumes based
on
__
Ranga Nathan / CSG
Systems Programmer - Specialist; Technical Services;
BAX Global Inc. Irvine-California
Tel: 714-442-7591 Fax: 714-442-2840
Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11/26/2004 08:09 AM
Pl
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
> cmsfssed.sh: this release of Linux is not supported!
Like Karsten said, it's just a quick config hack
to get the utility to build on a 2.6 based system.
(The util runs on a ww-ii-dd-ee range of systems, including OpenVM.)
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, C
__
Ranga Nathan / CSG
Systems Programmer - Specialist; Technical Services;
BAX Global Inc. Irvine-California
Tel: 714-442-7591 Fax: 714-442-2840
Phil Smith III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11/26/2004 02:05 PM
Plea
> Gotta disagree -- "it depends" (as I've heard it said many
> times). I have
> one machine under _very_ heavy interactive load. Going from
> z/900 to z/990
> made all the difference in the world to it, in terms of performance as
> well as stability (the z/VM Q3 issue I'd been experiencing
> disapp
On Monday, 11/29/2004 at 08:50 EST, James Tison/Poughkeepsie/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Gotta disagree -- "it depends" (as I've heard it said many times). I
have
> one machine under _very_ heavy interactive load. Going from z/900 to
z/990
> made all the difference in the world to it, in terms of pe
> Ah, but the question was, does he have to reinstall his penguins. And
> the answer is "probably not". They will get faster because the
> hardware is faster, but reinstalling the Linux image itself probably
> won't help. At least not if you install it with all the same
> parameters.
And you ca
Aha. I read it as a question of value. Sorry about that.
We didn't have to reinstall a single thing. It all just worked (SLES 8).
--Jim--
James S. Tison
Senior Software Engineer
TPF Laboratory / Architecture
IBM Corporation
Meum cerebrum nocet
Adam Thornton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux o
On Nov 29, 2004, at 7:50 AM, James Tison wrote:
Gotta disagree -- "it depends" (as I've heard it said many times). I
have
one machine under _very_ heavy interactive load. Going from z/900 to
z/990
made all the difference in the world to it, in terms of performance as
well as stability (the z/VM Q3
You shouldn't really have to do anything special if you use the built-in
install scripts and yast.
The default install process seems to set nearly everything up properly. One
thing it could do better is tell you when you need to reboot. Once, I thought
yast had just died, but it ended pending
Gotta disagree -- "it depends" (as I've heard it said many times). I have
one machine under _very_ heavy interactive load. Going from z/900 to z/990
made all the difference in the world to it, in terms of performance as
well as stability (the z/VM Q3 issue I'd been experiencing disappeared).
Your m
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 10:14:26AM +0100, Gianfranco Ciotti wrote:
> a little question: if I have some "Penguins" installed on z900 (z/VM 4.4) and
> I change the Big Iron with a z990, did I have any improvement if I reinstall
> the linux machines?
If you use the same Linux distribution software,
Hi list,
a little question: if I have some "Penguins" installed on z900 (z/VM 4.4) and
I change the Big Iron with a z990, did I have any improvement if I reinstall
the linux machines?
thanks,
--
Gian
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe
Hi Peter. To update the VM directory without dirmaint you can use
DIRECTXA <-- being the name of your file with
filetype DIRECT.
On the other hand try the following:
- ipl cms parm instseg no
- It will get into VM READ state. Press ENTER.
- Then Q DISK
- Then access 591 z
- The Query com
35 matches
Mail list logo
