Hamish Moffatt wrote:
radio.linux.org.au seems to have disappeared from the DNS!
Does anyone know where it's gone? I can't remember TerryD's email address.
Sorry. Yes we're experiencing DNS problems. It's a bit of a cock-up
frankly, our primary failed and that wasn't a good time to discover
Hello all,
A group of us have registered the #hamradio IRC channel on the
OpenProjects IRC network to discuss amateur radio and opensource
software, and generally congregate.
All are welcome to come along.
The list of servers is available at:
http://www.openprojects.nu/ -
Ismael Pellejero Ibáñez wrote:
I want to know how much HD space may use a minimum
Linux installation with AX.25+TCP/IP support, and wich packages
should I install. We have several PCs with small HDs and want to
use AX.25+TCP/IP possibilities if possible :-)
You can do a 'node'
Dirk Koopman wrote:
Is that actually true? I know that it is generally received wisdom, but if
the device drivers handled the level 1 issues (including txd, txtail etc) and
stopped there, would it _actually_ be necessary to have the rest in the
kernel.
I was using "belongs" in the sense of
ron jochems wrote:
Is it true ax25 is only written for linux, or can these utils be easely be
adapted in other unix's .?.
The short answer is "yes, it is true".
Much of the Linux AX.25/NetRom/Rose functionality belongs in the kernel
at the heart of the operating system. Until the *BSD's get
Chris Smith wrote:
I run kissnetd /dev/ptyzf /dev/ptyze
Then kissattach /dev/ptyzf port ipaddr
and get : kissattach: open: Input/output error
kissnetd should be opening the slave end of the pty, and kissattach
should be opening the master end.
You've got them both opening the same end.
Hans-Peter Zorn wrote:
If monitored _this_ list, you wouldn't have missed Jens' announcement
that he does currently work on Matthias' stack as long as Matthias
is busy with other things. Diskussions of the new implementation
have been _here_ on linux-hams, and I really hope this will not
Michele A Debandi wrote:
In fact, the correct behaviour is to send an ICMP redirect, and resend
the packet anyway. But I'm not sure if the ICMP redirect is made if
the packet has a route to another gateway os is sent ever if the station
is directly reachable. I have to find my CD with all
John Ackermann wrote:
The Linux setup is kernel 2.0.34 with ax25-module-14 and utils 2.1.42a.
For the 19.2 link, we're running a T1 timer of 2.5 seconds, and T2
timer of 200ms.
[Fri Feb 4 20:40:00 2000]
Port pi0a: AX25: N8BJQ-W8APR-3 RR C P R0
[Fri Feb 4 20:40:00 2000]
Port pi0a:
Gerd wrote:
As the maintainer of the german version of the AX.25-HOWTO (and, if nobody
has something against that) the english retranslation of that document, I am
herewith offering support in sorting that information and melting it together
into a, let's say, AX.25 programming HOWTO.
On
"James S. Kaplan KG7FU" wrote:
This message only turned up here today, no idea where it has been for
two weeks.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't address groups such as 192.168 and 44.0
considered "private" nets and technically aren't supposed to be routed via
internet? Even if they were,
Robin Gilks wrote:
Is there another parameter or does Linux strictly not allow routing back out
the same port. If this is the case I've got some serious rethinking to do :-((
Robin,
I'm suffering precisely the same problem and have been for some time.
I'm completely baffled by it myself.
Jens David wrote:
And the number of daemons the user has to run high.
Didn´t you just say that a linux packet-radio setup needs to be easy
to administrate by the end user? ;)
"Number of daemons required" is not a measure of "ease of
administration".
Frankly when it comes to architecture in
Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote:
I would guess, that exactly these people don't install stuff themselves but
rather eventually do an update with a new RedHat/Suse/Debian/whatever
distribution. They will get a new Kernel _along_ with matching application
software.
I think you'll find they're
Jan Wasserbauer wrote:
I think it would be very nice to have also unified API for drivers. Now
many drivers have own configuration utilities which is not wery good.
Most of drivers just need irq/io/dma/number of channels (which in some
cases could be replaced by just com/lpt number).
Plus
Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote:
We should be looking toward being as consistent with the rest of the
Linux networking standards as possible.
Absolutely. What I personally wish is that the ax25-Interfaces are referenced
with their kernel-net-device-name (e.g. bcsf0, ax1 ...) instead by means
Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote:
I think one can assume nobody installs an older kernel than the distro-
supplied one. The original question was whether new _userspace_ tools/apps
should support _older_ kernel API. Or did I get that wrong :-) ?
The question isn't really that simple.
If it's a
Robert A Jenkins wrote:
(If anyone knows of any other bugs, please let me know I'll have a go at
fixing them.)
I'll call this a bug if the answer to either of the following questions
is no :)
Has the convers server-server protocol been documented anywhere?
Has the convers user command
Gerd wrote:
Yes, but there's one thing you should be aware of (I have seen it on Debian
2.0 the last time).
make-kpkg relies on "make config". One has to answer all the questions one by
one there. For people that prefer "make menuconfig" or "make xconfig" the
make-kpkg tool seems to be not
Erik Jakobsen wrote:
Does anybody know where to get the KCT linuxpackage ??. I have the KCT
board here with the software in dos that followed the card, but not much
fun if running linux and having just dos software :-)
http://radio.linux.org.au/pkgdetail.phtml?pkgid=76
regards
Terry
Erik Jakobsen wrote:
I have seen that F6FBB has released som patches, but I need the complete
package to could start.
Do I not ??.
The patches are against a 2.2.13 kernel and add support for the KCT to
the kernel. Applications with appropriate support can then make use of
it. A patch file is
"Ing. Jose A. Amador" wrote:
This seems a newbie question to me, but I also need to clarify this:
How can I use either libc5 or glibc under demand or at will ? What / where
should I read ?
Application programs will use whichever libraries they were linked
against at compile time.
use the
Hans-Peter Zorn wrote:
# /usr/sbin/nrattach netrom
# ifconfig nr0 44.136.8.5 netmask 255.255.255.0 hw netrom
# VK2KTJ-9
# route add 44.136.8.5 nr0
--- snip --
Why do I need a route to the interface ip address? Shouldn't that be
a network route (which is set up
Hans-Peter Zorn wrote:
(I think it would be rather annoying if 20+ stations at a user qrg
would broadcast every 5 minutes?)
Most networks I know use 30 minutes, not 5 minutes.
Terry
Gerd wrote:
I'm a Debian developer, I'm not running slink.
So there are plans to use 2.2.x kernels on Debian, too?
Of course.
Terry
Richard Adams wrote:
define(`confBIND_OPTS',`-DNSRCH -DEFNAMES')dnl
And where is one supposed to find that define ??
Richard,
It goes in your sendmail M4 configuration file. In Debian it is called
/etc/mail/sendmail.mc.
Terry
dpfister wrote:
Has anyone compiled or found a kernel for a very small SBC?
Mine has a 386 at 25 or 40 MHz I don't remember with only 2
MB of ram and a 8 MB Disk on a Chip sort of HD.
2Mb is probably asking for a lot.
I need very little for this kernel, no terminal will be
connected but
Richard Ferryman wrote:
I have managed to get netscape to read mail from the jnos spool/mail
directory but how can I
get it to put replies or new mail to the spool/mqueue queue? At present it
seems to go to a black hole..
Supply communicator with the IP address of your JNOS to use as the
On 21 Jan, Gerd wrote:
And that is the main question: Is there still an effect, a benefit from all
these improvements even if the newest kernel is run on the 386 DX 40
mentioned above? Or, in other words, can it be recommended to upgrade even
such old machines to the current kernel?
On 20 Jan, Dirk Koopman wrote:
It appears to transmit, but does not receive. Running listen -a on other
(non SMP) boxes shows both the out going TX and the reply packets, but on the
SMP box only outgoing packets are visible.
My SMP machine (BP6) does not experience the problem you describe.
On 20 Jan, Gerd wrote:
But in a lot of publications and also in a lot of user statements in the
Usenet, repeatedly, such requirements were announced.
You're not cynical enough about mainstream press.
Those sorts of configurations might be recommended by distributions for
"typical" user
On 19 Jan, Gerd wrote:
Pentium class computer, preferrably 300 MHz and above
64 MB RAM or more (the more, the better)
These are wildly exaggerated requirements for Linux.
So, I even was a little bit afraid if Slackware 7, which comes with 2.2.13,
would run on my K6-2/400 with 64 MB RAM -
On 18 Jan, Bob Nielsen wrote:
Has anyone come up with a method to convert the ampr.org listings from
ftp.ucsd.edu to a proper format to use with bind (which appears to me
to be more difficult to set up than sendmail?) I'm looking for a
solution which could be used on a system not connected
On 18 Jan, James S. Kaplan wrote:
1) sendmail is tough to configure!! I need in/out tcp mail to the
net/lan AND very much desire
ampr.org and pbbs smtp mail in and out. I've looked and zmail (I
think!) and mailgw and am not impressed
with the documentation. In other words, it seems like the
On 6 Jan, Bob Nielsen wrote:
http://radio.linux.org.au has it all (or at least most).
Bob,
What is missing you should contribute. There is a form there for the
purpose.
regards
Terry
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9 Jan, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Terry,
Here's what I use:
http://www.lantz.com
I'm confused, what am I supposed to do with this?
Terry
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6 Jan, Bob Snyder wrote:
I just signed up to this list. I'm interested in getting some Linux based
radio software. Is there a good place for some links/downloads? Right now
my main concerns are logging and digital modes.
Bob,
Surely:
http://radio.linux.org.au/
Terry
--
[EMAIL
On 4 Jan, Craig Small wrote:
Do you want me to split-out the ax25ipd stuff out of ax25-tools?
Craig,
I think it's a good idea to split it out. It's something that is
required by a comparatively small group of users and has no dependence
on libax25 at all, ie it's completely standalone.
On 21 Dec, Normando Marcolongo (account per amministrazione lug) wrote:
Is it possible that there isn't an ENGLISH document about new
libs/utils/kernel? Will AX25-HOWTO be updated?
Please, anyone can supply me addresses of new documents about that?
The english one hasn't been updated in
On 11 Dec, Gareth Rowlands wrote:
Can any kind reader tell me if the little goldmine that is the
radio.linux.org.au box also has an ampr.org 44 network address,
and if so, is it accessible via the encap wormholes ?
It doesn't yet, but I'm seriously considering it, especially if there
is
On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 05:58:53PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided after getting burned out on all this Y2K update stuff, to
grab a copy of the AX25-HOWTO and start updating it! After creating a
simple index of all the topics, I've come to the quick conclusion that I
think
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 10:56:43AM +, Gerd wrote:
2. AX.25-Software-HOWTO
-contains the basic application setup
-contains hints on available Packet Radio Software for Linux
(Terminal programs, BBSs etc.) - the HAM HOWTO could be
disburdened a little bit
The HAM-HOWTO will cease to
I've lost the name/email/callsign of the person who took over the
AX25-HOWTO.
If you're out there, could you get back to me please?
regards
Terry
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 10:22:11AM +0300, Tomi Manninen OH2BNS wrote:
Quoting Hessu's original announcement of the dev-hams list:
Following recent discussion it was decided to publish the existence of
the list, and make the mailing list archive available for anyone to
read.
snip
On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 08:24:33AM -0700, Bob Meyer wrote:
Did I screw something up? It's perl script... that is the source code. It compiles
at run time.
No, I did :) I didn't realise it was perl.
We'd better get it listed in the radio software data base ...
Ya know, I'm just a dumb
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 08:22:35PM +, Julian Munoz Dominguez wrote:
I hope the rest of the dev-hams subscribees don't mind me speaking on their
behalf, but to be on the safe side assume that the contents of this message
are my opinion only, although I'm fairly confident the others would
On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 09:45:04AM +0100, Riley Williams wrote:
One obvious reason would be to make it more attractive to people using
it, as many people give up on a site that regularly times out on them.
I've so far tried three times, and each time, you time out on me!!!
Since I don't get
On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 12:20:18PM +0200, alberto escudero wrote:
It looks like that the default php3 page queries to the mySQL engine for New
Software... (checking the date i guess!)
every time the page is asked... is that right?
yes, that is correct.
It will be a good idea to have the
On Mon, Jul 12, 1999 at 12:10:04PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow! Does this offer include updating the AX25 Howto?? :)
Absolutely, if someone wants to take over the AX25-HOWTO, they're
welcome to it.
Terry
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 11:17:17PM +0200, Jaime Robles wrote:
I think Terry, the HAM-HOWTO mantainer is in the list...
Terry, could you please mail me? I would like to talk you about the
Spanish translation of HAM-HOWTO.
You dont' need to talk to me. The document is covered by the GPL.
On Sat, Apr 24, 1999 at 02:18:04PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
1. How do I bring down the network interface? I can ifconfig ax0 down,
but how do I kissdetach? Killing kissattach leaves a stale lock file
on the serial port.
SIGTERM is the cleanest way of closing a kissattach, but
On Wed, Apr 21, 1999 at 06:30:19PM +0100, Riley Williams wrote:
Section 3: An index to software available for the ham to help
with his or her hobby, grouped by category, and an
index to the same software listed alphabetically by
name, both stating
On Wed, Apr 21, 1999 at 10:08:47AM -0400, Bloom, Jon, KE3Z wrote:
The next step, it seems to me, is to put together an outline of the book.
Trying to determine a page count is pointless until you know what material
you're going to cover.
Jon,
Let's see what the outline of the HOWTO that
On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 02:56:00PM -, Mike Bilow wrote:
Jameson Burt wrote in a message to Mike Bilow:
JB Because the HAM-HOWTO has not been updated in 2 years, someone
JB new should take over its maintenance. I can think of a couple
JB extra class HAMs who spend much time writing
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 08:40:00PM -, Mike Bilow wrote:
The LDP is unlikely to revoke HOWTO status for something that has been in as
long as the HAM HOWTO, as long as it has a maintainer. They might be more
selective about new additions, but we get a lot of benefit from inertia.
You
On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 03:50:30PM +0100, Dirk Koopman wrote:
Maybe a way forward is to look at 'DocBook' format, which is used by the
gnome people (amongst others). This seems to be a pretty useful sgml DTD
which has tools to convert it to every format you are likely to want already
written.
On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 12:48:11PM -0400, Bloom, Jon, KE3Z wrote:
It would be nice to continue to have a ham radio presence within the LDP
(other than the AX25-HOWTO). Terry, can you briefly synopsize the
requirements that a HOWTO must conform to? Is the problem with the current
HAM-HOWTO
On Tue, Apr 13, 1999 at 09:46:07AM -0400, Al Woodhull wrote:
Maybe I missed something along the way, could you provide information or a
pointer to information about the proposed redefinition of the HOWTO
format? Perhaps someone else will be willing to take up the conversion or
re-creation of
58 matches
Mail list logo
