Read me now Mr Mark.
Once we had the maintnance contract with suse but expired last month. But
the thing down here in South America, to renew the contract is slow i can
maintain contact with suse distribuitor. this is the point, im not ask you
any favor?
Regards
- Original Message -
Hi Folks
We have a small SuSE Lpar that is about to go live and I need to complete a
DRP setup, we have a GDPS/XRC solution already in place and I was thinking
to do a Sync and Drop process on the Linux volumes , the LPAR would remain
up during this process. Has anyone else already looked at this
Tom,
... must be added to Linux as a Linux user, Samba share and in the
SMBPASSWD file (using smbpasswd as the backend, no LDAP etc, yet).
I will agree with the Linux user and smbpasswd, but not the Samba share.
The special [homes] section exists to avoid having to create separate
shares in
My experience with Novell and SUSE has been that if they know paperwork
is on the way, they'll give you temporary access to the maintenance
portal. Then once the paperwork has been completed and payment made,
you'll get your activation code. So, there should be no need to ask
others to provide
I
was thinking
to do a Sync and Drop process on the Linux volumes , the
LPAR would remain
up during this process. Has anyone else already looked at
this ?
You will not get a usable backup. This process does not take into
account the data cached in memory.
Any ideas what the
change would
Thank you for your reply... Could I maybe get that initrd2 file that you
mentioned? I tried both rc2 and rc3 but neither liked my 9336 devices. I
installed Debian before but I CTC connected it and then converted it to
QDIO. It just seemed like this should be easy enough to start with QDIO
David have you (or anyone else for that matter) gotten Bacula to work
in a Linux on z environment?
David Boyes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e.net To
Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
On May 4, 2005, at 10:11 AM, James Melin wrote:
David have you (or anyone else for that matter) gotten Bacula
to work
in a Linux on z environment?
Yes. What problems are you experiencing?
Adam
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe /
I understand your frustration. This situation happens here in the USA also.
Here at the State of California we had a major budget crisis last year and had
to let some of our service contracts expire.
The thing is that here in the USA (and many other countries) the agreements
between vendors
Not that I've completely read the following manuals yet, but based on
the table of contents, there isn't a section for what I'm interested
in.
Samba-3 by Example
The Official Samba-3 HOWTO and Reference Guide
What I'm interested in is being able to diag a problem based on error
messages.
So,
David have you (or anyone else for that matter) gotten
Bacula to work
in a Linux on z environment?
Yes. It works fine, including autochanger support if you are running
under VM and native tape support if you're not. I've posted the tape
mount component, and if you use 1.37 (the current
Funny you should mention that presentation.
When I find presentations of interest, I print them out and file them
in 3 ring binders. With all the different sites, sometimes I remember a
presentation is available but can't for the life of me locate who is
hosting it or the name it is under.
David,
I guess I disagree. While you are certainly right that there is
data cached in memory we ought to look at the scenario that could
take place.
If there is transactional data the transaction monitor and/or the
database would typically worry about data being written to persistent
data store
What I'm interested in is being able to diag a problem based on error
messages.
Open source applications rarely do error message manuals (in fact, CUPS
is the only one I know of). You should assume that the source is the
only way you'll find this information.
May 4 10:29:45 linux26
ACtual problems are still well into the future here - I'm still
theoretical.
I have a pair of 3490 tape drives that I could have in my configuration
I would love to do more granular backups than DFDSS can provide I like
the idea of backing up linux to datasets that are 'active0' meaning
If there is transactional data the transaction monitor and/or the
database would typically worry about data being written to persistent
data store so that in case of an outage you have roll-back or
roll-forward capabilities.
I think we're starting from different assumptions. I start from the
I have a pair of 3490 tape drives that I could have in my
configuration
That will work.
I would love to do more granular backups than DFDSS can
provide
Bacula can do that.
I like
the idea of backing up linux to datasets that are 'active0'
meaning migrate
immediately via NFS.
And remember, for some reason unfathomable to me, the USA has three times as
many lawyers as the rest of the world combined. And they like to keep busy.
A statesman is a dead politician. Lord knows we need more statesmen!
--Berkeley Breathed
Gordon Wolfe, Ph.D. Boeing Shared Services Group
Don't get me started on lawyers. The reason that there are so many is easy to
understand: They make lots of money.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Wolfe, Gordon W
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 10:00 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:
And a lot of our Congressmen are lawyers. That's a funny coincidence.
Jon
snip
Don't get me started on lawyers. The reason that there are so many is easy to
understand: They make lots of money.
/snip
--
For LINUX-390
That was a good explaination. Basically what I thought was happening,
but it doesn't help in this case.
This isn't OSA (yet), it's a 3172 via escon to VM's TCPIP (z/VM 4.2).
There was a problem with Samba and broadcast on this setup, but not
anymore.
But I don't think it would make any
On May 4, 2005, at 11:27 AM, James Melin wrote:
ACtual problems are still well into the future here - I'm still
theoretical.
I have a pair of 3490 tape drives that I could have in my
configuration
I would love to do more granular backups than DFDSS can provide
I like
the idea of backing up
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 05/04/2005 12:22:47
PM:
On May 4, 2005, at 11:27 AM, James Melin wrote:
ACtual problems are still well into the future here - I'm still
theoretical.
I have a pair of 3490 tape drives that I could have in my
configuration
I would
On May 4, 2005, at 12:43 PM, James Melin wrote:
Ultimately I am thinking weekly full volume backups via CDL (so I
get such
things as the cyl-0, the IPL records, etc) and daily incrementals via
either bacula or the NFS option. What is the best way to copy only
changed
files?
Set up your backup
Mark:
I added the following to CHANDEV.CONF (which didn't exist) and now it only
looks for the three addresses defined and all appears ok:
noauto
qeth0,0x8804,0x8805,0x8806
add_parms,0x10,0x8804,0x8806,portname:LIN01
Should SETUP create this file (from PARMFILE) when installing the system?
Maybe I don't have them because downloaded the media rather than getting the
actual CD's, but is there Regina and THE packages for sles9 somewhere? I
got them off the supplemental CD for sles 8.
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not
This isn't OSA (yet), it's a 3172 via escon to VM's TCPIP (z/VM 4.2).
There was a problem with Samba and broadcast on this setup, but not
anymore.
Hmm. The topology is:
3172 - VM TCPIP - Linux (guest LAN/IUCV/CTC)?
or is it
3172 - VM TCPIP (direct LCS attach)
3172 - Linux 1 (direct LCS
Ultimately I am thinking weekly full volume backups via CDL
(so I get such
things as the cyl-0, the IPL records, etc) and daily incrementals via
either bacula or the NFS option. What is the best way to copy
only changed
files?
Use the Bacula client inside the Linux guests.
Right now I
Nope. Not there...anymore.
I was looking for Regina and Kate.
How well was taking Regina from Sles8 work for you? I went to the
Regina Website and got the source, but haven't had a chance to do
anything with it yet.
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
A platform without Rexx, isn't one I bother
By sure frustration, I'm starting to get somewhere..
I took Linux26 and put it in its own workgroup (workgroup=LinuxSamba).
It immediately came up in the Windows brower list.
So I took Linux23 and put it in the same workgroup. Nope. Not there.
Which means that my configuation files, have
Hello from Gregg C Levine
You mean its forming a pattern? Coincidences often form patterns.
Before we get involved in one of the national debates regarding that
life form, I suggest we return to our usual discussion.
---
Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This isn't OSA (yet), it's a 3172 via escon to VM's TCPIP
(z/VM 4.2).
There was a problem with Samba and broadcast on this setup, but not
anymore.
Hmm. The topology is:
3172 - VM TCPIP - Linux (guest LAN/IUCV/CTC)?
or is it
3172 - VM TCPIP (direct LCS attach)
3172 - Linux 1
On May 4, 2005, at 2:04 PM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
By sure frustration, I'm starting to get somewhere..
I took Linux26 and put it in its own workgroup (workgroup=LinuxSamba).
It immediately came up in the Windows brower list.
So I took Linux23 and put it in the same workgroup. Nope. Not there.
Chuck,
Yes, it should. That's partly why Slack/390 10.1 isn't out yet. The
packages have all been built, but there are a number of things in the
installer that need to be implemented or improved somewhat. Adding
support for network interfaces that don't follow the ethx name, for
example. I
David,
I think we're starting from different assumptions.
You may be right. I understand your rationale, let me elaborate on
mine once more :-)
I don't expect that any of the filesystems would or should change their
behavior, or Linux changing its caching policies. My point was that if
you
Yep, the former (3172 - VM TCPIP - IUCV - Linux.
There use to be a problem with Samba and broadcasting on a point to
point connection, but that has been resolved.
I moved all Samba images to a workgroup called LinuxSamba, and that
workgroup started poping up on many PCs. But not on all of them.
I don't expect that any of the filesystems would or should
change their
behavior, or Linux changing its caching policies. My point was that if
you can't afford loosing the data you better assure to write the data
synchronously or programmatically flush the buffers from time to time
assuring
Well, this is just slightly OT, since it isn't 390 but is Windows Samba.
I guess two out of three ain't bad.
Anyway, at home I have two desktops on CAT5 ethernet, and two notebooks
on 802.11g all running WIN2K and one wired linux machine running debian.
The workgroup machines showing up seem to
Here's the background before the question.
We are attempting to clone a RHEL4 system (LPAR / NOT VM!)
using DFDSS backup/restore.
So (after the backup/restore) we need to change the DASD= device numbers
in the newly restored
system by mounting the new dasd to the source system (as /dev/dasdc1
39 matches
Mail list logo
